Slashdot Mirror


Russia Falls Behind In Annual Space Launches For First Time Ever (themoscowtimes.com)

From a report on the Moscow Times: This year, for the first time in history, Russia has fallen behind the United States and China as the world's leading launcher of space rockets. Russia will finish 2016 with just 18 launches, according to open source data, compared to China's 19 and America's 20 launches. Alexander Ivanov, deputy chief of Russia's Roscosmos space agency, said on Nov. 29 that the launch rate has decreased because Moscow's space strategy has changed. Currently, it's top priority is reviving existing and aging satellite groupings. But there are other reasons Russia's launch rate may be falling behind. Since the 1957 launch of Sputnik, the world's first satellite, Russia has been the undisputed leader in annual launch rates -- a figure that spoke to the general health of its space program and aerospace industry. At the peak of the Soviet space program, Russia often launched around 100 rockets a year. Since 1957, Russia has launched over 3,000 rockets -- roughly twice as many as the U.S. But with the Russian economy in crisis, space budgets have plummeted. Funding for the next decade of Russian space activity stands at just 1.4 trillion rubles ($21.5 billion), a figure that was only finalized after three rounds of cuts to proposed funding, which began at 3.4 trillion rubles ($52.3 billion). The U.S. space agency, NASA, received a budget of $19.3 billion in 2016 alone. To make matters worse, Russian rockets are becoming uncharacteristically undependable.

7 of 93 comments (clear)

  1. Anti-Russian space program propoganda by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If I had a nickel for every piece of "NASA's story represents the entirety of the space race/USSR-Russia sucks/Let's pretend that NASA is the only space program" propaganda piece in journalism and pop culture that has come out since 1957, I could fund my own space program that would be better than anybody's.

    Yeah, I get it, butthurt Americans are mad that they can no longer send men into space. So they feel the need to come up with any metric to show that NASA is somehow still superior to the Russians, even as they have to beg Russia for rides to ISS.

    Americans, still fighting the Cold War long after everyone else went home.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  2. Sounds fine by unixisc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Russia needs to work on its economy and lower unemployment, increase wages and improving the quality of life of all their citizens. Space activities, admirable as they are, should be lower in priority

    1. Re:Sounds fine by HornWumpus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      WTF?

      Launch services where/are a good source of hard currency for the Ruskys. The rest of the world has supported Russia's space program as it delivers good value. To say nothing of the chaos that would happen if the technical staff hit the world job market.

      Other than that, they have oil/gas/weapons/prostitute exports. Not a diverse economy.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  3. Not worried by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, I get it, butthurt Americans are mad that they can no longer send men into space.

    Umm, actually most of us aren't all that worried about it. Those of us who care know we've got programs in the works to revive our ability to put humans into space and we knew there would be a bit of a gap. It will get resolved soon enough in all likelihood. The rest simply don't care at all. Maybe a few folks get bent about it but they're a tiny minority.

    1. Re:Not worried by nucrash · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As long as we continue to develop these programs, I think we have a pretty good shot at having two space worthy programs within the next two years. Our private space program has been developing for some time and several companies are getting in on the action. At some point, the US might be be the go-to country for LEO travel. Right now this is dependent on the Trump Administration and their decision to move forward with the existing programs or adapting the existing programs. If they recklessly abandon them as some administrations have done in the past, we could be begging India or China for a ride in the near future.

      SpaceX still has some work to do yet, but I see Boeing as also being a competitor and with the Sierra Nevada team chasing them to try and get in on the action, the potential of having at least two out of three programs getting us to ISS and possibly prolonging or building the next ISS.

      NASA still has the SLS to look forward to and move us into manned deep space. Even if that only ends up putting us on the Moon, it will be a good program for research that might put us in the rightful lead of the world as far as space exploration. I feel Russia is superior in longevity and actual logged manned space travel but NASA leads in exploration overall. I would like to see the US take the manned travel crown too.

      --
      Place something witty here
  4. Re:clarifying this garbage article by kiviQr · · Score: 2

    Russia funding is for the next decade while US is for 2016

  5. Re:clarifying this garbage article by mydn · · Score: 2

    not sure why you mentioned it in the article at all. its still less than the russian budget by 2 billion

    Funding for the next decade of Russian space activity stands at just 1.4 trillion rubles ($21.5 billion)

    Emphasis added.