Slashdot Mirror


US Believes Hackers Are Shielded By Russia To Hide Its Role In Cyberintrusions: WSJ (newsmax.com)

According to a report from The Wall Street Journal (Warining: may be paywalled), U.S. officials are all but certain that the hacker Guccifer 2.0, who hacked the Democratic National Committee in June, is connected to a network of individuals and groups who are being shielded by the Russian government to mask its involvement in cyberintrusions. Even though the hacker denies working for the Russian government, the hacker is thought to be working with the hacking groups Fancy Bear and Cozy Bear, which have ties to the Russian government. The Wall Street Journal reports: Following successful breaches, the stolen data are apparently transferred to three different websites for publication, these people say. The websites -- WikiLeaks, DCLeaks.com and a blog run by Guccifer 2.0 -- have posted batches of stolen data at least 42 times from April to last week. Cybersecurity experts believe that DCLeaks.com and Guccifer 2.0 often work together and have direct ties to Russian hackers. Guccifer 2.0 said in a Twitter direct message sent to The Wall Street Journal that he wants to expose corruption in politics and shine light on how companies influence policy. The hacker said he also hopes to expose "global electronization." "I think I won't have a better opportunity to promote my ideas than this year," Guccifer 2.0 added in a long exchange with a Journal reporter. The Journal cannot verify the identity of the person sending messages on behalf of Guccifer 2.0, but the account is the same one that was used to publish personal information about Democrats. A posting on a blog run by Guccifer 2.0 says he is a man who was born in Eastern Europe, has been a hacker for years and fears for his safety. "I think u've never felt that feeling when u r crazy eager to shout: look everyone, this is me, this is me who'd done it," the hacker wrote to the Journal. "but u can't." WikiLeaks officials didn't respond to requests for comment on whether Russia fed them the stolen files published by WikiLeaks in July. A representative for DCLeaks.com asked the Journal to submit questions via email but hasn't responded to them. Last week, U.S. intelligence chielf James Clapper said it "shouldn't come as a big shock to people" that Russia is behind the hacking operation. While Russia has tried to interfere in U.S. elections since at least the 1960s by spying and funneling money to particular political groups, "I think it's more dramatic maybe because now they have the cyber tools," he said.

9 of 109 comments (clear)

  1. So what? by Nyder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Doesn't matter who is doing the hacking, what matters is how serious the USA takes with it's security measures to protect computers/devices from being hacked to begin with. And to be quite honest, the USA Government doesn't take it's computer security serious at all. That you can tell from letting Clinton off with her mismanagement of her server and the fact that our Government wants back doors in everything even though they keep being told that is how you get hacked.

    Let's not even get into the encryption bullshit.

    --
    Be seeing you...
    1. Re:So what? by rockout · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It doesn't matter who's doing the hacking? Are you that myopic that you take any excuse to crowbar in your anti-Hillary rants? Of course it matters. And thanks for trying to take a Slashdot post about Russian hackers and turning it into yet another "Clinton vs. Trump" debate, which will probably work. You dick.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    2. Re: So what? by bestweasel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Trump says we don't know it's the Russians, and he knows about the cyber.

      Does that help?

  2. A Lot of Effort to Bury the Lede by Kunedog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So the mainstream press really never did come up with a way to spin the DNC Leaks.

    They've repeatedly shown they had NO answer except to try to ignore the real story (like with Snowden), and pretend that the source of the info is more important than the fact that the DNC was nothing but a branch of Hillary's campaign, colluding to push Bernie to the side at all costs.

    1. Re:A Lot of Effort to Bury the Lede by wiredog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, shame on the Democratic Party for supporting a lifelong Democrat who had done massive amounts of work to support other Democrats over the Socialist who became a Democrat recently only so he could run for President. They should've been more like the Republicans!

  3. James Clapper is now a reliable source .. by bongey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The same James Clapper that lied under oath about NSA spying and has this fancy website http://www.hasjamesclapperbeen....

  4. Re:Ties to Government? by tinkerton · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Could be, but what I'm certain of is that the pentagon has decided a while back it needs Russia as an enemy, for budgetary reasons let's say, so we are /will be getting a constant stream of russian evil.

  5. New top 40 hit: "The Ruskies did it!" by bradley13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yahoo: It's not our fault that our security sucked, and that we didn't tell anyone about it for two years. The Ruskies did it!

    DNC: It's not our fault that we got caught rigging primaries - the Ruskies did it! It's not our fault that Hillary's poll results suck - the Ruskies did it!

    Everybody together now: "It's not our fault - the Ruskies did it!"

    Can we put that to music? Seriously, this is ridiculous. Even if it were true (which I doubt), it's still ridiculous.

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
  6. Re:Here comes the propaganda machine, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The new Cold War started when Russia went back to its old habit of invading its neighbors.

    Whether you noticed or not tells us nothing about the situation, it only tells us about you.