Slashdot Mirror
Scientific American Column: 'It's Not Cold Fusion...But It's Something' (scientificamerican.com)
An anonymous reader writes: Scientific American magazine has published a guest column on low-energy nuclear reactions (LENR) [putting] into context the history of what was mistakenly referred to as cold fusion and what happened. The bottom line is that there is compelling cumulative evidence for nuclear reactions taking place, including shifts in the abundance of isotopes, element transmutations, and localized melting of metals. Furthermore, those reactions do not have the characteristics of either nuclear fission or nuclear fusion. Despite sharp criticism from much of the scientific community after the 1989 announcement by Fleischmann and Pons, the Department of the Navy's Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center and other reputable organizations continued the research and published many papers.
The article reports that "to the surprise of many people, a new field of nuclear research has emerged," adding that even in the early 20th century, atomic scientists were already reporting "inexplicable experimental evidence of elemental transmutations."
No, it is about the EmDrive. It totally works. NASA said so. Did I mention it was NASA? Yeah, NASA. Totally isn't a scam, because NASA.
What a charlatan. What is next, a book about the EmDrive?
I want my goddamn nuclear car, I want a car with some sort of a small sized nuclear reactor. Slow nuclear ... transfusion/transfusion/subfusiin/submission, I don't care, I want it now.
You can't handle the truth.
Oh wait never mind. I didn't realize you were Steven, and submitted this to drum up business for your "book".
You are right. Therefore everything is true, and possible, but just being suppressed by scientists. So where is my warp engine?