Slashdot Mirror


Anonymous Hacker Explains His Attack On Boston Children's Hospital (huffingtonpost.com)

Okian Warrior writes: Martin Gottesfeld of Anonymous was arrested in connection with the Spring 2014 attacks on a number of healthcare and treatment facilities in the Boston area. The attacks were in response/defense of a patient there named Justina Pelletier. Gottesfeld now explains why he did what he did, in a statement provided to The Huffington Post. Here's an excerpt from his statement: [Why I Knocked Boston Children's Hospital Off The Internet] The answer is simpler than you might think: The defense of an innocent, learning disabled, 15-year-old girl. In the criminal complaint, she's called 'Patient A,' but to me, she has a name, Justina Pelletier. Boston Children's Hospital disagreed with her diagnosis. They said her symptoms were psychological. They made misleading statement on an affidavit, went to court, and had Justina's parents stripped of custody. They stopped her painkillers, leaving her in agony. They stopped her heart medication, leaving her tachycardic. They said she was a danger to herself, and locked her in a psych ward. They said her family was part of the problem, so they limited, monitored, and censored her contact with them..."

2 of 295 comments (clear)

  1. Re: independent medical experts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    My Google is Fine and I did look.
    And slog though the Family written pieces.
    Did the Doctor from Tuffs write anything? Appear at the trial? Will be at what I assume is a Malpractice trail?

    But really why should I look?
    If you care you can post good links.
    Why should I research every injustice on the web.
    The Poster should have put more info in Article.
    Otherwise it just reads here is how a Hacker rationalizes.

  2. Re:BCH psch = T4 program by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1, Troll

    You guys are all a bunch of wakos. Seriously.

    What could possibly motivate a hospital staff to open themselves up to negligence lawsuits just so that they could ... what? Torture a patient for jollies? Or something?

    Before you draw conclusions that fit your tinfoil hat world view, please just spend even the tiniest moment trying to reason out why any group of people would behave in a way that defies logic, before concluding that this is what they must have done.

    A single person can do batshit crazy stuff, yes. But a group of professionals working in a hospital? Nope. Not going to happen. There may be some bending of rules, some I'll-scratch-your-back-if-you'll-scratch-mine situations, but a group of doctors intentionally trying to injure a child? That doesn't happen. Period.