Slashdot Mirror


ESA: European Mars Lander Crash Caused By 1-Second Glitch (space.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Space.com: The European Space Agency (ESA) on Nov. 23 said its Schiaparelli lander's crash landing on Mars on Oct. 19 followed an unexplained saturation of its inertial measurement unit (IMU), which delivered bad data to the lander's computer and forced a premature release of its parachute. Polluted by the IMU data, the lander's computer apparently thought it had either already landed or was just about to land. The parachute system was released, the braking thrusters were fired only briefly and the on-ground systems were activated. Instead of being on the ground, Schiaparelli was still 2.3 miles (3.7 kilometers) above the Mars surface. It crashed, but not before delivering what ESA officials say is a wealth of data on entry into the Mars atmosphere, the functioning and release of the heat shield and the deployment of the parachute -- all of which went according to plan. In its Nov. 23 statement, ESA said the saturation reading from Schiaparelli's inertial measurement unit lasted only a second but was enough to play havoc with the navigation system. ESA said the sequence of events "has been clearly reproduced in computer simulations of the control system's response to the erroneous information." ESA's director of human spaceflight and robotic exploration, David Parker, said in a statement that ExoMars teams are still sifting through the voluminous data harvest from the Schiaparelli mission, and that an external, independent board of inquiry, now being created, would release a final report in early 2017.

4 of 110 comments (clear)

  1. This never happened to me before... by hyades1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Man, if I had a nickel for every time some kind of sensory saturation forced a premature release...

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:This never happened to me before... by rsmith-mac · · Score: 5, Funny

      Man, if I had a nickel for every time some kind of sensory saturation forced a premature release...

      Then you'd still be broke. This is Slashdot; you're not fooling anyone.

  2. What the? by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 5, Informative

    So they didn't correlate the IMU data with ranging radar or even barometric altitude information so as to avoid this?

    I know weight and volume are at a premium on such craft but a barometric sensor (even one capable of operating in Mars's rarefied atmosphere, is the size of a thumbnail and weighs just a fraction of a gram.

    Sigh!

  3. Re:They didn't learn the lesson by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To be fair, few people did. Multiple cases of overflows and bad data problems have occurred and still continue to occur not just in space programs around the world but in other industries too.