Slashdot Mirror


English Man Spends 11 Hours Trying To Make Cup of Tea With Wi-Fi Kettle (theguardian.com)

All data specialist Mark Rittman wanted was a cup of tea from his all new Wi-Fi kettle. Little did he know that the thing would take 11 hours for that. The issue, in the case of Rittman was, that the base station was not able to communicate with the kettle itself. According to The Guardian: A key problem seemed to be that Rittman's kettle didn't come with software that would easily allow integration with other devices in his home, including Amazon Echo, which, like Apple's Siri, allows users to tell connected smart devices what to do. So Rittman was trying to build the integration functionality himself. Then, after 11 hours, a breakthrough: the kettle started responding to voice control.

29 of 200 comments (clear)

  1. The worst part by Shane_Optima · · Score: 5, Funny

    The worst part was the liquid it ended up producing was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea.

    1. Re:The worst part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, that's not the worst part. The worst part is his kettle is now completely pwned and mining bit coins for ISIS.

    2. Re:The worst part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought it was that his kettle unexpectedly transformed into a whale.

    3. Re:The worst part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I like the final tweet of his in the article.

      Well the kettle is back online and responding to voice control, but now we're eating dinner in dark while lights download a firmware update

      This should be the only response ever given when someone tries to sell IoT nonsense.

    4. Re:The worst part by Overzeetop · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's rare to have a first post that can effectively be the last post. Today is the day you win the internet.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    5. Re:The worst part by David_Hart · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought it was that his kettle unexpectedly transformed into a whale.

      Oh No..... Not again.....

    6. Re:The worst part by fluffernutter · · Score: 3, Funny

      More depressing than Marvin.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    7. Re:The worst part by tomhath · · Score: 4, Funny

      the kettle started responding to voice control.

      And the kettle responded by calling the pot black.

    8. Re:The worst part by jpfulton · · Score: 2

      The first 100 million years were the worst. The second hundred million years were also the worst. After that I went into a bit of a decline.

  2. More accurate headline? by rhazz · · Score: 5, Informative

    Man buys IoT kettle that doesn't have support for Amazon Echo, spends 11 hours coding support, puts lame spin on story because nobody cares.

    1. Re:More accurate headline? by geek · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I kinda care. Its interesting to see the hacks people do to make things work. Granted this isn't as cool as making an iMac into a fish tank but still, kinda neat.

    2. Re:More accurate headline? by CODiNE · · Score: 4, Funny

      You must have very thin fish.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    3. Re:More accurate headline? by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Informative

      Back in the Ancient Times, there were colorful iMacs with cathode ray tube screens.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:More accurate headline? by chispito · · Score: 2

      Man buys IoT kettle that doesn't have support for Amazon Echo, spends 11 hours coding support, puts lame spin on story because nobody cares.

      To be fair, he didn't spin the story, he just tweeted what he was doing. It isn't his fault that newspapers and the public can't tell the difference between a hacker's project log and an average person struggling with a consumer device.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    5. Re:More accurate headline? by mjwx · · Score: 2

      You must have very thin fish.

      Walks into shop and looks at phrase book: "My Mac is full of eels".

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    6. Re:More accurate headline? by CODiNE · · Score: 2

      How often do I get to troll a 4 digit UID? :)

      *Obligatory rant about the old days of quality slashdot full of petrified Natalie Portman hot grits and penis birds*

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  3. RFC2324 compliant? by eMilkshake · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Does it correctly implement RFC2324 and respond 418 I'm a teapot when asked to brew coffee?

    1. Re:RFC2324 compliant? by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'd expect it to implement RFC7168. Perhaps he just sent a BREW request for / and didn't inspect the Alternates header on the response.

    2. Re:RFC2324 compliant? by DarthVain · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately the only response it gives is that it is "short and stout"...

  4. What. The. Fuck. by jenningsthecat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Seriously? I'm not sure what has me more gobsmacked - the fact that somebody would make a WiFi kettle, or the fact that anybody would actually BUY the fucking thing and burn 11 hours of his life trying to make it work. "Yes, I willingly wasted 11 hours of time, plus however much time I had to work to pay for it, on a kettle, just so I could connect it to the Interwebs! Isn't that cool?"

