Slashdot Mirror


Russians Seek Answers To Central Moscow GPS Anomaly (yahoo.com)

stevegee58 writes: Russians have been noticing that their GPS doesn't work in Moscow near the Kremlin. Everyone from taxi drivers to Pokemon Go players suddenly notice that they're transported 18 miles away at the airport when they near the Kremlin. While this may be an annoyance to the public it seems like a reasonable countermeasure to potential terrorist threats. Is it only a matter of time before other vulnerable sites such as the White House or the Capitol in Washington start doing the same? "A programmer for Russian internet firm Yandex, Grigory Bakunov, said Thursday his research showed a system for blocking GPS was located inside the Kremlin, the heavily guarded official residence of Russian President Vladimir Putin," reports Yahoo. "The first anomaly was recorded in June, according to Russian media reports, which have also suggested that the GPS interference comes and goes in a pattern. Putin's spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Thursday he did not know why the malfunction was occurring and admitted experiencing the problem himself when driving recently. Peskov redirected questions to Russia's Federal Guards Service, which is responsible for protecting the Kremlin and senior Russian officials."

176 comments

  1. Signal triangulation = GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If anyone is seriously interested in finding out where a signal is coming from, they probably can do that without GPS. Maybe defeating logging of patterns in carried cell phones among the general personnel, but if you're relying on that it's kind of ridiculous anyway.

    1. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by Z00L00K · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Now that it's know that there is an error then any attacker would plan for alternatives.

      The only way it really can be effective is when it's not active until really needed.

      And there are still maps, alternative beacons, compasses (magnetic and gyro) and dead reckoning that can be used to find such targets for anyone out to perform an attack.

      People were able to navigate even before GPS existed.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by AHuxley · · Score: 1, Interesting

      re 'People were able to navigate even before GPS existed"
      The US tried that with maps and sketches by informants from Iraq.
      When US top experts got deep in Iraq they find cache of vacuum cleaners not match sketch.
      Spies who defect or are sent to be perfect defector often draw nice map to earn top defector status and good life as expected. Map match map by past double agent sent last decade, is confirmed by two sources from different departments. Must be true as both now trusted defectors could never both be two double agents.
      Decades later MI6 or CIA send local spy in, find art restoration room not vault conference room corridor.
      So working gps on site is vital to get signal out, perfect alignment and not spread data flow all over site to be detected during bug sweep.
      Would toy device or entertainment unit with hidden or designed useful compasses (magnetic and gyro) be allowed in with any staff?
      Giving staff extra special spy device during spy meeting can be a risk for both spy handler and spy to try and hide and walk in.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 4, Funny

      In Putin Russia, GPS relocate you!

    4. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      this hits my Gee-spot.

    5. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Who needs GPS for spying? We've had satellites that can read the numbers on vehicle licence tags for decades.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    6. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erh, what? You think that spy doesn't recognize where the Kremlin is even when standing next to it?

      Or that a USA spy with bomb doesn't know when to explode by a timer?

      GPS TO SAVE!

      Ps. Do not tell that the russia has own GLONASS that works better! Shhh!!

    7. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's because Putin's animal magnetism has a 18m radius.

    8. Re: Signal triangulation = GPS by fubarrr · · Score: 1

      Poutine doesnt want hipsters with DJI drone to take his dick pix

    9. Re: Signal triangulation = GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mamma, put on your boots, the shit is deep in that one! OK Apple fanboy, who developed GPS? It wasn't some peacenick. Mankind's advances have involved death, and destruction. From food preservation to heart filters to your TV and even GPS, all have been started as how to kill more effectively. You do not want to kill your friends, with a middle? Guide it, how, a long string? How about an analog computer, or s program running on a computer that's guided by a universal map from anypoint?

    10. Re: Signal triangulation = GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, that is fairly easy
      Did precisly that during the first part of my phd (using leagally collected jammed GPS signals)

    11. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just attack the entire area where GPS doesn't work right.

      "Nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to make sure."

    12. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by MouseR · · Score: 2

      Some weapons are GPS-guided, such as JDAM-assisted bombs.

      The world is gearing up for a heated conflict. Wether it occurs or not is a different story. But last month's US chief of armies gave a chilling speech where they expect mass casualties within 10 years, to the likes of WWII.

      The nations are placing their pieces on the map and gearing up for defence. GPS denial devices is an obvious counter-measure, assuming it actually deter military -grade GPS systems (which are far more precise than civilian ones).

    13. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      You mean the militants that use roadside bombs because the only people they will try to kill in person are women and children? Those fuckers drop their guns and melt into the population when the marines show up. They use children as human shields because they know we try like hell to avoid collateral damage and killing the innocent. When the US occasionally fucks up the innocent often do die but to ISIS and Hamas and other similar bastards there are no innocents. To their hate filled minds everyone is a target and the weak and helpless are their very favorite victims. The US military isn't afraid of shit. All those guys are volunteers in an age when they know without a doubt they'll see combat. The problem is their opponents are cowards that hide like cockroaches and have to be rooted out of their hiding places. The "militants" are nothing more than the scum of the earth that victimize their own people more than their proclaimed enemy. In truth they are the enemy of all civilized society.

    14. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      LOL. And if he takes his shirt off, it goes up to 20m!

    15. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      We've had satellites that can read the numbers on vehicle licence tags for decades.

      Uh...says who? Certainly not laws of diffraction.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    16. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It goes up to 22m, double the eleven!!

    17. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are increasing the threshold in skill level required for an attack, which seems like a reasonable plan.

    18. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by fremsley471 · · Score: 1

      There's an odd throw-away line from a book on the construction of the Hubble telescope, purportedly from someone at Perkin-Elmer, who made it and the satellites who point the other way. "Turns out things are a lot clearer looking into the atmosphere than looking out of it."

    19. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Old meme -1. Actually funny +5.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    20. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's an odd throw-away line from a book on the construction of the Hubble telescope, purportedly from someone at Perkin-Elmer, who made it and the satellites who point the other way. "Turns out things are a lot clearer looking into the atmosphere than looking out of it."

      This is a well-known optical phenomenon, often called the "shower curtain effect."

    21. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You're over-thinking it. If the enemy knows that it is unreliable and can't be used for an attack... it won't be used for an attack.

      It might not have to thwart other types of attack in order to achieve the purpose it was intended for.

      Yes, you show that the purpose is not likely to be to fool people into believing that they are really at the airport when near the Kremlin. But that doesn't mean it won't work, it just means that the more likely purpose is to deny use of GPS for detonating a bomb near there.

