Slashdot Mirror


China Launches Second Space Lab (space.com)

Reader hackingbear writes: China's next space laboratory, Tiangong-2 launched from the country's Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center today at 10:04 a.m. EDT (1404 GMT) on a Long March 2F carrier rocket. Like its predecessor Tiangong-1, Tiangong-2 is an orbiting space lab -- but this latest model has made several improvements in the series. Among the advances: astronauts can remain on the station up to 30 days; New systems allow in orbit refueling of propellant; and 14 new experiments in a wide range of sciences including composite material fabrication, advanced-plant cultivation, gamma ray burst polarization, fluid physics, space-to-earth quantum communications. The space lab is also equipped with a cold atom space clock, that has an estimated precision of 10 to the power of minus 16 seconds, or a one-second error every 30 million years, enhancing accuracy of time-keeping in space by one to two orders of magnitudes. This exactitude will help measure previously undetectable fluctuations for experiments conducted in zero-gravity.The Tiangong 2, while is an experimental space station, is still operational. The astronauts that would come on board next month are to spend a full month up there -- a longer period of time than possible on Tiangong 1.

88 comments

  1. piracy? by networkBoy · · Score: 2

    I've often wondered what prevents (aside from stupendous cost) someone from launching up to one of these and taking it over while it's not occupied?

    At what point will this actually become an issue?
    -nb

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    1. Re:piracy? by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 3, Funny

      It would probably be considered an act of piracy in international legal terms.

      Of course, it might just be worth it for that alone, to go down in history as the first Space Pirate. :)

    2. Re:piracy? by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 2

      I want to see this in a move.

      --
      That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
    3. Re:piracy? by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      I've often wondered what prevents (aside from stupendous cost) someone from launching up to one of these and taking it over while it's not occupied?

      It will have to be Russia or India. The US doesn't have its own ride.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    4. Re:piracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...because there's absolutely nothing up there worth the cost? Like with most space-based propositions, if you *had* the money to do it, you wouldn't need to!

      "WE ARE TAKING OVER, HAND OVER THE TANG AND FREEZE-DRIED ICE CREAM!"

    5. Re:piracy? by tomhath · · Score: 1

      What are they going to do, kick the door in? Break a window? It's not like stealing a 1963 Volkswagen. Unless you've already taken control of it from the ground I doubt there would be any way for a person to get inside and do anything.

    6. Re:piracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But why would they put locks on the outside?

    7. Re:piracy? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, India has not yet put any people into space. They are at the same level as SpaceX and Boeing. They have launched unmaned vehicles.

      My guess is SpaceX will put a human into space long before India does.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    8. Re:piracy? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      If you could put a person into space, you could just as easily put your own station into space.

      I think you are entirely unaware of how few manned space programs there are right now.

      Heck, it took a ton of effort just to get spacecraft from different countries to be able to dock with each other during Soyuz-Apollo and Space Shuttle-Mir missions. Nobody in Russia, US, or India would even have the equipment to link up to a Chinese station.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    9. Re:piracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "would even have the equipment to link up to a Chinese station."

      Wrong. Computers got better and we have 3D printers now. Just design what you need and 3D print it with asteroids. Duh. Luddite.

    10. Re:piracy? by nycsubway · · Score: 1

      Sandra Bullock did this once. She didn't seem to have any problems getting into the station and launching the return module.

    11. Re:piracy? by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I'm quite aware, thank you.
      I just enjoy the thought experiment. Every time one launches, all the way back to Skylab, I've had the same thought.
      -nb

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    12. Re:piracy? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      chance are good that China has weapons on theirs and they would simply blow it up upon somebody trying to enter.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    13. Re:piracy? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      what kind of move? Bowel Move?

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    14. Re:piracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've often wondered what prevents (aside from stupendous cost) someone from launching up to one of these and taking it over while it's not occupied?

      At what point will this actually become an issue?
      -nb

      It's not just the cost. You would also piss off China.
      They might decide that they'd rather shoot it down than let someone else have it.
      Or they might just decide to send a rocket on collision course with the unwanted visitors landing path.

    15. Re:piracy? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Yes, and she did it all while winning the Miss Congeniality title.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    16. Re:piracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would probably be considered an act of piracy in international legal terms.

