Slashdot Mirror


China Opens Door For Tesla and Other Foreign Automakers To Produce Electric Vehicles (electrek.co)

Despite its strong protectionism laws in place that require any automaker wanting to establish production capacity in the country to partner and share its technology with a local manufacturer, China is proposing to relax laws. In an attempt to accelerate electric vehicle production in the country and fight its air pollution problem, China is now proposing to relax those laws for what they call "new energy vehicles," a.k.a. electric vehicles, in order to attract more foreign investments. From a report: The new rules are expected to open the door to Tesla and other automakers who recently expressed desires to establish manufacturing capacity in China to produce electric vehicles. The National Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Commerce released the new policy last week, and it is seeking public comment until next month. The new rules could go into effect soon after.

84 comments

  1. Partner and Share = Give up IP by sinij · · Score: 5, Insightful

    China wants free IP, and even next quarter myopic CEOs no longer falling for "partner and share" scam.

    1. Re:Partner and Share = Give up IP by theArtificial · · Score: 1

      But but but you'll have access to a huge market!

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
    2. Re:Partner and Share = Give up IP by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Just look at what happens to all the tech we sell and install there. Within a year, a copy shows up and the Chinese firm sues the original inventors for "stealing Chinese IP".

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    3. Re:Partner and Share = Give up IP by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      It is nice if China relaxes the laws requiring Tesla to share with a local manufacturer. However, they will still have to share. If not directly, then through spying by employees planted within the manufacturer.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    4. Re:Partner and Share = Give up IP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hasn't Musk stated that he was willing to share/give the IP away and that his goal was only to have as many electric cars on the road as possible?

    5. Re:Partner and Share = Give up IP by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      You mean the other car companies? Like the one that built electric cars two decades ago and then crushed them instead of selling them?

    6. Re:Partner and Share = Give up IP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For Tesla, it's a great deal. Other manufacturers have loads of proprietary technology they invested a lot of money in, but Tesla barely does any R&D and has nothing of any value to share.

    7. Re:Partner and Share = Give up IP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They pretty much learned all dirty tricks from the US, except that they do it on a larger scale.
      Bullshit like that happens in US courts too.

    8. Re:Partner and Share = Give up IP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US doesn't require an American company to own 51% of any ventures from foreign companies on its soil, nor do they require someone from the government be on every company board, which is required by China. Lets compare apples to apples. If I am selling magic widgets and want to have a factory in China, they have to own the majority stake of the stuff on their side, and any IP in use has to be shared with the government. That, or no deal.

  2. For once pragmatism trumps policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are strangling on their own fumes and are desperate for immediate solutions they don't have time to steal.

    1. Re:For once pragmatism trumps policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are strangling on their own fumes

      I doubt that. Maybe choking on them.

    2. Re:For once pragmatism trumps policy by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Have they seriously tried anything as far as legislative remedies? You'd think a totalitarian government could force people to comply with whatever regulations it wants.

      California had a terrible smog problem in the 1970s and early 1980s. The entire Los Angeles area (including Disneyland, for example) had air that was smothered with a visible brown haze. Even the Bay Area was getting bad. We passed a bunch of laws, force people to comply with them e.g. by requiring catalytic converters in all new vehicles and refusing to register vehicles that haven't had their emissions checked. Today the air quality has improved immensely.

      If any government can do the same, it's China. They just lack the will. Moreover, it may turn out that vehicles aren't even their biggest problem -- their crony-capitalist industries may be just as much to blame, and who wants to regulate them?

      No, this move is far more likely to be about getting their hands on the technology so they can steal it.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    3. Re:For once pragmatism trumps policy by haruchai · · Score: 1

      "California had a terrible smog problem in the 1970s and early 1980s"

      With such a low UID, one would think you could remember that CA smog problems went back much, much further.
      https://www.arb.ca.gov/html/br...

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    4. Re:For once pragmatism trumps policy by Cyberax · · Score: 2

      Most of the pollution in China is from coal powerplants and various industrial plants. They can't really do much about them in the near future even if they are willing to take a hit on the economy growth (which they are not). In more distant future, China is expanding renewable power generation, nuclear power and natural gas power plants.

      Cars are not really a big problem in cities right now, most of them have effective emission control systems. But in future they are going to become more significant. Interestingly, electric-powered bikes and scooters are already insanely popular because gas-powered ones are too expensive because of regulations.

