Slashdot Mirror


Americans Work 25% More Than Europeans, Study Finds (bloomberg.com)

Americans are addicted to their jobs. U.S. workers not only put in more hours than workers do almost anywhere else. They're also increasingly retiring later and taking fewer vacation days, reports Bloomberg. From the article: A new study tries to measure precisely how much more Americans work than Europeans do overall. The answer: The average person in Europe works 19 percent less than the average person in the U.S. That's about 258 fewer hours per year, or about an hour less each weekday. Another way to look at it: U.S. workers put in almost 25 percent more hours than Europeans. Hours worked vary a lot by country, according to the unpublished working paper by economists Alexander Bick of Arizona State University, Bettina Bruggemann of McMaster University in Ontario, and Nicola Fuchs-Schundeln of Goethe University Frankfurt. Swiss work habits are most similar to Americans', while Italians are the least likely to be at work, putting in 29 percent fewer hours per year than Americans do.

63 of 404 comments (clear)

  1. What have they got to show for it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I mean bragging about our victory over socialized medicine is fun and all..

    1. Re:What have they got to show for it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How does retiring at age 50 sound? House paid off, Cars paid off, kids in college, $1.2M in bank. Of course it wasn't easy, working a minimum 65 hours per week and going home tired as death.

      Retirement sounds all good and well at age 50, unless you end up dropping dead at age 55 due to the stressful work schedule you've endured for most of your life.

      Also, I can comfortably assume that at least one of the parents wasn't around much for family time and raising children when working to death at a minimum of 65 hours per week. As a parent, some sacrifices are worth it, and with $1.2M in the bank, the one thing even you can't buy back is lost time.

    2. Re:What have they got to show for it? by kwbauer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course. I forgot that Europeans were able to prevent Russia from moving in all by themselves. Oh wait. No they didn't. Russia moved in and installed puppets in all those Eastern bloc countries and the other European countries did nothing. The US was tired and left Europe to do something and Europe failed. The US left Europe to keep Ukraine safe and Europe failed.

      How much has Europe been paying the US to maintain all those bases that kept Russia at bay? Only an idiot believes that the Soviet Union/Russia would have left Europe alone had the US not maintained those bases, free of charge to the Europeans. Actually, the US was pumping money into the countries where those bases were located.

    3. Re:What have they got to show for it? by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      What does that tell me?

      That you make up 'facts'.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:What have they got to show for it? by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      In our case it was just living the "European lifestyle" in a place that's not like a big European city. That means two working professionals. Except one pays the bills, and the other pays for the frills.

      We didn't live life to the credit limit. We saved and invested instead.

      We also didn't have to compromise too much on the fun.

      As far as vacation time goes: quality over quantity.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:What have they got to show for it? by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      Why do you think he didn't? I did.

      Americans really don't know how good they have it. A lot of them whine about how every other place is so much better. Except they've never bothered to actually visit those places.

      Plus there are plenty of ways to "live it up". Not all of them are terribly expensive. Otherwise European vacationers would be screwed. '-p

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    6. Re:What have they got to show for it? by plopez · · Score: 4, Informative

      "European Lifestyle" also means single payer medicine, 4 or more weeks vacation, and an efficient mass transit system.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    7. Re:What have they got to show for it? by Jason1729 · · Score: 2

      From the industrial revolution until Nixon Shock, the standard of living was on a steady rise.

      Nixon made changes to monetary policy so that ever since then the standard of living has been basically frozen and all improvements to productivity go to corporate profits.

      Even most households going to 2 income still have the same basic standard of living despite contributing twice as much to the workforce.

      In Europe, the extra productivity went to a combination of more profits and shorter hours.

      A side effect of the American system is fewer people can do the same work, the companies have less need for employment, so much higher unemployment. So not only are you profiting the rich, you're paying higher than needed taxes to support the poor who would have jobs if each person worked fewer hours.

    8. Re:What have they got to show for it? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not to be Debbie Downer, 1.2MM is rarely enough to retire early on, even with zero debt or college costs, unless you live on less than $1,500 per month and plan on down-sizing the home soon to boost savings.

