Slashdot Mirror


It's Entirely Reasonable For Police To Swipe a Suspicious Gift Card, Says Court (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes Ars Technica: A U.S. federal appeals court has found that law enforcement can, without a warrant, swipe credit cards and gift cards to reveal the information encoded on the magnetic stripe. It's the third such federal appellate court to reach this conclusion. Last week, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found in favor of the government in United States v. Turner, establishing that it was entirely reasonable for Texas police officers to scan approximately 100 gift cards found in a car that was pulled over at a traffic stop. Like the previous similar 8th Circuit case that Ars covered in June 2016, the defendants challenged the search of the gift cards as being unreasonable. (The second case was from the 3rd Circuit in July 2015, in a case known as U.S. v. Bah.) In this case, after pulling over the car and running the IDs of both men, police found that there was an outstanding warrant for the passenger, Courtland Turner. When Turner was told to get out of the car and was placed in the patrol car, the officer returned to the stopped car and noticed an "opaque plastic bag partially protruding from the front passenger seat," as if someone had tried to push it under the seat to keep it hidden. The cop then asked the driver, Broderick Henderson, what was in the bag. Henderson replied that they had bought gift cards. When the officer then asked if he had receipts for them, Henderson replied that they had "bought the gift cards from another individual who sells them to make money." Turner's lawyers later challenged the scanning, arguing that this "search" of these gift cards went against their client's "reasonable expectation of privacy," an argument that neither the district court nor the appellate court found convincing. The 5th Circuit summarized: "After conferring with other officers about past experiences with stolen gift cards, the officer seized the gift cards as evidence of suspected criminal activity. Henderson was ticketed for failing to display a driver's license and signed an inventory sheet that had an entry for 143 gift cards. Turner was arrested pursuant to his warrant. The officer, without obtaining a search warrant, swiped the gift cards with his in-car computer. Unable to make use of the information shown, the officer turned the gift cards over to the Secret Service. A subsequent scan of the gift cards revealed that at least forty-three were altered, meaning the numbers encoded in the card did not match the numbers printed on the card. The investigating officer also contacted the stores where the gift cards were purchased -- a grocery store and a Walmart in Bryan, Texas provided photos of Henderson and Turner purchasing gift cards."

5 of 204 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds reasonable by 110010001000 · · Score: 1, Informative

    They caught a bad guy. What is the problem here? It is entirely correct to be suspicious of a guy who has $100k in gift cards.

  2. Re:To the Secret Service? by Etcetera · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is the officer very well connected or does the Secret Service widely offer the service to scan gift cards?

    I'm surprised the Secret Service just takes these requests as part of their duties..

    Gift cards are a modern way to perform money laundering, which is part of the financial crimes that the Secret Service is in charge of when it's not protecting the President.

    Old and Busted: Money Orders
    New Hotness: Applebee's Credits

  3. Experts disagree ... by l2718 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Prof. Orin Kerr, a noted expert on the 4th Amendment and on computer crime law posted his negative reaction to this ruling; he has a longer commentary on this issue here

    According to Prof. Kerr this is the third court of appeals to rule that that reading the stripes is "not a search", and that this runs counter to Supreme Court precedent such as Arizona v. Hicks .

  4. Re:Well, there goes the 4th Amendment again... by sjames · · Score: 1, Informative

    They got one. It's right there in the summary.

  5. Re:Well, there goes the 4th Amendment again... by Nethead · · Score: 4, Informative
    Because of 18 USC 1029:

    (a) Whoever -
    (1) knowingly and with intent to defraud produces, uses, or traffics in one or more counterfeit access devices;
    (2) knowingly and with intent to defraud traffics in or uses one or more unauthorized access devices during any one-year period, and by such conduct obtains anything of value aggregating $1,000 or more during that period;
    (3) knowingly and with intent to defraud possesses fifteen or more devices which are counterfeit or unauthorized access devices;

    And yes, things with mag stripes are access devices as defined under this federal law. Having 143 access devices when a normal person may have at most half a dozen does raise concern that the person is committing a violation.

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.