    5. Re:For once pragmatism trumps policy by haruchai · · Score: 1

      China has been taking action against coal plant emissions for a few years, passed laws roughly as stringent as any to be found in the West that went into enforcement in Fall 2014 and, most importantly, were not grandfathering ANY plants. I don't know if they've backed on on that since the law went into effect.
      But even for their heavy handed government, enforcement isn't easy and local officials typically have quite a bit of power.
      But if there's a death or disaster, those same officials quickly find themselves in front of a firing squad

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    6. Re:For once pragmatism trumps policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they govt regulators HAVE NO POWER. The EPA will shut you down. The Chinese regulator will simply file a report.

      So why spend the money to clean up when there is no penalty for NOT doing it???

    7. Re:For once pragmatism trumps policy by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Northern China uses coal for local heat. Just like people in London did when they had killing 'fogs'.

      Coal burning stoves are dirty as fuck.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    8. Re:For once pragmatism trumps policy by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Northern China uses coal for local heat. Just like people in London did when they had killing 'fogs'.

      Coal burning stoves are dirty as fuck.

      Some years ago, I was mentoring a student from Northern China and he did mention that coal was the primary fuel source in households.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    9. Re:For once pragmatism trumps policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They lack will. Couldn't agree more.

      Last week in China I was told my prototypes were delayed, When I inquired why they said "Enviromental Inspectors are in town".
      Turns out local government tips off the local industries when the Enviromental inspectors come to town. The businessess then simply shut down for 3 days.
      The enviromental inspectors then play along with the charade "Look this factory isn't used anymore, nothing to inspect here"

    10. Re:For once pragmatism trumps policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have they seriously tried anything as far as legislative remedies? You'd think a totalitarian government could force people to comply with whatever regulations it wants.

      It could be argued about how totalitarian they really are.
      China does however stand out from other totalitarian governments in that they are idealists.
      It appears as if there is a genuine desire in their government to make things better for the their population and they have a system where politicians that are outed as corrupt are punished instead of rewarded.

      So while they likely could force people to comply with strict regulations they won't write such legislation if they think that will lead to too much unemployment or cause other problems.

    11. Re:For once pragmatism trumps policy by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Combustion engines are a big problem in cities. While their emissions in terms of greenhouse gasses and some harmful particles have improved a lot, they still do a lot of damage to people's health.

      Even if all the electricity is from dirty old coal plants, it's still better to move it away from densely populated areas.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:For once pragmatism trumps policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they sound like jedis

    13. Re:For once pragmatism trumps policy by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      It's easy, low hanging fruit. Electric resistive heat is a terrible solution, but it's much better than a coal burning stove. N. China's city cores have enough density they should be using common steam loops and waste heat from nearby power plants.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  3. Sucker Trade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >China has strong protectionism laws in place

    Why do people keep complaining about Trump's trade stance?

  4. Trump! Trump! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 0

    China does not want to be locked out so they are dropping the partner and share its technology and are willing to be open to more out side stuff. They don't want an trade war.

    1. Re:Trump! Trump! by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Hilarious!

      Communist China knows Trump will roll over and turn a blind eye while they steal all the technology they can get their hands on. If Tesla sets up any kind of manufacturing facility over there, it will be so riddled with surveillance equipment and "employees" who check in with the Party before they clock in at work that there won't be any proprietary tech left to steal after the first few months.

      Trump won't go up against the Commies. He's a bully, not a warrior.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    2. Re:Trump! Trump! by JeffAtl · · Score: 3, Informative

      If Telsa or anyone else is naive enough to go through with this type of deal, what is Trump supposed to do about it?

      Trump's plans are (1) to end the asymmetrical trade deals that the last 4 four presidents have given us and (2) push to eliminate the existing tax code provisions that make it more economical to move manufacturing offshore and then import back in to the US. The US is pretty much alone in having such an inverted tax structure.

    3. Re:Trump! Trump! by Stinky+Cheese+Man · · Score: 1

      Communist China knows Trump will roll over and turn a blind eye while they steal all the technology they can get their hands on.

      That is an interesting assertion. I would like to learn more. Could you possibly provide links to supporting evidence? Thanks in advance.

    4. Re:Trump! Trump! by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      The US is pretty much alone in having such an inverted tax structure.

