Slashdot Mirror
LinkedIn Promises To Bring Order and Meaning To Your Useless Endorsements (qz.com)
Oliver Staley, reporting for Quartz: LinkedIn's endorsement feature has never felt like the most trustworthy of sources. Rather than a panel of star witnesses who can honestly vouch for you, it more often seems like a random assortment of friends, acquaintances, and opportunists hoping for an endorsement in return. LinkedIn has recognized the problem and is trying to address it by creating a hierarchy of endorsers. Instead of all your endorsements having equal weight, the site will highlight people who might actually have some claim on knowing you, such as former colleagues and classmates, or who have credibility in the field. The goal is to make the feature more like the real world, where you ask for recommendations from people you trust or are in a position to know, says Hari Srinivasan, head of the LinkedIn team developing the feature. "If you want to find a good designer, you ask other good designers," he said.
I have also been "tricked" into making unsolicited connections, thinking the other party had initiated it.
When I first created my LinkedIn account, they asked for my Yahoo and Gmail email addresses, and then ASKED FOR THE PASSWORDS. I saw no reason to provide that information, but my wife fell for it, and LinkedIn then, without her permission, logged into her accounts and sent a link request to every single person in her contact list, consisting of over 3000 people, many of whom she barely knew and hadn't heard from in years. Each email was phrased to imply that she was personally requesting the connection.
LinkedIn was a very sleazy company. They should fit right in at Microsoft.