Slashdot Mirror


The Verge's Deputy Editor Chris Ziegler Was Secretly Working For Apple For Two Months (gizmodo.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Gizmodo: Late this afternoon, Nilay Patel, the editor-in-chief of The Verge, published a post detailing the circumstances around the departure of Chris Ziegler, a founding member of the site. As it turns out, according to Patel, Ziegler had been pulling double duty as an employee of both The Verge and Apple. "The circumstances of Chris' departure from The Verge raised ethical issues which are worth disclosing in the interests of transparency and respect for our audience," Patel wrote. "We're confident that there wasn't any material impact on our journalism from these issues, but they are still serious enough to merit disclosure." According to Patel, Ziegler, whose most recent post was published in July, began working for Apple in July but didn't disclose his new job; The Verge apparently didn't discover he'd been working there until early September. Patel noted that Ziegler continued to work for The Verge in July, but "was not in contact with us through most of August and into September." What's not clear is how The Verge leadership went six weeks without hearing from their deputy editor or taking serious action (like filing a missing person's report) to try to find him. Patel says they "made every effort to contact him and to offer him help if needed." Patel noted the obvious conflict of interest, and added that Ziegler was fired the same day they verified his employment at Apple. "Chris did not attempt to steer any coverage towards or away from Apple, and any particular decisions he helped make had the same outcomes they would have had absent his involvement," Patel wrote. However, it's still unclear how exactly the team at Vox Media, The Verge's parent company, ascertained there was no editorial consequences from the dual-employment. You can read Patel's full statement here. Vox Media's Fay Sliger followed up with a statement to Gizmodo: "Chris is no longer an employee of The Verge or Vox Media. Chris accepted a position with Apple, stopped communicating with The Verge's leadership, and his employment at The Verge was terminated. Vox Media's editorial director Lockhart Steele conducted an internal review of this conflict of interest, and after a thorough investigation, it was determined that there was no impact on editorial decisions or journalism produced at The Verge or elsewhere in Vox Media. We've shared details about this situation with The Verge's audience and will continue to be transparent should any new information come to light."

80 comments

  1. Just Another Symptom by alphatel · · Score: 2, Funny

    Of the "I'm too cool to respond to you" generation, and the "we're too cool to panic about your status" management style.
    Normal employment policy is credentials are immediately revoked when any employee does not respond to login/status requests for over 3 business days. But don't let the cool kids tell you that's reasonable to enforce on important people.

    --
    When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
    1. Re:Just Another Symptom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Meh, why are right winger endlessly crying about EVERYTHING as if one or a few examples are indicative of an entire generation.

      The simple truth is that this isn't the first time someone quit without notice of any form. It's usually, but not always, an indication of a hostile work environment and sometimes there is an informal declaration or argument which precedes. I've never done anything like that, but I've seen it, especially in places where they fire people summarily anyways.

    2. Re:Just Another Symptom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we're in the "I'm an expert in internet comments" era.

      Normal employment policy is credentials are immediately revoked ...
      There's nothing about credentials one way or another in the statement; they only talk about terminating his employment, which is a separate activity. For all we know, that happened.

      requests for over 3 business days.
      Why so specific? It's a policy thing, not a law.

    3. Re:Just Another Symptom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just another symptom of a fundamentally fucked up system of justice.

      If a peon employee does this he'd get dragged into court, but some fucked up high society brown nose asshole can fraudulently misrepresent his employment status and breach his contract with a small sideways glance.

    4. Re:Just Another Symptom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Normal employment policy is credentials are immediately revoked when any employee does not respond to login/status requests for over 3 business days.

      So... I can't go to Fiji for a week on vacation?

      What happens if I get hit by a car and end up in intensive care for several days?

      Your office sounds like a great place to work. And I'm curious how many employees sue the company.

    5. Re:Just Another Symptom by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      That's why you tell your manager about your holiday plans. or do you just up and leave when you feel like it without letting anyone know? You sound like a great employee.

      As for the policy, it actually makes a lot of sense. We're talking about disabling an account and key card, not termination. If you're in intensive care, are you really so desperate to log in to work remotely? Before letting them know you're OK after an unexplained radio silence of 3 days?

