Slashdot Mirror


Police Raid Pirate Site, Seize 60 Servers Following MPAA Complaint (torrentfreak.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from TorrentFreak: When it comes to shutting down pirate sites, few groups have a longer history than the Motion Picture Association of America. The Hollywood organization has dozens of pirate scalps under its belt and today is able to claim another. Serving more than a million users every day, FS.to was one of Ukraine's largest pirate sites. Ranked the country's 21st most popular site overall, the movie-focused platform attracted the attention of the MPAA and local rights holders alike. That has resulted in one of the biggest raids ever seen in the country. According to the cyber crime division of Ukraine's national police, an operation shut down the platform Monday following a complaint from Hollywood. The authorities say that 19 people suspected of running the site via a network of local and offshore companies were arrested. The operation to shut the site appears to have been significant. Raids took place at the offices and homes of the suspects, plus datacenters where equipment running the site was installed. Thus far around 60 servers have been seized from a range of local ISPs but the operation is still ongoing so the tally could increase. Local sources indicate that the authorities have linked local Internet company Ferazko Holding Inc. with FS since it owns several of the site's domains including FS.to, BRB.to and FS.ua.

60 comments

  1. The MPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    ...can go FUCK itself. Maybe Trump will do something worthwhile and shut it down, considering it's run by (((globalist elite Hollywood types))), and we can all move on with our lives.

    1. Re:The MPAA by gatkinso · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps you should boycott all of their content.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    2. Re:The MPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should boycott all of their content.

      I don't know about everybody else, but that's exactly what I do. I live quite happily without what they peddle.

    3. Re:The MPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You keep using that word.

      A solo boycott is an oxymoron.

    4. Re:The MPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Don't be silly. I'm an American, boycotting Jews is illegal here.

    5. Re:The MPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Movies and music are not Jews, and last I checked, the US isn't drone striking me for not buying MAFIAA-branded trash.

    6. Re:The MPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do but that doesn't help much.
      They have this crazy levy in place on storage media so they get my money even if I don't buy their content.
      As far as I know the only party that has talked about getting rid of the levy is the Pirate Party but they aren't very likely to get into the parliament where I live. (I still throw my vote their way every election.)

    7. Re:The MPAA by johanw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I never pay for content they claim artificial scarcity on, does that count as a boycot too? :-)

    8. Re:The MPAA by johanw · · Score: 1, Informative

      The current Ukraine coup junta was installed when neonazi groups supported by the EU/US forcibly removed the ligitimate government. And I'm not making up the neonazi part, they are actually marching through the streets with swastika's. So they have to do their masters bidding, wether their own population agrees or not.

    9. Re: The MPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NY and Hollywood, yeah, they are...

    10. Re:The MPAA by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should boycott all of their content.

      I don't know about you, but I did ~15 years ago. Doesn't seem to be stopping them from getting their hands on helping to write stuff like TPP though does it? It also doesn't help that the media likes to denigrate other forms of entertainment like gaming as "it'll turn you into a mass shooter" or "it makes children into murders" for example. Even though the video game industry is bigger than hollywood.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    11. Re:The MPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if he really wants to FUCK them, he could also upload all their content as torrents.

    12. Re: The MPAA by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      Same thing happening very soon in Brazil... the legitimate goverment already down (paid by USA), now we have a saboteur destroying the country while the nazis will soon be on the streets. You may know how I can apply to refugee status?

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    13. Re: The MPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      now we have a saboteur destroying the country while the nazis will soon be on the streets

      Don't feel lonely, this sums up America pretty well too.

    14. Re:The MPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's such a big problem

  2. Russians want their monopoly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Pirate site.. LOL.

    Meanwhile, the Russians run sites where you can pay a few bucks for the same shitty rips and cam files as you find on torrent sites.

    Don't believe me?
    www.movieberry.com

  3. "Pirate site" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Pirate site" is meaningless. Did they have magnets? Torrents? Link to streams? Have their own streams? For profit?

    1. Re:"Pirate site" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      They had a ton of films and TV shows streaming on demand, with a good ratings and comment system. They streamed everything themselves and made money by embedding ads inside the streams. Their player had multiple language subtitles for many films. There was also an enormous list of serials/cracks that was much better than the putrid remains of astalavista. Sample page for a movie listing.

    2. Re: "Pirate site" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      torrents is a way of downloading with many other peers a gateway or middleman if you want nothing in of itself has to do with pirating and even if it is its like letting a friend have a copy though posibly lots of freinds. this was these people streaming blatent pirated materials them selves with a large distrobution on hand almost like a buisness.

    3. Re:"Pirate site" by ShaunC · · Score: 1

      What the MPAA ought to do, then, is seize the site assets, anglicize (or internationalize) everything, and set up their own site that charges a couple bucks per stream without any advertising. Of course we know that will never happen, they'd rather bitch and moan about piracy than provide more consumer-friendly options.

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
  4. Piracy is not a victimless crime. by Marsoupial · · Score: 1

    No indeed.

