Slashdot Mirror
China To Build a Solar Plant In Chernobyl's Exclusion Zone (reuters.com)
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters: Two Chinese firms plan to build a solar power plant in the exclusion zone around the Chernobyl nuclear reactor, which has been off limits since a devastating explosion contaminated the region with deadly radiation in 1986. GCL System Integration Technology (GCL-SI), a subsidiary of the GCL Group, said it would cooperate with China National Complete Engineering Corp (CCEC) on the project in Ukraine, with construction expected to start next year. CCEC, a subsidiary of state-owned China National Machinery Industry Corp, will be in overall charge of the project, while GCL-SI will provide and install solar components. GCL-SI did not say how much it would cost. The Chernobyl reactor, which is due to be covered next year by a 1.5 billion euro ($1.6 billion) steel-clad arch, is surrounded by a 2,600 square km (1,000 square mile) exclusion zone of forest and marshland. GCL-SI would not disclose exactly where the solar plant would be built, but a company manager told Reuters that the site had already gone through several rounds of inspections by the company's technicians. China is the world's biggest solar power generator, with 43 gigawatts of capacity by the end of last year. It is also the world's top manufacturer, producing 72 percent of global solar power components in 2015, according to a research note by Everbright Securities last week. "There will be remarkable social benefits and economic ones as we try to renovate the once damaged area with green and renewable energy," said Shu Hua, chairman of GCL-SI. A company manager added: "Ukraine has passed a law allowing the site to be developed for agriculture and other things, so that means (the radiation) is under control."
Well, people *do* work in the exclusion zone -- obviously the people involved in managing the ruins of the plant. So people *can* work there reasonably safely with precautions. And contamination is spotty. There are really hot spots, like the hospital which is too dangerous to enter without special gear, and there are other spots that are pretty much uncontaminated. In fact people have returned to subsistence farm, and they're OK as long as their soil and water is regularly tested.
The idea of setting up photovoltaic farms here is actually pretty clever. You don't want to bring lots of people into the exclusion area on an ongoing basis, because sooner or later they'll tramp around where they shouldn't go and spread the contamination. But the thing about PV panels is that they don't have any moving parts, and they aren't really that complicated to install. So you don't need that many people to get PV farms up and running, and with remote monitoring you don't really need anyone in the exclusion zone on a permanent basis to keep them running. With PV panels becoming cheap and land essentially free for the asking it makes a lot of sense.
Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
A good chunk of the exclusion zone is to the southeast of the reactor. The winds on the day of the accident were primarily to the northwest. Radiation levels in the southern portion of the zone are only slightly higher than natural background, and about the same as some of the more naturally radioactive cities on Earth. Most people don't realize that Ukraine's capitol of Kiev is only about 100 km southeast of Chernobyl.
Some elderly people have been allowed to move back into this portion of the zone, but it's still kept part of the exclusion zone out of an abundance of caution. I think it should be kept undeveloped because this is a great experiment on the long-term effects of a nuclear accident on wildlife (both flora and fauna), and the results could be very insightful for determining the effects of radiation on humans. There's very little data on long-term exposure to low levels of radiation. Right now we simply take the effects of high doses of radiation on people, and extrapolate it as a straight line down to zero assuming that if a lot is bad, then a little is also bad. The early research coming out of the Chernobyl exclusion zone seems to contradict this. Slightly elevated levels of radiation actually seem to make animals healthier than normal background radiation (though it could just be that they're not bothered by people). (source)
When have Russia and China ever been BFFs? They've always been competitors with very different interests... even when they were both communist.
This space intentionally left blank
Right. Fermented and upgraded on site, you'd get methane. It's my understanding that C14 and H3 are not major causes for concern at this site, except right near the reactor area... otherwise we'd be rather panicked over 1000 square miles of evaporation and biological decomposition.
In fact, using a closed loop biogen system has been proposed for dealing with the radioactive forests in the exclusion zone before a wildfire releases the radionuclides uncontrollably.
Someone had to do it.
I hope this solar power station would not interfere with the de facto vast wildlife refuge, which formed in the Chernobyl Exclusion zone. Surprisingly the deadly radiation turned out to be a lesser evil for wildlife than a human with its exoskeleton - a car.
Except when it doesn't. The terms for getting a credit from the IMF were (among other) that the Ukrainan government basically stops the natural gas and electrical power subsidies. When people have to pay two thirds of their monthly income for power and heating, they tend to lower their consumption. I have just checked out of curiosity, in Kiev the price per kWh is 1.29 hryvnas, that is about 5 eurocents, which is about half of the price in Bulgaria (let's take two more or less comparably piss poor countries for this). The average annual net household income in Bulgaria is EUR 4596. The annual average net household income in Ukraine is EUR 1884. In Germany, the average power price is abot 29 eurocents per kWh (and yes, that does hurt a bit) but the average net household income is over EUR 27180, so 3100 kWh per year is only EUR 900 - just over 3% of the income. Same 3100 kWh per year would be more like 8% of the Ukrainian income, so it would be the same as me paying not, say, EUR 900 per year (I actually pay about EUR 700, got a better than average tariff), but EUR 2400 - a whole month of net income. Ouch. Feel free to calculate how much you'd have to pay if electicity would cost 8% of your yearly income.
"It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
Russia and China aren't that close, this is a common myth peddled by the idea that because they both oppose US domination, that they must be friends.
But let's be clear, even China agreed that Russia's annexation of Crimea was wholly unacceptable, and regardless of Putin trying to put a brave face on things by announcing deals with China to sell them Russia's oil and gas, this is really desperation by Russia and exploitation by China as the prices China has agreed to pay are grossly in favour of China.
It's arguable that China actually has a better relationship with some European nations such as Britain than it does with Russia. Ultimately China cares about two things - trying to gain control of the South China sea, and growing wealth through trade. The reality is that contrary to it's claims Russia can't help much in the South China sea because it's navy is decrepit (and focussed on Syria) and it's economy is small, declining, and of low quality to external investors anyway.
As such, China has more to gain from working with the West than it does with Russia as much as Russia may be desperately happy to play the useful idiot for China when it needs one every now and then. Even historically one shouldn't forget that China and Russia were technically at war with each other over a border dispute for most of the cold war and up until 1991.
Perhaps it is now time to stop saying "China does ..." when it is actually not the Chinese state that does it?
China National Machinery Industry Corp. is state-owned, so technically it is China that is partnering.
Think about infrastructure - the transmission networks are already in place from the old nuclear power plant, so situating distributed solar generation there is cheaper.
Not at all, that is just the American viewpoint. You need to read more.
Visiting the Zone was my dream vacation. But if it's been cleared for development, what's the point...
That's nothing. In recent polls in the Crimea, 106% of residents were in favour of Russia.
I am TheRaven on Soylent News
Silence, human! That's our trick.
That's nothing. In Russia even 100% of the dead are in favor of Putin.