      Personally, I like working, so I don't mind spending 10-12 hours a day at the company I helped build. The money is good, wife and I don't have kids and like to travel, so it works. I get about 6 weeks of vacation a year, although most of it is in the form of long weekends. We cut back on our pay and proportionally reduced the stress level, so a long day isn't always long hours working.

      I look at my Scandinavian sister-in-law, and while I might envy the month of July off and zero-work weekends, I prefer what we have more. (Although I will need to retire hopefully around 50, I liked the retire early, retire often strategy more.)

    9. Re:What have they got to show for it? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, but APART from single payer medicine, 4 or more weeks vacation, and an efficient mass transit system, what did the Romans do for us?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    10. Re:What have they got to show for it? by Aighearach · · Score: 4, Funny

      Americans really don't know how good they have it.

      Hey Dillweed, I'm gonna call you out on that. For one whole year I expect you NOT to call Americans arrogant. Who the bleep told you we don't know how good we have it?! Of all the anti-American nonsense I hear, this one just really stands out as being daft. Of all the things we're good at, knowing that we've got it better has got to be right up there at the top.

      Even a random moron living in a trailer park with no health care can tell you they've got it better than some Frenchy socialist.

    11. Re:What have they got to show for it? by xSauronx · · Score: 2

      not with mandated insurance requirements. 10% of my income is spent on insurance--which doesnt include copays, medications and other visit or operation fees. i make a decent amount of money but that is a big, big chunk.

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
  2. Misleading results by dysmal · · Score: 4, Informative

    Working more does not necessarily mean more productivity. It's especially hard to be productive when you're burning your limited PTO/vacation allotments for unplanned family illnesses rather than... you know... planned restful downtime.

    1. Re:Misleading results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In this case, though, it does. Americans have one of highest productivity per person in world.

      I'm not saying it's a good thing, but it's true. Personally. I use ALL my vacation and rarely work more than my allotted time (I work in internal medicine, so I do 7 on and 7 off).

      http://www.news.com.au/nationa...

    2. Re:Misleading results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I am very interested in how they defined the productivity per worker. The article does not state that. From the numbers they show, my gut feeling is that they simply divided the gross national product by the number of employees, which is a wildly inaccurate way of defining productivity. Norway is not significantly more productive than Sweden or Denmark - it just has a lot of oil and those two countries do not. The relative sizes of the financial sector in different countries adds a similar distortion and there are many more factors to consider. How much a worker actually contributes to productivity is very hard to measure objectively. The GDP per worker does not tell much of that story.

    3. Re:Misleading results by Thud457 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but what has increasing worker productivity gained us?
      TL;DR - since ~1973, diddly-squat if you're a worker, pretty sweet if you own the place. Let's give those heroic jerb creators another tax break!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    4. Re:Misleading results by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We will soon find out, I fear. The UK has already been talking about which employee rights will be removed once it leaves the EU. Time off proportional to overtime looks like it will be the first thing to go, but they keep talking about making the UK more "competitive", by which they of course mean lower wages, longer hours and fewer expenses like safety equipment and adaptations for people with disabilities.

      So it is likely we will find out just what that does to productivity soon, giving us an opportunity to compare the EU and US models.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Misleading results by konekoniku · · Score: 2

      The standard accepted approach in economics is to use Total Factor Productivity. You can read about it here: http://www.people.hbs.edu/dcom...

    6. Re:Misleading results by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      I am very interested in how they defined the productivity per worker.

      It is GDP (usually adjusted by PPP) divided by total hours worked by all workers in the country.

      my gut feeling is that they simply divided the gross national product by the number of employees, which is a wildly inaccurate way

      No. That is NOT what productivity means.

      Norway is not significantly more productive than Sweden or Denmark - it just has a lot of oil and those two countries do not.

      Productivity does NOT mean "working hard". Offshore oil workers may not "work harder" than, say, farmers, but they are likely to contribute far more to GDP, and are thus more productive.

    7. Re:Misleading results by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      It's a lot harder to quit your job and strike out on your own now that having health insurance is the law.

