Slashdot Mirror


DirecTV Now Leak Reveals Channels, Promotions of AT&T's Upcoming TV Service (variety.com)

It seems AT&T won't leave any stone unturned for its upcoming DirecTV Now streaming service. According to a new report, the company is planning to offer a free Apple TV set-top box or an Amazon Fire USB stick to people who subscribe to the service. From a report on Variety, which also details some channels that could be featured on DirecTV Now: The leaked documents detail that consumers who are willing to commit to at least three months of paid service will be able to get a free Apple TV as part of a device promotion. Consumers who pay for one month will get a free Fire TV streaming stick. Both devices are more expensive on their own than the service charges consumers would have to pay to qualify for each promotion. AT&T officially announced DirecTV Now as an internet-based live TV service earlier this year. The telco has since given us some idea about the programming, announcing deals with Disney, NBCUniversal and Viacom as well as Scripps, A&E Networks, Discovery, HBO, and Starz. Last month, AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson announced that DirecTV Now will cost $35 per month and carry more than 100 channels when it launches in the coming weeks. The leaked customer-support documents didn't include complete channel lineups -- those also depend on the local markets of subscribers -- but they do give us a better idea of which other channels DirecTV Now aims to launch with. A partial list of channels included not only networks from the aforementioned partners, but also Univision networks like Galavision, Univision and UniMas, Fox and MundoFox, CBS, HDNet Movies, the Hallmark Channel and the Sony Movie Channel.

45 comments

  1. Free? by oaf357 · · Score: 1

    Please provide kidney in lieu of long-term contract for free Apple TV or Fire Stick.

    1. Re:Free? by wfj2fd · · Score: 2

      3 months isn't really a long-term contract for this type of service.

    2. Re:Free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just install Kodi on either device and watch everything for FREE !

  2. Most important question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you cancel online without having to speak/chat with a rep?

    1. Re:Most important question by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Can you cancel online without having to speak/chat with a rep?

      If they're smart and have set this up like SlingTV and Playstation VUE, then you should be able to sign up, upgrade, degrade or cancel online without having to talk to a rep.

      I'm anxious to see what the DirectTV Now offers.

      My "cut the cord" set up currently is with Playstation VUE over Amazon FireTV box....combined with a Tivo Roamia OTA unit and Tivo minis for the bedrooms and office....

      I like the VUE option over SlingTV to date...for $35/mo has all the "cable channels" I'd miss from regular cable tv...TCM, FX, FXX...new channels (MSNBC, Fox News, CNN, etc), and it does have a decent DVR capability for these channels too!!

      But then nice thing about this...is so far, none of them require any contract...month to month, so if I like DirectTV Now...I can switch, etc.

      I'll be anxious to see what they offer.

      One thing, however...I'd caution against using any "stick" for these services. I found with VUE..the guide section, it would not work smoothly on a PS3...or old Roku 3...I had to get the latest Amazon Fire TV to have it work smoothly. I believe the Roku 4 should work the same, but the sticks just can't handle the processing in many cases...just like the older full sized units I listed.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Most important question by PRMan · · Score: 1

      The new Roku Stick is the same as the 4K without the 4K or wired networking stuff.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    3. Re:Most important question by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      The new Roku Stick is the same as the 4K without the 4K or wired networking stuff.

      Well...don't you want the capability to stream 4K off Amazon prime (free), or Netflix (extra fee)?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:Most important question by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Well...don't you want the capability to stream 4K off Amazon prime (free), or Netflix (extra fee)?

      Sure, just as soon as they actually stream some real 4K content, or, heck, HD content for that matter.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  3. on demand or not? ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it isn't on-demand content than what is the point, same thing with ads... The fact that is doesn't say on demand or ad free makes me think its just another tv service.

