Slashdot Mirror


When a City Has Gigabit Internet, Prices For Slower Speed Tiers Drop: Study (arstechnica.com)

A new industry-funded research study, titled "Broadband competition helps to lower prices and faster download speeds for U.S. residential consumers," analyzed DSL, cable, and fiber broadband plans from the 100 largest designated market areas in the U.S. and found that when a city has gigabit internet speeds, the price of plans with slower speeds drop. Therefore, customers who don't purchase gigabit internet plans will still benefit from their availability. Ars Technica highlights the key findings of the study in their report: -The presence of gigabit service in a market is associated with a $27 decrease in the average monthly price of broadband plans with speeds of 100Mbps or greater but less than 1Gbps. That's a 25 percent price reduction.
-Markets with gigabit Internet also see smaller price decreases for plans as slow as 25Mbps. The presence of gigabit Internet has no significant effect on prices of plans with speeds below 25Mbps. This isn't that surprising since the slowest plans are already the cheapest and aren't suitable substitutes for gigabit speeds.
-Gigabit prices decline when at least two providers offer gigabit service. "If a DMA moves from having one to two providers of gigabit Internet, we estimate that the standard monthly price for gigabit Internet will decline by approximately $57 to $62, which is equal to a reduction in price of between 34 and 37 percent," the study said. Going from one to three gigabit competitors would reduce prices by an estimated $98.11 to $106.50 per month.
-Competition at any speed reduces prices. "An increase of one competitor is associated with approximately a $1.50 decline in the monthly standard broadband price for Internet plans with speeds ranging from 50Mbps to less than 1Gbps," the study said. For plans with download speeds of less than 25Mbps, the decrease in average monthly price is $0.42 for each competitor.
-Availability of fast speeds increases the likelihood that other ISPs will introduce their own higher-speed plans to match competitors. "In particular, we find that each additional competitor offering broadband in a higher speed category will increase the probability that other broadband providers in the market will offer broadband at those higher speeds by 4 to 17 percent on an annual basis," the study said.
-Average monthly prices for each speed category are as follows: $52.60 for speeds less than 25Mbps; $74.05 for plans from 25Mbps to 99Mbps; $108.52 for plans of least 100Mbps but less than 1Gbps; and $165.63 for speeds of at least 1Gbps.

5 of 42 comments (clear)

  1. Supply vs. demand phenomena discovered. Again. by Tailhook · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Really amazing work here.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  2. We have different definitions of cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When the cheapest internet you can buy is almost $50 it's still far more expensive than it should be for low income access. Basic services should only be $20 for phone, internet, or TV yet we see more than double that. When compared to other countries in the world we are far more expensive for far less service.

    1. Re:We have different definitions of cheap by Kjella · · Score: 2

      When the cheapest internet you can buy is almost $50 it's still far more expensive than it should be for low income access. Basic services should only be $20 for phone, internet, or TV yet we see more than double that. When compared to other countries in the world we are far more expensive for far less service.

      If you want really cheap with limited bandwidth/quota (like <20GB/month), then normally mobile broadband is the best solution. A wired connection will always have a lot of fixed overhead no matter what you do. here in Norway it's about $35 for a basic ADSL line, but very often you get close to 10x the speed for 2x the price like 5/1 -> 60/20 ADSL, 30/10 -> 250/30 cable, 50/50 -> 500/500 fiber. It's clear that having a connection and barely using it is a poor value for everyone involved.

      And the pattern at least here is that copper networks are getting increasingly expensive to operate because customers are getting fewer and fewer, both PSTN/ISDN and xDSL so I doubt they'll cut prices. Cable is holding steady because it's not worth it to replace coax with fiber, but fiber is the only thing that is growing. That has a higher baseline cost, usually around $60/mo for 50/50 broadband. Which I don't think you should complain about if you can afford $60, if not well they don't really go slower or cheaper. Though in apartment buildings the usually offer some "free" 1/1 Mbit for people included in the base agreement for who don't want to pay extra.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  3. In other news by Snotnose · · Score: 4, Funny

    Competition provides consumers with better service at lower prices. Maybe we can build an economic system on this amazing finding.

  4. Competition, just like other countries! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    US Internet is slower than foreign countries with lower population density and much more expensive. Why aren't more people complaining about lack of competition in it?