Slashdot Mirror


Advertising Company AppNexus Bans Breitbart News Over Hate Speech (betanews.com)

Mark Wilson quotes a report from BetaNews: Right-wing website Breitbart -- the darling of the so-called alt-right movement (which it defines as being "younger people who are anti-globalists, very nationalist [and] terribly anti-establishment") -- has been blocked by a leading ad exchange. The site, home to Milo Yiannopoulos (also known as @Nero and banned from Twitter) will no longer be permitted to sell ad space via AppNexus. The move comes after an audit by AppNexus found that Breitbart was in violation of its policies on hate speech and incitement to violence. AppNexus's spokesperson Joshua Zeitz told the BBC: "We use a number of third-party standards to determine what is and isn't hate speech, and if we detect a pattern of speech that could incite violence or discrimination against a minority group, we determine that to be non-compliant and we simply won't serve ads against it. I'm not going to put the examples out there because I'm not going to engage in a tit-for-tat on what is compliant." Bloomberg, which was the first publication to report on the news, noted that AppNexus' investors included Microsoft, News Corp and Sir Martin Sorrell's WPP.

5 of 434 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Should add HuffOp and Slate to the banned list. by Alain+Williams · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Most of what traverses the Internet is benign; but that is not newsworthy. Would you also complain about the clothing industry as crooks also wear trousers ?

  2. Re:Narrative Pushing by EmeraldBot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Can't admit that HIllary lost because of real news (like her rigging the primary) reported by Wikileaks, and that CNN/etc exposed themselves as fake news outlets by trying to bury that story (and a hundred others).

    While I agree strongly with your sentiment in the rigging part, keep in mind that wikileaks obtained the info illegally, which is in general an advantage over running a legal news service (wikileaks hasn't leaked for a good intention in years and this wasn't done because they thought the world should kmow, it's pretty much a political tool at this point). There's a very good reason we don't allow news services that kind of power, and while I'm glad we finally got confirmation about it, let's not cheer it on to the point where this becomes normal.

    Almost all the rest of Wikileak's news on the election was absolute garbage too, and one great scoop doesn't excuse months of lies, outright lies, stories we already knew, and some plainly pure bullshit.

    --
    "Set a man a fire, he'll be warm for the rest of the night. Set a man afire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
  3. Re:Narrative Pushing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Project Veritas proved that to such a standard that the DNC may be charged under RICO under the next administration.

    They literally admitted to literally bussing people around to vote multiple times and claimed they had been doing it for 50 years.

    But as a liberal, you are immune to logic and evidence, so enjoy your false reality while it lasts.

  4. The DNC wasn't hacked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    their info was delivered from an inside source, Seth Rich, who was then murdered for his trouble.
    http://www.newsweek.com/seth-rich-murder-dnc-hack-julian-assange-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-492084

  5. Re: Should add HuffOp and Slate to the banned list by RandomSurfer314 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There are both literally and metaphorically no white and black people, they exist in all shades from pale white to dark black. At least that's how it is where I live.