    Soon we'll be hearing stories about people being DDOS'd and spammed by their own appliances, and I will laugh heartily.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  5. Re:This is why I'm no longer in tech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Mine can do that - I press a button on it to tell it when I'm awake.

  6. Never ask a hobbyist why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The inevitable question asked IoT tinkerers is : what's the point? Was it worth it? After three weeks of tinkering, and an ugly mess of arduinos, breadboards and wires, Now you can hit the snooze button on your analog clock with wifi, or now you can run ssh on a teletype machine. Why did you do it?

    The answer is usually : to see if I could.

    And I say God bless those nutters.

    1. Re:Never ask a hobbyist why by green1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well of course it is! Manufacturers discovered a long time ago, that even their cheapest quality stuff lasts too long and people don't buy new ones often enough. By internet enabling them, they can conveniently discontinue the server side support (which usually blocks all local functions as well) any time they need a new revenue boost and force people to buy new ones all over again.

  7. Where's the love and support? by Tyr07 · · Score: 2

    This is actually really cool and good. Everyone seems to be mocking the wifi teakettle but what they're not realizing is this is the move to home automation expanding and growing. This is a good thing.

    Ever see Star Trek? When Picard went to a replicator and said 'Earl Grey Tea, hot' and poof, tea came out? Well, this is basically what we're trying to recreate, just without the fancy deconstructing and reconstructing things on the atomic level.

    As we automate more things in our lives it leaves us more time to pursue other activities. This is one of the ways civilization is going to advance.

  8. Wrong tool for the job by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Shouldda got a Galaxy Note 7. Heats up shit quick.

  9. Tea for my phone by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

    Unless the WiFi kettle can turn my phone, or wifi PC into a tea dispensing entity, I don't want it. It would be nice to have a tea button on my phone that pours freshly brewed tea out the headphone jack... ... obviously this wouldn't work with an iPhone.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  10. RFC 2324 Compliant? by Yaztromo · · Score: 2

    I suspect the problem is that the kettle is RFC 2324 compliant, and was returning a 418 error.

    No worries -- I hear they're working on a firmware update to make the kettle RFC 7168 compliant, which should make integration much easier.

    Yaz

  11. Re:they'll never sell... by plover · · Score: 2

    To paraphrase Thomas J Watson "I think there is a world market for about twenty Saturn rockets."

    And that's not just counting the Saturn Vs.

    Unimaginative.....If only they'd have kept building them, through economies of scale, we'd have a Saturn rocket in every household appliance by now.

    Those F1 motors should heat that kettle up right quick.

    --
    John
  12. Re: Four words by plover · · Score: 3, Informative

    Depends on your point of view. If you're a customer, the point of a pod is to make you a cup of coffee. But in Keurig's eyes, the point of a pod was never to make coffee, it was always to make a profit on each pod sold.

    However, third parties figured out how to make pods, too, and none of them paid Keurig royalties for doing so. This upset Keurig greatly. So they came out with Keurig 2.0, with a built-in Genuine Keurig Pod Detector (an LED and photo transistor that detects Keurig's invisible ink printed on the pod's foil top.) This invisible ink thwarted the evil third parties pods by reporting to the coffee maker's owner that "no valid Keurig pod was detected". This of course made all the coffee drinkers go back to buying Genuine Keurig Pods, making Keurig profits go up again.

    Except it didn't. The day after they came out, enterprising coffee drinkers figured out this nonsense and simply taped an old Keurig label onto the detector, and continued using their third party pods. Some third party pod makers provided a free clip-on reflector printed with the invisible ink that fit over the detector. And all the blogs were atwitter with the Evil that Keurig had wrought with Keurig 2.0. The demise of the company was predicted, buckets of tar and feathers were gathered, and the peasants grabbed their pitchforks and torches.

    Except that didn't happen either. Most people got on with their morning coffee, Keurig looked stupid for a while, and the whole tempest in a teapot blew over.

    --
    John