Slashdot Mirror


DJI Unveils the Mavic Pro, a Foldable and Ultra-Portable Camera Drone (petapixel.com)

It didn't take long for DJI to respond to GoPro's voice-controlled Karma drone. Today, the company has unveiled the Mavic Pro, an ultra-portable drone that can fold up into roughly the "size of a standard water bottle," DJI says. Of course, it also features a high-resolution camera and several autonomous software tricks. PetaPixel reports: Despite its petite form factor, the drone packs a punch: there's a 4K camera on the front, a visual navigation system, a 4.3-mile (7km) range, and a 27-minute flight time. By comparison, the Karma has a range of 0.62 miles (1km) and a flight time of 20 minutes. The Mavic Pro can be operated with a remote controller for long-range uses, or simply with your smartphone if you're not planning to fly it far. For the latter, the drone can go from folded up to in flight in less than a minute. In the Mavic Pro is a new FlightAutonomy system, which uses 5 cameras, GPS and GLONASS navigation, 2 ultrasonic rangefinders, redundant sensors, and 24 computing cores to serve as the drone's "brain and nervous system." Using FlightAutonomy, the Mavic Pro can follow positions and routes while avoiding obstacles at 22mph (36kph), allowing you to create advanced flights with minimal input and flying skills. What's more, the drone can even be controlled with your physical gestures, making it easy to shoot an aerial selfie if you so desire. A new compact remote controller has been designed for the Mavic Pro, and it features an LCD screen with essential data, dedicated buttons (e.g. Return-to-Home, Intelligent Flight pause), and a OcuSync video link system that provides live view at 1080p resolution. DJI is also announcing DJI Goggles to go along with the Mavic Pro. Wearing the goggles allows you to fly the drone with an immersive 85-degree view in full 1080p, viewing the world through the eyes of the drone. The DJI Mavic Pro will be available starting October 15th, 2016, with a price tag of $749 for just the drone and $999 with a remote controller bundled in. The DJI Mavic introduction video can be viewed here.

55 comments

  1. All drones are foldable by scsirob · · Score: 1, Funny

    Once. Most just don't work so well after that.

    --
    To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
  2. Re:GAY BLACK NIGGERS FELCHING ANUS SPOOGE NOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just so sick, twisted and demented. It is a shame to see this. It really upsets me. Who would do this? This looks like it took forever to write.

  3. standardized units? by zephvark · · Score: 2

    I think Slashdot would be raking in more of that sweet advertising revenue if it posted these ads at the same time as the rest of the internet, instead of a day or two later.

    'Can fold up into roughly the "size of a standard water bottle," DJI says.' For the benefit of us rich people who have running water in their houses, what is the size of a standard water bottle in (A) inches, (B) centimeters, (C) beer bottles, (D) Libraries of Congress, (E), football fields, (F) car analogies, or (G) Cowboy Neil? You know. Standard measurements.

    1. Re:standardized units? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google - "What is the size of a water bottle?"
      16.9 oz. Bottled Water. The 16.9 oz. bottle is 8" tall and is 2.5" in diameter.
      (Sourced: May 6, 2014)
      Google - "How big is a beer can?"
      The US standard can is 4.83 inches high, 2.13 inches in diameter at the lid, and 2.60 inches in diameter at the widest point of the body.
      Google - "Length of an American football field?"
      Football games are played on a rectangular field that measures 120 yards (110 m) long and 53.33 yards (48.76 m) wide.
      Google - "How big is the Library of Congress in square feet?"
        2,100,000 square feet with 1,500,000 square feet of assignable space

      AKA
      20.32 x 6.35 centimeters
      1.656 x .962 US Standard cans
      0.00185 x 0.000579 American football field lengths
      A Cowboy Neil ^ Google Library of Congresses

  4. 20 minutes... by sTERNKERN · · Score: 1

    Wake me up when they manage to achieve 1-2 hours of flight time.

    1. Re:20 minutes... by felixrising · · Score: 2

      When was the last time you took 20 minutes of video or photos over 20 minutes? 2 hrs of flight time? that is a lot of looking up! somehow I doubt you *need* 2 hours of flight time.

    2. Re:20 minutes... by sTERNKERN · · Score: 1

      Well.. actually I do. At the moment I have to have 2-4 battery packs for some jobs, which is a hassle I would not mind getting rid of. It might be suitable for someone who wants to record sliding down a snowy mountain or a short jog on the beach... but if you want to _use_ it, that 20 minutes is not much. The best I can make out of that 20 minutes regarding useful imagery is around 12-14 minutes, and that is the best case scenario. So, bottom line, I would love if they put that much effort in battery longevity they are putting into other areas.

    3. Re:20 minutes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bike races and stuff are a pain now, you setup the shot, but have to keep coming back to land to replace the battery.

