Slashdot Mirror


Nestle Discovers 'Breakthrough' Method To Cut Sugar In Chocolate By 40% Without Affecting Taste (theguardian.com)

Nestle and its scientists have discovered how to "structure sugar differently" to reduce the amount of sugar in some of its products by 40%. What's more is that it can be done reportedly without compromising the taste. The Guardian reports: The new process is said to make sugar dissolve faster so that even when less is used, the tongue perceives an identical level of sweetness. It plans to patent the process, discovered by its scientists, which it says will enable it to significantly decrease the total sugar in its confectionery products. A four-finger milk chocolate Kit Kat currently contains 23.8g of sugar, a plain (milk chocolate) Yorkie contains 26.9g and a medium peppermint Aero has 24.9g of sugar. If the amount of sugar in each of these products was cut by 40% the new amounts would be 14.3g, 16.1g and 14.9g respectively.

10 of 328 comments (clear)

  1. JUST GREAT! by Dutchmaan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I'll have to eat nearly twice as much to maintain my obesity.

    1. Re: JUST GREAT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      How do you know what shit tastes like?

    2. Re: JUST GREAT! by The+Grassy+Knoll · · Score: 4, Funny

      And homeopathy? :-)

      --
      They will never know the simple pleasure of a monkey knife fight
  2. Thanks for doing the math by tomhath · · Score: 3, Funny

    People on slashdot would have a hard time multiplying a number by 0.4

    1. Re:Thanks for doing the math by hey! · · Score: 5, Funny

      People on slashdot would have a hard time multiplying a number by 0.4

      Indeed they would not. However they do sometimes stumble about when to multiply a number by 0.4.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  3. What?!?! by freeze128 · · Score: 5, Funny

    a plain (milk chocolate) Yorkie contains 26.9g

    Oh my God! They're eating DOGS!

  4. Re:Why not just use Splenda? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would argue that the first step in realizing that goal is to avoid Nestle products at all costs.

  5. Re:Why not just use Splenda? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 4, Funny

    How the hell do you raise your tail?

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  6. Re:Maybe NOW we can have Nestle chocolate back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, and Dove... Dove is better than Hershey's, but not as good as I remember Nestle chocolate being.

    Dove does taste better than Hershey's but please note that it's intended to be a body soap.

  7. Re:Nestle by jandersen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes I agree, I live in central Europe and if you ever have tasted LÃderach (Swiss) or Bachhalm or Zotter (Austrian) you would not touch any Nestle dreck with a 10 ft pole.

    If you really lived in Central Europe, you would know that Poles, although excellent people, rarely get that tall.