Slashdot Mirror


The Mac App Store Is Full of Scams (howtogeek.com)

Over the years, Apple may have improved security, filters, and screening process of apps for its Mac's App Store, but even today things the quality of fraudulent apps continue to not only seep through its gatekeepers, but often times outnumber the good apps. How To Geek did some investigation over this and published the findings yesterday in a story titled, "Don't Be Fooled: The Mac App Store Is Full of Scams". It didn't take long for the publication to find scam apps on Apple's marquee app store for Mac computers. A search for "Microsoft Excel", for instance, returns "Office Bundle" made by a third-party. The app offers templates -- and just that -- for $30. Same is the case with any Office suite application. This might not seem as a real problem to many, but as How to Geek points out, there is one more problem: almost all these apps have icons and title names that are similar to those of Microsoft's, and Apple has had no issues with that. From the article: Let's be blunt: these customers were ripped off, and Apple pocketed $10 each (Editor's note: Apple charges 30 percent on all transactions on App Store(. And you'll only see these comments if you scroll past the two five star reviews that mention the word "app" numerous times. All of these fakes use Microsoft brands like Office, Word, and Excel in the product names. The logos aren't one-to-one copies of Microsoft's official logos, but they're almost always the correct color and letter (blue "W" for Word, green "E" for Excel, etcetera).

72 of 117 comments (clear)

  1. These customers are stupid for buying impulsively by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Excel's logo is a green X, not E.

    Let's be frank here, if you can't be assed to look at the screenshots and read anything, hell, do more than just look at the icon before pressing "buy", you're being a moron, and you deserve to be scammed. This isn't Apple's responsibility, it's yours, and yours alone to do the absolute minimum amount of "research" (if it can be called that) before spending money. I thought this was called common sense; apparently it's a rare and valuable skill.

  2. Very math. Such good. by Calydor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    30% of 30 dollars is 9 dollars, not 10.

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    1. Re:Very math. Such good. by hodet · · Score: 4, Funny

      This can be the minor quibbles thread. Excel is a green X not a green E.

    2. Re:Very math. Such good. by flyingfsck · · Score: 5, Funny

      It is $10 when you use Excel to calculate it.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    3. Re:Very math. Such good. by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

      And it's $7.49771843171109 when you use Excel on a first-generation Pentium.

    4. Re:Very math. Such good. by Calydor · · Score: 1

      US, CAN or AUS?

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    5. Re:Very math. Such good. by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Gold-pressed latinum.

    6. Re:Very math. Such good. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      There are more than twenty 'dollars' in the world. Why did you only list two of the small fry?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:Very math. Such good. by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Probably because CAN and AUS are the two other "dollars" Americans are most familiar with. The Brits use pounds, the rest of Europe mostly uses euros, Mexico has the peso and China the yuan, so really Canada and Australia are pretty near the top of the list of countries that call their base currency 'dollars'.

      Do you think he should have used the Bahamian dollar instead? Or perhaps the Namibian dollar?

      Honestly, if you're only going to pick two (why two? I dunno), Australia and Canada are pretty solid choices.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    8. Re:Very math. Such good. by Calydor · · Score: 1

      I picked those two because it's the two dollars I tend to hear about from my circle of friends. Sadly I have no friends in Namibia or the Bahamas. Would like the latter to go visit, though!

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    9. Re:Very math. Such good. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It is $10 when you use Excel to calculate it.

      Are you really going to make a fuss over 0.1000000000000000055511151231257827021181583404541015625 of the total value?

    10. Re:Very math. Such good. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Any justification for only listing 3 is also justification for just assuming it's US dollars.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    11. Re:Very math. Such good. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Probably because CAN and AUS are the two other "dollars" Americans are most familiar with.

      Yeah, but that's wrong. Austria uses the Euro, not the dollar. Trust me, I'm American.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    12. Re:Very math. Such good. by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Still better than yamok sauce.

  3. With Apple as with anything else by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 2

    Caveat emptor!

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    1. Re:With Apple as with anything else by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Apple's walled garden is meant to be a protection against scams. Strange that they allow this.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    2. Re:With Apple as with anything else by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Yeah, right, I'm pretty sure that's Apple's whole motto.

      Apple: Caveat Emptor
      Apple: Just Because We Stamp Our Logo On Something, Doesn't Make It Worth More

      Right, that's totally Apple's sales strategy.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  4. Just a sec - by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

    Let's be fair for a moment here...

    1) It's not Apple's job to police Microsoft's trademarks - that's Microsoft's job. Same with any other trademark that the store owner does not own or control.

    2) If the worst you get is an app that has a semi-misleading title that sells you nothing but MS Office templates (for $30? Caveat Emptor, eh?), then it's miles better than the outright malware and data-harvesting apps to be found in other stores. Also, did the author bother to read the description of the item before buying it? Pretty sure that if an app only says "Office Bindle" and has little-to-no description of the product, it's probably going to be a crap purchase.

    This is going to sound a bit trollish, but this is the Internet, FFS... show some brains before you buy.

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:Just a sec - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I expect crap and malware from other stores because they explicitly DO NOT POLICE what is in there. Apple does, or claims to.

    2. Re:Just a sec - by Holi · · Score: 1

      If you run a brick and mortar store and sell knockoffs you can be shut down and arrested.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    3. Re:Just a sec - by BigBuckHunter · · Score: 1

      Let's be fair for a moment here...

      Indeed... Let's be fair. When an app has a 1 star review, and 99% of the reviews say the app is a rip-off and that the customer was deceived, Apple should (fill in the blank).

    4. Re:Just a sec - by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      ...how many of them took advantage of the refund policy?

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    5. Re:Just a sec - by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Yes, sure, that's great, I hope you enjoyed typing that on your iphone.

      My LG G3 is not an iPhone ;)

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    6. Re:Just a sec - by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Not all knockoffs are illegal.

    7. Re:Just a sec - by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      1) It's not Apple's job to police Microsoft's trademarks - that's Microsoft's job.

      As the curator of their own store, Apple is liable for misuse of Microsoft's trademarks within that store. It would be different if they didn't, supposedly, curate that store, but they do; allowing the misuse of Microsoft's trademark in that manner is, effectively, Apple misusing it themselves. This is especially true as Apple profits directly from it, in the form of 30% of all resulting sales.

      In that sense, and as a shareholder, it is absolutely Apple's job to police Microsoft's trademarks where they may face liability for any such violations.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    8. Re:Just a sec - by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      One would think Apple would have some type of back-end API allowing copyright holders, trademark holders, etc, to automatically check at least the icons and graphics used in the App Store. No app should stay up very long if it's using infringing icons. I'm waiting for Microsoft to sue Apple and these "app developers" for copyright and trademark infringement...Apple at least pretends this is against policy and supposedly reviews everything before allowing it to go live which would make them culpable in a lawsuit.

      But, as we all know, that would take quite a bit of work, and cost Apple in both their 30%, building such a system, etc. It's a better profit method to just let it all run rampant and worry about whatever happens once it gets to court.

    9. Re:Just a sec - by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      (fill in the blank) invite the "developers" on a free trip and then dissolve their still-thrashing bodies in vats of acid.

      (fill in the blank) doxx the "developers" and give out their personal account information on file to everyone who got ripped off.

      (fill in the blank) suspend the app, and the developer's dev account, until a satisfactory investigation can be completed.

    10. Re:Just a sec - by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      1) It's not Apple's job to police

      That depends entirely on what kind of store Apple want to run. Are they running a reputable and reliable business offering customers good quality products they can depend on? Or are they the equivalent of "ppssssst. hey. I heard you were looking for Excel, I got some Excel I can send you. Let me know if you're interested I can call for some Excel and have it here in 5 minutes, and it comes at a nice discount too"

    11. Re:Just a sec - by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      The app doesn't appear to be infringing.

      As a developer who produces apps featuring well known brands. We've been challenged before now to prove we're authorised. Which we do.

    12. Re:Just a sec - by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      As the curator of their own store, Apple is liable for misuse of Microsoft's trademarks within that store.

      Only if Microsoft complains (via court order) and Apple does nothing. So how many times has Microsoft complained, and how many times has Apple ignored them?

    13. Re:Just a sec - by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Do you have malware from the App Store? There's always going to be things in stores that you think are crap.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  5. Mackeeper by thesjaakspoiler · · Score: 1

    when does Apple finally take on that piece of junk that is spamming me online every day.

  6. Citation needed by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1, Informative

    >> Apple may have improved security, filters, and screening process of apps for its Mac's App Store

    Citation needed

    1. Re:Citation needed by e4liberty · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Citation needed by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      You just cited it, you moron.

    3. Re:Citation needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Off the top of my head, they've added sandboxing to restrict what each app can access, they've added transport security requirements to push developers into using TLS by default, and they've sped up the review process. Don't they all count as improvements?

  7. Re:These customers are stupid for buying impulsive by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

    Buying M$ from an Apple store, that's just stupid.

