Slashdot Mirror


Comcast Raises Controversial 'Broadcast TV' and 'Sports' Fees $48 Per Year (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Comcast's latest price hikes include a significant increase in the company's widely despised "Broadcast TV" and "Regional Sports Network" fees. The Broadcast TV fee is moving from $5 a month to $7 a month, while the Regional Sports Network fee is rising from $3 a month to $5 a month, according to notices sent to customers in several cities. Combined, that's a change from $8 to $12 a month, giving Comcast an extra $48 a year from each customer that has to pay the fees. Comcast began charging these fees a few years ago, which have risen quickly. Just over a year ago, Comcast raised the Broadcast TV fee from $3 to $5 and the Regional Sports fee from $1 to $3. The two fees have thus gone from $4 to $12, combined, in little more than a year. Comcast customers recently sued the company, saying that Comcast falsely advertises lower-than-actual prices and then raises rates by tacking on these two fees. Comcast falsely portrays these fees as being required by the government, the proposed class action lawsuit said. Charter is facing a similar lawsuit. Comcast says the fees recover a portion of the price it pays broadcast networks and regional sports networks to air their content. But paying for programming is simply part of the cost of doing business as a cable TV provider, and programming costs have always been passed on to consumers in their cable TV bills. By charging fees separately from basic rates, "Comcast has found a way to secretly and repeatedly increase the monthly price it charges for its channel packages" even when customers are supposed to be getting a flat rate during a contract term, the lawsuit said. The Broadcast TV fee was introduced in 2014, initially as $1.50 a month, and the Regional Sports fee was added in 2015 at $1 a month. Comcast charges the sports fee even though it owns many of the regional sports networks that broadcast sporting events in local markets. The price increases were reported by TVPredictions and DSLReports, and customers have been posting letters they received from Comcast detailing the price changes.

8 of 166 comments (clear)

  1. This is fair by youngone · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Comcast (and the other US regional monopolies) have spent an awful lot of money to dominate the markets they operate in.

    These fees are just one way they have to claw those costs back.

    Another method is having State Governments pass laws stopping cities and towns from operating their own networks in competition.

    1. Re:This is fair by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No one is saying that it's not fair for Comcast et al to charge what they need to in order to make a profit. The issue is they advertise say $39.99 for some package but then it comes with the extra fees that should be included in the advertised price as they are just the cost of doing business. If the advertised price is $39.99, it shouldn't actually cost $39.99 for the content.

      This isn't even considering all the extra taxes and fees that go beyond their cost and get passed on to various government bodies.

  2. Easy way to increase profits by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wall Street investors want year-over-year profit increases. It is far easier for Comcast to just raise these fees (which really should be a part of the quoted price for the cable TV package) than it is for Comcast to spend money on things that make its customers happy (like quality customer service) and more willing to buy more Comcast products.

  3. Best way to opt out? Streaming Services! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The best way to opt out of these fees is not to pay Comcast ANY money and switch to just watching content from streaming services like Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime and YouTube!

    1. Re:Best way to opt out? Streaming Services! by surfdaddy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would cut the cord but my only high speed option is the same shitty company that I get cable TV from. And they've priced their options such that cutting the cord doesn't save that much. Oh, and of course then data caps are coming into vogue to ensure that you don't get too excited about those streaming services or have "unlimited" data. Which means you are going to pay them yet again for overages, or more per month to get rid of the caps. And that price will keep going up.

  4. Re:Welcome to Trump's America Inc. by tripleevenfall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You will pay. You will not complain. You have no rights against the all-powerful CORPORATION. Unless you incorporate yourself.

    I'm not free to cut the cord?

  5. Re:Welcome to Trump's America Inc. by msauve · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Nobody is holding a gun to your head making you pay for TV at all."

    Ultimately, someone may be. Those under contract, who paid for service at a specific rate are now seeing price increases to the service being disguised as government mandated "fees." Stop paying before the contract ends, and ultimately the full force of government law enforcement (which includes guns) may come into play.

    Yeah, it's a stretch in the real world, but so is claiming that such people have a real choice. Do you "you feel morally and mentally superior?"

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  6. Re:Welcome to Trump's America Inc. by tsqr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    TFS: "Comcast began charging these fees a few years ago, which have risen quickly. Just over a year ago, Comcast raised the Broadcast TV fee from $3 to $5 and the Regional Sports fee from $1 to $3. The two fees have thus gone from $4 to $12, combined, in little more than a year."

    So, a practice that started "a few years ago" and has continued over the past year, has what to do with Trump?