      It might even be backwards; they might be protecting the airport by sending a false "you're at the airport" signal in various places and it is only downtown where people noticed, and blamed the nearby government building.

      That's the thing about intelligence services... you can't measure what they're doing very well unless you know what their intent is, and they're not going to tell you. So. You never really know. Even when stuff "leaks," or is purported to, there is no way to weigh it.

    22. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of an interview with chess grandmaster Lev Alburt, who defected to the US around 1980. When he was a kid growing up in the Soviet Union, the government propaganda always said that the Americans were preparing to attack. And the people believed it. So the local kids drew maps showing the locations of military barracks and other landmarks, to give to the American paratroopers when they landed. But the liberation forces never came.

    23. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The Soviet Union flooded MI6 and the CIA with double agents. Decades of perfect stories to sell or give away. Until a real defector gets out and offers proof its all been set up.
      The West really, really wanted to believe that lifestyle, freedom and cash offers could not be countered with a steady flow of double agents.
      The other issue is how the CIA and MI6 have to act in Russia. Laying flat in a car, changing clothing, a wig just to reach out to a local turned contact to offer spy equipment or contact paper work often fails.
      The turned official is often bait waiting to see what the approach will be and by what US/UK embassy worker or NGO. Thats why the GCHQ and NSA got all the funding. Safe and total signals capture and full translation services. Just like the Enigma but for decades, totally unnoticed by Russia...
      The gps issue is just another line of protection to stop bugs from been able to be aligned out of any site.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    24. Re: Signal triangulation = GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What they don't tell you is that it's actually a vortex of evil circling like a vengeful guardian. Not only does GPS not work but time and space actually warp.

    25. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Even without any atmosphere, the diffraction-limited resolution of a 2.5 m optical system watching from a 200 km altitude is limited to ~5 cm. Is that sufficient for reading the plates? (Even that number is only for watching from straight above, which sort of doesn't work for vehicle license plates - Pythagoras then applies for diagonal lines of view.)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    26. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by fremsley471 · · Score: 1

      Yes, agreed, it's unlikely that plates can be read and illumination angles of 30 degrees make it much more difficult. But this received wisdom allows information more realistically obtained from in situ personnel to be helpfully explained away.

    27. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You're very credulous. You read all that information, and fail to suss out the most important implication: there is no way for you to know what any of that means. You have no way to know what response there was to the influx of double-agents, or if the responses were effective. Neither side benefits from giving you accurate knowledge, but both sides are known to leak nonsense to conspiracy theorists and overly-credulous historians.

      Just like, you have no idea why the NSA got funding, or what it was for. Members of Congress had closed-door hearings about it, and nobody knows what reasons were given. It could be anything as well as it could be any thing that you would name.

      Claiming to know things you obviously wouldn't have access to knowing about does not make you appear knowledgeable, it only makes you appear credulous.

      Or to use Rumsfeldian information analysis, these are known unknowns. Falsely believing that what others know to be unknown is known to you, because people you trusted told you so, is a standard error that people make. Rumsfeld talked about that after the Iraq War. And the lesson he talked about; don't be credulous when people tell you that they know how to make known unknowns into known knowns, unless you have access to high quality data that corroborates it. And he had access to lots of data. You're just a regular joe, you don't have any access at all, not even marginal or fleeting access.

    28. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      ".. what response there was to the influx of double-agents, or if the responses were effective."
      That can usually be seen with an influx of different science education offers, the building of listening stations globally, the power needs, cooling water and the rushed reaction to a few very select very fake signals collected.
      Antenna design, foundations, the need to involve a local gov/mil with a cover story.
      If billions get spent on placing hardware (like a long term https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...) thanks to results of double agents telling a good story over decades?
      The over reaction in policy changes is noted or a better story is told.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    29. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Two things.

      Likely the reason for the GPS scrambling isn't to deter human beings from locating within the area. If one were to build an autonomous drone however that might make any attack just a bit harder. It would require a manual operator, which would be subject to distance limitations, and also loss of connection as likely that signal can also be blocked.

      Second, the story says "GPS", but doesn't actually say which GPS. So far as I am aware there are at least 3 or 4 variations of GPS out there. GPS as commonly known is the US system, but Russia and China also have their own systems. So I am not sure if they mean one or all of the systems are being blocked. It would seem less useful if only the Russian one were blocked for example and that might just point to a technical issue perhaps.

    30. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      In truth they are the enemy of all civilized society.

      Sure, but so are those who radicalized them. People don't become terrorists on a humbug.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    31. Re:Signal triangulation = GPS by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      ".. what response there was to the influx of double-agents, or if the responses were effective."

      That can usually be seen with an influx of different science education offers, the building of listening stations globally, the power needs, cooling water and the rushed reaction to a few very select very fake signals collected.

      Is that how it was in your daydream, or are you going off a TV show?

      You're being naive and credulous again, even while defending yourself against it! No, you do not, did not, and will not know how many double-agents there were, how many were triple agents, how many were single agents pretending to be double agents, if their activities were monitored in a way that made them ineffective, if their activities were monitored in a way that actually exposed intelligence resources in their home country, etc., etc., etc.

      What sort of weird magical being do you believe yourself to be that you would glance at some sort of "science education offer" somewhere and know from that how many double agents were effective in country Y? I mean, that is totally fucking stupid, even as magical thinking goes. No, you wouldn't fucking know.

      These are known unknowns. That means everybody already knows you didn't know it even before you say it and look stupid.

      "wikipedia!" lol yeah, the spies would never think of that, golly, I'm sure national secrets are all over wikipedia. You point to a disinformation plan from the past... MY FUCKING GOD DUDE, that is the exact shit that should prove to you that you won't know what the fucking truth is because there is lots of disinformation. The thing you point at as showing how you magically know what is going on in the world is actually the exact fucking shit that should prove to you that you would never know any of that.

  2. China too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China also mandates errors in GPS mapping.

    FP btw

    1. Re: China too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost. The GPS is accurate but the maps are slightly off. Accurate maps are considered a state secret, and cannot be exported.

    2. Re: China too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed they are. If I wanted an accurate map of hostile territory I reckon it might be possible to creste one from space where I have multiple known positions and good clocks. If I wanted pinpoint accuracy I could flash lasers from my space platforms to get centimetre plus accuracy. Mapping the interiors that would be fun. However with a few well placed radio beacons on the ground you could do that too.

