Slashdot Mirror


Fidel Castro Is Dead (nytimes.com)

Striek quotes the New York Times: Fidel Castro, the fiery apostle of revolution who brought the Cold War to the Western Hemisphere in 1959 and then defied the United States for nearly half a century as Cuba's maximum leader, bedeviling 11 American presidents and briefly pushing the world to the brink of nuclear war, died Friday. He was 90. His death was announced by Cuban state television.

In declining health for several years, Mr. Castro had orchestrated what he hoped would be the continuation of his Communist revolution, stepping aside in 2006 when he was felled by a serious illness. He provisionally ceded much of his power to his younger brother Raul, now 85, and two years later formally resigned as president. Raul Castro, who had fought alongside Fidel Castro from the earliest days of the insurrection and remained minister of defense and his brother's closest confidant, has ruled Cuba since then, although he has told the Cuban people he intends to resign in 2018.

Kebertson shares an AP article which remembers a book proclaiming "Castro's Last Hour" -- in 1982. And Miamicanes jokes there'll be celebrations among Castro-haters in Miami, sharing a CNN article which notes that in the end, Castro "lived long enough to see a historic thaw in relations between Cuba and the United States."

7 of 279 comments (clear)

  1. an unpopular opinion. by nimbius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    this isnt going to be a very popular opinion here, but the reason for the historic thaw is surprising. Typically the united states is content to hold trade embargos indefinitely against any nation that so much as thinks of challenging unfettered capitalism. The reason for this thaw is similar to the reason for the Iranian thaw. The US is losing geopolitical capital at an unprecedented rate early in the 21st century.

    central and south american leaders are no longer subscribing to the teachings or guidance of american politicians. instead theyre renationalizing their resources and divesting from markets typically dominated by american presence. Cuba was a last ditch effort by the state department to keep a foothold in trade agreements that are rapidly moving away from the dollar as their standard. Prior to this we had tried calling in our debts from socialist democracies, demonizing their policy in our media, and withholding world bank investment only to find these countries far more resilient and fungible than they were 35 years ago when we could routinely replace their leaders with a coup.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:an unpopular opinion. by mvdwege · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Noam Chomsky always seems to blame America for everything

      Well, he seems to take the, to me, logical point of view that as a US citizen it behooves him to critcise his own government first.

      Cultural Marxist

      Oh. Never mind. Logic is wasted on you. Carry on then.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  2. Resistance by snookiex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You can say anything about Fidel, but he was a tough guy. Cuba resisted bravely (if you allow me to use the term) to an enemy way bigger and more powerful for many years. Curiously, the end of the Castro era could have arrived long before if the past presidents would have used the Obama approach: Embrace, extend and extinguish. Personally, I think he chose a wrong path and became the perfect example of why communist social structures are not sustainable. "Join together to share the lack of wealth", to use Stallman's words, simply goes against human nature. RIP, anyway.

    --
    Open Source Network Inventory for the masses! Kuwaiba
  3. Re:"Historic thaw"? by arth1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cuba's hostility against America is legendary.

    From a non-US perspective, USA's hostility towards Cuba is far more legendary. While most of the world have had diplomatic relations, trade and travel to Cuba, USA has consistently refused. This is not due to Cuba not wanting any relations.

  4. Fidel - The little bully sidekick by drnb · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You can say anything about Fidel, but he was a tough guy. Cuba resisted bravely ...

    Fidel was the little bully sidekick talking sh*t, sucking up to, the real tough bully, the Soviets. He was a useful idiot, nothing more. Once the Cuban people are allowed a voice he will be consigned to the dustbin of history.

    1. Re:Fidel - The little bully sidekick by amiga3D · · Score: 1, Insightful

      He was a brutal dictator who murdered tens of thousands of his own people. The fact that Batista was a monster too hardly absolves him from the guilt of his murder and torture of his own people. To see people try to excuse this monster is incredible. Seldom do I truly rejoice in the death of another human being but it's hard not to feel good about Castro's demise.

  5. Pushed into comunism by Alomex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When Castro first came to power, he was inspired by the Mexican revolution of 1910-1920 who did not turn communist. Moreover the Cuban Communist Party had denounced Castro's revolution as pro-Western. He was pushed into the USSR sphere of influence by the aggressive CIA-led actions.

    Then the embargo provided the biggest excuse ever for Castro and his dictatorship. He could always blame his failed economic policies on the USA led embargo.