      If it's unused and abandoned, wouldn't it be salvage instead of piracy in international legal terms?

    17. Re:piracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But why would they put locks on the outside?

      Aliens.

    18. Re:piracy? by Etcetera · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are weapons on the ISS too, if inadvertently.

      The Soyuz capsule has a 9mm on-board for use in self defense if it lands in the middle of, say, a lake surrounded by somewhere with wild animals.

    19. Re: piracy? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Soyuz is not iss. And the shuttle, as well as Apollo, had AR7 onboard. The difference is that Chinese space station likely does not have survival weapons.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    20. Re:piracy? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      What are they going to do, kick the door in? Break a window? It's not like stealing a 1963 Volkswagen.

      A telegram from the SpaceShark (SNL reference).

    21. Re:piracy? by Boronx · · Score: 1

      And while maintaining speeds over 50. She's amazing.

    22. Re:piracy? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Can you access the docking port without assistance from the ground? Can the ground control remotely lock it or otherwise make the station uninhabitable? Might need some hacking but I bet they could sabotage it pretty well remotely.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    23. Re:piracy? by Maritz · · Score: 1

      I can't even keep aliens away from my fucking bins. It's murder.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    24. Re:piracy? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I've often wondered what prevents (aside from stupendous cost) someone from launching up to one of these and taking it over while it's not occupied?

      I'm just guessing, but what prevents someone from launching up to one of these and taking it over while it's not occupied is probably the stupendous cost.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    25. Re:piracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've often wondered what prevents (aside from stupendous cost) someone from launching up to one of these and taking it over while it's not occupied?

      I'm just guessing, but what prevents someone from launching up to one of these and taking it over while it's not occupied is probably the stupendous cost.

      BYOO - Bring Your Own Oxygen. I am waiting to see the youtube video selfie documentation on this. Darwin award material!

    26. Re:piracy? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      You have bins specifically for fucking?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    27. Re:piracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bins aren't for fucking. They are fucking. Where do you think little bins come from?

  2. I can't wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I just can't wait until we catch up with China and have the ability to launch astronauts into space!

    1. Re:I can't wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why? At this point it's just a spectacle. There's no purpose to putting people into LEO. It's been done. It achieves little to nothing.

    2. Re:I can't wait by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Yes, but currently we rely on Russia to be our Astro-Uber. It's embarrassing and gives Putin more ways to mess with us.

    3. Re:I can't wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why? You rely on China to be your Manufacturing-Uber. You aren't embarrassed by that! As long as it allows more taking and taking by the billionaire leisure class, it's OK, right?

    4. Re:I can't wait by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Where's 'this' point? At what point did it become pointless? Be specific.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  3. "exactitude" by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    Try "accuracy" next time. That's like listening to an asshat who uses "betterment" in conversation.

    1. Re:"exactitude" by kbonin · · Score: 2

      I think 'it "embiggens" their experiments' is more appropriate. And less grammer snobberastic.

    2. Re:"exactitude" by tomhath · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with the word exactitude.

      I'd use precise rather than accurate though. It can measure time intervals very precisely, but if it was set to the wrong time in the first place it isn't accurate.

    3. Re:"exactitude" by mah! · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, I wonder about the editor "manishs", and what their native language may be. Closing the story with "The Tiangong 2, while is an experimental space station, is still operational."

      "while is an experimental" and "is still operational" is supposed to mean what?

      And the sentence "The astronauts that would come on board next month are to spend a full month up there" ...

      Verb modality? Use of commas?

    4. Re:"exactitude" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Subs might be a native French speaker.

    5. Re:"exactitude" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because fuck foreigners, right?

    6. Re:"exactitude" by mah! · · Score: 1

      ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

      Whether native speakers or non-native speakers, it'd be nice if people learned some grammar of the language they're going to use, before working as authors on a site such as slashdot.

      try again

  4. Time? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    The space lab is also equipped with a cold atom space clock, that has an estimated precision of 10 to the power of minus 16 seconds, or a one-second error every 30 million years

    Einstein proved that time is relative. So accuracy is also relative.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:Time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am missing your point. Yes, time is relevant to the same reference frame only, but the precision is still important to conducting experiments aboard the station or to measure the differences in time between the station and ground based observers.