  3. Bollocks by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

    it seems like a reasonable countermeasure to potential terrorist threats.

    In conjunction with the fact that it isn't marked on any paper maps and is completely invisible, you mean?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Bollocks by willy_me · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is likely a defence against autonomous drones. One can pilot drones without GPS but autonomous operation requires a location reference. This will be ineffective against guided bombs or cruise missiles so it looks like Russia wants to protect themselves against other Russians.

    2. Re:Bollocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That would be fine if the self-guided drones and weapons only used GPS, they don't. Often they use a multitude of things, from GPS, to visual, to laser pinpointing, to other things we don't even know about.

    3. Re:Bollocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he means consumer grade drones operated by poor terrorist wannabes.

    4. Re:Bollocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be fine if the self-guided drones and weapons only used GPS, they don't. Often they use a multitude of things, from GPS, to visual, to laser pinpointing, to other things we don't even know about.

      So because there may be things you don't know about, it makes it pointless to guard against things that you DO know about?

      I guess you run your PC without installing any security patch too, since there will always be vulnerabilities that you don't even know about.

      I am glad you aren't responsible for anyone's security.

    5. Re:Bollocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a defense against drones. It's a SIGINT defense against something else.

    6. Re:Bollocks by freeze128 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So instead of terrorists blowing up the Kremlin, and maybe killing a couple dozen high-ranking officals, the terrorists will be re-directed to Moscow's airport, where they can blow up hundreds of people. Good plan.

    7. Re:Bollocks by Megol · · Score: 1

      Why only Russians? This improves security against all amateur-level drones etc. which can come from any nation state (and even non officially recognized actors such as IS).

    8. Re:Bollocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think Putin has any qualms about getting innocent people killed to further his goals. This makes the important people in the Kremlin a bit safer, and if an attack ends up on the airport instead of the Kremlin, that would be unfortunate, but a good excuse for Putin "increase security" and his control of the country.

    9. Re:Bollocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the position is being spoofed it will not move with you. Any movements of the receiver antenna will be seen as a pure timing offset (at least if all signals are broadcast from one antenna, otherwise the receiver will probably get very confused) and cancelled out.

      It would look like you are standing still in the airport, this is not going to make something that is programmed to navigate to the Kremlin go to the airport. If anything, it would go the other way trying to correct the 'course error'.

    10. Re:Bollocks by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't fly a drone off to the actual airport. It may do several things.

      A drone with FCC style restrictions built in my immediately land itself instead of continuing into the protected zone as flying within range of an airport is banned.

      It might try to correct its course and head further away from the actual Kremlin trying to find it. Like the robot from the Asimov book that was running in circles trapped between 2 zones.

      It's extremely unlikely it could head to the airport from this, and most likely it would head in the opposite direction of the actual airport. If the airport was 20 miles East of the Krelmin, drone wants to blow up the Kremlin so it goes 20 miles West to find it. End result, drone is now 40 miles West of airport and 20 miles from Kremlin.

      I think it would more likely get stuck along the radius but each drone could behave differently.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    11. Re:Bollocks by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      That would be fine if the self-guided drones and weapons only used GPS, they don't. Often they use a multitude of things, from GPS, to visual, to laser pinpointing, to other things we don't even know about.

      It's not a perfect defense, but it will stop casual attackers using toy technology. On the other hand, the reason all the ATM skimmers come from Russia is that they spent a lot of money on mathematics education. If there's any hackers in the world ready to make their drones finish a journey on dead reckoning when the GPS goes funny, it's probably Russian ones.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re: Bollocks by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      I'd like to think that modern cruise missiles rely on more than just GPS for guidance...

    13. Re:Bollocks by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Directed? Directed how? Is there are clear line of spoofed GPS all the way to the airport? Do you think a drone is going to say, ooh actually the Kremlin is over there and I'll just fly there and bomb it without looking at myGPS again until I'm done. More likely you'll see a drone endlessly flying on circles just outside the Kremlin

    14. Re:Bollocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're clever enough to figure this out, but not that a dumb drone would fly AWAY from the airport not toward it. No matter the political stance I or you may have, don't smart talk about the Russians if you fail at middle school math.

    15. Re:Bollocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a bad thing to spend on actually : you need chalk, paper and ink. Plus feeding and housing the professor and students.

    16. Re:Bollocks by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      you need chalk, paper and ink.

      That's OK, they come from private sector suppliers.

      Plus feeding and housing the professor and students

      What? That's communism!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    17. Re:Bollocks by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I believe that most of the really sophisticated strategic weapons do not use GPS. They use inertial navigation with highly accurate and terribly expensive gyros that enable accuracy to within 30 feet or so at distances of thousands of miles. Only a few nations have such weapons however so this system is probably aimed at terrorists or some lesser opponent.

    18. Re:Bollocks by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      I explain this to people all the time. Places that high cyber-crime participants also have low job opportunities. Former Eastern Block countries have some great "IT people" who could do great in a normal environment...but there are no "normal" jobs for them. So, they get hired by criminal organizations instead. Everyone's got to eat.

    19. Re:Bollocks by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      The bad news is that this stuff gets cheaper all the time. I wouldn't be surprised if hobbyist parts were usable for it these days. Not for a 2000 km range missile, perhaps, but...no, even that might actually work.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    20. Re:Bollocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wouldn't fly a drone off to the actual airport. It may do several things.

      A drone with FCC style restrictions built in my immediately land itself instead of continuing into the protected zone as flying within range of an airport is banned.

      But how does it know it's within range of an airport if you're spoofing the GPS it receives to trick it into thinking it's somewhere else?

    21. Re:Bollocks by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      The spoofing makes the GPS receiver believe the airport is in 2 locations. One real, the other at the Kremlin. It's like you drew a circle around the airport and then copied and pasted that over the Kremlin.

      It shouldn't have any problem finding the real airport unless it flies over the Kremlin and gets confused. The drone will react normally at the real airport and unpredictability at the Kremlin.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    22. Re: Bollocks by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

      Why not? History teaches us that the Nobles are extremly valuable and precious while the ÂÂeasants (very small "p") are expendable and lower than dogs. Even though in all practicality, the Nobles are overgrown, useless eater spoiled brats and bullies with a taste for blood who owe their entire lifestyle to the ÂÂeasants they shit upon, but don't tell anyone that.

