Slashdot Mirror


US President Barack Obama Criticizes Facebook of Spreading Fake Stories (www.bgr.in)

An anonymous reader writes:Concerned over the spread of fake news on the social networking giant, US President Barack Obama has criticized Facebook, saying fake stories on social networks are spreading lies this election. Speaking at a rally for Hillary Clinton at University of Michigan, Obama said: "The way campaigns have unfolded, we just start accepting crazy stuff as normal and people if they just repeat attacks enough and outright lies over and over again. As long as it's on Facebook, and people can see it, as long as it's on social media, people start believing it, and it creates this dust cloud of nonsense," he told the gathering. A recent BuzzFeed investigation found that 38 percent of posts shared from three large right-wing politics pages on Facebook included "false or misleading information."

20 of 436 comments (clear)

  1. Re:BuzzFeed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Do you regularly make studies about things for which you are unqualified, and draw unsupported and inflammatory conclusions designed to polarize people toward idiotic misunderstandings?

  2. Re:BuzzFeed? by tripleevenfall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A better question - what is this "Facebook of Spreading Fake Stories" that BO is criticizing?

  3. 1984 by Roodvlees · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "To combat the lies being spread about me; I'd like you to rev up the censorship"

    --
    Thank you, Bradley Manning, Edward Snowden and so many others, for courageously defending humanity, my freedom and more!
  4. Fake Stories...about me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When they were spreading stuff against my political foes, it was cool. But now that my party is getting some bad press, it ain't cool no more. Need to stop this! Think of the children!!

  5. Go MSM! by Orgasmatron · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We were so much better off when all of our fake stories were carefully handcrafted by the propaganda wing of the Democrat party (CNN, MSN, CBS, FNC, etc.).

    --
    See that "Preview" button?
    1. Re:Go MSM! by s.petry · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Have you ever watched Bill O'Reilly or Megan Kelly? They repeat the same talking points as the other MSM and for the most part allow narratives to run unchecked. The only people on that network who are pro-Trump is Hannity and part timer Jeanine Pirro.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    2. Re:Go MSM! by pastafazou · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not yet, but they're very close to having a monopoly now that Ailes is out at Fox. If you've been following the Wikileaks releases, you would have seen that all of the mainstream media were colluding and working with the Clinton team. All of Hollywood and all of the big networks working overtime for Clinton, controlling the news you hear, massaging, filtering, and shaping the message being delivered to the populace. If not for the internet, Reddit, Wikileaks, and a few others, Clinton would be winning all 50 states and nobody would have a clue.

    3. Re:Go MSM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't forget Buzzfeed. I love how they are now suddenly a "legitimate news source" just because they've been pro-Hillary and anti-Trump.

      People only want to hear the lies that suit their worldview. All that pretentious nonsense about morals, truth and objectivity is nothing but bullshit.

    4. Re:Go MSM! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's more like, Clinton has been doing politics for decades, so has her husband, both have held high office and over that time have developed connections and contacts in the media, as every other politician does. Trump doesn't have that and some of the people in his own party who would normally be helping him are kinda reluctant to.

      This reminds me a lot of the stupid outrage over journalists being friends with various game developers that came out of GamerGate's "ethics" cover story. That's how journalism works, people don't tell journalists stuff if they don't know them or like them. The professional part is being able to be friends or at least friendly while still being objective.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  6. The government is concerned about spreading lies.. by ewhenn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The government is concerned about spreading lies and that it may dupe people into making choices that they wouldn't make if they knew the real facts? Talk about blistering irony...

  7. Re:Liar-In-Chief by wbr1 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Are you that dumb? If you are undocumented, you cannot register to vote or vote. He is talking about LEGAL citizens who may have undocumented friends going to vote.

    Of course, you would have all the -others- tossed out even if they are citizens. Xenophobes like you have no place in modern society. Either we learn to get along with each other (and we have been doing better lately even though the news makes you think otherwize), or we will wind up destroying ourselves, or that which makes us human.

    Quit using your fear as a driver for your beliefs.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  8. Re:BuzzFeed? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Oh, you're so cute. Making jokes in front of people angry enough to kill.