    1. Re:Piracy is not a victimless crime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The piracy of any creation with a copyright that has exceeded a reasonable period of time for a copyright, is a victimless crime. Pirating papers containing scientific knowledge that's not available elsewhere, is a victimless crime. Pirating "Happy Birthday to You" was a victimless crime. Copying movies you wouldn't otherwise pay for - no lost sale - is victimless.

    2. Re:Piracy is not a victimless crime. by gatkinso · · Score: 0

      Nice try, but you are full of shit.

      Pay for your content.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    3. Re:Piracy is not a victimless crime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That the best you have, shill? Pay for content that should be, or already is, in the public domain? Give money to copyright thieves and tax-dodgers? I'd rather it goes to the people that actually create. I'm not the one full of shit.

    4. Re:Piracy is not a victimless crime. by Loon911 · · Score: 1

      Pay for your content couldn't agree more. Next birthday party you go to where you sing "Happy birthday" don't forget to pay up, ok? USA copy right law Life of the author + 70 years, the latest works that came to public domain was from 1946. http://copyright.cornell.edu/r...

    5. Re:Piracy is not a victimless crime. by cart_man4524 · · Score: 0

      I do pay for my content; I have my cable subscription. Some people just like to see stuff at their own leisure.

    6. Re: Piracy is not a victimless crime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      copyrights do get out of hand more than not when left unchecked.

    7. Re:Piracy is not a victimless crime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Happy Birthday" is in the public domain. You need to use current information in your counter arguments.

    8. Re: Piracy is not a victimless crime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't sell it if you can't handle people using it however they like.

      You remind me of someone crying when they find out the 25 cent dictionary they sold you is busy holding up a chair. Boo hoo. If you want full control, don't sell it. Full stop. I don't care about the laws you bought. I believe if I paid for it I can do whatever the fuck I want with it. Including giving it away.

    9. Re:Piracy is not a victimless crime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't waste everyone's time agonizing particulars that don't affect The Point.

    10. Re: Piracy is not a victimless crime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Butthurt much, nerd? The media industry has won. Your beloved internet has been brought to heel. The war is over and you lost. Get over it.

    11. Re:Piracy is not a victimless crime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the problem.
      They expect me to pay for *my* content.
      They block my Youtube channel when I distribute *my* content.
      They tax me for buying storage media to store *my* content.
      That is before I have even touched *their* content.

    12. Re:Piracy is not a victimless crime. by johanw · · Score: 1

      It's not a crime anyway. Corporations may think they have a right to monopolies as a profit model, but the only reasons they have it is because they bribe politicians better than ordinary people.

    13. Re: Piracy is not a victimless crime. by johanw · · Score: 2

      I didn't get that impression when looking at several file sharing sites.

    14. Re: Piracy is not a victimless crime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naa, I don't think I have :)

    15. Re: Piracy is not a victimless crime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I interpret "copyright" as the right to copy. So I'll do just that :)

    16. Re:Piracy is not a victimless crime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I live:

      - There is a levy on storage media (USB Sticks, external harddisks, CD-ROMs; etc...), because they _can_ be misused to store copyrighted material.
      - There is a levy on internet access, because it _can_ be misused to download copyrighted material.
      - There is a levy on MP3 players, because they _can_ be misused to play copyrighted material
      - and more.

      Yet, my country tells me it is stil considered wrong to download such content without paying...

      How can I explain this to my kids?

    17. Re:Piracy is not a victimless crime. by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      Intellectual property isn't a crime, but it isn't victimless. Appropriation of culture from the people at large harmful.

  5. Bribed the Wrong People by bufo333 · · Score: 1

    They should have set that server farm up in the Crimea. Then they could have bribed the Russians to make sure shit like this did not happen.

  6. Ukraine that wealthy country by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    Good luck suing the local downloaders.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  7. migrate to distribute web by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    move to zeronet and ipfs

    1. Re:migrate to distribute web by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See the real problem is none of you cumcatchers understands that if you want to truly SHARE FREELY, you CANNOT [!!!] do it over the wide open clear internet, you CANNOT do it over your stupid VPN's either. Because ALL of them log you and can shut you down and turn you in to the man!

      The ONLY, I repeat, ONLY [!!!] way to share freely is to go download I2P, Tor, or Phantom, or the like, install it, configure it, then plug your FAVORITE torrent sharing app into it, possibly using OnionCat to provide the IPv6 layer these apps can use with these networks.

      THEN, and ONLY THEN, will you be able to SHARE FREELY, FOREVER, 24x7x365, with NO FEAR WHATSOEVER about the MAFIAA, POLICE, etc.

      These anonymous overlay networks have been proven over time, and when properly used, to be immune to BULLSHIT like the MAFIAA.

      So I ask you my fellow brothers.... get your goddamned ass outta yo stupid head and start torrenting ENTIRELY WITHIN these PRIVATE ANONYMOUS OVERLAY NETWORKS.

      Are they fast? YES!!! I can download a CD and a DVD-9 per day over these networks WITHOUT ever touching clearnet. Thus ALL my needs are met ;-)

  8. Copyright is not a victimless crime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No indeed.

  9. ROI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess that the US demanded something back for the billions invested in undermining the previously ELECTED government of Ukraine and installing the current puppets !