    23. Re:Bollocks by PJ6 · · Score: 1

      So instead of terrorists blowing up the Kremlin, and maybe killing a couple dozen high-ranking officals, the terrorists will be re-directed to Moscow's airport, where they can blow up hundreds of people. Good plan.

      Wow, your spacial reasoning isn't very good, is it?

    24. Re:Bollocks by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Also even a piloted drone requires some sort of signal for operation which is also likely vulnerable to blocking, as otherwise splat (or autonomous take over which would then be subject to the other anyway).

    25. Re:Bollocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > but there are no "normal" jobs for them

      This simply isn't true.

      My last job hunting went like this: put out a CV; wait for calls.

  4. A-GPS Anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a feature not a bug.

    1. Re:A-GPS Anyone? by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 1

      This is a feature not a bug.

      Yeah, imagine the sales pitch (in a heavy Russian accent): Let your sat nav guide you into the Moskva river, enjoy a river cruise and take a bath while travelling to work! Just don't forget to install an outboard motor in the boot of your car and mind the airliners when you drive across the runways at Sheremetyevo airport.

  5. Think like a spy by AHuxley · · Score: 0

    The West has been placing devices in Russia for years.
    "Russian 'spy rock' was genuine, former chief of staff admits"
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new...
    "... accepted that Britain did indeed plant a "spy rock" despite attempts by the then-prime minister to dismiss the story and denials of improper conduct by the Foreign Office."
    Britain admits 'fake rock' plot to spy on Russians
    https://www.theguardian.com/wo...
    A lot of spy devices are distance sensitive. So a good idea of the inner device location is needed and the location for a collection or helper device.
    By altering the GPS, measurements for device placement by spies gets tricky. Any more power than needed a device risks detection. Not enough and signal is too week to get out of secure area.
    Readers might recall the ANGRYNEIGHBOR, SURLYSPAWN, VAGRANT, DROPMIRE, SURLYSPAWN and the note about TAWDRYYARD and gps.
    Catalog Advertises NSA Toolbox (December 29, 2013)
    http://www.spiegel.de/internat...
    A hired spy with local time limited access placing a device is then 10 feet out? 100ft ? Pacing the building with funny walk might be off limits or get seen on gait analysis from CCTV. Past sketches, plans or details might have altered with upgrades or have come from double agents sent to West with amazing stories of fiction about layout.
    So expecting gps to work well at all times was needed to get fine tuning of device to outside support device by spy.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  6. I want one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To annoy pokemon go players.

    1. Re:I want one by kreuzotter · · Score: 2

      Me too. It could tell my ankle bracelet that I am at home when I am at the air port.

  7. Countermeasures by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 1

    This is why I always felt JDAMs were a bad idea in the long run because their INS is less accurate without GPS assistance and a discrepancy like this must really screw up the guidance if GPS assistance is switched on.

    1. Re:Countermeasures by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Right, because it's totally impossible to disregard one information source if it deviates beyond reasonable limits, and even if it was possible it would totally never occur to engineers or scientists.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Countermeasures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. It's an *inertial* system, how could you know if it's deviating?

    3. Re:Countermeasures by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Inertial system says I'm heading North at speed x. GPS concurs. I continue on the same course. You wait. Time passes. Inertial system says I'm heading North at speed x. GPS suddenly says I'm heading West at 17x when my maximum speed is 3x.

      I disregard the GPS for the time being. In an actual plane, I might look out of the window.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:Countermeasures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once the Earth suddenly halts and starts turning another direction, you're going to end up wishing you had not been so willing to disregard the guidance your GPS receiver gives you...

    5. Re: Countermeasures by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

      Once the Earth halts and reverses direction, you won't be alive to give a damn about GPS, or anything else for that matter

  8. who cares about gps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does glonass work?

    1. Re:who cares about gps? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      AC GLONASS does not work near or in NSA, GCHQ lab so its hard to prototype a device with that functionality.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re: who cares about gps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure, because FSB knows the location of every NSA or GCHQ lab, so they can selectively place jammers in their vicinity.

    3. Re:who cares about gps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, my phone with both GPS and GLONASS was throwing me at the airport, so in this case GLONASS gives nothing.

  9. it's by design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    someone with the capability obviously has decided to disrupt gps signals around sensitive targets.

    in soviet russia, gps locks you.

    just wait until your map app directs you to a siberian gulag when you ask it for directions. (your iphone probably does that already).

  10. Diversion by bestweasel · · Score: 1

    It seems a bit odd to redirect attacks to an airport - I'd have expected it to point to the opposition's headquarters.

    1. Re:Diversion by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      No attacks intended for the Kremlin won't go anywhere but traffic for the airport might go to the Kremlin...

    2. Re:Diversion by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 3, Funny

      Future headline:

      Russian leader Vladimir Putin was killed in a freak accident today while crossing the street next to the Kremlin. A fully autonomous prototype Tesla sedan had veered out of control and was speeding through central Moscow side streets at freeway speeds, and it tragically ran over Putin and several of his bodyguards. A defiant Elon Musk issued the following statement: "Our vehicle had nothing to do with this incident. We've analyzed the black box data, and this car was miles away at the airport at the time of the accident."

    3. Re: Diversion by bestweasel · · Score: 1

      Oh thanks, I think I see now. You'd approach the Kremlin then at some point be directed in the Kremlin-from-airport direction until the effect wore off then go round again and again.

  11. Doesn't sound very safe by MichaelSmith · · Score: 0

    transported 18 miles away at the airport

    Broadcasting GPS data for the local airport seems like a good way to have an aeroplane land on top of you.

    I could completely understand if GPS didn't work at all, or gave a an unimportant location.

    1. Re:Doesn't sound very safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think relying on GPS alone while flying above a city is dangerous.

    2. Re:Doesn't sound very safe by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I would agree but there are a lot of idiots out there.

    3. Re:Doesn't sound very safe by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Broadcasting GPS data for the local airport seems like a good way to have an aeroplane land on top of you.

      Are you implying that planes rely exclusively on GPS to the point where an anomaly would suddenly cause them to change course and attempt to land on the roof of the Kremlin? I know $50 drones which are more intelligent than that.

    4. Re:Doesn't sound very safe by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Pilot error blamed for Syd flight failure

      One approach trajectory for runway 34 in MEL flies directly over a runway at the much smaller Essendon airport and some large jets have come close to landing there because they follow their navigation, see a runway and go for it.

