'Lurking Malice' Study Finds Malware Hiding In The Cloud (gatech.edu)
"Cloud repositories have become the hub of malicious web activities," warns one computer engineering professor. An anonymous reader quotes SC magazine:
A recent study detected more than 600 cloud repositories hosting malware and other malicious activities on major cloud platforms including Amazon, Google, Groupon and thousands of other sites. Researchers...scanned more than 140,000 sites on 20 major cloud hosting services and found that as many as 10 percent of the repositories hosted by them had been compromised, according to the "Lurking Malice in the Cloud: Understanding and Detecting Cloud Repository as a Malicious Service" report [PDF]...
[According to the researchers] threat actors are taking advantage of the cloud because of how difficult it can be to scan the large amount of storage they provide... service providers which are bound by privacy commitments and ethical concerns tend to avoid inspecting their customer's repositories without proper consent and even when they are willing to inspect them it is difficult to spot malicious content.
[According to the researchers] threat actors are taking advantage of the cloud because of how difficult it can be to scan the large amount of storage they provide... service providers which are bound by privacy commitments and ethical concerns tend to avoid inspecting their customer's repositories without proper consent and even when they are willing to inspect them it is difficult to spot malicious content.
NT
Not doing the scanning and removing the malware?
NT.
NT...
Malware is a problem when people try to execute it. Malware laying in “cloud repositories” (what does that even mean?) is doing no harm except waste place. Why waste even more energy trying to scan it? Or even study it?
Water is wet.
If you want to keep data secure, keep it in house and hire people who know how to protect it.
Mimetics Inc. Twitter
Oh oh!! Busted by the cloud provider shills.
the internet is filled with malicious servers
news at 11
If the cloud is so bad, why is it that virtually all companies are looking to move to it, ditching all enterprise-grade hardware on premises is their edge router to the Internet and AWS? Like it or not, it is the way of the future.
Because, it's a fad. Like outsourcing. The people making the decisions typically aren't technologists, and tend to believe the marketing hype.
Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
AC its groupthink. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... The experts offer huge amounts of storage, fast networking, low cost energy and CPU time for cents on the $.
But with that comes a total loss of control. What random code is in the same location with your brand? What is been done in your brands name?
On site experts can ensure your site and brand is clean and fast on totally controlled hardware and software. A cloud offers network balance globally but with a risk to reputation.
Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
If the cloud is so bad, why is it that virtually all companies are looking to move to it, ditching all enterprise-grade hardware on premises is their edge router to the Internet and AWS? Like it or not, it is the way of the future.
The suits have been sold on how inexpensive it is, and how they can get rid of a lot of employees. This leads to bigger bonuses.
And just like every insourcing versus outsourcing battle, it will be cyclical.
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
Anyone's free to ask my sources in the security community where my data comes from
So you kinda have to tell us exactly who your sources in the security community are if we are to ask them, AC.
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
Pretty much this. Big time fad. Also exaggerated. "Everyone" is most certainly not moving their stuff to the cloud. That's just more marketing hype and press bullshit.
Sure, it's useful for some things. However, the only businesses moving everything to the cloud are startups that never had infrastructure and will be out of business soon anyway, and total idiots. Decisions like that really are made by clueless executives.
When cloud computing first became a marketing term (because we'd already called it "time share" and "hosting") it was supposed to be cheaper. Now it's not cheaper--well, it never really was except for companies that artificially discount it to gain customers (cough, Microsoft, cough). Now it's more flexible or something, because everybody I know has to go from 100 to 500 servers and back again in the same week.
There's always going to be a hard sell for this though because it involves recurring revenue and that's attractive for bullshit artists.
Really, here's what's going to happen. Right now running cloud services is hard because the chewing gum and bailing wire of homemade scripts that glue all that proprietary stuff together is hard to maintain. More flimflam artists are going to want in though, but they're not going to have any skills, which means other opportunists are going to simplify the infrastructure so that even offshore outsourced idiots can run it...but when you combine good management tools with more powerful servers and storage with smaller footprints, who needs a rent seeking cloud provider? So we'll go full circle, just like we did the last time that time sharing dominated by rent seekers was the prevalent computing model.
What the hell is a "cloud repository"? Is that just a cloud-hosted file drop? Why the weird nomenclature?
Of course they host malware. And porn. And wares. And illegally-traded movies. Literally every kind of file that has ever been created can probably be found "in the cloud". What are we learning, here? Oh, right: SC magazine needed some clicks today.
See subject: Tons of "cloud-based" hosts misused to house malware or its code while using this daily APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?... to build my hosts file to block them out.
APK
P.S.=> I've been gathering this data for protection vs. malicious threats of all kinds daily since 1996 or so, consistently - & IF my words aren't good enough? Anyone's free to ask my sources in the security community where my data comes from if cloud is misused thus (along w/ email phish etc. being used a lot lately too)... apk
They're listed in my program. I don't do others' homework for them. I just point the way to information.
APK
See subject: I wrote it (audited by Malwarebytes' personnel, 1 of my data sources who hosts + recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... )
Verified by Malwarebytes' S. Burn "I've seen the code & it's safe" http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi...
(You're also free to verify that with the gent as well - he wouldn't have hosted it otherwise & even RECOMMENDS it above others he hosts...)
Safe by 57++ antivirus programs too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
(I've been doing freeware/shareware/commercialware (in commercially sold code you might even use) for decades & I'm fairly well known for it - certainly more than MOST here, even "registered 'lusers'" who make THAT (lol) some "claim to fame"... see, even the SECURITY COMMUNITY knows who I am & your proof's above)
APK
P.S.=> You're welcome to download it & see for yourself - it's ALL THERE in "black & white" etc. as the saying goes, nothing to hide... apk
Wait, are you talking about a standard /etc/hosts file with entries like:
127.0.0.1 localhost
0.0.0.0 some.evil.host.com
0.0.0.0 googleadservices.com
?
@APK: you're spamming all the fucking time in slashdot but now cat got your tongue? It's a simple question.
I think apk's letting you stew in your "ne'er-do-well" do-nothingness by ignoring you. The question's the only stupid question I've ever seen. The answer is self-evident if you know anything about his program and apparently you do. Call it spam? If that's the best you've got, let's see you do better. Obviously you can't and have to troll people by unidentifiable anonymous posts since it's all you're capable of in being a stupid nuisance.
I think you are apk and you're a fucking clown.
You don't possess the brains to think and you are projecting you are the clown.