Slashdot Mirror
IBM Buys Promontory Financial Group (zdnet.com)
An anonymous reader quotes a report from ZDNet: IBM said Thursday it plans to acquire compliance consulting firm Promontory Financial Group to bring more financial regulatory expertise to Watson's cognitive computing platform. Promontory is a global consulting operation with an aim of helping banks manage the ever-increasing regulation and risk management requirements in the financial sector. With that in mind, IBM wants to use the industry expertise of Promontory's workforce -- which is made up of ex-regulators and banking executives -- to teach Watson all about regulation, risk and compliance. IBM is also using the deal to create a new subsidiary called Watson Financial Services, which will build cognitive tools for things things like tracking regulatory obligations, financial risk modeling, surveillance, anti-money laundering detection systems. "This is a workload ideally suited for Watson's cognitive capabilities intended to allow financial institutions to absorb the regulatory changes, understand their obligations, and close gaps in systems and practices to address compliance requirements more quickly and efficiently," IBM said in a press release.
And when the USA IBM's are let go put that virus on the system that takes the leftover fractions of a penny and put them in there own account.
I thought the headline read "IBM buys Predatory Financial Group". Which actually seems to be type of financial group IBM would be likely to buy.
American Third Position
Finally, a real choice!
Identifying when someone is out of compliance is far easier than figuring out what to do with a loophole, let alone detecting a loophole autonomously.
I actually worked in Boston financial sector building compliance systems. I've talked to banks like Wachovia, Bears Stearn and others. It's not a secret how fraud occurs. The crooks at these institutions "break" the compliance system to let things slip through. How do you do that? One way is to edit a rule and blame it on "human error". Another is to get the compliance officer to override a violation. Yet another is to setup complex transactions. The compliance engine can only detect fraud if it has enough data. Some system purposely require a minimum number of fields entered so that transactions can go through. Data is also falsified to by pass compliance. Watson can't catch this stuff, because all they will is break watson. It's pretty easy. Until you put bankers in maximum security jails, they will keep breaking laws.
Well, this would certainly be new take on that popular business practice.
From a game-theory POV, I suppose this is the best move; if you're convinced AI is going to make your "profession" obsolete, position yourself at the forefront of the transition, so you can cash out on your company's success before all your peers lose their jobs.