      People fuck up. In the dark with rain going they might see lights below, assume they are in the right spot and put their A340 down in Putin's bedroom.

    5. Re:Doesn't sound very safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the Kremlin have a runway? If it does, then I suppose it could be a problem, otherwise I don't think a pilot would confuse Putin's bedroom light with a runway light.

    6. Re:Doesn't sound very safe by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Broadcasting GPS data for the local airport seems like a good way to have an aeroplane land on top of you.

      So that's why Mathias Rust landed there!
      They must have jammed Loran-C too, back before GPS/GLONASS :p

    7. Re:Doesn't sound very safe by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You've linked to a subscriber only article but I'm going to assume that your article is about that Sydney flight which ended up on Melbourne instead of Asia because of a navigation error which had nothing to do with GPS

    8. Re:Doesn't sound very safe by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to say? People following navigation incorrectly thinking that their navigation is in error and making a decision to land at a wrong airport has nothing to do with GPS.

      That's actually a prefect example of why this is a non issue. Do you think a pilot will blindly follow an incorrect GPS reading and smash into the side of the Kremlin because their navigation was right? Because that pilot error example you linked to showed the navigation was actually right and the pilot made a decision to ignore it thinking it was wrong.

      While we're on the topic of GPS being wrong, airlines don't blindly follow the GPS position they are given. Heck my $50 drone doesn't blindly follow the GPS position it was given. If the GPS location jumps unexpectedly it will fall back to inertial or VOR based systems. This is what allows planes to fly polar routes or intercontinental routes where GPS coverage isn't available.

    9. Re:Doesn't sound very safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the range of ground-based transmitters is somewhat within 2km, i don't think there would be any planes flying that low over city.

  12. Counter-countermeasures? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    It seems like this would be easy thwart by having the software software prevent sudden large movements (while GPS is active) that don't match the reading of an IMU.

    Everything you need is in every smartphone, you just need basic programming knowledge to defeat these countermeasures.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Counter-countermeasures? by F.Ultra · · Score: 2

      Not only that but just like how the CCTV:s in the UK in the end helped the criminals to optimize their business this will in the end help the terrorists to optimize their business. Now they can build drones that fly around looking for these anomalies in order to map out all potential targets, many of which one would probably never be able to find otherwise.

  13. Reasonable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hile this may be an annoyance to the public it seems like a reasonable countermeasure to potential terrorist threats

    This must be a new use of the word 'reasonable'' I was not previously aware of.

  14. Alternative? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Would that mean the Russians have an alternative working and secret GPS that only the top guns use (and military)?

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re: Alternative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      maybe. or they just use their not-secret alternative, glonass, with a fallback to beidu or galileo, when they go online.

    2. Re:Alternative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure they could live with GPS not working around the Kremlin. Can you think of a good reason why they would need it?

    3. Re:Alternative? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Well I'm still looking for a good reason they jammed the regular GPS in the 1st pl.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    4. Re:Alternative? by schnell · · Score: 1

      Whaaaat? You mean a Russian alternative to GPS that they own and operate? That's crazy talk.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
  15. Timing connected to US elections. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's very strange that all of these things are happening JUST before a US election.

    Russia just moved warships through the English channel and into the Mediterranean sea, to a base being made in Syria. That naval base is not complete yet, and he doesn't need the sea base for his war in Syria. He's likely moving them now more to do with US elections.

    Russia just accused the UK of reducing its diplomatic staff by denying visas to people it wanted to send.

    It looks like Putin will have a bit of US conflict as an October surprise. That will let Trump paint Obama as weak, and play the war card. A bit of a gift from Putin to Trump to save his disastrous election campaign.

    1. Re:Timing connected to US elections. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the frigging aircraft carrier they're sending? Anyway, that one is for November and I suppose stuff happens in the interregnum.

  16. This is meant for assassins and terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Very few military weapons depend solely on GPS (or GLONASS for that matter). It's been obvious for a while that satellite navigation and guidance systems were not going to survive any engagement with another military for very long. The Chinese finalized that argument in 2007.

    Further, a Predator or other military drone isn't going to last 5 seconds above Moscow airspace. It would have to be a stand-off weapon or (god forbid) a ballistic missile. The area covered is very small by these standards and any of these weapons would already be in "terminal" phase... GPS wouldn't be used (or make a difference... especially on ballistic missiles).

    If the signal is always adjusted to a specific spot (it seems Vunoko) it's easy enough for a "major actor" to just reprogram whatever is using GPS to say "if you see a 18 mile jump at any of these coordinates surrounding the anomaly, adjust".

    This is meant to throw off things like car bombs, thus internal assassins and possibly smaller states like the Ukraine.

  17. Note to Czar Vladimir by rossdee · · Score: 0

    Our old Minuteman III missiles were made before GPS, and don't rely on it for terminal guidance

    and in spite of your meddling , The Donald won't be getting his finger on the launch button any time soon

    1. Re: Note to Czar Vladimir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our ?

      They are not yours, you have no control or ownership of the, any more than Your opinion was asked when Iraq was invaded..

  18. Satellites are not in buildings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How difficult would it be to use directional antennas that strongly favor signals from sources in the sky over sources with low elevation?

    1. Re:Satellites are not in buildings by serbanp · · Score: 1

      That's plain stupid. The GPS signal is very weak (-130dBm, it boggles the mind how weak a signal that is). Swamping the band with stronger signals will "overwrite" the true GPS signal and not even the best directional antenna can retrieve it.

    2. Re:Satellites are not in buildings by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

      A better answer might be that the best reasonable directional antennas are not directional enough to reject a strong local jamming signal.

    3. Re:Satellites are not in buildings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you could just home in on the strongest signal strength in the GPS band.

    4. Re:Satellites are not in buildings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usually this kind of jamming is mitigated by the opposite of a directional antenna, it has a very sharp null in the direction of the jamming. Good systems can achieve 40-50dB attenuation in this way. Of course the pointing precision is impractical on a moving object, so electronically steered antennas are used. The simplest systems uses normal GPS antennas that are combined via a phase shifter and variable gain amplifier. The system is optimized such that the combined output power is minimal. This is fine since the GPS signal is under the noise floor, so it won't try to cancel the wanted signal if there is no interference (and the signals come from different directions anyway).

    5. Re:Satellites are not in buildings by serbanp · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's a better explanation, I agree.

