Slashdot Mirror


Drupal Event Apologizes For Giving Out Copies Of Playboy (drupalcamp.de)

An anonymous reader writes: The organization team for a regional Drupal event apologized Thursday for distributing copies of Playboy to attendees. The magazines were distributed in welcome bags, according to a statement from the organizers of DrupalCamp Munich, and "were provided by Burda, a major German publisher, who also provided other technical magazines as part of their sponsorship. These magazines were approved for inclusion by the camp organizers.

"At the time, we thought it would be a good idea, as playboy.de was one of the first major Drupal 8 websites ever released. Upon reflection, this wasn't the best idea, and the magazines have been removed... It was a decision made in poor taste, and we regret it.

The inclusion of the magazine had attracted criticism on Twitter from both male and female developers, with one writing sarcastically, "Dunno about you, but I only read playboy.de for the Drupal code."

13 of 251 comments (clear)

  1. Ok with porn or not, that was genuinely stupid by bjdevil66 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...from a PR standpoint. This doesn't exactly help the perception about how misogynistic web development environments are for women. And the last thing a somewhat fading development platform (at least outside of large enterprise) like Drupal needs is for something to fire SJWs up...

    Where was the, "Das ist eine wirklich schlechte Idee?", leadership from the conference organizers in Munich?

    1. Re:Ok with porn or not, that was genuinely stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think SJW's need to grow up.

    2. Re:Ok with porn or not, that was genuinely stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What exactly is misogynistic in Playboy? You do know that women chose to act and chose to be in Playboy? And here I am, thinking we are living in a progressive society where women have full responsibility and control over their bodies. We are not in Saudi Arabia, are we?

    3. Re:Ok with porn or not, that was genuinely stupid by smooth+wombat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly. At the next event they should put Playgirl inside instead.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    4. Re:Ok with porn or not, that was genuinely stupid by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Feminist message is that women need to be protected.

    5. Re:Ok with porn or not, that was genuinely stupid by Oligonicella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      SJW's and (actual) alt-righters have two things in common, they raise a lot of ruckus and their numbers are not that large.

    6. Re:Ok with porn or not, that was genuinely stupid by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm happy to have the US military protecting me from those things I cannot protect myself from. You know, actual threats.

      I don't need anyone protecting me from photographs.
      I don't need anyone protecting me from mean tweets.
      I don't need anyone protecting my feelings.

      Do you understand the difference? Everyone needs protection from superior firepower, but mature adults do, in fact, take all of the responsibility for their feelings, for their sense of being offended. If you claim someone needs their feelings protected, then you are, yes, claiming they are a child, or at least not a mature adult. It's not complimentary.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  2. Re:Hand out Playboys at every tech conference... by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You don't understand. This doesn't keep them away. It draws them in. Those who are always looking for something to be outraged over must seek out new sources for their outrage.

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  3. Women read Playboy too by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are you you some kind of anti-LGBT freak or victorian prude? Lots of women enjoy female nudity.

    They should have included a copy of Playgirl magazine also, then it would have been even more equanimous. Taking out the magazine was the wrong thing to do.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  4. Re:Fire up SJWs, make my day by ClickOnThis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I, for one, simply enjoy [watching SJWs] froth about human traits. They've been trying to shame us all into suppressing them for too long.

    There are plenty of human traits that we suppress with laws. Traits like violence (which can cause injury or death), negligence (see violence), avarice (which can cause theft), and so on.

    There are other human traits whose consequences do not rise to the level required to suppress with laws, but they are discouraged through social mores and codes of conduct. Traits like impatience (which causes people to butt into lines or disrupt public gatherings), gratification (which leads to people doing things that disturb others in their presence, like farting or smoking), and so on.

    And there are other human traits that may be offensive to some, but we agree collectively to tolerate nonetheless. Traits like self-validation (which can lead to a talker trapping you in a conversation), or stubbornness (which limits what you can accomplish in a relationship with someone.)

    Whether we decide to suppress, discourage, or tolerate a particular human trait comes down to what extent the exercise of that trait can cause harm to others.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  5. Re:What's the big deal? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Playboy departed the nude photo market due to the vast and unending supply of photos and video of all manner of naked people doing sexual things which one can access via the Internet.

    However, one can make a case that a good deal of the past content of Playboy was about objectifying women and to some extent the publication still is about that.

    It was a dumb decision. Several people just weren't thinking. They're embarrassed now. They learned, and won't do it again.

  6. People need to chill by XXongo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Really, people need to chill out. When absolutely everything gets you offended, really your offendedness is meaningless.

  7. Re:Why is this an issue? by amiga3D · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is confusing. I see women every day who state they hate being objectified as sex objects and then show up with a mini skirt that shows the curvature of their ass and shoes with 7 inch heels. I'm almost 60 now and my urges no longer have the overwhelming power they did when I was 20. Still I thank God that women in my day didn't dress half as slutty as they do now or I'd have had problems for sure. The shit in Playboy today is tame by street standards.