    2. Re:Time? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Clocks in satellites already need to be re-synched periodically. The velocity of a satellite orbiting the earth is enough to make clocks go noticeably out of sync with earth.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    3. Re:Time? by CaptainLard · · Score: 2

      Accuracy and precision are not the same thing...

    4. Re:Time? by iridium_ionizer · · Score: 1

      Accuracy and precision are not the same thing...

      Please give us a simple but scientific definition of each.

      I teach high school science, and I currently use the darts analogy but next year I want to find definitions that are either more accurate or more precise...

    5. Re:Time? by CaptainLard · · Score: 1

      I see what you did there!

      In case your post was a rare instance of internet sincerity, how about the old school thermometer analogy? The amount of markings on the tube represent precision (direct relationship here). The stability of the fluid (thick tube with a lot of sloshing vs thin tube with minimal sloshing) represents the accuracy. Or measuring the height of a hyper dog vs a calm dog. If you use the same tape measure you'll have the same precision but the accuracy will be very different.

      In summary accuracy: the difference between the measurement and the actual value. Precision: the available significant digits of the measuring tool.

  5. Smaller than Mir by u19925 · · Score: 1

    China plans to complete space station in 2022 and will have a mass of 64,000 kg. This is about half of the mass of Mir launched 30 years ago by USSR. Still a lot to catch up. The ISS launched in 1998 has a mass of 440,000 kg.

    1. Re:Smaller than Mir by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Slashdot, where size is the only metric that some give a shit about when it comes to a non-US space program.

      How about we stand in silent appreciation of the feat that China is accomplishing, like the geeks we should all be would do, k?

      Perhaps China doesnt need a large station to achieve its goals - the Chinese don't seem to be bothered about taking it slow and steady with regard to their program, after all.

    2. Re:Smaller than Mir by kangsterizer · · Score: 1

      What if its made of graphene? ;-)

    3. Re:Smaller than Mir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      still one more than the USA has - now we know the meaning of USA #1 !

  6. Re:After a three year break... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    China has enough of a space program to let them quickly bootstrap up to levels they feel are socially, scientifically and militarily appropriate. There is plenty of opportunity for China to go way beyond what the US / European Space Agency / Russia has done. A decade or so of 'just enough' could get them in deep space.

    Yes, they're re-purposing Russian Soyuz craft. That sounds like a really intelligent way to .... jump ahead. You just don't make some 3D computer models and run out and build a space program. The infrastructure required is enormous.

    Perhaps they won't push the envelope. China has it's own share of problems. But a real, live space race would do us a world (so to speak) of good. It would be about the only thing that would get the US Congress of of it's pork filled ass.

    (The other being a credible Alien menace but even Justin Timberlake is looking more normal as time goes on.)

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  7. Re:After a three year break... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    Actually it puts them ahead of the US (for MANNED spaceflight) at the moment because the US has no means of putting people into space anymore. Non-manned spaceflight they have a long way to catch up.

    Not many countries have put their own independent space labs in orbit though. China is moving forwards all the time. Given this progress a decade or two from now and they will surpass the US in just about everything "space".

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  8. Priates are hung by the neck by mi · · Score: 1

    It would probably be considered an act of piracy in international legal terms.

    Pirates were, customarily, hung by the neck until dead. Can't do that in zero-gravity...

    Throwing one out of an airlock is rather cruel — and unusual too. Wasting your own crew's sole means of evacuation on transferring the captured pirates to Earth is not only wasteful, but may well condemn the said crew to death.

    Keeping the detained pirates up there — and feeding them food at $17,000-20,000 per kilogram? Talk about waste of taxpayers' money!

    Letting them "go", as we now do in our vegetarian times with most maritime pirates, is not going to be an option either — where are they going to go and what'll keep them from coming right back to your space-station after you leave?

    Quite a dilemma, actually... Unless you handle it the Russian way — "release" the bastards, but make sure, they die before reaching the shore.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Priates are hung by the neck by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      "Pirates were, customarily, hung by the neck until dead. Can't do that in zero-gravity..."
      Sure. Set the noose and twirl them around.

      "Throwing one out of an airlock is rather cruel — and unusual too. Wasting your own crew's sole means of evacuation on transferring the captured pirates to Earth is not only wasteful, but may well condemn the said crew to death."
      As if hanging isn't cruel if not done quite right. Twirling will require some acceleration, which will be cruel.