    6. Re:Satellites are not in buildings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one doesn't need a directional antenna to "point where the jammer isn't"...

      you need to be able to put a deep pattern null on the jammer. And that can be done easily with 3 basically omnidirectional antennas and combining them. In general, you can get N-1 nulls with N antennas, but there's some geometry constraints. And the resulting pattern (with the null) isn't particularly directional (which you wouldn't want for GPS.. the satellites are everywhere in the sky, and moving)

  19. Cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How would self driving cars respond to souch GPS disturbance?

  20. Probably a test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably a test to see if they how much they can redirect it.

  21. Is it really hard to figure out? by DrXym · · Score: 2

    Assuming the story to be true, the answer to the anomaly is pretty obvious. The USA is sending a message - fuck around with us and we can fuck around with you. Of course Russia has GLONASS but I bet a lot of devices don't use it or prefer GPs.

    1. Re:Is it really hard to figure out? by AC-x · · Score: 1

      The most plausible explanation I've heard so far is it's to break GPS triggered car bombs,

    2. Re:Is it really hard to figure out? by phayes · · Score: 1

      Plausible, no. Reasonable, yes. However this is Putin's Russia so reasonable carries very little weight.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    3. Re:Is it really hard to figure out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is is even possible to rewrite the signal so that only a very small area is affected? I don't think it is, it would have to be a local jamming effect.

    4. Re:Is it really hard to figure out? by jaa101 · · Score: 3, Informative

      GPS coverage can't be disabled or modified by the GPS satellites selectively over such a small area as the Kremlin. The satellites are essentially just sending the time and their location continuously and their antennas aren't very directional. Anything they did that affected accuracy at the Kremlin would have to affect a wide surrounding area as well. Any localised effect as described has to be local jamming which almost certainly means official Russian involvement.

    5. Re:Is it really hard to figure out? by AC-x · · Score: 1

      Being the most plausible doesn't mean it's very plausible, but it's more plausible than America doing it

    6. Re:Is it really hard to figure out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it could be the paranoid Russian Government who thinks that the Americans are going to start bombing Red Square with GPS guided weapons.

      You know in this case, blaming the Russians is a perfectly valid answer.

    7. Re:Is it really hard to figure out? by phayes · · Score: 1

      The problem with plausibility here isn't with who but with why.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    8. Re:Is it really hard to figure out? by AC-x · · Score: 1

      DrXym thinks it's the USA doing it, that's what I was replying to.

    9. Re:Is it really hard to figure out? by phayes · · Score: 1

      LOL, Apologies.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    10. Re:Is it really hard to figure out? by shagie · · Score: 1

      Apparently, the outage is also in GLONASS too. https://translate.google.com/t... If the article is to be believed, there is another signal that has a signal that is most intense around the Kremlin.

    11. Re:Is it really hard to figure out? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be a simple matter of putting GPS transmitters in the area, drowning out the weak satellite signals, broadcasting incorrect information?

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    12. Re:Is it really hard to figure out? by jaa101 · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be exactly simple but it would be possible. The main issue would be that GPS transmitters near the Kremlin that were installed by anyone other than the Russian authorities would be very quickly noticed by them and would be relatively easily located. Since the anomalies appear to have been present for a long period of time it's a pretty safe bet that they're being caused by the Russian authorities.

    13. Re:Is it really hard to figure out? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      I didn't think it was really a question that it was the state.

      Take a transmitter that would go in a GLONASS satellite, hook it up to an antenna, and plug it in somewhere. Upload slightly incorrect information. Done. It's not really 'spoofing' the GPS system, because it *is* the GPS system.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  22. Great leader Trump will have this on his palace! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also a yuuuge wall!

  23. See China's Compulsary GPS shift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The aircraft carrier is likely for defense of his fleet from the air. Putins already bombing Aleppo from the Iran airbases he was granted access to. A land base from a friendly would be a better base than an aircraft carrier. On the other hand a fleet normally has an aircraft carrier for cover.

    Do not underestimate Putin, Donald Trump may be a vain foolish ranting old man, but Putin is very sharp and clearly knows how to manipulate.

    1. Re:See China's Compulsary GPS shift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aleppo will be next door from the aircraft carrier and with no countries in between, although the aircraft carrier is weird and so the planes won't be able to carry as much weight as if they were on a bigger/more usual boat with steam catapults.

      An aircraft carrier also normally has a fleet to cover it.
      What I think of Putin is, he won't launch some huge assault while the boats and plane are barely there, and when there would be absolute maximum propaganda on the US front just a couple days before election day. Last time, Israel used the night Barack Obama was elected to breach the cease fire with Hamas (when everyone was tired or sleeping) and even waited for a few days after Christmas to launch a murderous airborne assault, although I don't think Russia will wait a couple months to do whatever (the war has long been on-going anyway and the "pacifist rebels" are quite worse than Hamas).

    2. Re:See China's Compulsary GPS shift by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      The worst, saddest thing I can say about your idea is it would play into Clinton's war card...
      depending on what you call the war card.

      Not every schedule is about the US election but recently, we've got the Pentagon's assault on Deir Ezzor (a thorough slaughter of Syrian troops), and then the assault on Mosul (which entails destruction of all water and power infrastructure, as part of "humanitarian" warfare). If the attacks on a humanitarian convoy was a false flag, then that's some hard core stuff there. White helmets already are something of a "reverse false flag" - many monthes ago there were severe hints they are Jihadi who put on some clothes and/or helmet.
      Some newspaper I've read still pretends the rebels are "Free Syrian Army", about the story about Kurds being bombed by Turkey slight North-West of Aleppo in order to make room for the "rebels".

      In all likehoodness or hopefully, the "West" is bluffing. They want to scare us afterall (i.e. the West scares itself). The Empire reaches several objectives : to bolster the Jihadi, get right-wing governments elected in Europe and North America, and increase weapon sales.

    3. Re:See China's Compulsary GPS shift by lucien86 · · Score: 1

      But Assad's and Putin's targets aren't the jihadi's, they are the remaining pro democracy groups. If you are a vicious dictator anyone who believes in democracy is a terrorist.. der

      --
      Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
  24. Plenty of devices support GLONASS by nicolaiplum · · Score: 2

    Most recent phones support GLONASS. Even an older device like the Nexus 5 does so. You can use an app like GPS Test (by Chartcross, for Android) to see them. They're the higher numbered satellite (60s, 70s). The support is built into the GPS integrated receiver, from Qualcomm and others.