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    6. Re:Just Another Symptom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Id love to know how we got from "poor management structure / corporate culture" to "OP is a right wing nut job" in a single post

    7. Re:Just Another Symptom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you should be asking yourself is why you glossed over the original poster's effort at going straight into an insult of the entire younger generation. Why don't you recognize the unseemly efforts of commonplace right wing lunacy?

    8. Re:Just Another Symptom by sh00z · · Score: 1

      That's why you tell your manager about your holiday plans. or do you just up and leave when you feel like it without letting anyone know? You sound like a great employee.

      I'll be, uh... hiking the Appalachian Trail! Yeah, that's it.

    9. Re:Just Another Symptom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because those are all in your head?

  2. So what's the story? by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    It seems to be:

    Person P stops doing work for Company A and starts working at Company B. Management at Company A has no clue. When they figure it out they see that the work Person P did for them was not related/influenced by Person P's relationship with Company B

    What is the news in that story that requires a 400 word summary?

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:So what's the story? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      What's the story? Shitty person engaged in unethical conduct with no disclosure. Also Vox Media investigates self, finds no conflict of interest or did anything wrong. And legally, they're required to now add disclaimers stating as such.

      Gotta remember this is /., where RTFA is difficult...

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re: So what's the story? by Entrope · · Score: 2

      This is about ethics and transparency in tech news reporting, so of course there will be outrage all around.

    3. Re:So what's the story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Shitty person engaged in unethical conduct with no disclosure.

      Shitty person? Dude just got another job, that's all. That doesn't one make "shitty" And for all we know since we haven't heard Ziegler's side of the story, he may have given notice but for some reason the Verge is spazzing out because of the appearance of tolerating conflicts of interest among its editors. They'd never admit it, but their concern for ethical disclosure is probably due to Gamergate's influence.

      >And legally, they're required to now add disclaimers stating as such.

      LOL. No, there's no laws requiring disclosure of conflicts of interest for media personnel. That's why journalists love to play the 'gotcha' game questioning the ethics of other journalists they don't like.

    4. Re: So what's the story? by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

      Wake me up when any of these bloggers demonstrate ethics. They're FAR too interested in posting things meant to gain clicks and ethics is somewhere down the ladder below "feed the dog" in terms of importance.

      Not only that but they tend to be PROUD of not having to act like real journalists with sources and confirmations and ethics and an editor to answer to. None of that stuff matters or has ever mattered to most bloggers, and yet they demand press credentials to events and get them, companies like Apple shower them in invites and free review samples and treat them occasionally to travel costs and meals and even stipends. All the while, they run around acting like they have a better grasp on things than "real" journalists for traditional media outlets.

      It's all bullshit. There are SO many kickbacks and spiffs and freebies flowing, it has spawned hundreds of bloggers and Youtubers and Twitchers many of who are in it for the free shit they can snag and the ego kick from having people read and click.

      --
      Sig for hire.
    5. Re:So what's the story? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Shitty person? Dude just got another job, that's all. That doesn't one make "shitty"

      We haven't heard the whole story, I agree. And I think "shitty" might be a bit strong.

      But from what I have heard, from one side at least, it sounds like he was "hedging his bets"--got the job at Apple and figured he'd double-dip for as long as he could. If the Apple thing didn't work out, he could come back and no one would be the wiser that he was gone.

      That wouldn't be a big deal anywhere else. But in journalism? Yeah, that's a bit tacky, to say the least.

  3. Nothing to see here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He didn't affect our journalistic integrity because, we don't have any!

    Seriously, The Verge shill for apple as hard as John Gruber.

    1. Re:Nothing to see here... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Yup! Apple owns the Verge harder than Google owns Android Police.

  4. Nobody knew & nobody cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It verges on the unimportant, trivial, trifling, negligible, inconsequential, of no account, petty, insubstantial, frivolous, pointless, worthless, meaningless, irrelevant, immaterial, peripheral.

    Don't waste my time with this crap.

    1. Re:Nobody knew & nobody cares by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      ....unimportant, trivial, trifling, negligible, inconsequential, of no account, petty, insubstantial, frivolous, pointless, worthless, meaningless, irrelevant, immaterial, peripheral.

