Slashdot Mirror


Black Friday Protest Sites Included An Amazon Warehouse (thecourier.co.uk)

An anonymous reader writes: Friday a group of protesters picketed Amazon's warehouse in Dunfermline, Scotland, alleging workers there face "up to 60 hours per week for little more than the minimum wage," according to an article in The Courier. "They also claim that new workers are tracked and monitored every minute of their working day and sacked if they fail to meet targets... Amazon has dismissed the claims, insisting that the firm values its employees and maintains a 'culture of direct dialogue' with them."

But around the world, more than 1 million people celebrated Buy Nothing Day on Friday, according to the editor in chief of Adbusters, saying their event has now spread to more than 60 countries. The Adbusters.org site suggested protesters stage zombie walks to parody the mindlessness of consumerism, and urged credit card-cutting ceremonies as well as "Whirl-Marts," where large groups of people "silently drive your shopping carts around in a long, inexplicable conga line without ever actually buying anything." The site is also sharing downloadable images which can be printed out for posters "to insert into public spaces."

One prominent retailer even closed both its physical and online stores Friday and gave all of its 12,000 employees the day off, according to USA Today. REI, which sells outdoor recreational equipment, was encouraging people to take advantage of Friday's free admission to many state parks for the second year in a row, and as many as 2.7 million people "pledged to participate" using the company's hashtag, #OptOutside.

6 of 165 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Hey guess what, low skill jobs suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    You sound like a real piece of shit. I hope you are murdered by a conservative Nazi you fucking piece of shit. Go die.

  2. Re:What am I missing? by SeaFox · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What am I missing here... workers apply for a job, get the job, agree to and get paid a legal wage, get held accountable for what they do, and are sacked if they don't do the job. Am I missing something?

    The problem is people unable to have a normal work-life balance and have a job at the same time. I have a relative who works for Wal-Mart. When she first got hired the company was actually CLOSED on Thanksgiving, in fact, they weren't even open 24 hours then. Since then, Wal-Mart has expanded their hours and started to be open now on holidays. They expect employees to work in a all-hands-on-deck fashion that leaves people with no way to enjoy the supposed "holidays" with their own loved ones. Can you imagine having a family and being told you have to work 9-5 on Thanksgiving? Even if you were an "evening Thanksgiving" type, that's not getting off early enough to actually cook a Thanksgiving meal from scratch. And would have the energy to anyway, after working 8 hours on what has become one of the busiest shopping days of the year thanks to Black Fri^H^H^HThursday?

  3. Re:60 hours a week? by sjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What they would really love is being able to make a decent living on 40 hours a week so they can actually spend time with their family.

  4. Re:60 hours a week? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The BBC did an undercover investigation of an Amazon warehouse. They found a very fit guy, a cross country runner, and got him a job there. Amazon gave him a cart and a little hand held device that tells him where to go. The screen has a big countdown timer on it, and beeps incessantly to encourage the worker to move faster. If they don't get to the right shelf and pick the item before the countdown hits zero, they get a demerit and eventually fired.

    That kind of high pressure, physically demanding job very quickly took a toll on the guy's health. If constantly being ordered around by a computer, controlling his every movement, wasn't bad enough, the time allocated to collecting each item required moving pretty quickly. Often the automatic lights would fail and he would be wondering about in the dark. Managers showed little sympathy.

    A company that designs its jobs such that a physically fit person starts having health problems working there is evil and such practices should be banned. We got rid of most of that back in the 19th century.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  5. Re: i bought nothing friday by jenningsthecat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I bought three Nike Golf polos on Kohl's website yesterday for $50. I'm not a big Nike guy, but those shirts are awesome for work, and normally cost about three times that price.

    #buycott

    So let me get this right - you paid ONLY one-third the normal price for the 'privilege' of allowing Nike to use your body as a walking billboard? Good for you my man - way to grab a bargain! I suppose it never occurred to you that if you were advertising for Nike on a building you own or a magazine you publish, THEY would pay YOU for advertising for them.

    Why should plastering a company's logo on your body cost YOU money?

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  6. Re:Hey guess what, low skill jobs suck by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Walmart pays poorly because the jobs it hires people for are mostly unskilled labor. Training consists of "take this, put it there". The alternative to "subsidizing Walmart" is that they get nothing from Walmart and everything from the government. Which is cheaper?

    Now just between you and me, there is money to be made at Walmart. And like it or not, the higher paid positions are not exactly rocket science either.

    As for your interesting "what the market will bear" remark, it should be cheaper in the end to have WalMart pay a wage that allows it's employees to survive without government assistance. That's simple efficiency. You can't have it both ways of wanting government subsidies because cheap, while banging a free market drum.

    Raising the minimum wage is just shifting the burden of welfare funding from the public to Walmart, which will have to raise prices to compensate.

    What the holy baby jeebuz in a pup tent? If a person is working and getting paid, and living off it - it isn't welfare.

    And dear Coward, if Walmart can't pay a wage that allows it's employees to not have to take money from the government, perhaps it is using a flawed business model, and should do what the market does to failed business models. Puts them out of business.

    As their entire business model is "sell stuff cheap to poor people", you are risking killing one of the most successful businesses ever in order to achieve your social goals. And, at the end, who gets screwed? The poor who shop at Walmart.

    Sounds awesome. Make everyone poor as possible so they can shop at Walmart.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.