Slashdot Mirror
House Committee Urges Congress To Pass Stingray Surveillance Legislation (theverge.com)
A bipartisan House Oversight and Government Reform Committee report released today urges Congress to pass legislation to regulate cell-site simulation surveillance devices like the Stingray. From a report: The devices, used by local and federal law enforcement agencies around the country, have been controversial, both for their power to track mobile devices and the secrecy often accompanying their use. As the report notes, the devices are still often used by local law enforcement agencies without warrants, instead relying on various lower standards of evidence. The committee's investigation, which last year prompted the Justice Department and Department of Homeland Security to change their policies on when to require a warrant before using the devices, found that the Justice Department uses 310 of the devices and spent $71 million on them between fiscal years 2010 and 2014. Homeland Security has 124 devices and spent $24 million in the same period. [...] The committee recommends that agencies become more "candid" about the devices, and urges states to pass legislation that would "require, with limited exceptions, issuance of a probable cause based warrant prior to law enforcement's use of these devices."
RTFA
This is an anti-spying law. Did you even read the summary?
It said you were a clown.
In the case of Stingray usage in relations to this article.
Don't forget Stingrays delay or prevent communications. Their usage directly delays warnings about snow removal and actual dangers to the public by a day or more in some cases. Also they allow spoofing of a persons cellphone and to "pretend" to be the targeted Cellphone. Not exactly legal evidence, more like falsified evidence more likely.
Stingrays act like cell towers, and if they delay or prevent communications, the delay NEEDS to be less than 24-48 HOURS!!!
Can't tell you how often I have missed an important Doctors or Work call because they are trying to weed out some meth heads.
was a specification made regarding my disposition in clown-hood?
This could have just been a thing in the works for some time, but my overall guess is that the change in executive power is finally getting the civil libertarians moving again. They were apparently fine as long as someone they trusted was in charge, but now suddenly they want oversight and limits to federal overreach.
A law is nice and specific to current tech that will probably be very old tech in the next 5 years. This is one case in which I would prefer the supreme court issue a general ruling rather than go through congress.
This device is the very essence of cracking, unauthorized access to a computer system, namely the targetted cellphone and others in the vacinity. A violation of 13 USC 1030. It is testimony to the corruption of our legal system that the perpetrators, so-called Law Enforcement Officers, are so brazen as to use these devices openly without fear of prosecution.
Since Homeland security and the FBI belong to the US federal government, state legislation won't curb the biggest abuses of this technology.
I thought Stingray devices also collected meta-data, which doesn't seem to be an issue to US politicians. Also, the DoJ still decides which cases require surveillance warrants, not politicians who are supposed to represent the will of the people; a clear case of the fox guarding the hen-house. There is no mention of how access to data will be restricted, but then again, the federal government gives itself so many exemptions on data privacy, any law would be meaningless.
...to do the right thing.
I can't believe that we haven't already outlawed Stingrays, or worked on Stingray genocide.
Stingrays took the great Steve Irwin from us. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
While American lawmakers may think that only Aussies can get killed by Stingrays, it's only a matter of time until the DoJ's rampant use of them leads to more unnecessary casualties.
Unless you feel that you need to be in continuous contact with the rest of the world, turn the phone off or put in airplane mode (transmitter is off).
Then you can't be tracked. Turn it when home or at work or places where you are expected to be.
Well, golly gee folks, this is just what the doctor ordered - - - EVERYONE gets their cell phones hacked
/ recorded / tracked. Just imagine what this process would have on the communications within the
Washington circle ! ! !
Let's see - delivery of meth, coke, crack, oxy, "escorts", etc - and SUDDENLY all the 'players' in the
political arena get their dirty laundry spread across the front page. I was going to add pot, but that is
apparently legal in DC nowadays.
Where, and when, did the concept of 'sunset' laws disappear from the agenda - wherein all laws had
to be re-approved periodically, or were deleted from the judicial books. Times change, attitudes change,
morals change, and yet - we are still burdened with laws on the books that SHOULD make you laugh (gay
rights, abortion, vulgar language in public, etc, etc, etc), except that they are STILL ON THE BOOKS,
and you can STILL be prosecuted.
Please, oh please, remove the free pass that legislator's get by NOT being liable or prosecutable for
their actions under the cover of 'public office exemptions'. Even sitting heads of state have, in recent
times, been held responsible for illegal actions - as in war crimes situations - - - so why should our
legislative representatives be allowed to get away with 'exempting' themselves from laws that they are
passing that make their same actions a CRIME if committed by 'joe blow' - a common soul - merely trying
to exercise his/her right to the pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness within their own homes in this
country - home of the brave and free, and cowed by legislation that intrudes into their own bedrooms?
Hell, it's no wonder that the radicalized factions and population sub-segments are taking it upon
themselves to 'act out' in the most horrible and unthinkably bloodthirsty ways - when they have no
effective input into the actual day-to-day rights embedded in our constitution.
Sorry, but this issue struck a nerve - seeing as how a high school friend of mine went to federal lockup
for TWENTY YEARS for having TWO SEEDS of marijuana in his glove box.
Life in the US has really turned into a '1984' balls-up scenario - - - only thing is, and it really
sucks because it still IS the best, is that it beats anywhere else in the world to live (as long as you
can hide your minor vices and issues from the jackbooted badges).
OK, so this gets me flagged as a 'no fly' asshole, but big deal. I'm a disabled veteran that can't handle the
hour(s) long delay involved in just getting ON a plane due to the pain from my back and knees
(service-connected disabilities). At least I don't have to be forced to undergo a strip-down, cavity-inspection,
just because I have the balls to speak my mind!
On the other hand, I carry a letter from my VA doctors explaining the need for my pain medications so that,
JUST IN CASE I get rousted in the middle of the night and tossed into the clink, I don't have to endure any
additional pain and hardship fostered on me by the 'powers that be' because they think I am a threat to
national security - - - or should I say, a threat to their justification to be total dick-wads hiding behind a
badge - who enjoy lording it over the 'people' of this once great country.
redneck geek
It's this exact constructive attitude I expect from Trump and supporters
Heck, it is in the summary. This is about requiring warrants with Stingrays, not allowing their use without warrants.
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?