Slashdot Mirror


Top Democrats Request FBI Investigation of Trump Campaign Ties To Russia Over Hacking (politico.com)

As the Trump campaign refuses to point blame at Russia for the DNC hacks, top democrats on four House committees are questioning possible connections between Donald Trump's presidential campaign and Russia. They have formally asked the FBI to investigate the matter, citing new comments from a Trump confidant. Politico reports: "Troubling new evidence appears to show that the Trump campaign not only was aware of cyber attacks against Secretary [Hillary] Clinton's campaign chairman, but was openly bragging about it as far back as August," said Reps. Elijah Cummings from Government Affairs, John Conyers from Judiciary, Eliot Engel from Foreign Affairs and Bennie Thompson from Homeland Security. "For months, we have been asking the FBI to examine links between the Trump campaign and illegal Russian efforts to affect our election, including interviewing Trump advisor Roger Stone," they said. "In light of this new evidence -- and these exceptional circumstances -- we call on the FBI to fully investigate and explain to the American people what steps it is taking to disrupt this ongoing criminal activity." Earlier this week Stone said that "I do have a back-channel communication with Assange," referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, whose organization has been dropping documents online from Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, and has been unloading documents from other Democrats as well. U.S. intelligence agencies last week declared that a connection exists between Russia and allegedly hacked documents leaked by WikiLeaks and others.

7 of 493 comments (clear)

  1. Re: Can we see this evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    You mean the 33,000 emails she deleted?

  2. Re: Can we see this evidence? by ravenshrike · · Score: 4, Informative

    Which were recovered in 2009 from backup.

  3. Wait about 2 weeks by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 5, Informative

    Can we see some of this troubling new evidence before we go to war with Russia please?

    I'm not counting out Trump losing for about the next 2 weeks. We have yet to see the following:

    1) Wikileaks has said it has evidence that will get Hillary indicted. As yet, the Podesta E-mails haven't done that, so everyone is expecting a big drop sometime soon. Probably on Hillary's birthday, October 26th.

    2) We haven't seen the last of the Podesta E-mails. A recent drop shows the democrats creating two organizations to infiltrate the Catholic religion, to create a "Catholic Spring" at some point of their choosing. (Yikes! WTF, Democrats?)

    3) It seems that Hillary had a hand in Kim Dotcom's arrest (remember him?). In response, Kim has promised a surprise birthday present for Hillary. (Many people will be quick to point out that Kim is various flavors of asshole, but that's beside the point - he's tech savvy, has lots of contacts, an axe to grind against Hillary, and a ton of money.)

    4) Someone over at Reddit/4chan has Clinton's deleted E-mails, and will be releasing them. These are apparently the ones deleted from her server before turning it over to the FBI.

    5) One of the recent Podesta dumps included his iPhone account password, and someone hacked his account, post a screencap proving that they were in the account, and sent all the data to Wikieaks. This means that Wikileaks not only has Podesta's E-mails up to whenever, they've got more recent ones up to about 2 days ago.

    6) ...and apparently remote-wiped his phone.

    7) Hillary is not appearing in person *anywhere*. (Check her rallys and engagements: it's all Bill, Barak, Michelle, and Chelsea. Hillary appears in person once from now to the end of the month.) Conspiracy theorists think that this is because of some hidden illness, but that's probably not the case. The Podesta E-mails reveal that the reason she's not being seen is because she's perceived as untrustworthy in person. Her campaign is being run largely by remote control.

    8) A couple of tapes of Clinton have yet to be released.

    9) And weirdly, during the last debate a fly landed on Hillary's face. That's not a problem or even especially interesting, but the fact that it landed, walked around and she never flinched or even notices is creeping out a lot of people.

    I'm not giving up on Trump just yet, and I've still got lots of popcorn.

  4. Re:Sure thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Bullshit.

    I read about her insider trading when she asked someone at the IMF in the EU about if Greece was getting a bailout, so her son in law could make a big bet on it happening. The guy at the IMF gave her a fairly detailed explanation of everything being considered, who was involved, and their stances on the issue. It basically came down to he said Greece was getting a bail out [side note, her son in law lost a shit load of money based on that insider information being wrong]. Her response to the information was to forward it onto the accounting/finance expert in the State Department to go over it and give her an in person briefing the next day on what it meant because it was way over her head. The insider trading was on Drudge Report and I decided to look at the actual emails myself.

    She doesn't understand shit. I read over 100 of her emails on Wikileaks and she is as dumb as a rock. Its her staff doing literally everything for her and telling her what to say and when. You either didn't read them, or you are lying. About 75% of her released emails that she sent say, "Call me at home at 8 tonight"

    Yea, I read, apparently more than you did, and she is a rock. Its not coincidence that Iran ran over the US on their "deal" and Syria is a mess, and her gun running in Libya turned into an assassination of an ambassador. She hasn't a clue what she is doing, period.

  5. Re: Can we see this evidence? by Imrik · · Score: 4, Informative

    You left out the part where the emails got subpoenaed.

  6. Re:Sure thing by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

    If I were as crude as you, I would be responding with your trademark "bullshit" response right now. Unless you're talking about something else (wherein you should probably reference it), you never read that email because it was lost (at least the relevant parts, aka the attachment). The only writing from Clinton on the subject was a hasty "Pls print two copies." Is that what you call reading things she's written? Furthermore,, the supposedly "damning" thing is a chain-of-guilt. Nothing at all about Clinton giving information to her son it law, it's "Sullivan gave the info to someone else, who works at the Clinton foundation, and Chelsea works for the Clinton foundation too, and her husband was investing in Greece, therefore Hillary Clinton is a corrupt scumbag"). I'm rather surprised that with all of the stuff Clinton had to read on Greece as part of her job that they couldn't find something worse than this to try to tar her with. The most "corrupt" action that's come forth in the Wikileaks releases concerning Clinton and Mezvinsky themselves is that she forwarded an email from him to another government official. I know, stop the presses.

    Back to the original topic: I recommend that people read things she wrote and form their own opinions from them. You clearly did not do that. It's something that very, very few people here commenting about the emails have actually done. They just repeat the "gotchas" that the leaks were designed to elicit.

    --
    The internet is not a series of tubes. It's more like a net. Or a network of computers. Or an internet.
  7. Re: Can we see this evidence? by David_Hart · · Score: 5, Informative

    Oh, you need more? How about asking Hillary what this magical "Fair Share" is that she keeps telling everyone we should be paying. Here is a hint, if she does not give you a number and we already pay the highest taxes in the world it's probably 100%. She want's fossil fuels to become stranded resources. How do we power a country with no assets exactly?

    Since when does the US pay the highest personal taxes in the world? Not even close...

    http://www.taxpolicycenter.org...
    http://www.tradingeconomics.co...

    If you are referring to the corporate tax rate, it may be around the 2nd highest but I guarantee you that not one company pays that rate due to write offs, tax deductions, and loopholes.

    http://taxfoundation.org/artic...