Slashdot Mirror


BMW Traps A Car Thief By Remotely Locking His Doors (cnet.com)

An anonymous reader quotes CNET: Seattle police caught an alleged car thief by enlisting the help of car maker BMW to both track and then remotely lock the luckless criminal in the very car he was trying to steal... Turns out if you're inside a stolen car, it's perhaps not the best time to take a nap. "A car thief awoke from a sound slumber Sunday morning (November 27) to find he had been remotely locked inside a stolen BMW, just as Seattle police officers were bearing down on him," wrote Jonah Spangenthal-Lee [deputy director of communications for the Seattle Police Department].

The suspect found a key fob mistakenly left inside the BMW by a friend who'd borrowed the car from the owner and the alleged crime was on. But technology triumphed. When the owner, who'd just gotten married a day earlier, discovered the theft, the police contacted BMW corporate, who tracked the car to Seattle's Ravenna neighborhood.

The 38-year-old inside was then booked for both auto theft and possession of methamphetamine.

14 of 368 comments (clear)

  1. Happy ending, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Good for the guy who got his car back, and good that they put the would be thief away, but still, can't say I much like the idea that our corporate overlords can track your car (and therefore movements) and remotely lock down your vehicle.

  2. My first thought... by flargleblarg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If it's possible to lock someone inside a car — which is a really terrible feature, by the way — then how long before some car's AI flips out and drives off a bridge — into a river — with passengers inside...and locks the doors shut?

    1. Re:My first thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, socialist scum. Happens all the time in Cuba, and totally wasn't invented in Germany and practised in the US.

      Fascinating how people yell all the time about "socialists" when things that doesn't happen in socialist countries happens in their own "democratic" countries. It's almost like they're talking out of their asses and need to learn a bit about corporatism and fascism. But that would require opening a book or two. Can't have that, it's socialism!

  3. See??? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This incredibly rare set of circumstances is exactly why we should happily and unquestioningly give our freedoms and privacy away to corporations and to the government!

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  4. I call bullshit. by Heebie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pulling the door opener lever on the door of a car overrides the locking mechanisms. This is a fire-safety requirement. The guy was probably just still asleep when the cops found the car.

  5. Dangerous by stooo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People died while being locked in cars.
    Two examples are : car fallen in the water, and people sleeping in a car while owner and friend locked it. The owner came back after a long hot weeken, his friend was dead inside.
    Double lock is a dangerous feature.

    --
    aaaaaaa
    1. Re:Dangerous by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That it's possible doesn't mean it's irresponsible to do it. People die in airplane crashes, that's not a reasonable reason to refuse all air travel.

    2. Re: Dangerous by Wootery · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nope. Slashdotters are generally nervous when it comes to corporate power of this sort. Brand isn't the deciding factor.

    3. Re:Dangerous by locofungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Door lock doesn't make any difference if the car is in water. You cannot open the door against the water pressure, locked or not.

      That's why, if you're in a car that falls into water it's essential that you open the windows before the electrics short out

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
    4. Re: Dangerous by Drethon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      who are you going to trust. have to trust some.

      I'll trust the company that leaves the decisions in my hands, rather than taking them away from me.

    5. Re: Dangerous by Drethon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To add to this, I personally much prefer the Boeing autopilot mentality over the Airbus autopilot mentality (I think they are still generally using this approach). The Boeing approach was the autopilot does its thing until the pilot wants to do something else. The Airbus approach was the autopilot will ignore the pilot if they do something dangerous. This is believed to have led to at least one crash when the autopilot prevented the pilot from taking action (there is however controversy over the actual cause ) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....

      Fine if they want to tell me I'm doing something potentially suicidal and resist my attempts but I'm still not ready to have a computer take full control from me when it thinks it knows better. Maybe I need to just stop and trust the AI, but I've tested certified software going into airplanes, I'm not willing to put my full trust into it.

  6. Escape is easy by LaLLi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have never seen a "modern" car that doesn't have headrests. Those headrests can be detached and the metal spikes used to break the passenger windows.

  7. "Feature" has already killed someone by Solandri · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The "feature" has already caused at least one death.

    Last week, a burglar pried apart some security bars at my business and squeezed in. He was able to make off with some stolen goods because once inside, he was easily able to open the locked exit door. Fire codes require that all building exit doors accessible to the public be openable from the inside even when locked. These laws were made after repeated fires with huge death tolls exacerbated by locked exit doors. That's what the bar on the door you press when leaving most restaurants and stores does. Even when the door is locked, pushing the bar from the inside will open the door. That way if a fire breaks out, you're not trapped inside because the only person who has the key was the idiot who started the fire and is dead.

    Same thing with refrigerators - both the old stand-up units which latched shut, and walk-in refrigerator/freezers used in restaurants. Too many people (especially kids playing) were dying after being trapped inside, that laws were passed requiring a mechanism which allows someone inside to open the latch on the outside.

    I don't see why cars should be any different. Yes easy egress makes thievery easier. But preventing that is just not worth the potential loss of life. Any car designer who thinks this is a good idea should be locked inside one of their cars on a sunny day until they admit it's a terrible idea. Heck, after dozens of kids dying each year after being locked in the trunk of a car while playing, we finally passed a law mandating a release mechanism inside the trunk. And some idiot car designer decides it would be a good idea to make it impossible for someone inside the passenger compartment to exit at will? Shame on BMW for trying to spin this to the press as a "helpful" feature.

  8. Re:so what? by geekmux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't see why this is a story on Slashdot

    Then you must not be thinking of the children. Or terrorists. Oh, and don't forget about children and terrorists.

    This story sounds like nothing on the surface, right up until you realize that BMW can track their cars remotely and execute remote operations on them (this was just a teaser of their remote capabilities most likely).

    From hacking that system to legal "justifications" sans warrants, this is a privacy and security nightmare.

    But hey, carry on...nothing to see here according to the ignorant masses who have been trained that way. Simply because most "gadgets" these days are a privacy and security nightmare doesn't dismiss that fact, or the consequences.

    I for one was rather baffled over the keyfob left in the car. My 8-year old car would not automatically lock the doors if it sensed the keyfob inside, so I'm assuming the car was left unlocked with the keyfob. Fail all around.