Slashdot Mirror
Trump Takes On 'Crooked Hillary' With Snapchat Geofilter (arstechnica.com)
In an effort to appeal to more young voters, U.S. Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has unveiled a "geofilter" ad campaign for Snapchat that slaps on the banner phrase "Donald J. Trump vs. Crooked Hillary" to a user's photo and video Snaps. Ars Technica reports: "The ad rolled out to American Snapchat users today, just ahead of the 2016 presidential election's first major debate between Trump and Hillary Clinton (the debate starts tonight at 9pm EDT). The ad joins the usual geofilter available to Snapchat users, which usually list the name of a city or a nearby event as determined by GPS and time information. The campaign differs from the deluge of text, photo, and video ads that politicans have relied on in recent years, as it doesn't publish or display to the public without a personal photo or video attached. While other political campaigns have paid for geofilter ad campaigns on Snapchat in the past, including Clinton and Bernie Sanders, those have been timed and targeted for smaller-scale events like political conventions and primary voting periods. In a statement to CNN, the Clinton campaign said that Trump was "throwing his money into a fire pit," and it pointed out the ad's potential for backfiring, since "given Trump's deep unpopularity with young voters, [the ad's phrasing] will be used mainly at [his] own expense."
This is the greatest frist psot of all time. The best!
Trump 2016!
Very presidential.
Why is it that, in the media, everything Trump does is "bad".
It's almost like he doesn't have a team of extremely smart people working on tactics which are vetted with A-B testing and focus groups.
It seems like everything he does has a negative editorial comment nowadays.
Are Clintons actions editorialized as well? I haven't seen any good examples.
Does anyone over the age of 30 care?
Trump should listen to Clinton here because by outspending Trump 5-to-1 on ads, she has proven she is an expert at throwing money into a fire pit for no gain.
for folks who don't use snapchat? I've read two articles and I still don't get it. Is this just something you can just put over a picture you post to the service? What keeps me from taking a photo of a dog's butt with it? I guess it at least still gets the "Crooked Hilary" meme out there though.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
Cooked Hillary? People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. The man wrote a book about conning people for fucks sake.
Be an alternative to Trump?
Where is the Snapchat filter that shortens one's fingers so that you look more like Trump? http://www.vanityfair.com/cult...
People still use Snapchat? I bailed when the Ads started.
Name one thing that Clinton has done *ever* that has benefited the American people?
Read her biography yourself. I may find the involvement with the Goldwater and Nixon campaigns a bit troublesome, but they did happen, and after that, she was involved in several charitable legal groups in Arkansas, and as first lady she did some more of that. She also attempted to reform the nation's healthcare system. She didn't succeed, but I can't call that a personal failure, just intransigent opposition. She did however succeed in establishing a program for children's insurance though.
If you want more, again, go read her biography.
PS, I just heard Trump claim he had not run a single commercial against Clinton. Is this an example of his Jedi Truth attitude?
>
Liberals. Always with the insults.
Other than name calling, what have you got? Name one thing that Clinton has done *ever* that has benefited the American people?
Eight successful years as Secretary of State. What has Trump ever done that benefited the American people?
Also, namecalling is the primary tactic of Republicans, and it's the only way Trump responds to any situation at all, as anyone who's watching the debate right now can attest. The fact that you try to paint this as a "liberal" thing is not good for your credibility.
Eight successful years as Secretary of State.
What is so bloody sad is that you aren't even right about THIS thing, and you probably vote...
Remind me again HOW LONG she was Secretary of State for?
And that is ignoring the "Why were they successful?" point...
I wasn't calling you a name, I am asserting you are stupid. The evidence is your belief in a conspiracy. Do you deny the evidence?
Well, for one thing, she just trounced Sniffles McPumpkinface, which was better value for our entertainment dollar than all episodes of "The Apprentice" combined.
Still in the tank for the Dems.
Eight successful years as Secretary of State.
What is so bloody sad is that you aren't even right about THIS thing, and you probably vote...
Remind me again HOW LONG she was Secretary of State for?
And that is ignoring the "Why were they successful?" point...
Not to bring facts into the argument, but during her stint as SoS, Clinton:
1) Sold 1/3 of our Uranium reserves to Russia
2) Sold dual use (civil/military) tech to Russia
3) Overrode expert opinion and ordered military intervention into Libya that led to the downfall of Gaddafi
That #3 is interesting. Clinton was advised that Gaddafi was the only thing keeping militant islamists at bay, and that taking him out would result in them forming a separate state based on terrorism.
We now know that by overriding the advice of experts, Clinton essentially caused the formation of ISIS and the subsequent deaths of hundreds of people, here and abroad.
Here's what the Washington Times reported at the time:
“I had facts that indicated America was headed once again into an intervention that was going to be disastrous,” Mr. Kucinich told The Times. “What was being said at the State Department — if you look at the charge at the time — it wasn’t so much about what happened as it was about what would happen. So there was a distortion of events that were occurring in Libya to justify an intervention which was essentially wrong and illegal.”
