Slashdot Mirror


Newsweek Website Attacked After Report On Trump, Cuban Embargo (talkingpointsmemo.com)

After Newsweek published a report titled "How Donald Trump's Company Violated The United States Embargo Against Cuba," the site found itself on the receiving end of a "massive" denial-of-service attack that managed to shut down the site for several hours. TPM reports: Editor-In-Chief Jim Impoco noted that the attack came as the story earned national attention. "Last night we were on the receiving end of what our IT chief called a 'massive' DoS (denial of service) attack," Impoco wrote in an email to TPM. "The site was down most of last evening, at a time when Kurt Eichenwald's story detailing how Donald Trump's company broke the law by violating the U.S. trade embargo against Cuba was being covered extensively by prominent cable news programs. Our IT team is still investigating the hack." Later Friday afternoon, Impoco emailed TPM that in an initial investigation, the "main" IP addresses linked to the attack were found to be Russian. It should be noted that it is possible to fake an IP address. "As with any DDoS attack, there are lots of IP addresses, but the main ones are Russian, though that in itself does not prove anything," he wrote. "We are still investigating." Eichenwald tweeted Friday morning: "News: The reason ppl couldnt read #TrumpInCuba piece late yesterday is that hackers launched a major attack on Newsweek after it was posted."

12 of 342 comments (clear)

  1. potential backfire by VernonNemitz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The more that Americans perceive that Russia thinks that electing Trump will be good for Russia, the more likely Americans might also think that electing Trump might not be so good for America.

  2. The nature of the Trump-fans is pretty obvious by gweihir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They are authoritarian followers, that fight anybody that disagrees with them with violence. They are irrational and dangerous. They are unable to find a middle-ground with others. This is the same type of people that are responsible for countless mass-murders throughout history and have establishes countless totalitarian states. These people are the enemy of anybody not in their camp. And they destroy nations.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:The nature of the Trump-fans is pretty obvious by ooloorie · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Independent here, not a "Trump fan".

      They are authoritarian followers, that fight anybody that disagrees with them with violence. They are irrational and dangerous. They are unable to find a middle-ground with others.

      You're describing Hillary's followers here.

      This is the same type of people that are responsible for countless mass-murders throughout history and have establishes countless totalitarian states. These people are the enemy of anybody not in their camp. And they destroy nations.

      Again, you are clearly describing progressives and their policies. In fact, Hillary herself, as SoS, has literally authorized mass killings, aided and supported totalitarian regimes, viciously attacked her political opponents, and destroyed nations.

      Trump and his followers may be uneducated and stupid, but Hillary and her followers are smart, violent, and vicious.

    2. Re:The nature of the Trump-fans is pretty obvious by whoever57 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The really gold standard of stupidity is that some Trump supporters think that there is a sizeable population of 1%-ers who are quaking in their boots at the thought of a Trump presidency.

      These dumbfucks actually think that Trump will bring about change that will be against the desires of the wealthy.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    3. Re:The nature of the Trump-fans is pretty obvious by Tough+Love · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Eventually I installed cameras and caught the motherfuckers, who got fined and harassed by the cops...

      Your troll would have come across as more credible if you had managed to avoid the temptation to feed your ego with that embellishment. Harassed you say, golly.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    4. Re:The nature of the Trump-fans is pretty obvious by Tough+Love · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Trump, the best president that money can buy. The best. 100 percent.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    5. Re:The nature of the Trump-fans is pretty obvious by swalve · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They are the same idiots who fell for the tea party. They are the conservative version of occupy wall street. Petulent simpletons falling for the myth of the simple solution.

  3. Correlation? by ichthus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did Newsweek publish any other stories that day (or that week)? Is there a definite correlation between that publishing of that story and the DDOS?

    --
    sig: sauer
  4. Trump's a D-Bag, but... by eepok · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Trump's a D-Bag, but if there's literally no evidence that the DDOS came as a RESULT of the article (only that it came after the story), then why are we strongly insinuating causality?

    There's no need for that. Trump's already shit stain and everyone knows it. There's no need to jump to conclusions and tie him to something that he may not be associated. Because if it turns out that he's NOT associated, this will just be conspiracy theorist and Trump pariah bait.

    1. Re: Trump's a D-Bag, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think it is exceptionally safe to say that any of their "supporters" are in fact "fanatics." They would have to be in order to generate the suspension of disbelief and maniacal myopia necessary to support either of them. Their flaws are like something straight out of bad fiction, and yet here they are, the first runner up and the winner of the most "powerful job on the planet."

      Hillary is a run-of-the-mill politician. Far from the worst by any stretch of the imagination of someone who actually understand politics. Trump is a run-of-the-mill attention-whoring media animal. Also far fro the worst of the genre.

      Meanwhiile, your shrill denunciations are pretty extreme.

  5. Re:Putin has Trump's back... by swalve · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nope. All we are being asked to believe is that he is a petty, vain man with lots of money. That explains just about everything.

  6. Re:Putin has Trump's back... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He called her "Miss Piggy" and "Miss Housekeeping", both sexist and racist. He clearly was not referring to her contractual obligation.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC