Slashdot Mirror


5-Year-Old Hosting Service AllMyVideos, No Longer Profitable, To Shut Down (torrentfreak.com)

Founder five years ago, AllMyVideos.net is one of the most popular video hosting services out there, but it will be shutting store this month. Though millions of users visit the website every month, the company said it operated on "minus 20 percent" profit margin. "We are sorry to inform everyone that effective October 23, 2016 Allmyvideos.net will stop accepting new uploads and the site will close fully at the end of the month," the site announced.

59 comments

  1. All My Videos nolonger belong to us by jfdavis668 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sorry to see it go.

  2. Must be very popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This must be super popular because I've never heard of it.

    1. Re: Must be very popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny ðY

    2. Re:Must be very popular by Anrego · · Score: 3, Informative

      This was pretty much my thought.

      Quick google and just looks like one of the many youtube wannabies out there that started to spring up when hosting video (at least on a small to mid scale) started to become more feasible.

    3. Re:Must be very popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto.

    4. Re:Must be very popular by danomac · · Score: 1

      I was more thinking another cloud service bites the dust, but at least they're trying to warn the users their content will be unavailable.

    5. Re:Must be very popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonymous Coward!!? You're so popular! I see you everywhere!!

    6. Re:Must be very popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They killed all their subscribers and now all that material will be lost to Humanity because if someone peruses it maybe some real killer might be found. This is not supposed to be happening with our latest technologies much less when people do care about saving collections just for the sake of not losing them. It does not feel like an announcement but like a THREAT and they won. ALL THESE WRITERS HERE ARE SO BLAND they will say it is OK when the news is the USA was nuked or that we will no longer be producing computers of any kind at all.... Truly, infuriating, you are supposed to go campaigning and finding solutions not just accepting fate and using ECONOMICS to justify ALL LOSSES.

    7. Re: Must be very popular by MichelleVittorio · · Score: 1

      But here you are....making a stupid comment.

  3. Any attempt to sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like the founder gave up trying to evolve it and rather than selling, would rather consign it to the dustbin. Sadly, no one can compete with youtube these days because of the legal issues and profitability scale involved.

  4. Really? by ledow · · Score: 2

    "Unprofitable business model leads to business not making enough profit"

    Honestly, where's the news or the shocking surprise.

    A high-end, tech-heavy hosting site that you can upload stuff to for free, and share to people for free, and they can all watch it for free, not making money? Amazing.

    And their premium offering gave you:

    - Ad-free access and no waiting
    (So you pay to make the ads go away)
    - No daily streaming limitations
    (Amazing - how much time do you think one person will spend on such a website streaming videos from it exclusively, such that they will pay to remove the restriction?)
    - Unlimited parallel downloads
    (Ooooh... so I can download more than a handful of videos at the same time. Or just do a few and wait)
    - Upload larger files - up to 5GB
    (5Gb of MP4 is a LONG movie)
    - Files never removed due to inactivity
    (Except if the company goes bankrupt...)
    - Special dedicated servers just for PREMIUM Members
    (Oooh! But if the free service was shit, nobody would bother to pay for the premium one anyway)
    - Mobile access - iPhone and Android
    (You mean I can watch videos on my smartphone too!?)
    - Download original files
    (You mean I can download the thing I'm watching?!)
    - Upload more files simultaneously
    (See "Unlimited parallel downloads")
    - Create custom links to track traffic
    (Because there's no other way to do that)
    - Ultimate file security with AES encryption
    (WTF does that even mean in the context of a video-sharing website?)

    Amazon Prime? People queried why I bought it. Because my usage pattern makes it have value enough for me even if theirs doesn't.

    But what these people have made is a pay-for YouTube. One of thousands of them. A website that's incredibly annoying to download anything significant from, and would confuse people for even casual use (e.g. your family video), and which nobody with a brain would ever pay for against other sites offering the same or more.

    And I imagine the costs of DMCA takedowns alone would wipe out anything that you've got coming people. People will badly abuse a site like this, and maybe even pay to do so, just like any other file download site.

    Where was the profit, ever?

    There should be a register of people who have owned a company with a turnover over a certain amount, which later closes business, so that you can deny these people ever running a business again.

    1. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it still is geek news at heart.
      Radio shack closure shouldnt have been covered as well, do you think?

    2. Re:Really? by ledow · · Score: 3, Insightful

      5-year-old website nobody's ever heard of, with no business plan, little to no profit ever and obvious misuse for piracy that offers yet-another-file-download service bouyed up for even that long by a handful of ads.

      vs

      100-year-old bricks-and-mortar, household-name geek store, which we all have nostalgia for the local equivalent of, slowly pushed out of the high street, as a sign of declining necessity and changing use of technology, after a long-established and massively profitable business in many countries for nearly a century, until last year.

      Yeah. Same thing.

    3. Re: Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The daily streaming limitations were the real killer for non premium users. So many other sites offer no daily limit. They shot themselves in the foot there.

    4. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (WTF does that even mean in the context of a video-sharing website?)

      No automated DMCA takedowns.

      All of these sites are basically just used for piracy.

  5. Yet again... by Jack_the_Tripper · · Score: 0

    Federal Reserve starts cranking up interest rates, investor funds start drying up, unprofitable businesses start dropping like flies...think I've seen this movie before.

    Or, I suppose, one could replace "Federal Reserve" with "Animal Spirits" if they wanted to tow the party line.

    1. Re:Yet again... by GrumpySteen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The federal interest rate has absolutely nothing to do with a business failing after five years of losing money. Some of the actual reasons are mentioned in the article that you obviously didn't bother to read.

    2. Re:Yet again... by rossdee · · Score: 1

      "Federal Reserve starts cranking up interest rates,"

      When did that happen?

      or are you in some alternate universe

    3. Re:Yet again... by CRC'99 · · Score: 2

      the actual reasons are mentioned in the article that you obviously didn't bother to read.

      Are you new here?

      --
      Sendmail is like emacs: A nice operating system, but missing an editor and a MTA.
    4. Re:Yet again... by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      It has everything to do with it. There wouldn't be any of this money flowing through the system without 0% interest rates and various QE programs. People wouldn't waste their own *savings* on these so called 'business models' of giving away free stuff for years without the Fed providing the money and the government providing a guarantee.

  6. Doesn't surprise me by jonwil · · Score: 2

    One of the biggest reasons for AllMyVideos (and a number of other similar sites) to exist is for hosting all the copyright-violating stuff that the big boys like YouTube and DailyMotion detect and block.

    And the sort of people who seek out such content are exactly the sort of people who are least likely to pay AllMyVideos any money and the most likely to use whatever combination of blocking software and tools are necessary to avoid the annoying ads (after all, one big reason why they want to find the stuff online rather than watching it on TV is because they want to avoid all the ads TV gives you)

    So its not surprising that AllMyVideos is failing (not getting enough people paying for premium stuff and not getting enough people viewing their ads either)

    1. Re:Doesn't surprise me by ledow · · Score: 1

      And lawyers up its backside every minute of the day looking for any profiting from that venture in order to claim triple-damages on later.

      Sometimes, there's a reason to go bankrupt.

    2. Re:Doesn't surprise me by AAWood · · Score: 3, Informative

      One of the biggest reasons for AllMyVideos (and a number of other similar sites) to exist is for hosting all the copyright-violating stuff that the big boys like YouTube and DailyMotion detect and block.

      One of the other biggest reasons for for AllMyVideos (and a number of other similar sites) to exist is for hosting all the none copyright-violating stuff that the big boys like YouTube and DailyMotion misdetect and wrongly block.

    3. Re:Doesn't surprise me by lgw · · Score: 1

      That would make sense if AllMyVideos was a Youtube clone, where you could browse for videos to watch. But it seems to be a Megaupload clone, for hosting vids traded on forums. That's a dead giveaway.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    4. Re: Doesn't surprise me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like what?

    5. Re:Doesn't surprise me by TheLink · · Score: 1

      That's why I think that a fair amount of money that Kim Dotcom's Megaupload made was legit.

      >99% of those people who wanted free stuff wouldn't have paid him. And they might even be running ad blockers. In contrast I can imagine employees of organizations signing up for paid accounts to transfer large files to customers. I used it to transfer large (legit) files. Didn't go for the paid account- the downloaders could wait - wasn't a business thing. If I needed it for business I might have expensed it.

      --
  7. Could you put all the videos in a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Giant torrant.

  8. No longer profitable? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    So were these sites ever profitable? I assume that Kim Dot Com was running Mega profitably, was this one ever cash flow positive?

    On a side note how about all the other cash flow negative internet 'businesses' (hobbies AFAIC)? I fully expect the Fed to announce a new round of QE sometime but not too long after the elections, that will help them I suppose. Other than that those types of enterprises should also be readying to shut down.

  9. Re:I Bet!! by tepples · · Score: 0

    There is no K in Yamaha, maker of motorcycles and FM synthesizers. It might be what your computer's spell checker recommended, but many spell checkers fail to take into account phonics or context, instead focusing on presses of a key near the presumably intended one. A "yarmulke", a beanie worn by Jewish men, was probably meant.

  10. And you can thank all the ad blocking for that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    This is what happens when careless consumers ad block and don't consider the ramifications of how they're taking the only revenue source away from the web services they love to use. It's a shame it went out of business. It's not surprising and if you ad block, it's your own fault. The online ad business has been beat to shit over the years and it's tough enough to make a profit as a web service these days, never mind ad blockers. People ad block proudly like they're smart for doing it or whatever. Not smart - online is only medium, unlike TV, print, radio or streaming audio services, that has to tolerate ad blockers. Go ahead, keep blocking ads and kill the free web. No biggie, right?

    1. Re:And you can thank all the ad blocking for that by war4peace · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Blocking ads came as an effect. The cause being obnoxious ads.
      It was a run to the bottom (top?) since then.
      Ads became more obnoxious, ad blockers became more complex, and so on, and so on.
      Of course, some websites would fall. Is this users' fault? Only if you look no further.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    2. Re:And you can thank all the ad blocking for that by rholtzjr · · Score: 2

      As long as ads systems are an avenue to infiltrate and infect systems with malware do not expect blocking to be unjustified by the user.

    3. Re:And you can thank all the ad blocking for that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If people aren't willing to be bombarded with ads to pay for a service, then the service is poorly designed business.

      An ad-supported business is not "the free web," it's just another business.

      You can choose to be deliberately obtuse and skip over how bad the ad serving racket has become, but you should save that for an audience of non-technical people.

    4. Re:And you can thank all the ad blocking for that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ad (and script) blocking is what happens if websites take 10 seconds to load scripts and ads, when they can do 6 seconds without ads, and 0.5 seconds without both. Not to mention privacy concerns / tracking.

    5. Re: And you can thank all the ad blocking for that by slasher999 · · Score: 1

      Good. I block ads because I don't want to see them, not because ads are inherently bad but because ads have become so intrusive due to targeting algorithms. If the online ad industry continues to evolve as it has been that industry can expect more people to "fight back". Anyone running an ad supported site these days should take note.

  11. "one of the most popular" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, how come I literally NEVER heard of this hosting service before if it was "one of the most popular" ?
    Stop claiming something is popular when it really isn't, otherwise most people on the internet would've at least heard of it in passing, but this is the first time I even see any mention of this site, when I asked a couple friends, none of them even knew what it was too.

  12. Re: Founder five years ago? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

    Muphry's Law. Any spelling/grammar/language usage flame post will inevitably involve at least one mistake.