    --
    "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled"
    1. Re:Plenty of devices support GLONASS by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Most recent phones support GLONASS. Even an older device like the Nexus 5 does so. You can use an app like GPS Test (by Chartcross, for Android) to see them. They're the higher numbered satellite (60s, 70s). The support is built into the GPS integrated receiver, from Qualcomm and others.

      And not just that, but most drones' GPS receivers support GLONASS as well. By far the most common GPS chipset is the NEO6,7,8M. NEO6M is the only of these which doesn't support GLONASS and it's also by far the most rare, most common is NEO7M and NEO8M is most common for new sales since the price is virtually identical to the 7M.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  25. In a politicians mind by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    It makes sense to send terrorist threats from the Kremlin to the airport where they become a photo op and a chance to show strong leadership. Why do you think other politicians want it?

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  26. Cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's cheaper than those automatic guns we see in the movies protecting the White House from attacks of disillusioned North Korean terrorists.

  27. GLONASS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does GLONASS still work? there are plenty of multi-band receivers.

  28. Probably jamming GPS, and spoofing Glosnass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although they have could be spoofing a GPS signal, they are probably simply jamming GPS, but meddling with the Glosnass signal which they obviously have complete control over. Modern gps chipsets (in phones etc) can use both signals these days, and if GPS is unavailable can fall back on Glosnass.

    1. Re:Probably jamming GPS, and spoofing Glosnass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Glosnass signals seems to be meddled near the Russian borders as well..at least for the air force.

  29. Apple Maps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Strikes again!

  30. A speculation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Countermeasure for GPS-related or GPS-triggered mobile device surveillance / spying.

  31. GPS is off in the US too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in the US, I've noticed GPS "anomalies" while driving in the Washington DC area and around military bases. Not loss of GPS, but the coordinates are off just enough that you really have to pay attention to driving so that you don't miss a turn.

    Not that I'm paranoid, of course.

    1. Re:GPS is off in the US too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in the US, I've noticed GPS "anomalies" while driving in the Washington DC area and around military bases. Not loss of GPS, but the coordinates are off just enough that you really have to pay attention to driving so that you don't miss a turn.

      I've never had a signal issue with my GPS in Washington DC, regardless of where I've been in the city, doesn't matter if I'm down near Capitol Hill or in the area of the White House or anywhere else. Washington DC isn't the fortress people seem to think it is. What sort of device were you using, a phone inside of a car? That might be more of the issue, lack of decent GPS signal. I've always had accuracy of 10 feet or less in DC, but I've got an aftermarket head unit in my car, that has Garmin GPS built in and uses an external GPS antenna on the roof of the car.

      The only place I've ever had issues with my GPS was in Manhattan, but that was all of the skyscrapers.

      Not that I'm paranoid, of course.

      No really, you are paranoid, GPS doesn't allow you to do "selective inaccuracy" in such a small area.

  32. Only one reason to jam GPS... by dislexic · · Score: 2

    In an instance of war or a strategic hit precision guided bombing sequence requires gps. If there is no gps they will have to use laser guidance or some other less 'fire and forget' tracking method. Bomb makers knew this day was coming Guided-Bomb Makers Anticipate GPS Jammers http://www.defensenews.com/sto...

    1. Re:Only one reason to jam GPS... by kimvette · · Score: 1

      If there were only backup systems which could detect changes in motion by measuring acceleration regardless of what nonsensical GPS data says and maybe a secondary device which measures angular changes, and if the path since the last good data set could be extrapolated based on these hypothetical devices. For a thought exercise let's call the acceleration detector an "accelerometer" and the angular detector a "gyroscope." It's such a shame that those devices do not exist and are not already included in cruise and air to surface missiles. /s

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    2. Re: Only one reason to jam GPS... by dislexic · · Score: 2

      When fighting at Mach 3 minute changes in vector can mean the difference between here and the next town over. No, gyros, and accelerometers are no replacement for gps when your target needs are within 10 sq feet

    3. Re:Only one reason to jam GPS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In an instance of war or a strategic hit precision guided bombing sequence requires gps.

      Not true. Tomahawk cruise missiles were already capable of navigating by recognizing street layouts and buildings (literally following streets in some cases), and this is decades old technology. The trick is to use known waypoints and multiple radio sources to enhance the position, and reject "liar" inputs.

  33. Re:GPS is off in the US too and Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And in Australia. A few years ago when driving around Canberra I found my SatNav unit just stopped working in an area just a couple of city blocks across - then I noticed that the US Embassy was right in the centre of the black-out zone. I'm sure GPS jamming must be commonplace in the vicinity of sensitive sites around the world.

  34. Anyone consider it's a moved WiFi access point? by aviators99 · · Score: 1

    For those with Androids, by default, WiFi access point known locations supersede GPS **Even when WiFi is turned off** (the asterisk-encapsulated part can be disabled, but it's pretty difficult, and it annoys you about it all the time when you do).

    If the complaining taxi drivers are using auto manufacturer GPSes, then I guess that's not the problem. But if they are using Androids, it could be. And for Pokemon Go users, it certainly would be consistent.

    I turn off this feature mostly because it's very annoying when I fly on an airline with WiFi (always). When I land, it shows me in Phoenix, Dallas, Atlanta, or wherever the hub of the airline is, even though I'm somewhere else.

    Google collects WiFi location data via crowdsourcing (see https://www.cnet.com/news/goog...)

    This is a common problem when someone moves houses, or moves an access point from one place to another. It takes a long time for Google to update its database.

    1. Re:Anyone consider it's a moved WiFi access point? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      WiFi does not supersede GPS on Android. It only supersedes GPS if the required GPS accuracy is not achievable. I.e. this may be a problem if you're INSIDE the Kremlin and not near any windows, and someone in the Kremlin decided to re-purpose a WiFi device from the local airport, ... and keep the airport's SSID.

      Sorry there's just so much wrong with this theory.

  35. Massive misunderstanding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It is strange to see many posters think that GPS is an american something. GPS is a shorthand for the generic term "Global Positioning System".

    The american implementation is called NAVSTAR,
    The soviet (later russian) implementation is called Glonass,
    The European Union has Galileo and
    The chinese system is called COMPASS
    (but most call it Bei-dou, lit. art of wayfinding, in order not to confuse it with "Compass Call" which is an american military satellite jamming aircraft).

    All of these are Global Positioning Systems, although there were a few years after the fall of USSR, when only the american system had truly global reach, due to russians' lack of funds to replace ailing satellites.