      That is a lame excuse. But seriously, you should NOT try to start your own business. If you really think a molehill like this is a major impediment, you will never get over the mountains. Keep your day job.

  3. Need more unions and workers rights! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Need more unions and workers rights!

    1. Re:Need more unions and workers rights! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe Americans need to live in a framework that allows them to walk away from hostile work environments. To put it another way, I don't think most Americans would be satisfied by the materialistic aspects of European life and due to this pursuit we're suffering for it. Until our conceptions of what it means to lead a successful and good life changes we're doomed to repeat the same cycle of consumerism. Each concept has its own pros and cons, choose wisely.

    2. Re:Need more unions and workers rights! by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly. You're being fired from two of your three part-time, low-wage jobs because you needed to stay home to care for a sick child? You just need to start your own business! If you're too lazy to do that, why should we care about your problems?

    3. Re:Need more unions and workers rights! by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      > Maybe Americans need to live in a framework that allows them to walk away from hostile work environments.

      That's called self-discipline.

      Americans have more choices. They can chose to be vulnerable or not. We make more, keep more, and our currency goes farther. We just have a consumer culture that encourages blowing it all.

      Even ghetto children have this fixation on overpriced status symbols.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:Need more unions and workers rights! by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, that's going to work super in a global economy. I'm sure countries with the proverbial Eye of the Tiger won't take advantage of that to further erode US jobs!

      It's hilarious some of you people think it's still 1973 and what worked in the last century will work now.

    5. Re:Need more unions and workers rights! by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 2

      Brilliant! If those lazy, shiftless poors would just put off having children until they can afford it, then... well, given the increasing stratification of American culture, they'd probably never manage to have children. So we breed poorness out of the population! Win-win!

  4. Only Logical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As Americans measure everything by size and not quality, I am not surprised by this. My USA counterparts are much more at the office, and producing less work than the continental ones. Make a study about effectiveness and I am your man!

    1. Re:Only Logical by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, that makes Dublin the Delaware of Europe.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  5. working to offset expansion of the money supply by roman_mir · · Score: 3, Informative

    Americans have to work more hours and take fewer vacation days because they are poorer at this point, given that USA is running 500,000,000,000 a year trade deficit and has been running that for 2 decades now, Americans cannot afford anything, they are completely stuck in debt and their government in concert with the Federal reserve are destroying the value of their money, value of theirs savings every days. Government spending and money printing, pushing interest rates down to keep borrowing more by doing things like 'operation twist' (the Fed buying long term bonds at negative real interest rates because nobody else would), all of this is expanding the money supply making USD less valuable all the time, thus making Americans less productive every day.

    The only way out of this insanity is to restructure the debts, an honest default on the USD denominated debt, stopping all government spending (yes, this means all wars, all SS payments, all Medicare payments, everything). You have to clear away all of your debts, allow the bond holders to lose money so that the interest rates would reset to normal levels (only real market without government intervention can set real interest rates). Get the government out of your money because otherwise you will never have vacations or retirement savings or anything.

    1. Re:working to offset expansion of the money supply by RichPowers · · Score: 2

      You're correct, roman_mir, but this isn't a US-specific problem. There's Japan, EU, etc. It's a rolling disaster for the so-called liberal capitalist democracies.

      What's disheartening is that public anger over the dismal outcomes of this inflationary fiscal policy manifests itself in bizarre and ineffective forms, like Trump. The Fed, meanwhile, continues as usual, while Congress ignores its constitutional responsibility to coin money and regulate its value.

    2. Re:working to offset expansion of the money supply by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not just the trade deficit, it's the spending we have to support as well. Even though the Federal Government took more than $10,000 per man, woman, and child (about $26,400 per worker - about $13.20 per hour worked in the US), it still spent $1,423,000,000,000 more than it took in (an additional $5.69 per hour worked). We have a LOT of Government to support - there are career politicians and crony capitalists to support after all!

