Slashdot Mirror


Star Wars Production Company Fined Almost $2 Million For Harrison Ford's Injury (bbc.co.uk)

New submitter Shimbo writes: Foodles Production (UK) Ltd was fined 1.6 million British pounds (almost $2 million) at Aylesbury Crown Court today after pleading guilty to two charges under the Health and Safety at Work Act at an earlier hearing. Judge Francis Sheridan said, "The greatest failing of all on behalf of the company is a lack of communication, a lack because, if you have a risk assessment and you do not communicate it, what is the point of having one?" The fine is a result of an unfortunate incident while filming Star Wars: The Force Awakens. Harrison Ford was reportedly knocked to the ground and crushed beneath a heavy hydraulic door when he walked on to the set of the Millennium Falcon -- not believing it to be live. The 71-year-old actor suffered a broken left leg. Prosecutor Andrew Marshall said, according to Britain's Press Association, the door acted like a "blunt guillotine," coming down "millimeters from his face." The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) told the court that Ford was hit with a force similar to the weight of a small car.

81 comments

  1. 1.6m pounds, not 1.6m euros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A British film production company has been fined £1.6 million (almost $2 million) ...

    1. Re:1.6m pounds, not 1.6m euros by BeauHD · · Score: 1

      Thanks, the story has been updated.

    2. Re:1.6m pounds, not 1.6m euros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do they swirl in different directions when going down the toilet?

    3. Re: 1.6m pounds, not 1.6m euros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah, the ink bleeds off the plastic and all you have left is a plastic film on the water surface that doesnt flush but sticks to the walls like a temporary tattoo or shrinky-dink or a American Cheese wrapper.

    4. Re:1.6m pounds, not 1.6m euros by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I checked. If you're going to round to the nearest 100k it should be $1.9 million, not $2 million. The pound is right in the toilet this morning.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    5. Re: 1.6m pounds, not 1.6m euros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wait, $1.8 million.

      No... $1.7 million.

      Hold on... $1.6 million.

  2. Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was trying to recreate the stormtrooper hitting his head in the first Star Wars film (IV: A New Hope).
    The film was so bad they needed to add a bloopers extra for the film to even sell on DVD.

  3. Why not styrofoam? by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am a bit curious on why they didn't use styrofoam for the automatic doors. When they are molded and painted it is tough to tell the difference. However if they close on someone. The injures would be much less.
    The cost of fixing a styrofoam door would be less than the cost of breaking a stars leg.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Why not styrofoam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you SEEN styrofoam doors in older movies? It's really touch to get just right and the stability for such a large object makes it even more difficult.

    2. Re:Why not styrofoam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because styrofoam just breaks when they pressurize the cabin before liftoff...

  4. Small car by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ford was hit with a force similar to the weight of a small car

    The force was not with him, that day.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:Small car by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The force was not with him, that day.

      Actually it was with him. Close to him. ON HIM.

    2. Re:Small car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alternatively, too much force with him that day, there was.

      Yes, hmmm.

    3. Re:Small car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A small car, or 0.00026 Libraries of Congress.

      Also, if you hit Ford lightly with a feather duster I think he'd suffer a broken limb. He doesn't seem in the best of condition these days.

    4. Re:Small car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're kidding. He just walked away from a plane crash a couple months prior. What do you expect him to look like?

    5. Re:Small car by BoogieChile · · Score: 1

      No, but it certainly did some work on him instead.

    6. Re:Small car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the force was with him. REALLY with him.

    7. Re:Small car by Gornkleschnitzer · · Score: 1

      What brand of small car? A Ford, perhaps?

  5. Han Solo dies on Millennium Falcon. by laserhead · · Score: 2

    Sound like a legendary way to leave.

    1. Re:Han Solo dies on Millennium Falcon. by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      Insightful.

      Much better than the predictable way in which he kicked the bucket at the end of the movie.

  6. Leg? Head? by idontusenumbers · · Score: 1

    I'm picturing a huge door slamming down right next to his head as the article describes. But then I try to figure out how his leg broke... Where was his leg such that it was broken when the door came down near his head?

    1. Re:Leg? Head? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was pinned to the ground by his hips.

      To just miss his head, he would have to be bent double.

    2. Re:Leg? Head? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine that he's walking through the doorway while standing upright. His leg is extended in front of his body. The door slams down, narrowly missing the top of his head but crushing down onto his extended leg.

    3. Re:Leg? Head? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he was standing under the door and it hit a shoulder (not far from the head and off his center of gravity), it would have knocked his upper body sideways. Knocked unbalanced suddenly he probably tried to catch himself by moving one leg to brace his fall and left the foot/leg that was already planted under the door. He was probably very startled and didn't realize the full danger until it was to late to get his other leg out of the way.

      If it had hit him in the head, mostly square with his center of gravity, it would have been more likely to crush his head/core.

      I like to believe if it had knocked off his hat he'd been ok, with a dramatic roll and reach for the hat as the door came down.