    1. Re:Massive misunderstanding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Positioning_System
      "The Global Positioning System (GPS), also known as Navstar,[1] is a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) that provides location and time information in all weather conditions, anywhere on or near the Earth where there is an unobstructed line of sight to four or more GPS satellites.[2]"

    2. Re:Massive misunderstanding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, all of these are global positioning systems but only one of them is commonly known as GPS or Global Positioning System:

      The Global Positioning System (GPS), also known as Navstar, --

      Generically, I would call them satnav systems.

    3. Re:Massive misunderstanding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is strange to see many posters think that GPS is an american something.

      Because the colloquial term for Navstar GPS is GPS.

      The generic term for all systems which provide global navigation capability is Global Navigation Satellite System or GNSS.

  36. Happening in US too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once in a while the local news in SoCal reports that GPS may be disrupted in areas around military bases. I was on a road trip up the coast during one of the events when the GPS started going bonkers. Later examination of the history said my top speed was 138mph, I know I never exceeded 70mph.

  37. Homing Beacon by Soylent+Beige · · Score: 1

    Eh, you say jamming signal I say homing beacon.

    --
    Everyone hates me because I'm paranoid.
    1. Re:Homing Beacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PotAto - Potato

  38. What a great idea! by rnturn · · Score: 1

    Render the GPS on someone's cellphone useless if they're, unbeknownst to the poor phone user, near a location that the government has decided shouldn't be found via GPS. What happens to the poor soul who needs to call 9-1-1 after gettiing in a nasty car accident or to report a crime and the EMS service or police can't find them because GPS indicates they're miles away from the true location? Short: answer: there a good chance that, if they're seriously injured, they'll probably die. Jeebus, this is that damned stupidest thing I've heard in a while.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  39. Jammed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The answer is likely very simple, the system is being jammed by a broadband pseudo noise RF signal , likely transmitters at Kremlin itself,. This is Russia people ! Wake up!. This dubious so called " anomaly" no hole in the GPs system, the system is being Jammed by Russian government, To what end is likely foolish
    High power RF signal with peak amplitudes of Megawatts for Tenths of nanoseconds not detectable by anything but the most sophisticated equipment. yet can totally prevent a Gps receiver from working, likely by confusing the GPS receiver . The thing about this method is that voice and digital communications on or near the same frequency and its harmonics although disrupted for nanoseconds , show no ill effects but a GPS signal that relies on this nanosecond wide timing is rendered totally useless

    1. Re:Jammed by JohannesJ · · Score: 1

      Yes!! Very likely narrow High power RF pulses in a random manner would disrupt a GPs system and show no ill effects other than reduced receiver sensitivity on other types of receivers GPS unlike other communications systems relies on nanosecond pulse timing and such random pulses would harm it and not disrupt other communications that rely only on signals that can be microseconds in error and system still tolerates this error GPs however is ruined by these narrow pulses

    2. Re:Jammed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Narrow pulses by definition have a wide bandwidth. A 1ns pulse would use around 1.5GHz bandwidth depending on the shape and sharpness of the edges. A single CW tone on the GPS L1 frequency has a theoretical bandwidth of 0Hz, while still disabling an unhardened GPS receiver completely.

  40. The answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we tell you, we'll have to kill you. :-)

  41. Is it actually confirmed to be the GPS network? by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1
    The summary and the article it links to both say GPS, but there is no other information on which system and devices are showing the errors. Thing is, there are a handful of satellite navigation systems in use these days. The EU, India and China all have their own systems. But the Russians have their own system as well. GPS is a common term for satellite navigation, especially in Western media. Thus; I think there is room to ask if it is actually the American GPS doing this, or if it is the Russians own system. Also, I don't know the current state of export controls on satellite navigation systems. I just know that, at one time, GPS devices were not legal to import into a number of countries, mostly (ex) soviet bloc nations and known sponsors of terrorism. As a result, I would expect that most Russian citizens, especially high level officials, would be using devices that use the Russian (GLONASS)

    Come to think of it, it's possible that many consumers devices actually track based on multiple satellite networks to increase availability and precision and the intermittent nature of the error is because the error depends on which satellite/satellite system is in view at the time.

    --
    I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
  42. obligatory "in Soviet Russia" quote by tie_guy_matt · · Score: 1

    I am surprised that no one has put in the obligatory "in Soviet Russia, GPS gets directions from you" comment yet. How can you not quote Yakov Smirnoff?

  43. What uses GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nukes? Missiles?

  44. Stop lying by cbraescu1 · · Score: 1

    last month's US chief of armies gave a chilling speech where they expect mass casualties within 10 years, to the likes of WWII.

    Stop lying. It never happened.

    You're a paid Kremlin troll.

    --
    Catalin Braescu
    Ofaly.com
    1. Re:Stop lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another anonymous coward here, I've watched the whole speech, as well as the linked excerpt and I did not notice that "they expect mass casualties within ten years, to the likes of WWII." The general stated that the next work will (sic!) be highly lethal, like WW2, but there was no particular timeline expectation given.

  45. Stop lying by cbraescu1 · · Score: 1

    Former Eastern Block countries have some great "IT people" who could do great in a normal environment...but there are no "normal" jobs for them. So, they get hired by criminal organizations instead. Everyone's got to eat.

    Stop lying. You're describing Eastern Europe cca. 1995.

    Nowadays, more than 20 years after, the situation is the exact opposite: not enough IT people compared with available jobs in the local market. Moreover, non-local job opportunities all over the EU drain the IT people from Eastern Europe.

    --
    Catalin Braescu
    Ofaly.com
  46. What did they do before GPS? by doccus · · Score: 1

    Stick their head outside the airplane window and say "Yup.. looks like we're close"? ;-)

    1. Re:What did they do before GPS? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Stick their head outside the airplane window and say "Yup.. looks like we're close"? ;-)

      They used [special, fancy-pants] sextants through windows. Then they used the bomb sight. Alas, equipment for automated optical reckoning is still quite spendy.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  47. When did reading a map become impossible? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    While this may be an annoyance to the public it seems like a reasonable countermeasure to potential terrorist threats.

    Not being able to find the Kremlin would require navigation of a truly mind-bogglingly low standard. I've walked around the thing (having several hours to kill in Moscow, between flying in to one of the internal airports and out of one of the external airports) and it took a solid 3 hours. Detouring, it must be said, to find a toilet and to buy a matrioshka which said rude things about Clinton and Lewinsky. And "odin piva, perzhalsta."

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"