      Sources: number of workers, 124.73 million. Federal revenues: $3.3 trillion. Federal debt added FY2016: $1.423 trillion

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  6. We get vacation?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wage slave here. Recently changed jobs (moved) and new company gives only 8 days a year vacation+Personal Holiday+mandatory holiday. I would love to work less... My wife and I are still discussing if we could afford for me to be Mr. Mom and her to work (she does make 2x what I make)... Lately I have been working the actual hours I get paid for, and have even been taking all of the breaks I am entitled to, but nobody ever takes, and my life satisfaction has gone way up. It's not that most americans are addicted to their job, it's that they are made to feel that if they don't work 120% of the hours they are "paid to work" then they will look like slackers and be let go.

    1. Re:We get vacation?? by avandesande · · Score: 2

      It's a regional thing too... on the east coast many of us wouldn't leave until 6 or 7. Live in southwest now and people work a straight eight.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:We get vacation?? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      Come to Europe.

      In most countries minimum vacation per year is by law 30 days. And no, you can not be forced by contract to give up days on that.

      Most countries have free or partly public funded kinder gardens etc. public transport for school kids low crime rates. Chances are you never meet one who ever witnessed or suffered from a crime.

      Bottom line you have less hassle with your life ... best places are of course Denmark, Netherlands or other nordic countries, Germany and France and depending on your touch for weather Spain and Italy and of course the baltic countries.

      If you or your wife are into software development you an get a job here with a snipp of a finger.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  7. Re:Capitalism of exploration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    True. It also doesn't take into account the quality of work done. It might just mean Europeans are 25% more efficient.

  8. That's definitely not accurate... by Captain+Centropyge · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's highly unlikely that we're addicted to our jobs. It's not usually by any choice that someone will work more and get less vacation. This is a cultural issue that's being pushed on the working classes by employers. I'd love to have a mandatory month of vacation and see everyone work less than 40 hours per week, as they tend to do in Europe.

    --
    Bite my shiny metal ass!
  9. That's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What do they have to show for it? That depends on whether you fit in.

    If you fit in, you've got money to show for it.

    If you don't fit in, you've got nothing to show for it.

    1. Re:That's easy by Timothy2.0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's the end result of the Prosperity Gospel.

      Those on the "outside" are conditioned to believe that, with enough hard work and effort, they'll eventually be on the "inside". However, those on the inside create policies to keep those on the outside, *outside*. Despite this, people still make decisions (i.e., voting) with the belief that they *might* become part o that inside group, ignoring the present (or even future) realities.

      It's fantastic social propaganda, though. The economy exploits the increased productivity (assuming, of course, more work hours equates to comparable economic gains; we all know that person that does 3 hours of work in an 8 hour shift), while kindling hope in a population that prosperity is just around the corner if they just keep working harder.

  10. Work != Worked hours by Oxygen99 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Pfft. Get back to me when hours worked equals productivity.

    --
    I had a dream, bright and carefree, but now there's doubt and gravity
  11. Trump = avatar? [Re:Greed is God] by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    Could be. We may be a simulation, and the server owner(s) sell "interference time" to the highest bidders. "Q" and Trump are customers who come to screw around in the "ant farm" as avatars. (Hillary doesn't give the vibe of a vacationer.)

    We are toys, analogous to Toy Story, except we don't know, like Buzz.

  12. Re:Capitalism of exploration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Someone else linked this which seems to indicate that south Europeans are simply lazy sods.

    However, when measured as value added per hour worked, Norway had the highest labour productivity level per worker at $46.55, followed by the US at $43.66 and France at $42.99.

    So, if a good hardworking Nord tells me I'm doing my work wrong, I'll listen (but may ignore the advice). If a Frank criticizes me for anything, I'll pour out his wine and feed his cheese to the rats.

