Slashdot Mirror


First New US Nuclear Reactor In 20 Years Goes Live (cnn.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNN: The Tennessee Valley Authority is celebrating an event 43 years in the making: the completion of the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant. In 1973, the TVA, one of the nation's largest public power providers, began building two reactors that combined promised to generate enough power to light up 1.3 million homes. The first reactor, delayed by design flaws, eventually went live in 1996. Now, after billions of dollars in budget overruns, the second reactor has finally started sending power to homes and businesses. Standing in front of both reactors Wednesday, TVA President Bill Johnson said Watts Bar 2, the first U.S. reactor to enter commercial operation in 20 years, would offer clean, cheap and reliable energy to residents of several southern states for at least another generation. Before Watts Bar 2, the last time an American reactor had fired up was in 1996. It was Watts Bar 1 -- and according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, it cost $6.8 billion, far greater than the original price tag at $370 million. In the 2000s, some American power companies, faced with growing environmental regulations, eyed nuclear power again as a top alternative to fossil fuels such as coal and oil. A handful of companies, taking advantage of federal loan guarantees from the Bush administration, revived nuclear reactor proposals in a period now known as the so-called "nuclear renaissance." Eventually, nuclear regulators started to green light new reactors, including ones in Georgia and South Carolina. In 2007, the TVA resumed construction on Watts Bar 2, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency. The TVA originally said it would take five years to complete. The TVA, which today serves seven different southern states, relies on nuclear power to light up approximately 4.5 million homes. Watts Bar 2, the company's seventh operating reactor, reaffirms its commitment to nukes for at least four more decades, Johnson said Wednesday. In the end, TVA required more than five years to build the project. The final cost, far exceeding its initial budget, stood at $4.7 billion.

6 of 344 comments (clear)

  1. Re:From the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Rubbish. Steam engines produce steam.

    We're talking about a nuclear power plant here so those are nuclears coming out of that tower.

  2. Re:Can't make steel with windmills by Pascoea · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can I have a hit of whateverthefuck you are on? Read that post 4 times, still have no clue what you are talking about.

  3. Re: From the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    It's the souls of extinct snail darters.

  4. So rain clouds are all steam now? by dbIII · · Score: 5, Funny

    All of it does. It's water, not steam.
    You were aiming to correct me but you mist :)

  5. Uh oh by whodunit · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you listen closely you can hear mdsolar screaming.

  6. Re:From the article by Chas · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just the sheer amount of deaths per terawatt caused by nuclear power should make people rethink it. Nothing even comes close.

    You mean that whopping number of ZERO?

    You're right. Pretty much everything out there has a higher death count than nuclear, even when taken individually. So you're right. Nothing even comes close.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!