  7. Spoiler? by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    I guess that means Han Solo isn't dead.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  8. His hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    He was actually completely clear of the door, but reached back to grab his hat

    1. Re:His hat by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      With his foot...

    2. Re:His hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which was "millimeters from his face."

    3. Re:His hat by chispito · · Score: 1

      With his foot...

      Missed the joke you have.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    4. Re:His hat by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Nono. Thanks to the /. moderation system, the GP was already at +5 Funny when I made my comment, so I knew without a doubt that it was a joke.

  9. Ford was "crushed beneath a heavy hydraulic door" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Almost sounds like Han Solo getting crushed by heavy hydraulic garbage compactor...

  10. Anyone else's broken leg... by bitchtits · · Score: 1

    £1.6 million. About 260 times the usual UK settlement for a broken leg at work.

    1. Re:Anyone else's broken leg... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This was a fine, not a settlement.

    2. Re:Anyone else's broken leg... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      the fine is proportional to the company who it is levied against.

      and it's not a settlement or reimbursement to Ford, rather it's a fine for breaking safety regulations. like, in the uk it is not up to you or your employees if you adhere to safety regs, it's the law. undoubtedly it is that way because long time ago industrial scrooges exploited the workers safeties based on "if they don't want to work they don't have to".

    3. Re:Anyone else's broken leg... by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      That's a new one to make money: take an old-fashioned actor ; make him deliberately injure himself ; sue ; profit.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  11. Sounds like it was the main door by Solandri · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The one that lowers to form a ramp to enter the ship. Can't have actors walking on a styrofoam ramp. TFA says in the 1977 movie, the door/ramp was lowered by hand using pulleys. Guess someone decided the new movies deserved a fancy mechanized door. Except since this is for a movie and not "real" use, it was designed and built by prop makers who never really gave much thought to safety since the very low frequency of use of their props meant accidents were exceedingly rare.

  12. Hey Mr. Slashdot Editor... by pinzvidz · · Score: 1

    Are you sure this story isn't about Harris Ford?

  13. Re:Because it was Ford by DjReagan · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ford's lawyers are irrellevant. This action was taken by the UK Health and Safety Executive.

    --
    "When I grow up, I want to be a weirdo"
  14. On screen death worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    They should have hit Disney with a bigger fine for killing Han Solo GRAPHICALLY - ON SCREEN - BY HIS OWN SON in front of an audience including six year old kids. Giving that movie a PG-13 rating was pretty fucked up. PG-13 sounds like 'Parental Guidance for children under 13' but if you read the go to the MPAA's web site their fine print it says "PG-13 (Parents Strongly Cautioned) – Some Material May Be Inappropriate For Children Under 13." Guess Disney didn't want an R rating to scare away families so they pulled strings at the MPAA

    1. Re:On screen death worse by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Cry moar. It's not like they showed them the X-rated Robocop.

    2. Re:On screen death worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't bring your 6-year-old to a PG-13 movie, dumbass. If you didn't know what PG-13 meant, it's your fault.

    3. Re:On screen death worse by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      PG-13 sounds like 'Parental Guidance for children under 13' but if you read the go to the MPAA's web site their fine print it says "PG-13 (Parents Strongly Cautioned) – Some Material May Be Inappropriate For Children Under 13."

      I'm not sure I see the difference. Some material may have been inappropriate for six year-olds--arguably, Han's death. What's the problem?

    4. Re:On screen death worse by aXis100 · · Score: 2

      So, you're complaining because the movie content fits the rating, but you didn't understand the ratings until you went and double checked?

      I'm really not sure how this is Disney's fault, and the fact that you want to see them punished reflects poorly on you.

    5. Re:On screen death worse by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      Never mind the dozens of people shot with blasters.

    6. Re: On screen death worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Won't someone please think of the children!!

    7. Re:On screen death worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Movie ratings below NC-17 are not legally enforced, and I'm not sure about NC-17.

    8. Re:On screen death worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forbes has been caught deliberately publishing malware ads, don't link to them directly. Post an archive or a screenshot.

    9. Re:On screen death worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's what the number in the rating has always meant, dumb-ass.

      PG-13 has always meant "For kids 13 and up, parents use your judgement below that age".

      If you took a 6 year old to a PG-13 film that you had not seen, then you are a negligent parent, and should have your parenting license revoked.

    10. Re:On screen death worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the PG-13 rating has been around longer than you, so you have no excuse for not learning what it is.

    11. Re:On screen death worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but Han shot first.

  15. F.O.R.D. by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

    Found On Ramp Dead?
    Fix Or Repair Door?
    Force Of Ramp Door? .......I slay me.

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    1. Re:F.O.R.D. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fined Over Regrettable Damage.

  16. A force similar to the weight of a small car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In fact, it was over 12 parsecs of force. He is lucky to be alive.

  17. May the force be ... by jxander · · Score: 4, Funny

    May the force be equal to mass times acceleration.

    --
    This signature is false.
    1. Re:May the force be ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May the force be equal to mass times acceleration squared.... it's the law.