  9. pissing off the mob == pageviews++ by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Some people are saying that Hillary is a shapeshifting reptoid.
    Myself, I wouldn't know.
    But that's what they're saying on the Facebooks.
    We just provide the lies, you pick which one fits your preconceived bias.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  10. Re:You mean like the story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Do some homework there, sparky. Bill O'reilly is not a source, by the way.

  11. Re:You mean like the story... by frovingslosh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I remember Obama saying both of these things in the 2008 campaign and you can find videos of him saying them on YouTube. Mentioning O'Rielly in your post can't change that truth.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  12. Re:Liar-In-Chief by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Of course, Obama's pledge to "get your back" runs out in mid-January. If Trump wins, me might have an interest in cleaning up the voter rolls and might discover hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants who have committed the FEDERAL FELONY of electoral fraud and might just do something about these repeat criminals as part of his effort to "drain the swamp". He might do something about the tens of thousands of Deceased-American active voters, too.

  13. Re:Going by this logic by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It isn't lying if you don't tell the story at all. When you're in active collusion with a candidate's campaign and present yourself as "unbiased news source", be it from MSNBC/CBS/ABC/CNN or Fox News, you've lost whatever credibility you're trying to peddle. And if you're not credible news outlet, then what are you actually peddling?

    It is so bad, they aren't even trying to hide it anymore.

    Which leads to "fake news stories" on Facebook. When the people are desperate for REAL coverage, rather than reading Talking Points / biased propaganda from the Campaigns, they will reach out to whatever actually sounds right, regardless of whether it is or not. If you want to blame someone, blame the MSM news for not covering anything even remotely close to an unbiased way.

    There is no way in hell that Hillary or Donald are nominees in any campaign except via collusion between campaigns and media. I am 100% convinced that Hillary wanted Donald as the (R) candidate, and the media set him up to win. The fact that she is pretty much tied with him is proof how lousy a candidate she actually is.

    I'm just glad it is almost over, and we can watch the final episode of the USA.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  14. Re:Going by this logic by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are many kinds of lying. There is lying by commission and lying by omission. If you purport to tell the truth but only tell carefully selected truths, you are lying, even if what you say is completely factually accurate.

    Now social media companies don't actually lie; what they do doesn't even rise to the standard of a lie. A liar tries to get you to believe a proposition he believes to be false. What social media companies want to do is provoke a reaction.

    In other words the nearly half of adults who get their news from social media are getting their news from trolls and bullshitters.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  15. Re:Too late.... by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now, here is the better question, if those people are working and contributing to society and have been doing so for a long time, why shouldn't they have a say in things?

    Simple, because there are NOT FUCKING CITIZENS!!

    Geez, how hard is that to get?

    They came here illegally....they are disqualified from voting and they have started out their journey on US soil by committing a crime. If you don't like that, change the laws, but you can't change the fact that they are here by breaking immigration laws.

    Ok..so, you say anyone here in the US during elections should be able to vote? Ok..are there other countries in the world that are so haphazard with their election laws?

    By your logic, you'd be cool with other countries sending floods of folks here to try to sway elections. How about lots of Russians flooding in close swing states...they come here, overstay their visa...and keep doing this with more and more people coming over during the 4 years between elections and then they all get to vote and sway our elections based on what their mother country wants.

    Far fetched? It could happen.

    Ok, how long do you think you should have if you are in the US illegally before you can vote. 1 year? 5 years? 10 years? If you are here illegally, how can you prove it?

    Those documents to prove how long you are here could easily be forged....

    Again..there are rules and laws on the books. If you don't like them, vote to get representative that will change them, get involved...promote your cause.

    But we can just ignore things we don't like, or it falls into anarchy.

    And other external countries to the US do NOT have our best interest in mind, they have their best interest. That's what a countries government is supposed to do.

    So, look. I don't think hardly anyone has a problem with immigrants. Legal immigrants.

    Yes, come to the US...just sign the fucking guest book on the way in....

    And one last hint..if you want to come here, be a citizen and contribute...quit waving other countries' flags when you're on TV protesting. It doesn't help your cause much.

    If you wanted things like they were in your home country..stay there.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  16. Re:BuzzFeed? by bugs2squash · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If it's not this "joke" then it's some other "joke", a call to say there's no need to vote or that you're guilty of a voting violation.

    It's all mean spirited, disrespectful and crooked and should be prosecuted whichever side is doing it.

    --
    Nullius in verba