People say that Trump is scary and will lead us into war, but they conveniently forget that Hillary Clinton actually *did* lead us into war - under false pretenses!
Oh, and let's not forget all the people who had access to top secret classified information on Hillary's server.
What is so bloody sad is that you aren't even right about THIS thing, and you probably vote...
Remind me again HOW LONG she was Secretary of State for?
And that is ignoring the "Why were they successful?" point...
Oh goodness, somebody doesn't bother to check to see that Hillary was only Secretary of State for half of Obama's term, and you're all upset at them. Or they mistype eight instead of four. But you, you are disappointed that they vote, because they don't have perfect recall? Heavens no! That's so rare, the rest of us are like Commander Data, with positronic memory that never has an error!
Hey FlyHelicopters, how about Trump's command of numbers? He couldn't even get the homicides in New York City right (they have been dropping even since De Blaiso took office in 2013, been on a downward trend for years before that, and haven't consistently gone back up for any year, and are down this year), let alone be consistent on the "cash" to Iran (which was returning their money with interest after we refused to provide them what they paid for, a reasonable decision, but they were kinda entitled to a refund), as I heard him say we gave them 125 billion towards the end. Also, if he's bothered about the B-52 being the backbone of America's air fleet, you think he's troubled that we've chopped up around 90% of them due to treaties with Russia? Of course, those treaties were negotiated during the Reagan and GWHB years, so he can't blame Clinton for that. And at the very beginning, he made the accusation apparently Hillary Clinton has been fighting ISIS her adult life. Um...he's only a year older than he is. Did he think ISIS dates back from the 1960s?
I'll grant that the Mid-East has been full of terrorism and brutality for that long, but ISIS specifically? A bit much. And he left out how much of that time we've had Republican Presidents, and how Hillary wasn't you know, actually in charge of things, given that neither she, nor anyone else, has been absolute despot over America, let alone the world. Also, apparently he expects China to invade North Korea at our behest, which is just weird.
And he never did explain why he kept on about the birther nonsense AFTER the birth certificate came out, which apparently HE wants credit for, even though he denied it was real at the time. Huh.
I'm also confused, did he really suggest we invade Iraq and take all their oil? What's with that? Is he suggesting we violate their sovereignty for our own benefit? That's a scary thought.
PS, do you think Trump forgot that NAFTA was negotiated by George H.W. Bush? I'm surprised Hillary Clinton didn't call him out on that one. It went into effect during Clinton's term of office, but it was also heavily bipartisan. Support was almost 50-50 from Republicans and Democrats. Not that he bothered to specify what terms NAFTA were wrong, but that's another problem. Of course, his solution is to increase tariffs, apparently. Not that his representation of taxes was very accurate, but that is what he suggested, isn't it?
I won't get into whether or not the things she did "benefited the American people", nor any other highly subjective stuff, but here's a list of the laws she sponsored during her eight years in the Senate:
S. 3613: A bill to name a post office the "Major George Quamo Post Office Building."
S. 3145: A bill to designate a highway in New York as the Timothy J. Russert highway.
S. 1241: A bill to establish the Kate Mullany National Historic Site in the State of New York.
In addition to those three laws, she also sponsored a bill the president did not sign:
2. S.Con.Res.27 â" 110th Congress (2007-2008) A concurrent resolution supporting the goals and ideals of "National Purple Heart Recognition Day".
Three laws in eight years might sound rather low. It is, the average Senator does quite a bit more.
You be the judge as to whether or not her eight years in the Senate "benefited the American people". Aside from those eight years, she has been in politics in 1977. Much of that has been running PR and especially damage control for the officeholder, her husband.
BTW she did also sponsor several amendments to other people's bills. Those include:
requires the Federal Protective Service to have at least 1,200 officers protecting the Congressional Office Building, the Capitol, and other federal buildings.
requires the Comptroller General to study sharing border enforcement with Mexico and Canada.
requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to require that DHS contracts require successful acquisition outcomes
Okian Warrior, off the top of your head, answer me right now:
Do you think that one/third of US Uranium reserves were actually physically sent to Russia?
I do not.
Why - is it important?
(I'm not mentioning that a Russian bank paid Clinton $500,000 for a speech right before the deal, because she says there was no conflict of interest.)
Funny how if you add up all of Trumps indiscretions, they don't even total one of Hillary's speaker fees.
That's a scary thought.
You have many scary thoughts, most of them dreamed up in your fantasy land...
You're an idiot, but that's ok, Clinton loves idiots, so you'll do well with her... Or not actually, but you won't figure that out either...
As opposed to FlyHelicopters who obviously lives in a magical land inside his own head where he's always right, and if he's wrong, reality magically transmutes itself to match. Yeah.
Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
> I rather suspect he won't release his tax records because he's the pot calling the kettle black.
He wont' release them because they would reveal that he's not a billionaire.