      "Keeping the detained pirates up there — and feeding them food at $17,000-20,000 per kilogram? Talk about waste of taxpayers' money!"
      Right. So capital punishment serves the same purpose in space as it does on the open seas; why are you feeding the criminal at the expense of your own crew?

      "Letting them "go", as we now do in our vegetarian times with most maritime pirates, is not going to be an option either — where are they going to go and what'll keep them from coming right back to your space-station after you leave?"
      The Russian solution...

      "Quite a dilemma, actually... Unless you handle it the Russian way — "release" the bastards, but make sure, they die before reaching the shore."
      Ditto.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    2. Re:Priates are hung by the neck by HBI · · Score: 2, Interesting

      By your own admission, it'd be more humane to both the crew and the prisoner to just kill them and eat them. Something like 40 kilograms of meat at $20,000 per kg...win!

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    3. Re:Priates are hung by the neck by HBI · · Score: 1

      I'm imagining the pictures beamed back to Earth of the ISS covered with blood and floating chunks of flesh being grabbed at in microgravity.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    4. Re:Priates are hung by the neck by HBI · · Score: 0

      Perhaps this is the chance for another country to add a module to the ISS...maybe the "Saudi Arabian Halal Abattoir module", capable of incinerating and storing the excess remains.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    5. Re:Priates are hung by the neck by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      "Oh, the sights you'll see..."

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:Priates are hung by the neck by Progman3K · · Score: 1

      just kill them and eat them

      Soviet Green is people!

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    7. Re:Priates are hung by the neck by HBI · · Score: 1

      Soylent Green, not Soviet. Soviet is Red. :-)

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  9. Re:After a three year break... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're butt-hurt. Get used to hearing about Chinese science and tech advancements and start learning to suck it up, because as an American you will have to do it over and over again during this century.

  10. We banned them by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In many ways it's too bad USA banned them from the current station (ISS) due to possible military-related secrets.

    ISS requires a lot of maintenance such that there's not much time left for science. If China participated, then there would be more time-slots for science instead of fixing toilets, etc.

    By now the ISS's technology should be old enough to not be secret: it's decades old. Plus, Russia already has access to it and they trade secrets with China anyhow.

    Why did US put sensitive tech in ISS to begin with? We F'd up.

    1. Re:We banned them by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      wrong. If China participated, we would have given them LOADS of IP, and they would contribute little to nothing UNLESS IT BENEFITED THEIR MILITARY.
      As to accomplishing more science, that happens within another 1.5 years, if not sooner. SpaceX continues to work on their V2, so, that is a non-issue. IOW, they will likely be close to schedule
      In the end, the real question is, can Bigelow put a BA-330 habitat on the ISS, which would allow for say 10-12 ppl to live there. That would make a HUGE difference.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:We banned them by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      If China participated, we would have given them LOADS of IP

      Example? Space stations have been around since the 1970's (Skylab). It didn't need to contain anything secret. And if it did, why did we allow Russia on-board?

      It just doesn't seem logical: You don't need cutting edge to make a station, and IF we by chance DID put cutting edge in for some unknown/silly reason, why let Russia in?

      that happens within another 1.5 years, if not sooner.

      China asked permission roughly a decade ago IIRC.

    3. Re:We banned them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Letting Russia in back in the 70s and letting China in today are completely different. Russia had a good space program, they weren't going to learn anything from a visit to Skylab. China needs and will steal any IP they can.

    4. Re: We banned them by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      We DID share a lot of tech with Russia. Ours was high tech, while, like their ak-47, low tech but works easily and cheaply.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    5. Re:We banned them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what? A huge part of humanity would benefit and probably contribute in a few years of cooperation? IP is bullshit. Humanity got here by sharing knowledge.

    6. Re:We banned them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except that bastion of IP protectionsim the USA - who got there by stealing everyone elses

    7. Re:We banned them by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Yes, but China can and does get space tech from Russia NOW.

      Russia wants cash and China wants space tech, and they both want to spite the USA. Thus, Russia selling/trading space-tech with China is "natural".

      The cat is already out of the bag.

      And my mentioning Skylab was not really about Russia, but to illustrate that space-station technology is 40+ years old. Everybody and their dog already knows it. We could have built a space station without using anything new, secret, or special. (Maybe we did, but Congress got irrationally paranoid anyhow and booted China.)

