Slashdot Mirror


Paris Makes All Public Transportation Free In Battle Against 'Worst Air Pollution For 10 Years' (independent.co.uk)

Paris has barred some cars from its streets and has made public transportation free as it suffers from the worst and most prolonged winter pollution for at least 10 years, the Airparif agency said on Wednesday. The Independent reports: Authorities have said only drivers with odd-numbered registration plates can drive in the capital region on Wednesday. Drivers of even-numbered cars were given the same opportunity on Tuesday, but could now be fined up to 35 EUR if they are caught behind the wheel. More than 1,700 motorists were fined for violations on Tuesday. Paris mayor Anne Hidalgo said images of smog blanketing the capital were proof of the need to reduce vehicle use in the city center. The air pollution peak is due to the combination of emissions from vehicles and from domestic wood fires as well as near windless conditions which means pollutants have not been dispersed, the Airparif agency said. "This is a record period (of pollution) for the last 10 years," Karine Leger of AirParif told AFP by telephone. For more than a week, Airparif has published readings of PM10 at more than 80 micrograms per cubic meter of air particles, triggering the pollution alert. Along with odd-numbered cars, hybrid or electric vehicles as well as those carrying three or more people will be allowed to roam the roads. Foreign and emergency vehicles will be unaffected.

12 of 239 comments (clear)

  1. To avoid confusion... by XSportSeeker · · Score: 5, Informative

    Avoiding some confusion in the comments, Paris is making all public transportation free for one or two days alone, to reduce the ammount of smog/particulate matter in the air. No, they are not making public transportation free indefinitely, this is an emergency measure... not all that different from similar stuff that China and India already did.

    These are predicted to happen in several cities around the world in particular atmospheric conditions... if things keeps getting worse though, you can predict that soon, along with heavy snow days, we'll also have heavy smog days for some cities.

  2. Re:domestic wood fires by sg_oneill · · Score: 4, Informative

    Maybe an unpopular oppinion

    Well being completely untrue tends to have that effect on an opinion.

    This has nothing to do with refugees (Who are not 'burning shit' in paris). Calais was a good 300+ km away, nearly a year ago, and ironically the fires where lit by englishmen.

    But hey, keep mashing the crazy keys Anonymous Coward.

    --
    Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  3. Re:But... by Hadlock · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're right, it's a luxury that negatively affects everyone else to the point of being a health hazard, which is why it's ok to ban it. Just because they can afford it doesn't mean everyone else needs to needlessly suffer. They could just ride a bike if they wanted. Or walk.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  4. Re:To avoid collection. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe turn the Eiffel Tower into a giant ionic collector?

    It's already a giant ironic collector.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  5. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by Kergan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Eventually he got inmpeached and the new Gov discovered that free rides were not sustainable. So they means tested it.

    Dunno how they discovered it wasn't, but FWIW it might be an unfortunate (mis-)find.

    Public transportation where I live is free for seniors. Trains, metros, busses, boats, etc., in all cities and between all cities. Everything except airplanes. It surprised me somewhat when I came here for the first time, and it certainly surprised my parents when they first came (since as EU seniors they didn't need to pay either), but apparently this has been going on since the communist era.

    There arguably is a cost. Perhaps one can shrug it off as in "meh, the bus is scheduled anyway. The only point in time where it might be problematic is during rush hours when you need to field a few more busses." Or perhaps not.

    Either way, the positive side effects are observable when you care to look: seniors tend to visit their children and grand children across the country instead of it being the other way around like where I'm from - and more often, at that. You see seniors everywhere, and the contrast in their behavior is palpable when I compare this with the other two dozen or so countries I've lived in. When they do go out they can afford to go to cafes and restaurants, give some money to their kids and grand kids, etc. Plus nanny savings that allow single moms to work more than part-time where applicable.

    I've no idea if the net economic balance is positive, but when you factor in the quality of life side effects across generations it certainly seems worth doing.

  6. Banish cars from the city center by blind+biker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Allow service vehicles, public transportation, cabs and bicycles, and everyone will be happy.
    This will be unpopular with North Americans (US and Canadians alike) who live their lives in cars, but in Europe we can conceive of an existence where you don't need to hop into a car every time you have to go from point A to point B.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:Banish cars from the city center by Aliks · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sure, and put lots of local stores around town so that you don't need to drive to some out-of-town megastore.

      Maybe even some cycle lanes so that people can get some exercise.

      Actually most UK cities do have endless free parking outside the city with a park and ride service to the centre.

      Socialism huh?

  7. Re: But... by Soft · · Score: 4, Informative

    theres somthing called carpooling too which can help.

    Good point, and indeed, carpooling is encouraged in Paris on smog days: although they ban half of the cars (those with odd-numbered license plates one day, even-numbered the next), cars that transport 3 people or more are exempt from the ban.

  8. Re:But... by lxs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Or need to get there faster. "
    Get there faster in a car? Not in any European city.

  9. Re:Great System by ledow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That system's in use all over the world.

    The administrative burden of JUST ABOUT ANYTHING ELSE is far too high and would actually cost you more.

    On Thursdays (I think), you can't drive a truck through Italy. Same thing.

    As soon as you get into registered lists, issuing stickers or permits, etc. it gets so expensive that you don't want to do it.

    You can do it fairly, cheaply, or easily enforceable. Pick any two.

  10. Re:But... by Orphis · · Score: 5, Informative

    When I worked in Paris, I lived in the suburbs surrounding Paris and worked in another one.

    Public transport was easily 1h30m of traveling time. I would have to go through the town center and back. Share the train with all the people with the flu, suffer the unpredictability of the Parisian public transport.

    In my car, it was a solid 20 minutes, and I never caught the flu. I was saving 2 hours everyday thanks to my car.

    I'm not saying it's perfect for everyone, but for some people, it's definitely really great. Would I ever take the public transport again? Probably, if there were better routes around, not like this though.

  11. Re:But... by demonlapin · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's great for you, but I've never lived anywhere that had grocery delivery. Stores have recently introduced services that will, for a fee, collect your order and put it in your car for you once you get there. About $5/order, definitely not free. And that's only in the past six months.