Slashdot Mirror


Scientific Breakthrough Increases Plant Yields By One Third (wsu.edu)

Slashdot reader schwit1 writes, "Plant scientists have found a way to encourage plants to better use atmospheric nitrogen, thus increasing yields by more than one third. The technique not only produces healthier plants and more seeds, it reduces the need for fertilizer, the overuse of which can be an environmental issue." From WSU News: For years, scientists have tried to increase the rate of nitrogen [conversion] in legumes by altering...interactions that take place between the bacterioid and the root nodule cells. [Washington State University biologist Mechthild] Tegeder took a different approach: She increased the number of proteins that help move nitrogen from the rhizobia bacteria to the plant's leaves, seed-producing organs and other areas where it is needed. The additional transport proteins sped up the overall export of nitrogen from the root nodules.

This initiated a feedback loop that caused the rhizobia to start fixing more atmospheric nitrogen, which the plant then used to produce more seeds. "They are bigger, grow faster and generally look better than natural soybean plants," Tegeder said.

13 of 197 comments (clear)

  1. Big agro GMO ploy by Entrope · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is all a sinister plot by big agriculture to poison us all with nitrogen, amirite? They're just looking for ways to stuff more nitrogen and other fillers into our food supply!

  2. Re:Attack Of The Killer Soy Beans? by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Funny

    And what happens when the nitrogen levels in the atmosphere are depleted by these Genetic Horrors???

    The holy balance of 78.09% nitrogen, 20.95% oxygen, 0.93% argon, 0.04% carbon dioxide will be disturbed, increasing our oxygen intake, and BURNING OUT OUR CELLS AS OXIDATION RATES INCREASE!!!

    OMG where's my tin-foil-hat-equipped-with-supplemental-nitrogen-tank???

    \_(oo)_/

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  3. Re:Great, but by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

    industrial processing to make it edible and hormone-like effects abound....

    Uh, you mean it has to be cooked? Edamame is a delicious dish of straight soybeans........
    Also, every food you eat affects your hormones......

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  4. Re:That's great, but by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

    People have been consuming legumes (beans, peas, chickpeas, lentils, etc) since we were hunter-gatherers, and have long formed the staple diets of numerous regions across the world. Legumes are a rich source of plant protein, fiber, carbs, and minerals.

    --
    The internet is not a series of tubes. It's more like a net. Or a network of computers. Or an internet.
  5. Rushing? by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why didn't natural selection already "discover" this? Perhaps there's a big trade-off that hasn't been discovered yet.

    1. Re:Rushing? by Rei · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Natural selection optimizes to a plant's natural environment. Intensive modern agriculture is not a plant's natural environment. Everything comes with tradeoffs, and in nature there are a lot of things that come into play beyond just "racing to as many seeds as possible". Perhaps, for example, by producing more nitrogen they'd be fertilizing the soil for their competitors which would outgrow them - maybe they were limiting the nitrogen for a reason.

      Indeed, this actually does seem to happen. Here in Iceland, lupine is not a native species, but it's taken off like crazy since it was introduced (to try to restore our soil), pushing out native species. However, evidence shows that after an area has grown lupine for several decades, it tends to slowly die out, being replaced by native plants that can now - due to the improved soil - outcompete the lupine. Lupine is, of course, a legume.

      --
      The internet is not a series of tubes. It's more like a net. Or a network of computers. Or an internet.
  6. Re:GMO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You don't have to be anti-science to think that we need better regulation on GMOs. In particular the Monopoly (or almost of ) by Monsanto on a lot of the base patents when it comes to GMOs is a bigger issue than almost any other with GMOs.... there is more but I'm tired and don't feel like typing more... so...

    TL;DR: Political issues with GMOs and how they are being controlled/used in society doesn't make you anti-science

  7. Re:Yeah.. by amiga3D · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Honestly having enough food is the least of the problems with too many people on the planet.

  8. Re:Yeah.. by lobiusmoop · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The big problem is that every calorie of food requires the input of 10 calories of fossil-fuel energy, mainly from oil and gas, which will be running out within your lifetime.

    --
    "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
  9. maybe, maybe not by doug141 · · Score: 4, Funny

    An economist is walking through the park with his son. "Look, Dad! There's a $20 under that bench!" Dad says, "Don't be absurd... if there was, someone would have picked it up."

  10. Re:Attack Of The Killer Soy Beans? by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

    The plants basically breed them.

    It's important to note that root nodules operate as a very close symbiosis - not exactly to the extent of our mitochondria in our cells, but it's more than just "bacteria that happen to be living next to the plant". The plant roots grow a carefully structured channel specifically to allow bacteria to "infect" them. The bacteria and plants work together on this - the plants produce flavinoids to let the bacteria know that they're there, and the bacteria in turn respond to flavinoids by producing nod factors, which lets the plant know that the bacteria are present and that it needs to work to encapsulate them. When an "infection" is established inside the root, the plant closes off the channel, not only trapping the bacteria, but also protecting them. The plants then nurture the bacteria, providing them nitrogen, oxygen, nutrients, and even proteins that assist in the fixation process. When the plant dies, the extensive cultures of bacteria are released and become free to colonize other plant roots

    If you were asking why bacteria evolved the need to fix nitrogen in general... that's easy. Nitrogen is one of the essential components in life; they had to. It's needed for protein, DNA, RNA, etc; life as we know it can't exist without it.

    --
    The internet is not a series of tubes. It's more like a net. Or a network of computers. Or an internet.
  11. Re:GMO by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Monsanto's first generation of GE soybean went off patent a while back and anyone can now use it. Unlike copyright, plant patents do actually expire.

  12. Re:Yeah.. by PPH · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe. But then there's that little bit in TFS that says "it reduces the need for fertilizer". Which means less petrochemical input into the food cycle. That could be a good thing.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.