  13. the real reasons for this by nimbius · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1. no real work week. a plurality of americans work in the service sector, which is far different than an office job. theyre intentionally scheduled to work 39 hours, or some subset below 40, to avoid insurance from their employer which is mandated by law. This has become less of an issue lately due to the affordable care act, however it doesnt excuse the fact that most service sector does not have a set schedule.
    2. no schedules. service sector and manufacturing often have mandatory overtime requirements. You cant be fired, by law, for refusing overtime however in almost all states you can simply fire the worker for no reason at all. Hence, it pays to work overtimes to stay in the good grace of the employer. finally
    3. low wages. if youre only working for ten dollars an hour at 20 hours a week, youre working 2-3 jobs to maintain an apartment and a car (a car is generally required in america.) if you have kids or a family, or are a single parent, the burden requires you to pick up far more than 40 hours of work at a low pay grade. this isnt likely to change as the united states has the unique approach of using children as punishment for sex. contraception, abortion, and even simple reproductive education in the United states are inconsistent and wraught with urban legends, religious overtones, and outright pseudoscience.
    4. predatory culture of consumption. everything here is offered on credit, with unlimited financing and relatively lax regulation (especially in subprime markets) of terms. In the US its not uncommon for a security guard making $13 an hour to drive a Lexus or Acura luxury sedan, because the terms and conditions of her credit never take into account the fact that a $48,000 touring sedan isnt in their budget. US check caching companies can charge more than 50% interest with impunity, and many do. The average US citizen carries more than ten thousand dollars in debt at any given time.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:the real reasons for this by houghi · · Score: 3, Informative

      European here:
      1: 35-40 IS a work week. And if you work half time, you are still insured for that period. For the company having somebody work full time or two people half time will cost about the same. Part time might even cost more. The reason to get part time people is
      a) Because people want to. e.g. moms who want to work part time and still have time for the kids
      b) You have hours that need it.
      There will be people who are willing work 4/5th (4 day week) or 9/10th (e.g. every wednesday afternoon off) or other situations were they decide to work less in agreement with the employer

      2. If by schedules you mean fixed hour weeks, then yes. Working overtime in Belgium is just not worth it. The taxes on your over time are about 85% or more. So you would be stupid to do it. So how do they deal with situations where overtime can not be avoided? You get paid in extra days off. e.g. working 1 (unplanned) Saturday will get you 1.5 or 2 days off. Sunday will be 2-3, depending on where you work. As a company you will learn very fast that most unforseen days are not really unforseen. It is just bad planning. And the situations will suddenly happen less.
      And yes, there wwhere situations where I did a lot of extra work one month and had 2 weeks vacation extra.

      3. It is about living wages. Where I work and in many other places, public transport is not only an option, it is paid for by the company. Imagine if you would not need to pay for your car. No taxes, no payment, no maintenance, no fuel. Look at it financially, not practically, because that is not possible. For me that was 200-300EUR difference per month, easy. If you are at the low end of earning, that will be a HUGE difference. So all of a sudden, I make 200EUR more per month.

      4.. Credit is obviously available in Belgium and other countries as well. And some people fall into that trap. However top get a credit (in Belgium) the credit company will be forced to look how much other credits you have, how much you make and how much you need to live. Give credit to somebody who should not get a credit and he does not even need to pay it back. Not ever. Not when he starts making money. Just no pay back at all. Complete write off for the credit company. So how does this work?
      a) You need a minimal income to get a credit. Below 1100EUR per month netto and no credit.
      b) Deduct from you income a standard for living. e.g. food, rent and such. Not sure what the amounts are, but say 750. That leaves 250 per month. Now look at every other credit. Not: a credit (card) is calculated as if iut where maxed out, because that is what you would have to pay back in the worst case scenario. So a CC for 2000EUR would be 100EUR as there is a minimal payback of 5% per month. That leaves you 150EUR to buy a car.
      So many people will say: If I ditch the card, I can buy a bigger car. Many will even have to ditch their cards to be able to buy a house.
      So you do not build credit, you get it when you work and things are not added, but deducted.
      Interest rates are fixed by law. Charge more and they will close you down without blinking and good luck trying to get your money back.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  14. Re:Capitalism of exploration by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Productivity and "working more" are not the same thing.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  15. Re: Capitalism of exploration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, all my friends who brag about working 10h-12h days spend much of it online social media or shooting the proverbial shit.