    1. Re:on demand or not? ads? by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      It gets worse. Well, it started worse. It's still 100 channels of mostly-shit-you-don't-really-want. Wake the fuck up, AT&T (et al). I will gladly pay $35 for the ten (and that's stretching it) channels I actually care about, but I get to choose. M'kay?

    2. Re:on demand or not? ads? by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Then I don't pay. That's why I only pay for Sling Orange for $20 a month. And I'll cancel that as soon as college football is done.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    3. Re:on demand or not? ads? by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      Sorry to hear the Stockholm syndrome's still a problem.

      Hell, I'd have paid good $$$ extra to just not get political ads the last two years. Yeah, I could have recorded the network feed and FF, but I'm lazy and would prefer to delegate.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    4. Re:on demand or not? ads? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      That's what DVRs are for. If you're really DIY, your own DVR with comskip or myth tv or other automatic commercial skipping options.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    5. Re:on demand or not? ads? by tepples · · Score: 1

      DIY DVRs don't work with cable boxes that apply DTCP or HDCP to all outputs.

    6. Re:on demand or not? ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "100 cable channels"
      100 or 500 don't matter, they are all shit full of shit commercials. $99/mo or $0.99 don't matter, it is still the same shit news, shit sports, shit entertainment from the last century. Wake the fuck up At&T, nobody wants that shit at any price. Your monopolistic protected monopoly business model is history.
      AT the telephone is dead, so is "cable" and satellite TV. Wake the fuck up or die. Only fiber matters.

    7. Re:on demand or not? ads? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      HDCP is a broken technology. A simple cheap splitter combined with a capture device is all it takes to side step it. If you really want to go DIY, intercepting the output to the processor in a monitor also works. Like all digital DRM technologies for things that are meant to be consumed, they are fundamentally broken since you have to allow people to see/hear your content at which point it can always be reproduced, and they can always be captured electronically at those points by anyone with a little electrical know how, totally side stepping the DMCA entirely as you're not circumventing DRM in any way at those points as there is no DRM.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    8. Re:on demand or not? ads? by tepples · · Score: 1

      HDCP is a broken technology. A simple cheap splitter

      ...is likely to be stopped at the border by customs.

      If you really want to go DIY, intercepting the output to the processor in a monitor also works.

      The vast majority of cable DVR users are unwilling to tear apart a monitor and tap the buses.

    9. Re:on demand or not? ads? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      HDCP is a broken technology. A simple cheap splitter

      ...is likely to be stopped at the border by customs.

      Can be bought just about anywhere, under so many brands and names it's just about impossible to keep them out. It is even odds that any cheap splitter you buy, in B&M or online, will fail to properly utilize HDCP when splitting the signal. In this case, hooray for cheap knock-offs.

      The vast majority of cable DVR users are unwilling to tear apart a monitor and tap the buses.

      Yep, true. That's why the statement "If you really want to go DIY". It's simple enough, there's even how tos out there, but it does require some semi-destruction of a monitor or TV. However, you don't have to break open a monitor. You can open any compliant HDMI/HDCP enabled splitter and accomplish the same thing.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  4. Link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This links to the $35 cost announcement /. article and itself...

    1. Re:Link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Found it here: http://variety.com/2016/digital/news/directv-now-channel-list-leak-1201909846/

    2. Re:Link? by whipslash · · Score: 1

      fixed

  5. Commercials? by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

    I am assuming that this will have the full 15 minutes of commercials per hour that normal "cable" packages have?

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    1. Re:Commercials? by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Yes. It's just access to live TV same as Sling TV or Playstation Vue (but without Vue's cloud DVR).

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  6. directtvnow.com by The-Ixian · · Score: 2

    The target market for this service is made 100% crystal clear by their placeholder page.

    Leave your name and email here. We'll hit you up later with the deets.

    A'ight bro

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    1. Re:directtvnow.com by the_skywise · · Score: 1

      Oh dear - I guess I should put my email here then... won't the ladies in my bridge club be jealous!

      stephensfavoritegrandma123@aol.com

    2. Re:directtvnow.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AT&T hasn't made any secret that the millenials are the target market for this service.