      Now that is much more descriptive than "News for nerds, stuff that matters."

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  5. who hasn't thought about it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've often wondered how long I could keep getting payed with out showing up for work (maybe replying to a few emails here and there, not necessarily ones I don't want to deal with)

    My estimate has varied from a few weeks to a few months depending on the state of my management.

    This guy managed 6 weeks...

    I wonder if is a one off case (like has happened before) or if the relationship between employer and employee has dissolved to the point where this will eventually become the norm... Don't quit your job, just "work from home" do the absolute minimum you can to avoid people noticing that your not actually doing any work, and spend your day working at your new job collecting two salaries.

    1. Re: who hasn't thought about it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I made it 10 weeks then I had to travel for the new job

  6. Verge and Vox by tomhath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "We're confident that there wasn't any material impact on our journalism from these issues

    Daily Kos (aka Vox) was always a blog, it has nothing to do with journalism.

    1. Re:Verge and Vox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly.

    2. Re:Verge and Vox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Daily Kos (aka Vox) was always a blog, it has nothing to do with journalism.

      You mad bro?

    3. Re:Verge and Vox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed; i refer to blogging as lazy journalism; "here let me gather up all these links to make up today's quasi story. Thank you, Mr so-and-so for even putting them together; I will make sure to doublecheck before I print

    4. Re:Verge and Vox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Daily Kos (aka Vox) was always a blog,

      As a blogger, I think your lazy comparison is unfair to the record of my work.

    5. Re:Verge and Vox by quantaman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "We're confident that there wasn't any material impact on our journalism from these issues

      Daily Kos (aka Vox) was always a blog, it has nothing to do with journalism.

      I'm not sure why you talked about Daily Kos except for the fact that they're both left online news resources.

      They're completely different outfits.

      As for Vox, I've been reading it a decent amount and I'd consider them journalism. They're not investigative journalism, they don't send reporters digging through old court records to dig up scandals, but it's still journalism.

      They mostly do analysis, interviews, and long-form essays. It definitely comes with a wonkish highly progressive centre-left viewpoint (ie, they're big Clinton fans), but it's a valuable resource for understanding the world.

      There are slightly bloggy aspects as well, but I don't think that's a bad thing (as you imply). The weakness in traditional journalism is it gets myopic by focusing on what just happened and losing the larger context. Vox's objective seems to be tracking issues long term while adding context and analysis.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    6. Re:Verge and Vox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you analyze, "add context", and create essays without investigating? That is not journalism, that is making opinions sound like facts by saying them through a couple thousand words.

    7. Re:Verge and Vox by tomhath · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why you talked about Daily Kos except for the fact that they're both left online news resources.

      Other than the fact that Daily Kos and Vox were both founded by Markos Moulitsas there's no connection at all.

    8. Re:Verge and Vox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vox is nothing more than a third wave feminist leaning SJW cesspool now. not really much for actual journalism anymore. Just blog posts presenting that they're reporters.

  7. Most revealing sentence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Chris did not attempt to steer any coverage towards or away from Apple, and any particular decisions he helped make had the same outcomes they would have had absent his involvement"

    ==> "Basically, the journalists write as if on Apple's payroll at all times, so there's no obvious difference anyway!"

    (I use Apple products and like them. But I am cynical about the way Apple offer and withhold review unit/product launch/early access rights to journalists)

  8. Anandtech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does this all the time so where's the beef?

    Apple is good for America, and what is good for America is good for the world!

    VOTE TRUMP 2016
    MAKE AMERICA BUY MORE APPLE

  9. Verge is SJW Crybully Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I stopped clicking those links the day they had an article entitled "I Don't care If You Landed a Spacecraft On A Comet, Your Shirt Is Sexist And Ostracising." It's not even worth printing out to place at the bottom of your bird's cage.

    1. Re:Verge is SJW Crybully Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's Slashdot FBI bullshit

    2. Re:Verge is SJW Crybully Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No, you are not on the right side of history."

      We'll come back to that one I'm sure.

      But Palmer Luckey is bankrolling an entity which is dedicated to (making money from) derailing intelligent discourse. Even if it's legal to be a dick, it's still being a dick.