  10. fuckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Selling weapons to any cunt in the world is good but sharing some videos will get u to jail... good luck in American EU Ukraine

  11. MPAA, Raids, Who Are The Pirates? by HannethCom · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I find it funny that the criminal organization called the MPAA is having raids performed on on their behalf, as wasn't it pirates that used to perform raids.
    That's right, the MPAA has been found guilty of pirating movies. Thousands of movies have been found on MPAA computers that they have no license, or rights to.
    The MPAA has also paid companies to issue DMCA takedown on their behalf. Where tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of DMCA takedown have been in violation of the law.

    --
    Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon what's the difference? All steal money from devs and control with walled gardens.
  12. Why don't they... by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 2

    Instead of storing a music track (or movie) as an MP3 or MP4 file on a single server, why not break it up into a bitstream in chunks of less than a byte and distribute it amongst a large number of servers. Each file on each server would then appear to be nothing but a random bitstream bearing no relation to the actual original work.

    To access/download said movie/music, all you need is the right piece of software and the key which activates a function that downloads the bitstream fragments from the relevant servers and re-orders them into the original track.

    This way, no server will have a copy of the copyright-infringing material that could be recognised as the offending work so surely could not be the subject of a copyright violation.

    Since the servers would be useless without the key and the key would be useless without the servers -- neither part constitutes the copyrighted work.

    Yeah, it's a form of distributed encryption -- but how do copyright holders issue a takedown notice for something that is clearly not their copyrighted content?

    Just a thought. Probably already been done because there's nothing new in the universe.

    1. Re:Why don't they... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Neither part constitues copyrighted work, but:
      a) try explaining this to the police raiding Your servers,
      b) MPAA/RIAA doesn't care -- they will charge You with copyright infringement anyway,
      c) same thing had been argued about torrent files and the pirate bay, and look where the founders are now.

      Once You get a lawsuit, even if You are ultimately found not guilty, it costs You money, time and effort to defend against it, and takes You off the Internet. That's the point.

    2. Re:Why don't they... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A few p2p clients have tried that approach, like the OFF System. It didn't catch on because the overheads are just nasty (As much as doubling the amount you need to download for OFF).

      It's also legally uncertain. Judges are fully capable of recognising when someone is trying to deliberately subvert the intent of the law, and usually frown upon it - if there is any way they can find you liable, they will.

    3. Re: Why don't they... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called Freenet

  13. N.K. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone should tell Fatty Kim about this racket. He'd probably setup a server farm for free if he learned it would knot Hollywood's panties. Good luck getting any legal action or police raids in North Korea.

    1. Re:N.K. by johanw · · Score: 1

      He knows very well that means an invasion from the US. I mean, starving your own population and threatening others with nuclear missles is one thing, but violating copyrights is an entirely different matter, which calls far more serious reactions.

  14. Glad they have that problem taken care of by Pascoea · · Score: 1
    I'll be able to sleep at night knowing that they have rid this world of these awful pirate scum.

    one of the biggest raids ever seen in the country.

    Really? Is this really how Ukrainians want their tax money spent? Kowtowing to the MPAA? I have a feeling you wouldn't have to ask too many people over there to find better ways they would like their money spent.

  15. So which ocean were they operating in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OH, this was an illegal COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT network. Not PIRATES.
    Anyone who has had a loved one victimized by actual piracy gets rightfully pissed off when people glom onto the term.

  16. DMCA then MPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was first a DMCA law then it's step sister MPAA.
    My party supports these laws. To prevent any serious issues I would suggest the following until things get ironed out.
    1. Foreign Films. [The future of jobs/careers require that you learn a second or third language any ways ie. CIA, FBI, International Companies, etc.
    2. Indepent Films. These films need some viewers.
    3. Buy used DVDs or Borrow DVDs from friends, families, Library, DVD clubs
    4. Rent DVDs Netflux, RedBox is only $1.50 for each DVD which is cheaper than the cost to Download.
    5. DO NOT GO NEAR ANYTHING THAT IS COVERED UNDER MPAA 'Until U have sorted things out & determined which direction you want to take.'
    6. I know that the Internet is most easiest. But, the top 5 from this list I think, is most helpful.
    7. What I have found is that. People downloading tend to buy DVDs at a later time if they think the movie is really worth it.
    8. I think if everyone gets the same mentality from this list. Things will be easier for everyone. Also, who is paying the FBI their salary? is it the MPAA or tax payers?
    9. I hope this list doesn't cause a Boston Tea Party. I'm just trying to help a little. Yes, my party get's monies from them but they get your monies from Taxes/fbi.

  17. Related, what.cd shut down by tiagosousa · · Score: 1

    What.cd Shuts Down Following Reported Raids in France

    What.cd wasn't a mere torrent site, it was a library of alexandria for audiophiles. What was lost will probably never be recovered. This should be a crime against humanity, but no, muh copyrights...

  18. The word Piracy is inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To frame the argument, the MPAA/RIAA/BSA calls copyright infringement piracy. When you use their word, they automatically win.