Cloudflare Slams MPAA and RIAA's 'Distorted' Piracy Claims (torrentfreak.com)
Cloudflare has hit back at the entertainment industry's anti-piracy groups, RIAA and MPAA, which accused the service of helping pirate sites to hide. From a TorrentFreak report:Cloudflare was not pleased with this description, to say the least, and has now sent a rebuttal to the U.S. Trade Representative. The company highlights that it's a legitimate business and scolds the MPAA and RIAA for their misleading descriptions. "The submissions by the RIAA and MPAA present distorted descriptions of services that companies like Cloudflare provide. These descriptions fail to provide the USTR with an accurate description of the true intent, purpose, and value of Cloudflare's services," Cloudflare's General Counsel Doug Kramer writes. The company is disappointed in the industry groups, which fail to mention the efforts they have taken so far to address abuse. "Potentially even more troubling than the RIAA and MPAA's descriptions of Cloudflare's services is their complete omission of Cloudflare's efforts to address the small minority of users about which they complain."
These are organizations who are willing to take resources away from counter-terrorism because little Timmy might download the new star wars. They're serial liars and utterly shameless. Libelling a company is small potatoes.
Are you telling me that the RIAA and the MPAA are just a bunch of dicks???? Well here is how we fight back:
Movie tickets for 2 ... $20 ... $25 ... regrettable ... priceless ( to the bedbugs )
Snacks for 2
Quality of the reboot movie cause that is all they do anymore
The bedbugs you bring home
RIAA and MPAA should go after people illegally copying bedbugs while attending their movies.
I find it more compelling to know why these tactics work and how they are used in various places. Lawyers aren't known for presenting accurate descriptions of anything, since their whole job is to present as slanted and outlandishly biased a narrative as can be legally produced. A murder trial will see both sides omitting critical evidence unless obligated not to and not having plausible deniability. Why then do we expect such a politically charged case to be any different? Why does this surprise us enough to be news?
More importantly, why do we think the judge might not be aware of this in the first place? Are they? If not, can we solve that /actual/ problem?
This forum Sig is licensed under the LGPL.
CloudFlare has many criminal customers. Check out this recent list of DDoS/"Stresser"/"Booter" websites serviced by CloudFlare:
alphastress.com, anonymous-stresser.net, aurastresser.com, beststresser.com, boot4free.com, booter.eu, booter.org, booter.xyz, bullstresser.com, buybooters.com, cnstresser.com, connectionstresser.com, crazyamp.me, critical-boot.com, cstress.net, cyberstresser.org, darkstresser.info, darkstresser.net, databooter.com, ddos-fighter.com, ddos-him.com, ddos.city, ddosbreak.com, ddosclub.com, ddostheworld.com, defcon.pro, destressbooter.com, destressnetworks.com, diamond-stresser.net, diebooter.com, diebooter.net, down-stresser.com, downthem.org, exitus.to, exostress.in, free-boot.xyz, freebooter4.me, freestresser.xyz, grimbooter.com, heavystresser.com, hornystress.me, iddos.net, inboot.me, instabooter.com, ipstresser.co, ipstresser.com, jitterstresser.com, k-stress.pw, layer-4.com, layer7.pw, legionboot.com, logicstresser.net, mercilesstresser.com, mystresser.com, netbreak.ec, netspoof.net, networkstresser.com, neverddos.com, nismitstresser.net, onestress.com, onestresser.net, parabooter.com, phoenixstresser.com, pineapple-stresser.com, powerstresser.com, privateroot.fr, purestress.net, quantumbooter.net, quezstresser.com, ragebooter.net, rawlayer.com, reafstresser.ga, restricted-stresser.info, routerslap.com, sharkstresser.com, signalstresser.com, silence-stresser.com, skidbooter.info, spboot.net, stormstresser.net, str3ssed.me, stressboss.net, stresser.club, stresser.in, stresser.network, stresser.ru, stresserit.com, synstress.net, titaniumbooter.net, titaniumstresser.net, topstressers.com, ts3booter.net, unseenbooter.com, vbooter.org, vdos-s.com, webbooter.com, webstresser.co, wifistruggles.com, xboot.net, xr8edstresser.com, xtreme.cc, youboot.net
If CloudFlare would stop providing bulletproof hosting for criminals and spammers, the internet would be a better place. But CloudFlare apparently loves its criminal customers. DDoS purveyors, terrorist websites, malware distributors, CloudFlare seems to welcome them all to its hive of scum and villainy. Maybe it's time to revive the concept of the Usenet Death Penalty and apply it to all traffic to and from CloudFlare. They're the sewer of the internet and should be null routed and de-peered.
See also: CloudFlare Watch
"Pirate" is a word used to frame the argument in favor of the MPAA and RIAA. Stop using it!
Has the MPAA or RIAA *EVER* told the truth? About anything?