Slashdot Mirror
When a City Has Gigabit Internet, Prices For Slower Speed Tiers Drop: Study (arstechnica.com)
A new industry-funded research study, titled "Broadband competition helps to lower prices and faster download speeds for U.S. residential consumers," analyzed DSL, cable, and fiber broadband plans from the 100 largest designated market areas in the U.S. and found that when a city has gigabit internet speeds, the price of plans with slower speeds drop. Therefore, customers who don't purchase gigabit internet plans will still benefit from their availability. Ars Technica highlights the key findings of the study in their report: -The presence of gigabit service in a market is associated with a $27 decrease in the average monthly price of broadband plans with speeds of 100Mbps or greater but less than 1Gbps. That's a 25 percent price reduction.
-Markets with gigabit Internet also see smaller price decreases for plans as slow as 25Mbps. The presence of gigabit Internet has no significant effect on prices of plans with speeds below 25Mbps. This isn't that surprising since the slowest plans are already the cheapest and aren't suitable substitutes for gigabit speeds.
-Gigabit prices decline when at least two providers offer gigabit service. "If a DMA moves from having one to two providers of gigabit Internet, we estimate that the standard monthly price for gigabit Internet will decline by approximately $57 to $62, which is equal to a reduction in price of between 34 and 37 percent," the study said. Going from one to three gigabit competitors would reduce prices by an estimated $98.11 to $106.50 per month.
-Competition at any speed reduces prices. "An increase of one competitor is associated with approximately a $1.50 decline in the monthly standard broadband price for Internet plans with speeds ranging from 50Mbps to less than 1Gbps," the study said. For plans with download speeds of less than 25Mbps, the decrease in average monthly price is $0.42 for each competitor.
-Availability of fast speeds increases the likelihood that other ISPs will introduce their own higher-speed plans to match competitors. "In particular, we find that each additional competitor offering broadband in a higher speed category will increase the probability that other broadband providers in the market will offer broadband at those higher speeds by 4 to 17 percent on an annual basis," the study said.
-Average monthly prices for each speed category are as follows: $52.60 for speeds less than 25Mbps; $74.05 for plans from 25Mbps to 99Mbps; $108.52 for plans of least 100Mbps but less than 1Gbps; and $165.63 for speeds of at least 1Gbps.
-Markets with gigabit Internet also see smaller price decreases for plans as slow as 25Mbps. The presence of gigabit Internet has no significant effect on prices of plans with speeds below 25Mbps. This isn't that surprising since the slowest plans are already the cheapest and aren't suitable substitutes for gigabit speeds.
-Gigabit prices decline when at least two providers offer gigabit service. "If a DMA moves from having one to two providers of gigabit Internet, we estimate that the standard monthly price for gigabit Internet will decline by approximately $57 to $62, which is equal to a reduction in price of between 34 and 37 percent," the study said. Going from one to three gigabit competitors would reduce prices by an estimated $98.11 to $106.50 per month.
-Competition at any speed reduces prices. "An increase of one competitor is associated with approximately a $1.50 decline in the monthly standard broadband price for Internet plans with speeds ranging from 50Mbps to less than 1Gbps," the study said. For plans with download speeds of less than 25Mbps, the decrease in average monthly price is $0.42 for each competitor.
-Availability of fast speeds increases the likelihood that other ISPs will introduce their own higher-speed plans to match competitors. "In particular, we find that each additional competitor offering broadband in a higher speed category will increase the probability that other broadband providers in the market will offer broadband at those higher speeds by 4 to 17 percent on an annual basis," the study said.
-Average monthly prices for each speed category are as follows: $52.60 for speeds less than 25Mbps; $74.05 for plans from 25Mbps to 99Mbps; $108.52 for plans of least 100Mbps but less than 1Gbps; and $165.63 for speeds of at least 1Gbps.
Really amazing work here.
Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
When the cheapest internet you can buy is almost $50 it's still far more expensive than it should be for low income access. Basic services should only be $20 for phone, internet, or TV yet we see more than double that. When compared to other countries in the world we are far more expensive for far less service.
Competition provides consumers with better service at lower prices. Maybe we can build an economic system on this amazing finding.
It's not really supply and demand, because supply was always more than demanded
Something called the "Fiber to the Home Council" (we don't know who's behind that, but one could easily guess).
So this study manages to be both obvious and compromised.
Here in SLC I have gigbit fiber to home for $69 (about 76 with taxes) per month. 5 years ago when I bought my house the fastest available was 20mbs.
US Internet is slower than foreign countries with lower population density and much more expensive. Why aren't more people complaining about lack of competition in it?
they need single payer health care so they don't have to compete with mega-corps insurance pools when they're pricing out insurance for themselves and their employees.
Unless if by "red tape" you mean repealing minimum wage and eliminating OSHA. I guess that'd work, but then they'd still have to compete with the mega-corps who are also paying like shit and using employees like toilet paper.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
I don't get it...?
Jesus Christ, Marie, they're curves, not numbers
Ezekiel 23:20
Democrat "editor" rediscovers free market, dumbfounded by market forces fully explained by basic economics.
News at 11:00.
I wish Sanders had won so BeauHD could have finally gone to college and got an education.
It's years down the road where it becomes a problem.
Dictatorships seize what was free market infrastructure, and, gosh!, is everything great -- see how great I am, the politician who brought you this!!! Then years down the road, when it gets old, and real competition is killed off, do the failures manifest.
See Venezuela for a recent example, or Cuba with 50 year old American cars held together with twine, for examples.
"But as long as there are free markets somewhere on the planet, we can re-buy upgrades!!!"
Not helping your case any.
(-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
When everyone has 10Gbit, I wonder what I can get for $10?
There are parts of the US where you can get 25MBps for under $25.
I really only need like 5MBps.
“Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
Who would have thought that markets with more competition offer better quality and cheaper prices.
For my next analysis We'll measure the effect of paying people money (hint they spend it)
as if competition was better for the consumer than monopolies!
Nah, that can't be it, the free market would totally reinforce that then!
Argument for the utlity classification of internet access. Why is it a utlity?
1) Communications - some internet phone systems are the only choice available for some people, including 911...
2) Almost all of the job searches are internet. Federal and State governments expose jobs, tax information etc. on the web ( Acrobat Reader is needed, of course ).
3) Publc utilities, manufacturers, industrial use the internet to control power, water and sewage treatment plants. large buildings use the internet to control their
heating/coolng. Security companies use it to monitor alarm systems. Banks use it to control ATMs and banking access during off-hours ( which is the only
time a lot of us can get to the bank because of jobs...).
4) The amount of business ( airlines, trains, banks, B2B, and B2Consumer ) lost because of crappy connections, timeouts, and slow speeds up/down probably
is more than most people would guess.
5) Making it less expensive for the average user would benefit all of socety ( yes, education requires access at this juncture...).
And - the only way to stop the great rip-off that I see as viable is the public utility classification.
The biggies ( AT&T, Comcast, Charter, etc... as well as the lobbyists, congresscritters, senators, and probably a lot of high-level bureaucrats ) will not stop gouging even if you shame them and their mothers.
So maybe I am thinkng that any and all of the internet-centric businesses and social media giant(s) would prefer people to have more money to spend, better access to the internet, and maybe even time to buy/learn/interact/document/etc.....
What?
So amazing that Captain Obvious didn't even feel the need to show up.
Agreed!
I was going to post the same with following title:
"The greatest study that I ever found so far..."
Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
Who'd wondered such thing?
Wow. Astonished. You mean capitalism works? Bet that pisses off all these fucking "basic income grant" pussy millenials on slashdot.
Who'd have thought a free market with competition would be good for consumers...