He wasted over a million dollars to lose a libel suit against a reporter who did a lot of research and came up with a number of about $200M. That guy, by the way, has seen his tax returns, but he's under court order not to talk about the specifics. He deserves a crowd-funding campaign to encourage him to violate that court order.
Trump certainly has assets that could be liberally valued at over a billion dollars. But he also has debt, upwards of half a billion in debt and he's added at least $50M just to finance his campaign.
Douglas Becker, head of Laureate University was in chairman of the board for Youth Initiative, where the grants went, and he steered the money to his for-profit university. In return for getting the $55 million he funneled 30% of it to Bill Clinton.
You want a good laugh, read the Washington Post article on it. They wrote multiple pages "debunking" it, and failed to mention Douglas Becker once. You would think him being a long term Clinton friend and in charge of both organizations would be a relevant fact. Its almost as if they expect their audience to be idiots.
As evil as Hillary is she doesn't want to change the Constitution to make it politically expedient.
Except for the 2nd, 4th, 6th, and 10th amendments. She, and her staffers, do love that 5th amendment though. That one is sure to stay.
That's a scary thought.
You have many scary thoughts, most of them dreamed up in your fantasy land...
You're an idiot, but that's ok, Clinton loves idiots, so you'll do well with her... Or not actually, but you won't figure that out either...
Once again, FlyHelicopters doesn't actually respond to any of the substantial content of a post. Calls someone else an idiot.
And we're supposed to do what? Not realize that you've got nothing. I, on the other hand, can point to atranscript where Trump says:
"Or, as I've been saying for a long time, and I think you'll agree, because I said it to you once, had we taken the oil -- and we should have taken the oil."
Which means what exactly, FlyHelicopters? What does it mean? How am I supposed to take it as anything other than America ACTUALLY pillaging another country for its natural resources?
Figure it out for me. Explain it. Trump didn't limit his words to "We should have kept the oil in Iraq secure" or "We should have insisted on having defenses in place to prevent their oil from being taken" but instead, and this has been over the course of months, he has continually reiterated that WE should have taken THEIR oil.
What does that sound like to you? Be honest. Don't give us another blowhard fit of pique. Go for a serious and honest reply.
You don't even have to respond to the rest of my post, which you ignored. Respond to that bit. Tell us what Trump means.
Or just fume and present us with another display of your own temperament. Honestly, I wish Hillary Clinton had called Trump out on his words directly, but since I can't expect to get an answer from him, I guess you'll do.
What's your answer?
> Three laws in eight years might sound rather low. It is, the average Senator does quite a bit more.
You are right. The average senator does a lot more. Sponsoring a bill is just a teeny-tiny part of the work of getting laws passed. Most of it is negotiation, and coordination with all the stakeholders (and plenty of non-stakeholders who just happen to have a say because they are part of the process). That's the real work of being a senator and that's what clinton spent her time on. Putting their name on everything in site no matter how little they had to do with it -- that's Trump's schtick.
Chris Stevens was not available for comment.
Created who knows how many jobs, which puts money in the hands of those who earned it. People like Trump sign the fronts of checks. People like Hillary have only ever signed the backs of checks.
20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
How come I keep seeing commercials for trump and at the end they say "I'm Donald Trump, and I APPROVE this message."
If you notice the content in the ads, there isn't any content. It's all talk. Make America safe. More jobs for America. He never says how, just what. Which tells me he doesn't know wtf he's doing or how he will do it. But I am Donald trump, and I approve this message.
LOLOLOL look boys, an old graybeard teh Dunald supporter. The racism and hate must run deep with this one. He grew up in a time where black people were property. And to avenge his ancestors, he will fight for anyone who wants to bring back the old America.
Make America great again boys. AKA, make America a land controlled by white rich men, and everything else is just property.
Fetch me a sammich woman.
You're read/heard how he underpays or fails to pay people and small contractors he's hired.
Here's another one: my PT and I were talking this morning, and he told me his father's an industrial contractor - paints bridges, drywall buildings, etc, and more than once, he's done a job for Trump, and then, when it was done, Trump comes in, says yeah, he's satisfied... but that he thinks he's already paid him enough, never mind the signed contract.
Tell me that's not criminal fraud?
He is a crook. And his wife doesn't wear a cloth coat....
mark
Yeah, that notorious liberal Donald J. Trump came up with "Trump dat bitch!" and "Lyin' Ted" and "Crooked Hillary". They're always name-calling, those filthy liberals!
Is this campaign being run by the campaign CEO Steve Bannon? While Conway runs the physical campaign, he runs the virtual one. So it would be interesting if he puts on the Breitbart campaign on overdrive against Crooked Hilary
Trump says he'll attract companies back to the US. This will only happen by lowering the minimum wage and giving executives tax cuts. He's publicly stating that he will give the rich tax cuts. No mention of how he will make manufacturing in the US profitable. Trickle down has not, and will never work, Giving the rich more money does not mean they invest in jobs, they invest in yachts.