      Same with boat trips, I take a trip out to the island, I want the tracking shot, I don't want to have to stop the boat, try to land the drone on a drifting boat, change the battery and then off we go for the next leg.

      Really 2 hours would be nice. Also for the range, using Litchi (an upgrade app you can get for Phantom drones) I can send it off on a mission to patrol the edges of the farm, and it can go out of range of the controller and continue anyway, do the patrol and only then come back. Currently I have to do the whole farm in two trips because in high winds, there just isn't enough juice to risk it failing to complete the mission.

      I'm with GP, I really want longer flight time. Still Mavic is 27 minutes, which is a few minutes more than my current Phantom 3. I'll wait till I crash my P3 before I get this one though.

    4. Re:20 minutes... by felixrising · · Score: 1

      the same technology going into better longer lasting car batteries is also applicable for drones. There is a lot of effort to improve both motor efficiency and battery storage capability. Current record for quadcopter drone endurance flight is around 2.5 hours, of course, it won't carry your Red Epic.

    5. Re:20 minutes... by felixrising · · Score: 1

      minor correction: quadcopter hobby class (non commercial) endurance record is currently around 2 hours 9 minutes. http://www.rcgroups.com/forums...

    6. Re:20 minutes... by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      somehow I doubt you *need* 2 hours of flight time.

      Well.. actually I do. At the moment I have to have 2-4 battery packs for some jobs, which is a hassle I would not mind getting rid of. It might be suitable for someone who wants to record sliding down a snowy mountain or a short jog on the beach... but if you want to _use_ it, that 20 minutes is not much. The best I can make out of that 20 minutes regarding useful imagery is around 12-14 minutes, and that is the best case scenario. So, bottom line, I would love if they put that much effort in battery longevity they are putting into other areas.

      I'd like to use drones for live video shots of bands performing on stage for both a 'jumbotron' style live feed for the venue and for recording purposes, but actual practical flight endurance times are still too short, particularly when loaded down with a good camera and the extra battery weight needed for it as well.

      Much better than a bunch of guys in black running around with bulky steady-cams and blocking the live audience's view and being a distraction as an obstacle in the performer's way on stage. Not practical or safe under some conditions (outdoors/windy/no 'buffer' safety zone between stage & audience, etc) but still, those aren't huge restrictions.

      The authorities will have a dim view of the small drones in TFS. In their minds it gives the 'bad guys' a powerful tactical tool that goes a decent ways towards leveling the information playing field ('bad guys' these days also include those who would expose wrongdoing by the authorities, as authority detests accountability as strongly as criminals and for the same reasons).

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  5. Yea ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More shotgun targets... says a man in Kentucky.

  6. Karma is dead on arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That Karma drone from GoPro is dead on arrival then. Karma is small, and has a camera that can be used with a handle on the ground. BUT it missed a lot of the collision avoidance and expert features like tracking objects visually.

    Mavic is *smaller*, *cheaper*, has all the smarter modes and collision avoidance stuff. It's from the market leader, another plus. Flight time is longer for the Mavik, and flight distance is further I think. GoPro didn't talk about the range, so I assume its pretty crap. Oh and Mavik supports VR headsets.

    That leaves the removable gimbal. You can unclip it on the Karma and attach it to a handle and use it on the ground. *BUT* since the Mavik is small enough to be carried in one hand, then its only a firmware upgrade for DJI to turn the folded drone into a hand held gimbal. Since you could simply use the drone as a handle its so small.

    Incidentally, if you have an older Phantom 3, just buy the Litchi app, and it adds visual tracking and a bunch of other smart stuff to the drone, instead of upgrading. That's another thing, the DJI has both a little screen AND uses a smartphone, the GoPro uses its own system. But that means you can use your better faster smartphone and use third party software like Litchi to upgrade it.

    1. Re:Karma is dead on arrival by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      and expert features like tracking objects visually.

      Sounds like missile homing! That should be fun.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Karma is dead on arrival by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      With those foldable propellors it looks a lot more portable too: not just small, but safe to carry around in a backpack or bag without breaking. The price is pretty good too... $749 without remote; less than I've paid for mini RC helicopters (of the hobby variety rather than the toy ones) and this thing can do a hell of a lot more.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re:Karma is dead on arrival by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      With those foldable propellors it looks a lot more portable too: not just small, but safe to carry around in a backpack or bag without breaking.

      Those are the most interesting part of the whole design, and I look forward to being able to buy something similar in a 10 inch prop for not too much money. Right now folding props are expensive.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  7. Creeps Paradise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These will soon be flying outside girls schools, public swimming pools, and shower-room windows all over the country!

    Let none gainsay the geek!