  18. He belongs in a Museum?? by laurencetux · · Score: 1

    but i do rather like the 3 Indiana Jones movies but if they do a fourth they would have to do some sort of handof to a younger character

    1. Re:He belongs in a Museum?? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      They could simply use CG.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    2. Re:He belongs in a Museum?? by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      I bet that'd be right in the uncanny valley.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    3. Re:He belongs in a Museum?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oo! I like the sound of that!

      "Indiana Jones and the Uncanny Valley." :)

  19. Hit with a force by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    I guess the hit damage are more related to energy than force.

  20. move it back to usa where you can make each actor by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    move it back to usa where you can make each actor an 1099 work and wash your hands of any workers comp.

  21. Re: Will this hurt UK's movie industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fine is absurd.

    Look up most industrial deaths in uk and fines are no where near.

    However, on bizarre thing about their law is companies are expected to go to different levels based on their abilities.

    So a huge corporation would be expected to spend $10 million on a safety control to prevent a death, yet a very small company would only be expected to implement controls up to $100,000 to eliminate potential death.

  22. Han shouted first. by Snufu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But later versions were edited to show the door shout first.

    1. Re:Han shouted first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what did han shout? did he shout from the roof top professing his love for the door?

    2. Re:Han shouted first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No reward is worth this!"

  23. Re:Because it was Ford by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    But Ford has lawyers and a lot of money.

    Not his lawyers doing this. Not him starting it either.

    The production company has a lot of money. They should be fined just enough so that it hurts for a fuck-up like this. They will learn, and the risk of it happening again will be decidedly lower. That is a good thing.

  24. Re:Will this hurt UK's movie industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fine was down to who was hurt. Had this been an injury to a stage-hand, they'd be lucky to get any compensation and the company would just log it as a work accident. Furthermore, the stage-hand is probably on some contract via an agency who won't have employees comp insurance, so they'd also lose income.

    As for your idea, Durrbrain. The UKP is very low, making something in the UK with USD has never been cheaper. You also have no idea what unions are like in this industry in the US. You have to have very set jobs for people, which means lots and lots of people, despite only a few general skilled ones being needed. But don't let reality burst your wanky opinion of the UK. Go back to the Guardian or Daily Retarded Mail.

  25. Re:Because it was Ford by prefect42 · · Score: 1

    You socialists with your laws and regulations. No wait, you're not socialists, you're right wing neo-liberals with laws and regulations. US bubble.

    --

    jh

  26. Bladerunner 2049??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As heartbroken as the rest of us are over the next StarWars turd Disney's hard at work on, how does this affect the new Bladerunner movie? We were told 2017-10-7. We're holding you to it now!

  27. Re:Will this hurt UK's movie industry? by Dan+East · · Score: 1

    I'm replying to myself because I got modded down for a thoughtful, straightforward post about a legitimate scenario, and two of the replies make an interesting assumption. I said nothing about moving production to the USA from the UK. If anything they would move to some other country that is advanced enough to have the required infrastructure, but a government that will side with the producers in order to bring income to their country. I think the Asian market is ripe to start taking this kind of business. They have very large film industries already, and human rights are not something most are known for.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  28. Re:move it back to usa where you can make each act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except for that whole pesky union thing.

  29. Han Solo finally feels the force! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    took seven episodes, but he finally joins the jedi ranks.

    definitely not euros. one doesn't measure the force in euros. so, what is the going exchange rate from pounds to midichlorians, anyway?

  30. Real Life Final Destination by Kagato · · Score: 1

    Ford is more or less a real life "Final Destination" character. Between the door and the number of air plane accidents he should have died years ago. That last air plane accident did a real number on him. He couldn't talk for a week. If anything the real hero is his PR guy which made the media think he walked away from the last crash.

  31. Re:Because it was Ford by Motard · · Score: 1

    So, the movie company is fined, thus reducing its profits, and Ford might collect a smaller check as a result?

  32. Re:move it back to usa where you can make each act by RevDisk · · Score: 1

    This is true in a literal sense. But completely false in practical terms.

    Worker's comp is a trade off. They must cover you if you are injured, but generally you cannot sue for additional damages even if the employer is at serious fault. Damages are capped to medical bills and a paycheck. Without worker's comp limit of liability, there is no cap. A significant number of insurance providers demand employers ask for proof of workman's comp insurance for their contractors or pay for their workman's comp just as if they were a normal employee. Elsewise, said insurance provider leave themselves potentially open for significant uncapped liability.

    Workman's comp insurance is pretty cheap for occupations that aren't statistically dangerous. Electricians, chainsaw jugglers and commercial fishermen might have a much harder job.

  33. Re:move it back to usa where you can make each act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing to do with workers' comp.

  34. They forgot to play the recording by PPH · · Score: 1

    "Mind the gap."

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  35. Re:Will this hurt UK's movie industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty much zero effect, you have to consider the costs of sending and supplying key crew elsewhere with looser safety regs. elsewhere.

    Also Cecil B. DeMille's been dead for a long time now, and directors do have people to consider the safety of cast and crew; just imagine how expensive things would have been if they had killed Ford.

  36. Millimetres, not millimeters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...seeing as it was a quote from *Britain's* Press Association.