Slashdot Mirror


Milo Yiannopoulos Wants To Buy 4Chan, Promises Free Speech Haven (hollywoodreporter.com)

An anonymous Slashdot reader quotes The Hollywood Reporter: Milo Yiannopoulos, an alt-right hero known for his banishment from Twitter, is preparing a bid to acquire his own social media firm: 4chan... The Hollywood Reporter learned that Yiannopoulos, with the help of a wealthy backer, is preparing to approach 4chan owner Hiroyuki Nishimura, a Japanese entrepreneur, with a bid this week. Contacted Saturday, Yiannopoulos confirmed plans for a possible acquisition but did not offer details.

"As a free-speech fundamentalist and a student of Internet culture, I appreciate how fragile and precious the 4chan ecosystem is and how much it gives to the wider Internet -- even if some corners of it, such as /pol/, don't always approve of me very much," Yiannopoulos said... "I spoke to my lawyer this morning about purchasing the business... I intend to approach the current owners in the next few days with an offer."

Yiannopoulos added this his philosophy as an owner "would be very simple: free-speech central, no ifs, no buts."

6 of 369 comments (clear)

  1. great if possible by sittingnut · · Score: 4, Insightful

    sad that so called social media as they expand try to restrict speech to what is acceptable in a drawing room of bourgeois white women, and internet has to depend on a self described faggot troll to consciously create a truly free speech haven.

  2. Re:I'm fine with it.. by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    you mean the freedom to be a white supremacist neo-nazi hate monger

    Sure, and also the freedom to be a lying leftard knee-jerk SJW. They go hand in hand, and fuck you for sniveling about it.

    There's a reason why the ACLU defended the Nazis in first amendment cases. Educate yourself.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  3. Re:I'm fine with it.. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Keep in mind that even moot, the founder of 4chan and a guy renowned for his protection of free speech, had to ban all the GamerGate harassment. It's not that he particularly wanted to, it's that legally he had to or no-one would want to host or advertise on his website. In other words, it wouldn't be able to pay for itself. Plus, he would be dealing with a lot of log requests from law enforcement.

    8chan only manages to ignore harassment and child porn because it's small and doesn't cost much to run. So depending on your personal definition of "SJW", you might find that Milo is one of them when he is forced to delete threads and wield the banhammer.

    I also wonder where Milo would find the time for 4chan, considering he works for Breitbart and tours and is supposed to be running that college scholarship fund that is already behind schedule.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  4. Re:I'm fine with it.. by moeinvt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "when you say "freedom of speech" you mean the freedom to be a white supremacist neo-nazi hate monger."

    Definitely! Or maybe freedom to be advocating a homosexual lifestyle, or freedom to be a pornography spreading filth monger, or freedom to instruct people about making bombs or cooking meth.
    Yes, in the USA there is a First Amendment, but that only provides a little protection against government censorship. It does nothing to restrain the militant, hate-filled SJWs from using every tactic imaginable, including brute force, to stifle speech that they don't like.
    Creating a forum for unpopular opinions and controversial material is an entirely noble enterprise

  5. He's going to run into a brick wall by jigawatt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yiannopoulos added this his philosophy as an owner "would be very simple: free-speech central, no ifs, no buts."

    Let me know how that goes for you 5 seconds in when somebody posts child porn or makes a credible threat of violence.

  6. Re:really? by epyT-R · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know, right? The 21st century is all about properly censored and curated 'safe spaces.' WTF is he thinking?