    I come in at 6:30-7 and I spend 4-5h on mental stuff but then I'm utterly done. Got a good boss, he knows I get the plurality of team's shit done and doesn't blink twice when I head out at lunch at noon and don't come back till 3:30 because I'm playing disc golf or some such, see if I missed anything and head home.

    Any of the seatwarmers here try that and they'd be out of work the next day. But then they take a week to solve problems it takes me a day, tops, all because they can't concentrate. Multitasking, my ass.

  16. Re:Capitalism of exploration by Wycliffe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Productivity and "working more" are not the same thing.

    This poster was replying to a post that tried to imply that europeans were just more efficient. Also, one common thread you hear is that productivity starts to fall as hours increase. This poster was saying that for the USA, even working more than other people we still seem to have the most productivity per hour worked. I think it still wouldn't hurt to try to reduce the number of hours worked but to be working the most hours per week and still have the most productivity per hour is actually kindof impressive.

  17. Relevance? by kamakazi · · Score: 5, Informative

    Buried in all the statisics abuse in the summaries there is a paper of significance only to historians. This paper is based on numbers for 2005-2007, before the financial crisis.

    It also does not reflect work per person, but work for a theoretical average person age 15-64. Employment rate is a component of this person, so as employment rate drops so does the hours this average person works.

    Actually, that feels intuitively wrong, the ~25 hours per week in the US seems way too high when employment rate is factored in, but I am not interested enough in how much we all worked 10 years ago to read the paper more carefully.

    Besides, I don't have time for this, I have to get back to work.

    --
    "Proximity to wonder has blunted our perception and appreciation of it" --Tim Hartnell in 'Exploring ARTIFICIAL INTELLI
  18. Re:Conventional wisdom by Nunya666 · · Score: 2

    Conventional wisdom says that everything about Europeans is always better than everything about Americans. You get socially rewarded by high-social-status people for saying so. So not working is better than working in this case, regardless of whether that makes sense or not.

    Conventional wisdom also states that absolutes are absolutely wrong.

  19. Re:Capitalism of exploration by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Americans do work hard, you're right. And the productivity numbers are impressive, despite my best efforts to bring down the average.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  20. Not an EU problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    EU overall trades at a *profit*. There may be some of the smaller countries struggling (notably Greece) but overall EU does not have to internally inflates its economy with QE.

    This is a problem with a few key economies that run at huge deficits and go the easy short-term route of internally inflating their economies. Japan had it for decades, US followed, UK joined them.

  21. addicted ? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Americans are addicted to their jobs. U.S. workers not only put in more hours than workers do almost anywhere else. They're also increasingly retiring later and taking fewer vacation days, ...

    Perhaps we're just afraid of being unemployed and destitute. Employers show little loyalty to their employees (Pro Tip: If your company says "employees are our most valuable asset" start looking for another job.), the social safety net is not as strong as in Europe and it's clear that our politicians don't really care about the poor and (arguably) middle class -- look at the various budgets, including the latest Republican House budget which gets 62% from low/moderate income programs while also including tax cuts for the wealthy. (see below).

    House GOP Budget Gets 62 Percent of Budget Cuts From Low- and Moderate-Income Programs

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  22. No, We're Not Addicted to Our Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We are NOT addicted to our jobs. We HAVE to work 25% more than everyone else to KEEP our jobs, because workers in the US have ZERO protection against anti-competitive, inhumane, and employment practices that are ILLEGAL in Europe.

    We have to compete with workers in countries where there are no labor laws, no environmental standards, no minimum wages, no nothing. We have to compete with people who are essentially state-owned slaves. We're trying to break out in the lead in the race to the bottom, because if we don't, we lose our jobs to one of those people.

    And, our own government is leading the charge. So-called "liberals" and their banker buddies have been trying to make indentured servants of middle class America for ages - ever since the New Deal, all while claiming to want to "help."

    Help us how, exactly? By making it prohibitively expensive to do things in the US? By imposing onerous and overbearing regulations that don't make sense? By telling me that slinging burgers at McDonalds is economically equivalent to the job I do that I spend $100K on a degree for? Please.