    8. Re: We banned them by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Their capsule design hasn't changed much in 40 odd years. They incrementally improve it based on experience, and it's probably the safest ride out there.

      K.I.S.S. + patience

    9. Re:We banned them by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That was just an excuse. The decision was made for political reasons. In the end it might have created a new space race.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re: We banned them by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      True. It will interesting to see what the new capsule will do.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  11. Re:After a three year break... by caseih · · Score: 1

    Hmm, where does that leave us then. Because they can now do more than the US can do right now when it comes to manned flight and launching space stations. We have the ISS, true, but we couldn't build another one. And we certainly can't build small space laboratories like we used to in the 70s. Personally I'm a bit jealous that the Chinese are going to do this. I think having multiple, short-term space stations would be more economical and get more science done than the one big expensive one we have now, as cool as it is.

    You can think disparagingly about China's endeavors, but really we have a lot to fear from them. American supremacy has been eroding for decades and sooner or later other powers will rise and we can bet they won't give the US special consideration or treatment. Maybe China's government's inability to reform and lust for power will hold them back and allow the US to remain dominant in the world. But I'm not counting on that.

  12. Re:After a three year break... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    forty years behind everyone else?

    who is this everyone else you speak of?

    How many countries have the capability to send humans into space? Russia and China. Anybody else I missed there?

    That puts them ahead of the US, Europe, India, Africa, the Middle East, and the rest of Asia, none of who can send people into space. All of those counties send people to hitch rides with one of the few countries who can do it.

    Looks like China is ahead of everybody arguably except the Russians.

  13. wow by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    A lot of anti-spaceX posters here have to be pretty proud of China's accomplishment.
    There are plenty of them that would rather see CHina succeed than to see Musk, Bigelow, or even bezo succeed.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  14. Love how ppl think that US can not launch humans by WindBourne · · Score: 0

    Seriously, if we wanted to, we could put somebody up there within 3-6 months. The issue has been that CONgress has NOT properly funded things. However, in an emergency, SpaceX could easily launch a V1 with extra O2 on-board to get to the ISS, and within several months, a V2 could be ready.
    Likewise, CST-100 could be ready in under 6 months or less. It would take money, but there is little issue about our ability to do so.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  15. Re:After a three year break... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    I don't think China can ramp up that quickly. The US and Russia both have decades of experience. China literally is nominally at where the US and Russia were in the 70s, in some regards, but other technologies, like landing on other bodies, they're still back in the 1960s. They do get some benefit because they can review what the Russians and Americans did, but that still means they have to build an entire generation of engineers capable of building their own variants.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  16. Re:Love how ppl think that US can not launch human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I keep seeing you prattling on as a Musk fanboi. As much as I'd love to see space for myself I'd not ride a SpaceX rocket if it were free. Their failure rate is the same as the mortality rate of playing russian roulette.

  17. Re:Love how ppl think that US can not launch human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What, he didn't have the courtesy to give you a reacharound?

  18. Re:Love how ppl think that US can not launch human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you want to reply to Windborne, he's the one who seems to fancy MuskCock up his ass. Probably another one of these Trump fuckers who think that private industry is going to do it all. We see that Musk is a bitch sucking at the government teat and claiming to get a new god. Sounds a lot like Frump.

  19. Re:After a three year break... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe China's government's inability to reform and lust for power will hold them back and allow the US to remain dominant in the world. But I'm not counting on that.

    Speaking as a non-American, I tell you that it is impossible to like China the way we like the US. There's no charm to their culture; no sex-appeal. No savoir-faire. Their are incredibly BORING. Will never happen.

  20. A second one? by Progman3K · · Score: 1

    Is their swimming pool big enough to hold two?

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  21. Re:After a three year break... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our new Han overlords.

  22. Re:After a three year break... by mah! · · Score: 1

    just curious... who is the "we" you're considering to be part of, in your sentence "...the way we like..."?

  23. Warranty? by mschaffer · · Score: 1

    I hope they purchased some kind of extended warranty because I doubt that it will keep running past 10 years---let alone 1 billion years.

  24. Re:Love how ppl think that US can not launch human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, I wanted to reply to you. It is obvious that you have had your head pounded too much by the kock bros and are now brain dead.