    1. Re:Creeps Paradise by trollebolle · · Score: 1

      These will soon be flying outside girls schools, public swimming pools, and shower-room windows all over the country!

      This! I know it's a joke, but I just hate the immediate "assumption" that people that like and use drones are peeping toms. Makes me reluctant to tell other people about my racing drone hobby. There is always a chance that they'll assume, at least on an unconscious level, that I'm some kind of weirdo pervert. If you're into spying on your neighbour, I'm sure there are many less expensive, quieter and more effective ways...

  8. Re:20 minutes... Is that how long you need? 120 mi by sTERNKERN · · Score: 1

    Look who has not taken his pills this morning.

  9. Re:GAY BLACK NIGGERS FELCHING ANUS SPOOGE NOW by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

    This is just so sick, twisted and demented. It is a shame to see this. It really upsets me. Who would do this? This looks like it took forever to write.

    APK. He doesn't have a life. But he has invested a lot of time on Visual Basic and Windows XP - he's kind of proud of that.

  10. What? How much? by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

    OK it looks great, but that's a lot of dough for something the average Joe will probably smash within a week.
    Or get shot out of the sky...

  11. Call me when it can actually follow me by undefinedreference · · Score: 1

    It'll impress me when it can follow me like a pet in WoW. Until then, I'd still need a friend to fly it for a third-person aerial view...

    1. Re:Call me when it can actually follow me by peshooo · · Score: 1

      Well, actually it can follow you, check the youtube video.

    2. Re:Call me when it can actually follow me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'll impress me when it can follow me like a pet in WoW. Until then, I'd still need a friend to fly it for a third-person aerial view...

      So... what's your number? Did you bother to look at the actual linked stuff?

    3. Re:Call me when it can actually follow me by Kaptain+Kruton · · Score: 1

      It does have person/object tracking. I am not sure of it's reliability, but can select a "target" through the display on the controls and follow in 3 modes.
      1) It can follow behind the person.
      2) "Profile" mode allows it to move parallel to the person with the drone roughly 90 degrees to the right or left side.
      3) 'Spotlight' mode (which I think is circling above a target).

      The Mavic also has forward collision avoidance which will help when following behind a person.

    4. Re:Call me when it can actually follow me by undefinedreference · · Score: 1

      The problem is that it needs to be told what it's supposed to track and it homes for where it launched. Following someone walking is very different from following someone when they're moving quickly. None of their video showed the latter, which tells me that they couldn't show it (after all, it'd be impressive).

      Don't get me wrong, it looks like it'd be handy for a lot of purposes and they're moving in the right direction, but the pet analogy is really what I want to see for action shots. If I am bothering to charge and carry it, it needs to be able to do them with little-to-no planning or configuration. We're talking push of a single button simple. In a way, the best solution would probably be the simplest one: Have the smartphone stream GPS coordinates to the drone while tracking... It'd beat object recognition and keep it close the whole time.

      As I think about it more, I can see some great uses for it. It's very cost effective for the capabilities and the size would make it very practical to carry around. I do think the size is great and the way it folds up really small is the best part of it. If I was a travel blogger that wanted to add video of my adventures, this would be an obvious choice.

  12. Looks like I need to finish my foldable drone by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Although I'm only putting one camera on mine.

    Friend of mine made some carbon folding 250 quad frames. I'm really down to just soldering motor leads, renumbering ESCdirect pins, and software setup. I've never done pixhawk before, and this is based around a minipx4...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  13. I'm still waiting by OpenSourced · · Score: 1

    I'll keep on waiting for the fist-sized, ultrasound-enabled, electroshock-emitter, mosquitoes hunt-and-destroy, nocturnal-guardian drone. When it arrives, I'll have a couple dozens, please.

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
  14. Selfies by Kyrubas · · Score: 1

    A drone that does selfies eh?

    Just when you though selfie sticks were annoying...

    1. Re:Selfies by chispito · · Score: 1

      A drone that does selfies eh?

      Just when you though selfie sticks were annoying...

      This is nothing new. The only difference is that now people don't have to make their friends fly the quadcopter while they surf/skate/rock climb/try to look cool. I can't get over how compact this one folds down. That's some serious James Bond level stuff.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  15. The question **I** want answered. . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    . . . .is what is the drone's top speed, measured in Furlongs per Fortnight ?? (grin)

    1. Re:The question **I** want answered. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      40 miles per hour = 320 furlongs per hour = 7680 furlongs per day = 107520 furlongs per fortnight

      But the battery won't last that long it say 27 minutes but that is ideal conditions and probably not at top speed. Based on my own drones and some extrapolation and a bunch of guessing. I would say 20 minutes at top speed with a 90 minute recharge time. So calculate actual travel distance more like a Tesla...about 13 miles per charge and 183 discharge/charge cycles per fortnight = 19032 furlongs per fortnight with a single battery and no life.