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  13. never even heard of it, but I don't make vids so.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never even heard of it, but I don't make videos so I don't really care if another shit site, catering to narcissists out there, bites the dust.

  14. File bankruptcy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And use the loss to avoid taxes for life.

  15. Like YouTube? by Chewbacon · · Score: 2

    Maybe I'm living under a rock, because I've never heard of this site. I thought YouTube was pretty popular.

    --
    Chewbacon
    The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
  16. Re:Founder five years ago? by AC-x · · Score: 1

    Pretty sure it's meant to say "Founded five years ago", so to be fair it's only 1 letter out. That's better than most /. summaries manage :)

  17. A 5-year-old is hosting a web site????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OH man, kids these days. To find out a 5-year-old is hosting a website. I recall my first day of Kindergarten when I was 5 years old. But kids these days are born into the world of smartphones and high technology. It's truly amazing what kids cans accomplish now. Most kids set up a lemonade stand but hosting a web site is awesome.

  18. Re:Founder five years ago? by edittard · · Score: 0

    What do you expect from manishs?

    --
    At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
  19. Ads infect, slow & track us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I stop it the most efficient native way doing more for less: APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?...

    Ads rob speed, security (malvertising) & privacy (tracking).

    Hosts add speed (hardcodes/adblocks), security (bad sites/poisoned dns), reliability (dns down), & anonymity (dns requestlogs/trackers) natively.

    Works vs. caps & PUSH ads.

    Avg. page = big as Doom http://www.theregister.co.uk/2... & ads = 40% of it.

    Hosts != ClarityRay blockable (vs. souled-out to admen inferior wasteful redundant slow usermode addons)

    Less power/cpu/ram + IO use vs. DNS/routers/addons/antivirus (slows you) + less security issues/complexity.

    Compliments firewalls (blocking less used IP addys vs. hosts blocking more used domains) & DNS (lightens dns load).

    Gets data via 10 security sites.

    APK

    P.S. - Safe https://www.virustotal.com/en/... (Verified by Malwarebytes' S. Burn "seen the code & it's safe" http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... )

  20. "Where life had no value..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: "... Death, sometimes, had its price. That is why the bounty killers appeared"-> https://entertainment.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=9775949&cid=53085867/

    * Strong sites will survive - so will the web, as it did LONG before it was monetized for advertisement.

    (If those ads wouldn't INFECT us w/ malicious code, slow us down & track us? That program NEVER would've been released to the "general public" in the 1st place... but, here we are, doing MORE for stopping that, natively, & for FAR less...!)

    APK

    P.S.=> "Video Analogy" from For a Few Dollars More https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9vZJMVYHf0/ , starring "the KING of cool", Clint Eastwood (out here in the "wild west of the web" (complete w/ 'outlaws' & all)) ... apk

  21. Kodi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better remove it from my SALTS config then.

  22. I must be out of touch... by XSportSeeker · · Score: 1

    Most popular video hosting service? Wow... guess I'm out of touch with the whole video hosting service thing.
    I did some research sometime ago and came up with names like YouTube (obviously), Vimeo, Metacafe, Dailymotion, Break.com, Crackle, Viddler and stuff from other countries like NicoNicoDouga and Youku. But AllmyVideos? Never even heard of it.

    1. Re:I must be out of touch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AllMyVideos was one of many video hosting sites where people would upload pirated TV shows.

  23. Re:Founder five years ago? by moronoxyd · · Score: 1

    To be fair: Only one of the two earns their money by writing.

  24. apache lamp servers are neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm guessing in a couple hundred years some super smart geeks will figure out a way for anyone to operate a functionally equivalent (hell, vastly superior) service from home with their raspberry pi 7 they bought for a quarter from a vending machine.

    Free and Open Source Software Rocks!

  25. Re: Founder five years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you mean Murphys Law? :^)

  26. Re: Founder five years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoosh!