Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Confirms Its Chinese-Language Chatbot Filters Certain Topics (fortune.com)

Microsoft's Chinese-language AI chat bot filters certain topics, the company confirmed Monday, although it did not clarify whether that included interactions deemed politically sensitive. From a report on Fortune: Last week, CNNMoney and China Digital Times reported that Xiaoice would not directly respond to questions surrounding topics deemed sensitive by the Chinese state. References to the Tiananmen Square massacre of 1989 or "Steamed Bun Xi," a nickname of Chinese President Xi Jinping, would draw evasive answers or non sequiturs from the chat bot, according to the report. "Am I stupid? Once I answer you'd take a screengrab," read one answer to a question that contained the words "topple the Communist Party." Even the mention of Donald Trump, the American President-elect, drew an evasive response from the chat bot, according to reports. "I don't want to talk about it," Xiaoice said, reports CNN Money. In response to inquiries from Fortune, Microsoft confirmed that there was some filtering around Xiaoice's interaction. "We are committed to creating the best experience for everyone chatting with Xiaoice," a Microsoft spokesperson tells Fortune. "With this in mind, we have implemented filtering on a range of topics." The tech giant did not further elaborate to which specific topics the filtering applied.

2 of 19 comments (clear)

  1. Why do they bother? by Place+a+name+here · · Score: 2

    "We are committed to creating the best experience for everyone chatting with Xiaoice," a Microsoft spokesperson tells Fortune.

    Why do they bother with such BS answers? Everybody can see through it - it's not for "creating the best experience" for the users.

    1. Re:Why do they bother? by BlueStrat · · Score: 2

      "We are committed to creating the best experience for everyone chatting with Xiaoice," a Microsoft spokesperson tells Fortune.

      Why do they bother with such BS answers? Everybody can see through it - it's not for "creating the best experience" for the users.

      You must understand the context of this statement.

      The "best experience" from a Chinese users' point of view is not being shot and his family not being billed for the bullet by the Chinese government.

      In that context the statement from MS is quite true and literal.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.