      I don't have to give a shit about his politics to hate him for what he thinks is 'funny' and for the damage he is wilfully doing. He may want Idiocracy to come sooner but I do not.

    3. Re:Verge is SJW Crybully Shit by Mashiki · · Score: 0

      But Palmer Luckey is bankrolling an entity which is dedicated to (making money from) derailing intelligent discourse. Even if it's legal to be a dick, it's still being a dick.

      And Clinton has an entire Super PAC which does nothing but, but you're worried about a single individual who dropped $10k? Yes, you really are stupid.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  10. Highly unethical journalist now works for Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least until Apple initiates damage control and fires the scumbag.

  11. Doesn't Apple make you sign non-competes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't be surprised if this stunt landed his rear in court.

    1. Re:Doesn't Apple make you sign non-competes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Non-competes aren't legal in California, except in a couple of very narrow circumstances like competing with the people who you just sold your business to. Regular employees are always free to take whatever work they can get. That's a big reason why Silicon Valley is what it is and NYC and Boston/Cambridge just can't compete.

    2. Re:Doesn't Apple make you sign non-competes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alright thanks for that. Do you think he was poached then?

  12. Headline: Apple bluffs public by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... zzzzzz

  13. I don't get it by irrational_design · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't even expect the New York Times or the editors/journalists that work for it to be ethical, why in the world would I be expected to be outraged that a website I've never heard of has unethical editors/journalists working for it? Is anyone seriously surprised by this? What is the news story?

    1. Re:I don't get it by Threni · · Score: 1

      There's a reason the site was often referred to as iVerge!

  14. Anand did it properly by majorme · · Score: 1

    Anand was an Intel and Apple fanboi but at least he left his own site before he moved to Apple.

    1. Re:Anand did it properly by PPalmgren · · Score: 1

      Honestly, it could have been a similar situation. Anand started to become extremely heavy handed towards apple products for about a year or two before he left to work for Apple. His reviews on apple products become quite intolerable, and were often apologetic of any issues and was even starting to use fluff words like "magical" in those reviews. This seemed to unfold shortly after they busted open antennagate debacle. There was a lot of debate in article comments that Anand lost his perspective for a good time before he resigned.

  15. I know my Grandfather did something similar by Hasaf · · Score: 1

    The family story went like this; a company (company A) my Grandfather worked as an engineer wanted a better understanding of what the competitor (company B) as doing.

    Company A had my grandfather apply at company B as a watchman (yes, what an ironic title). As a result he wandered around and sketched and took notes of everything. People at company B just thought he was doing a great job; however, for reasons no one at Company B ever understood, their competitor suddenly began to duplicate their processes.

    The family story goes on that he later met the owner of Company B at a trade event. The owner recognised my grandfather as his former watchman and the reality of what had happened finally hit him. My grandfathers words to him were, "you really have to pay attention to who you let through your doors."

    1. Re:I know my Grandfather did something similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice guy, and no truer words.

    2. Re:I know my Grandfather did something similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did your grandfather work at Microsoft? They were known for pulling that trick.

  16. Obviously company politics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously a falling out between Nilay Patel, "editor-in-chief of The Verge", and Chris Ziegler, who was a founder. The previous guy he worked for seems to also have been a co-founder, and Patel only became his boss late 2014. So Patel would see Ziegler as a threat to his leadership be edged out.

    Likewise Ziegler wouldn't like working for someone who had done nothing of note to get that post.

    I Googled Nilay's Engadget stint..... lazy one paragraph articles, nothing of note, I'm not sure why he's a blogger if he has nothing to say.

    https://www.engadget.com/2011/02/25/htc-merge-first-hands-on/

  17. no impact?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I disagree. I stopped visiting the site a while back as it seemed most of the headlines that popped up on Daily Rotation were written by Apple fanbois. Please stop telling me that a company that has less than 14% of the smartphone market is poised to take over the market with their next product. If I want to read that crap I'll visit Forbes.

    The Verge should remove all of his content.

    1. Re:no impact?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      id go further and say the verge removes all content.