    To be fair, sometimes you're stuck with doing just that (e.g. your company issues Mac laptops, which is nice, but uses MS Office on them, which is not nice.) For instance, I get and use the Microsoft RDP client because 1) I'm cheap (it's $0.00 in the App Store), and 2) it does what I need it to do for the occasional/rare Windows server that I get asked to go fix.

    Buying fake M$ from an Apple store, is utterly moronic.

    Now this, I can agree with.

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  8. Re:These customers are stupid for buying impulsive by Tx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But you wouldn't expect to go into a physical Apple Store and have to inspect the merchandise to make sure it isn't fake, would you? It's up to the owner of a store to protect its reputation by ensuring the quality of the merchandise sold there. If Apple wants to give an experience equivalent to buying gear out of a cardboard box in an alley, that's up to them, but I'm not sure that's the smart move.

    --
    Oh no... it's the future.
  9. Scams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, they find a handful of scam apps, and suddenly they make the jump to "The Mac App store is full of scams"?

    I'm not saying this isn't a problem, or that the problem of scam apps doesn't exist, but the article never actually says how many fraudulent apps they found, what is the proportion of fraudulent apps to legitimate apps, or how does this compare to other stores (Google Play, Steam...). The jump from "some apps are a fraud" to "The store is full of Scams" is never explained.

    This is just another "OMG! APPLE!" piece with very little substance.

    This problem is unavoidable. If you have something popular, people will always try to extract a quick buck from it, legitimately or not. As long as it doesn't spiral out of control, and consumers are protected (IIRC, Apple has a refund policy for app purchases), I'd say this isn't as big of a problem as the article tries to make it.

    1. Re:Scams by Falos · · Score: 1

      TFA preemptively showers you with superfluous examples and you're still spouting apologist harder than a broken sphincter.

      Wipe up that mess with this old fanboy rag: "The istore is screened, safer, and superior"

      Once it's in the trash you're allowed to wear the "It's unavoidable" shirt.

    2. Re: Scams by CheapEngineer · · Score: 1

      And each image showed at least a dozen.

  10. Re:These customers are stupid for buying impulsive by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

    A standard Brick and Mortar store isn't quite the same, though.

    Think of the Apple App Store (and Google Play, whatever MSFT still has running, etc) not as typical stores, but as consignment shops, which is essentially what they are. Put with the proper analogy, it makes a lot more sense, no?

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  11. Nobody likes the Mac App Store by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Mac App Store is a thorn in the side of basically everyone. The promise was that it would be kind of like the iOS app store and you'd have a one-stop shop to find the things that you want. Installation would be easy-peasy, and you'd get Apple's famous quality control as part of the deal, etc., etc.

    The store just makes things worse. The apps are significantly restricted in their ability in the name of safety, so whole categories of applications won't ever be found there (Little Snitch, for instance). The store is as hard to search as the iOS counterpart, so you're just as likely to search on google for an app as the app store. The whole system reeks of neglect. The whole thing feels like a letdown whether you're a developer or a user.

    So are scams a surprise? Not really. The store just feels like work that Apple felt that it HAD to do, rather than something that they were excited to do. As a Mac user and general Apple proponent, I really think the Mac App Store is an embarrassment. Either put some time and money and people into it, or shut it down.

    1. Re:Nobody likes the Mac App Store by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      The idea is great. If you're the type to purchase apps (I'm not), having one place with thousands of apps makes purchase really simple. I doubt there are many, besides the wing-nuts who hang out here, who would use MacOS and not trust Apple with payment details.

    2. Re:Nobody likes the Mac App Store by e432776 · · Score: 1

      I agree. The bad thing is that this level of neglect from Apple does not suggest a long future for any apps you buy through the Mac App Store and, perhaps, the Mac platform itself. Interesting take.

    3. Re:Nobody likes the Mac App Store by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      At least the Windows Store doesn't have this problem.

      It doesn't have the market share to make running a scam worthwhile.

    4. Re:Nobody likes the Mac App Store by Leslie43 · · Score: 1

      Market share or not, both are equally useless.

  12. Re:These customers are stupid for buying impulsive by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

    This isn't Apple's responsibility, it's yours, and yours alone to do the absolute minimum amount of "research" (if it can be called that) before spending money.

