Slashdot Mirror


SolidRun x86 Braswell MicroSoM Runs Linux and Full Windows 10, Destroys Raspberry Pi (betanews.com)

BetaNews has a report today about a company called SolidRun, which has announced an Intel Braswell-based MicroSoM. Unlike the ARM-powered Raspberry Pi, this is x86 compatible, meaning it can run full Windows 10. Plus, if you install a Linux distro, there will be far more packages available, such as Google Chrome, which is not available for Pi. Heck, it can probably serve as a secondary desktop, Brian with the site writes. From the report: At 53mm by 40mm, these new MicroSoMs provide unheard of design flexibility while also eliminating the headache of having to design complicated power-delivery subsystems thanks to its single power input rail design. SolidRun's Braswell MicroSoM also offers flexibility in RAM options, ranging from 1GB to 8GB configurations, and offers on-board support of eMMC storage up to 128GB. Its robust design and unsurpassed HD Edge surveillance, event detection, and statistical data-extraction capabilities makes it the platform of choice for mission-critical applications requiring guaranteed reliability," says Solidrun.It starts at $117, the website has more details on specifications.

6 of 205 comments (clear)

  1. Why compare to the pi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Orders of magnitude more expensive. This should be compared to a $115 dollar laptop or Android device, not a $35 embedded device.

  2. Re:Why is Windows 10 the benchmark? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These boards aren't really *that* type of embedded system. They're more like smaller PCs really. If there's a simple job that would work great on an old/underpowered computer, but which you want to do ideally on low power, and without a huge metal box (perhaps with very minimal I/O usage) then it's a good solution. Especially if it has to display something on a monitor or TV.

    If you want lots of advanced peripherals, a lightweight RTOS and such (instead of a more "desktop-like" OS), then you're definitely looking at the wrong thing.

    I personally found out I have little use for these things. Most of the "simple computer" tasks I do work better inside VMs (no need for a display mainly), and most of the stuff that involves "serious" I/O and an RTOS is far better suited to ARM Cortex devices.

    I don't think too many people will buy it. Sure, it's x86 and fast, but it's much more expensive than a Raspbarry Pi ($157+), to the point where it's not even targeting the same market anymore. It has *zero* GPIO too (so it's really just a small computer), and it just won't have the community around it which is 90% of the Raspberry Pi's value...

  3. No GPIO? No Sale! by ipb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The first thing I did was look and see what it had for GPIOs with a small hope that it might even be at some level compatible with the RPi.

    None? I might as well buy a cheap mini-itx board.

    While I would love more horsepower for some projects I need GPIO's, I2C and SPI for interfacing.

    This one's a non starter and certainly doesn't destroy the RPi and as others have pointed out it has no community support whatsoever.

  4. Re:Apples and Oranges by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the sounds of the article it doesn't include a case, RAM or storage in the price.

    So basically it's a barebones mini PC, competing with Intel NUC or Gigabyte Brix and at roughly the same price as their entry-level models.

    "Raspberry Pi" only adds to the clickbait.

  5. Re:x86 is a plus by rubycodez · · Score: 5, Insightful

    plenty of tiny form factor x86 computers out there in that price range

    this has nothing to do with the pi market. zero.

  6. Re:Why is Windows 10 the benchmark? by m.dillon · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not quite true A.C. The instructions for those old 8-bit CPUs could be synchronized down to a single clock tick (basically crystal accuracy), thus allowing perfect read and write sampling of I/O directly. We could do direct synthesis and A/D sampling, for example, with no cycle error, as well as synchronize data streams and then burst data with no further handshaking. It is impossible to do that with a modern CPU, so anything which requires crystal-accurate output has to be offloaded to (typically an FPGA).

    RTOSs only work up to a point, particularly because modern CPUs have supervisory interrupts (well, Intel at least has the SMI) which throw a wrench into the works. But also because it is literally impossible to count cycles for how long something will take. A modern RTOS works at a much higher level than the RTOSs and is unable to provide the same rock solid guarantees that the 8-bit RTOSs could.

    -Matt