    2. Re:no impact?? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      What content?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  18. It's all about ethics in journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go ahead and keep sneering at the "basket of undesireables," but they're right: really is all about ethics in journalism.

  19. Not Similar at All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That doesn't sound at all similar.
    This guy just quit without telling anyone.

    No industrial espionage involved, just a guy who was either too much of a pussy turn in a letter of resignation or had a grudge with vox and thought this would be a way to stick it to them. Either way he's really only succeeded in hurting his own reputation, who is going to want to hire him after this? He'll be lucky of Apple doesn't fire him.

    1. Re:Not Similar at All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reminds me of a guy who went to work for a new company. After a week and a half he told them that it wasn't working out and left. It turned out that he never actually quit his previous job, he had taken a few weeks of vacation instead while he "test drove" the new employer so he was effectively double-dipping.

    2. Re:Not Similar at All by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      When you quit from a company, they have to pay out your vacation, so how would this be any different? It isn't double dipping, it is using something that you are paid.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  20. Explains a lot. by fred6666 · · Score: 2

    The Apple biased reviews, too much focus on form over function is typical of that web site.

  21. Gruber weighs in by rickward · · Score: 1

    "Several little birdies" have told John Gruber of daringfireball.net that Ziegler is not in the current Apple company directory. Ziegler's Twitter account has been silent for six weeks or so.

  22. Going to fire the Clinton campaign workers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll bet quite a few of the Verge's employees are doing double duty on the Clinton campaign. Does it matter if they are paid or not? I don't think so, it's the conflict of interest that bothers me.

  23. Re:Remember Intel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unfortunately now apple does not have to pay, it just blacklists from its events or refuses to send preview devices to punish bad publications

  24. I don't understand by chewie2010 · · Score: 1

    Dude has cool job with friends with low pay. Dude get a good job at apple and all of a sudden is busy. Internet smears.

    1. Re:I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As i understand, it wasn't that he got a new job. The problem is that he failed to inform his old employer that he had quit. Normally people would just think he's a dick and move on, but him being temporarily dual-employed with a tech site and a tech company provided a conflict of interest for Verge. Do people actually expect any non-partisanship in journalism anymore, though?

  25. no surprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It didn't affect their decisions because the whole place is a extension of the Apple PR department...

  26. All these corporations are way to full by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of themselves.

  27. Self-righterous bullshit; the "company" is pissed by Lieutenant_Dan · · Score: 1

    If I was that Ziegler fellow I'd be consulting a lawyer. Spouting that shit publicly, verges (ha!) on defamation.

    I'm not saying what Ziegler was right, although in this day and age, one should show very little loyalty to any corporation because they basically claim "people are our most precious resource" but treat employees like shit.

    I've seen staff where I worked, take a few weeks off or take a leave of absence. What they do, is try another job and see if it suits them. They quit the original job, or they quit the new job. I'm not going to judge people too much when they do this, hell, the company is always evaluating if they should terminate you.

    At this moment I have two contracts. Place A does not know of place B, but place B knows of me working at place A and they don't care. The type of work is very different and they're not in the same sector. Sure place A could claim some crap, but if they do, I just have to walk and move on to the next gig. They can claim some BS excuse anyways, doesn't matter.

    --
    Wearing pants should always be optional.
  28. Things must dark by Carewolf · · Score: 1

    When Apple have to pay "journalists" real salaries to do their advertisement for them and can't just bribe them with Apple hardware like they usually do.

  29. Re:Remember Intel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Bruhahhaha do you remember back in the 2000s when Intel bought all these websites and the Pentium 4 was topping all charts? All was a lie and Intel was forced to pay. Apple bought these guys, anandtech and who knows how many other publications. Apple does the same, in 10 years you will get your 10 bucks in the mail from the class action lawsuit."

    I'm just duplicating your post so it shows up as positive. I very much dislike pro-Apple-mods.

  30. We have investigated ourselves.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and find ourselves completely without fault. Straight from our role model the Clintons.

  31. Re:Self-righterous bullshit; the "company" is piss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Truth is a defense to a defamation claim...

  32. Trump says nothing to see here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no conflict of interest. In fact, in my entire huge life I have never actually seen a conflict of interest. Trust me. I know.