    But Apple and Google both claim to be screening their apps and most consumers expect them too just as most consumers expect amazon to police their third party sellers and weed out fraud. I personally almost never buy an app unless they also have some sort of free trial or demo that I can test first. I think the quality of apps would greatly improve if apple and google automatically gave an instant refund for any app uninstalled in the first 30 days. I find that 90% of the apps I download I almost immediately delete because they are crap. When I do find a good app I have no problem paying for it and most good apps know this and have a demo with an inapp purchase to upgrade.

  13. In other languages... by spiritplumber · · Score: 1
    --
    Liberty - Security - Laziness - Pick any two.
  14. Re:These customers are stupid for buying impulsive by Holi · · Score: 1

    It's a merged X and L

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  15. Re:These customers are stupid for buying impulsive by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    Excel's logo is a green X, not E.

    Let's be frank here, if you can't be assed to look at the screenshots and read anything, hell, do more than just look at the icon before pressing "buy", you're being a moron, and you deserve to be scammed. This isn't Apple's responsibility, it's yours, and yours alone to do the absolute minimum amount of "research" (if it can be called that) before spending money. I thought this was called common sense; apparently it's a rare and valuable skill.

    Keep in mind, Apple became popular because they do the thinking for their users. The mere availability of something that can be confusing on their store really is a big problem for Apple's customers.

  16. User error by iamacat · · Score: 1

    I don't know, what would you call a bundle of Microsoft Excel templates so that interested users can possibly find it? Fraud seems to be too sensationalist, the real problem is that actual office is not available and less relevant results thus bubble up to top. An informational message from Apple would easily solve the problem. Of course an actual deal with Microsoft to resell Office would be even better.

    1. Re:User error by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      I don't know, what would you call a bundle of Microsoft Excel templates so that interested users can possibly find it?

      Perhaps by including the word "Template" or its plural form in the title or description? The example given forgot to do that.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    2. Re:User error by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Still I would not use the word "fraud" unless there are more active attempts to mislead, like app description implying that this is actual Microsoft software.

    3. Re:User error by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Features:

      - Create Word, Excel and PowerPoint documents.
      - Sync documents in OneDrive's Documents folder to local.
      - Keep track all changes of online documents and automatic update on local.
      - Calendar and manage email with Outlook
      - Browse free online templates to create beautiful documents
      - Create and print custom labels and PDFs
      - Work with documents while on the go
      - Easily share your documents with friends and colleagues
      - Enjoy the freedom that comes with online and mobile editing
      - Simply upload your files to OneDrive to edit them everywhere
      - Save your favorite docs online to work with other apps and devices
      - Add charts, pictures, animations and effects
      - And so much more

      Tell me, which of those features (for the "Office Bundle - for Microsoft Word, Excel, PowerPoint Edition") are provided by a pack of templates, except maybe "browse free online templates" since that's almost certainly where this "bundle" was made of?

      The disclaimer at the bottom that "iOffice" (whatever that is) is "neither produced by, endorsed by, nor affiliated with Microsoft Corporation" doesn't mean anything because neither are QuickOffice, LibreOffice, Google Docs, or any of the other programs that actually can "Create Word, Excel and PowerPoint documents"

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  17. Damned if they do damned if they don't by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

    If Apple policed the Mac App Store as well as it does the iOS one, everyone would be yelling censorship and crying. At least on the Mac, their app store isn't the only way of getting software. Sounds like the one that should be getting policed more isn't.

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
    1. Re:Damned if they do damned if they don't by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Why would you make that assumption? People complain about policing on the iOS store, but it's still the most popular smartphone app store out there. The policing is clearly worth it. Why would you assume the policing would not be worth it on the Mac store? It seems to me they need something like that.

      I have zero experience with the Mac store, so I'm basically just talking out my ass here, but it sounds like they chose to go the cheaper and easier route for the Mac store and just set strict requirements to develop an app for the app store, and then only check the apps when they are added to the store.

      So if app makers are clever they can technically be within the rules, yet still be misleading to customers and scam them into buying the wrong product, and Apple doesn't care.

      I honestly don't know if the iOS store does better, but judging by the tone of the article and a lot of comments here, it sounds like they do a lot better.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
  18. Re:These customers are stupid for buying impulsive by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    But you wouldn't expect to go into a physical Apple Store and have to inspect the merchandise to make sure it isn't fake, would you?

    Brick-and-mortar stores are not immune to selling fake products. Sometimes the fake products are so good that the manufacturer can tell the difference. Saw a TV report many years ago on high-end purses and watches.

  19. Re:These customers are stupid for buying impulsive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You must have forgotten the days of grandma buying the expansion pack to the game you asked for instead of the actual game. Same basic thing is going on here.

    The products aren't fake in any real sense. They're just not stand alone programs. Bundles of textures, fonts, templates, filters, etc. for popular programs are valid products somone might want. The issue is morons who don't know what they're buying fall for deceptive marketing where they say it's juts a third party expansion pack in the description but imply it's a stand alone program from the reputable developer in the name and icon often enough to make the practice profitable.

    This is difficult to protect people from because nature always makes a better idiot.

  20. Re:These customers are stupid for buying impulsive by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    I thought "careful vetting and curating" was the whole reason Apple wanted everyone to use their store, and the reason they charge 30% for what, is effectively, a consignment shop...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  21. Re:These customers are stupid for buying impulsive by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

    Technically yes, but people treat it more like iTunes or a real store, i.e. somewhere curated and safe they can go to buy legit stuff. They may be wrong to do that in some sense, but Apple certainly doesn't slap a "buyer beware" sticker on every app either.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  22. Re:These customers are stupid for buying impulsive by SScorpio · · Score: 1

    That's because those purses and watches are made on the same factory lines in China that the real ones come out of. They just aren't sold with the 8,000x markup.

  23. if someone expected to pay $30... by dv82 · · Score: 1

    ... for a product that usually sells for many hundreds of dollars, they deserve what they get.

    1. Re:if someone expected to pay $30... by lgw · · Score: 1

      It looks like Office for iOS is http://www.macworld.com/articl...>free. If you're used to it being free for your tablet, why would you expect hundreds of dollars on your desktop?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  24. Re:These customers are stupid for buying impulsive by BronsCon · · Score: 1

    Every consignment shop I've sold through or bought from stakes their reputation in their ability to vet the items sold in their shop as either genuine and complete (and, therefore, worth the increased price tag) or fake/replica/incomplete/broken (and, therefore, priced lower or refused for consignment).

    You're right, that's is a proper analogy and it does make a lot more sense. Apple should give a shit, because they're putting their name on it.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  25. Re:These customers are stupid for buying impulsive by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Not anymore. It's a white X on a green folder with a sheet of paper peeking out.

  26. My God by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    It's full of scams!

  27. Re:These customers are stupid for buying impulsive by geekmux · · Score: 1

    Excel's logo is a green X, not E.

    Let's be frank here, if you can't be assed to look at the screenshots and read anything, hell, do more than just look at the icon before pressing "buy", you're being a moron, and you deserve to be scammed. This isn't Apple's responsibility, it's yours, and yours alone to do the absolute minimum amount of "research" (if it can be called that) before spending money. I thought this was called common sense; apparently it's a rare and valuable skill.

    Normally I would agree with you wholeheartedly.

    I'll kindly reserve my support for pointing at the stupid and ignorant masses in exchange for proof that Apple's business ethics here isn't equally fucked up.

    Seems sales has eclipsed ethics as more of a rule rather than a much-needed control mechanism. Bottom line is Apple could have scrutinized at least a tad more where blatant shadiness in advertising exists. They don't.

  28. this is a good thing, right? by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    Apple is just trying to keep up with Google-Play-Store

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  29. Re:These customers are stupid for buying impulsive by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Vetting, yes. Curating, no. Well they curate a "featured" section, but needless to say this piece of shit isn't featured.

    It's not malware. It explicitly says in the description that it's not produced by, endorsed by or affiliated with Microsoft. If someone wants to sell an app which consists of little more than a bundle of templates, they can. Nor does Apple set or approve prices.

    However, there is a ratings and reviews section, and in the UK Store, this has 5 one-star ratings with reviews that advise not buying it. And if people miss that, Apple has a refunds policy. Explain that the app is not what you expected and you'll get a full refund.

  30. Re:These customers are stupid for buying impulsive by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

    As both a developer and customer, I can assure you that apps are vetted. Despite this article claiming "scam" it doesn't appear to break any rules. It's just not worth the money. And Apple specifically don't set the prices.

    I buy from the App Store if the App I want is available there because I'm guaranteed a refund if the app does not meet expectations. That is not true if you buy an app directly.

    And because I can be pretty sure the app is not malware. The level of vetting, and the sandbox pretty much ensure that.

    People aren't rubes because some asshole on Slashdot with no experience of the topic says they are.

  31. Re:These customers are stupid for buying impulsive by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Sometimes. But commonly not. Usually they are inferior look-alikes. Purses are make with fake, or at least inferior leather, and only single stiched, so they fall apart within a few months. Watches come with digital rather than mechanical mechanisms, and cheap eletro-plating that wears off.