    3. Re:directtvnow.com by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      The target market for this service is made 100% crystal clear by their placeholder page.

      Leave your name and email here. We'll hit you up later with the deets.

      A'ight bro

      So the target is 40 somethings who might still use the term 'deets'?

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    4. Re:directtvnow.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name: Bro McFarley
      Email: lol@hipster.com

  7. 100 Channels? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 2

    100 channels makes it sound like the awful days when I had a dish. There mere many channels, mostly crap.

    Now there are no channels, there are programs and you watch them by choosing the programs. Channels are an artifact of radio transmission and have no place in internet streamed media.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    1. Re: 100 Channels? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How will grandma and grandpa understand it if there aren't "channels"?

    2. Re: 100 Channels? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Grandma manages fine. Given that she ran a microelectronics education resource center in her pre retirement days, I think she'll be ok.
      Grandpa doesn't need to manage any more. That's how cancer works.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  8. Diferent commitment levels, I'm sure. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    ...consumers who are willing to commit to at least three months of paid service will be able to get a free Apple TV as part of a device promotion

    Pretty sure there's different terms for those that's not a "your choice" thing. There's a big difference in device retail value between an Apple and a Fire Stick.
    Like maybe a Fire Stick for three months pre-paid and an AppleTV for a one-year contract. Sounds much more AT&T.

    1. Re:Diferent commitment levels, I'm sure. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Like maybe a Fire Stick for three months pre-paid and an AppleTV for a one-year contract. Sounds much more AT&T.

      Certainly if they have any clue that's how they'll set it up, because the FireTV Stick is a POS.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  9. 3 months and done by omnichad · · Score: 1

    I'd do it for an Apple TV. I've never wanted one, but I may have to support one from time to time so it would be good to play with one. If I can pay below retail and get some free streaming TV to go with it, I'll do it.

    And then back to my Netflix with an extra device to watch it on.

    1. Re:3 months and done by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      i was thinking the exact same thing

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  10. will they lower the HBO price on sat / iptv system by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    will they lower the HBO price on sat / iptv systems as well?

  11. Who even remotely wants a TV package anymore? by swb · · Score: 1

    I can barely justify Netflix as a package, but a bundle of cable channels? That's the last thing I want.

    1. Re:Who even remotely wants a TV package anymore? by harrkev · · Score: 2

      Netflix has the advantage of watching any of their programs at any time. With OTA, cable, and satellite, you also have the option of recording it to watch later.

      With this thing, it appears that there is no such thing as recording? I noticed a "72-hour catch-up windows" for "many" networks. Cute, but in my house a show can sit for a week or two before we get a chance to watch it, and that is just with OTA as a source. Thanks, but no thanks.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    2. Re: Who even remotely wants a TV package anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up. This is classic directv bs. '72 hour viewing window'. Full disclosure:. Just cancelled dtv after over a decade paying too much and using too little of it. Loving roamio ota skip, plus Netflix

  12. Competitor to SlingTV? by Lieutenant_Dan · · Score: 1

    This service sounds pretty much the same thing as what Dish is offering with Sling TV.

    I actually cancelled cable and have now a couple of Nvidia Shield's with Sling TV. Works quite well; some channels provide on-demand, some channels allow you to watch programming from the last 24 hours, and of course. Works fine for us for now; I got the basic package plus blue package. You can watch up to three devices at the same time.

    --
    Wearing pants should always be optional.
  13. Root Sports? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will the channel include the Direct TV/ATT owned Root Sports? If it does, sign my up. That is pretty much the only reason I pay for their stupid satellite service now.

  14. Channels for multicast and live events by tepples · · Score: 1

    I thought "channels" had two purposes: to show live programs, such as sports, award shows, or political talk; and to get more than one subscriber onto an IP multicast group.