    2. Re:The question **I** want answered. . . by trollebolle · · Score: 1

      But the battery won't last that long it say 27 minutes but that is ideal conditions ...

      Furlongs per fortnight is a unit of speed, not time...

    3. Re:The question **I** want answered. . . by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

      107,520

  16. FCC & EC. How is it done? by Max_W · · Score: 1

    The FCC and EC regulations about the power of a transmitter are the same for all. Hover, the range of DJI quads is much higher then usual. I flew DJI Phantom 3 Advanced up to 2.4 km away and back.

    What do DJI OcuSync Transmission System or DJI Lightbridge mean exactly? And why do they provide a higher range?

    Do these FCC and EC regulations make sense? Transmitter Power (EIRP) FCC - 26 dBm, CE - 20 dBm. Why cannot we use say 200 dBm and have a range of a hundred kilometers. Certainly for such long range it would be necessary to use a fixed-wing aircraft or a hybrid, Are these just bureaucratic arbitrary limitations as D.Trump talked about, - "layers upon layers of regulations..."?

    1. Re:FCC & EC. How is it done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dBm is logarithmic. While 20dBm is only 0.1W, 200dBm would be 100PW, which is quite a lot. The range would indeed be huge (receivable in other galaxies).

    2. Re:FCC & EC. How is it done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting fact that China has stricter regulations on transmitter power compare to FCC&EU. The version they will sales in China only supported up to 4km range, while US version supported up to 7km

    3. Re:FCC & EC. How is it done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it a limit on transmitter power or the Chinese drone regulation arbitrarily saying 4km or maybe the Chinese definition of LoS?

    4. Re:FCC & EC. How is it done? by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, streaming back video would be greatly simplified. You wouldn't even need to stream it, really -- just display a solid white field. Or, for that matter, just have the user look at a white card, which will faithfully represent the drone's POV in the tiny fraction of a second before the drone, the card, and the user are vaporized.

    5. Re:FCC & EC. How is it done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is the limits on transmitter power. If you buy a wifi router intended for the Chinese market, usually you will get better coverage if you switch the location in settings to US or Australia.

  17. I'll wait till my next crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That mode where it (Mavic) flies on the phone only, its probably shorter range Wifi. Better to get the remote. (Does it work with older remotes?)
    The Litchi app already gave me VR support on the phone using Google glass, so that isn't a draw.
    The visual tracking, = Litchi again, already got that.

    So the big draw for me: tiny + collision avoidance.

    I'll wait till I crash my Phantom3a before I buy it. But tempting. Very tempting, but so was the Phantom 4, and now I'm damn glad I waited.

  18. Re:What? How much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had my Phantom 3 for quite a while with no major crashes. And the couple of minor ones might have been avoided with Mavic visual object detection improvements (i.e. I tried to do cool, smooth, close fly in shots on something and mis-judged the tail wind a little. Everyone was like slow motion, but I haven't even broken a prop yet)

  19. Re:What? How much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We had a Phantom 3 turn off on us while flying over a tall tree (50ft tall). It whacked every limb on the way down. Bent one of the landing supports a little and put lots of dings on the props. Still flew fine though.

    Our best guess was that the battery wasn't plugged in fully or something.

  20. Re:GAY BLACK NIGGERS FELCHING ANUS SPOOGE NOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who is APK? I keep hearing about APK

  21. God Dammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DJI is taking my money this Christmas, again!

    This thing looks SWEET and my rather expensive Phantom 2.75, with ZenMuse gimbal, GoPro 4 Black, 5Ghz video downlink, and replacements due to activities, looks like something from the Jurassic period. The Mavic does more, better, faster, further, and for less money.

    God Dammit!

  22. Is Flight Autonomy Real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flight autonomy, in my mind, is the uploading of a series of GPS waypoints and then turn the drone loose. Completely autonomous. This capability is present and works as expected in drones such as those with ArduPilot flight controllers and others.

    DJI states that preprogrammed flight is available for the Phantom and other DJI drones. But in reality, the drone is "tethered" to a tablet and the tablet controls the drone. If the drone loses its connection to the table, it goes into emergency return home mod.This is NOT autonomous flight, in my opinion.

    According to FAA rules, the drone is supposed to remain in sight of the pilot and under the pilot's control at all times. This means that autonomous flight is not legal or is, at the very least, a very dark gray area.

    The Mavic claims to have autonomous flight capability. Is this true autonomous flight, or is the Mavic's autonomous flight capability just more of the old GroundStation on a tablet switcheroo?

    1. Re:Is Flight Autonomy Real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is available on the P3A and P3P. You have to set the drone up properly.

      Here is an example using Litchi: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PB55H38P_IA