    Some regulation is necessary, of course. There is a "right" amount that makes working safe and effective, and that levels the playing field. But, we surpassed that long ago. Today it is an active assault by government on entrepreneurship and individual success.

    I've voted for Democrats all my life. As a black man I took it as my duty, having been told by my father who grew up during the Civil Rights Movement that Democrats were the only ones who fought for minority rights. I now know that my father was hoodwinked, and I refuse to be hoodwinked as well.

    1. Re:No, We're Not Addicted to Our Jobs by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 2

      Wait a minute here. You start your rant basically saying "there's not enough regulation; we need protection!", and end it with "They're assaulting us with onerous regulation!"

      What on earth do you actually want?

      To have his cake and eat it too. Meet the electorate, and understand why we're fucked.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
  23. Livable minimum wage makes a difference by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The fact that a lot of people in the US have multiple jobs working many hours just to be able to buy food and pay rent is not something you should be proud of.

  24. Look at the historical data by TheSync · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From Work and Leisure in the U.S. and Europe: Why So Different?, hours worked by Europeans and Americans were about the same in the 1960's, although the number of hours were dropping for all every year. In about 1980, the US and Europe diverged, with hours continuing to drop in Europe, but the US plateauing.

    Two reasons have been explored. The first is due to tax differences, and indeed labor taxes have been rising in the EU since the end of the 1960's. The other is differences in labor regulations, such as the requirement for contracts, limitations in legal working hours (such as the 35 hour workweek established in 2000 in France).

  25. Re:Capitalism of exploration by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    True. It also doesn't take into account the quality of work done. It might just mean Europeans are 25% more efficient.

    I think it means that Americans get less paid vacation than Europeans and they are more afraid of losing their jobs.

  26. Re:Participation rate and unemployment by ADRA · · Score: 2

    Yeah, and most of those extra people are 65+'s who can't afford to retire. Nice life.

    --
    Bye!
  27. Re:Capitalism of exploration by jedidiah · · Score: 2

    Europeans are also not one hegemon. Liberals love to whine about diversity and then actually ignore it. Or they perhaps suppress the idea that people are different because it doesn't match their simplistic notion of equality.

    Each country in Europe is distinct. They are each their own thing that's developed over thousands of years. They are not a mishmash of all ethnicities (like the US tends to be).

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  28. I like working. People are different. by Brannon · · Score: 2

    Please don't force me to work less just so that you don't feel peer pressure to work more.

  29. Re: Capitalism of exploration by Nemyst · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Multitasking just means you do a lot of jobs at once, poorly.

  30. Re:Capitalism of exploration by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 3, Informative

    True. It also doesn't take into account the quality of work done. It might just mean Europeans are 25% more efficient.

    European countries and cultures are just too variable to make that assumption. Norway is not the same as Germany which is not the same as France which is not the same as Italy which is not the same as Greece which is not the same as Romania and so on and so on.

  31. Re:Participation rate and unemployment by ADRA · · Score: 2

    Flat unemployment rates:
    US unemployment: 6.1
    France unemployment: 10.4
    https://data.oecd.org/unemp/un...

    These are people who are seeking work of course. If you 'give up' searching for work, you fall off the board.

    For raw employment rates:
    US: 68.2
    France: 63.6
    https://data.oecd.org/emp/empl...

    Assuming you subtract the difference, you're left with roughly the same number of people 'not seeking employment' in either country:
    US: 25.7%
    France: 26%

    --
    Bye!
  32. Re:Capitalism of exploration by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That is wrong.
    They get less done.

    The rest are currency conversion errors and mountain high differences in financial markets etc.

    A typical worker, earning less then lets say $50,000 per year, is not even half as productive/efficient in the US as in Europe. Otherwise all your jobs would not be outsourced to China, India or other asian countries.

    The GNP/capita is no measure at all when you can manipulate local costs, exchange rates and can invent artificial spendings or gains.

    A country that has a financial market that dominates 50% of the money flow has obviously twice the GNP versus a country that has no financial market. But: nothing was produced. There is no productivity at all

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.