      Aside from Australia of course, where they do everything in an inverted position.

    5. Re:Trump! Trump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What proprietary technology does Tesla have that would be worth copying for China? Aside from buggy software and extremely poor build quality, there is very little unique to Tesla.

    6. Re: Trump! Trump! by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Battery and car manufacturing.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    7. Re:Trump! Trump! by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      Republicans NEED a national enemy to motivate their supporters. Trump needs to shut down China to fix the trade balance and "bring jobs back to America". I expect Trump will do everything in his power to pick a fight with China, or do you think he's filling his government with soldiers because "politics"?

    8. Re:Trump! Trump! by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      We people with three-figure IQ's have this thing called "inductive reasoning". We use it to reach reasonable conclusions based on past performance.

      http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/inductive-reasoning

      You're welcome.

      Is there anything else I can help you with?

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    9. Re:Trump! Trump! by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Call me when he actually does any of this. Talk is cheap.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    10. Re: Trump! Trump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They buy their batteries from Panasonic, which will also supply the technology if Tesla's 'gigafactory' ever becomes operational. As to car manufacturing, Tesla has a pretty appalling track record. They need many more people per car manuactured than when the same factory was churning out Toyotas and the build quality is legendarily bad, even for an American car. I don't see how the Chinese could learn anything from that, especially when all the major European and Japanese car manufacturers have joint ventures with factories in China.

    11. Re:Trump! Trump! by Stinky+Cheese+Man · · Score: 2

      So, no supporting evidence. That is what I thought. Thank you for confirming.

    12. Re:Trump! Trump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only noticed your nickname just now.
      Trump, is that you?

    13. Re:Trump! Trump! by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      You're one of those two-figure folks who believe when you throw something up in the air, "supporting evidence" is needed to confirm that it will fall back to Earth.

      Thanks for confirming.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    14. Re:Trump! Trump! by Stinky+Cheese+Man · · Score: 1

      Anyone who thinks that boasting of his IQ supports his argument is not as smart as he thinks he is.

      "Do you see a man wise in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him."

      See also Dunning-Kruger effect: "The Dunning-Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which low-ability individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly assessing their ability as much higher than it really is. Dunning and Kruger attributed this bias to a metacognitive incapacity, on the part of those with low ability, to recognize their ineptitude and evaluate their competence accurately."

      As an amusing side note, "The study was inspired by the case of McArthur Wheeler, a man who robbed two banks after covering his face with lemon juice in the mistaken belief that, because lemon juice is usable as invisible ink, it would prevent his face from being recorded on surveillance cameras."

    15. Re: Trump! Trump! by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      they buy stripped cells from Panasonic. These are then assembled into various levels of packing and have loads of sensors to react to temps, heat, etc.
      Obviously with Tesla have the TOP RATED CAR BY OWNERS, means that they are above and beyond other companies. Year after year, they come in tops, even though the early ratings of each model is low. Right now, they have a manufacturing that equals what GM and the rest have, only it is done differently. They are in the process of moving the final assembly line to being 100% robotics which will make them churn out 3-10x the cars that the next do.
      And if this was not the case, then why is China pushing this DIRECTLY at Tesla? China does not care about the others since all of the new car start-ups are in silicon valley, and not in Detroit, Japan, Europe, etc. They all want what Tesla has.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    16. Re:Trump! Trump! by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Commenting about your palpable lack of a three-figure IQ isn't boasting about my IQ. Perhaps you should read up a bit about Dunning-Kruger yourself. Try a place that doesn't use words like "metacognitive", so maybe you'll have a fighting chance of understanding what you're trying to read.

      Or perhaps you could just try to improve your reading skills to Grade 5 level. That might work, too. :-)

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    17. Re:Trump! Trump! by Stinky+Cheese+Man · · Score: 1

      I agree that metacognition can be a challenging concept to grasp. Basically, it describes the awareness and understanding of one's own thought processes, or to put it more simply, "thinking about thinking" or "knowing your mind". For example, one might analyze his own learning processes to determine the study strategies that are most successful for him and then adjust his behavior based on this knowledge. Or one might learn to recognize his own biases and preconceptions and take this into consideration when processing new information and experiences. Effective metacognition can help one to comprehend new information more capably or even to make better life choices. I hope that helps.

      I have thoroughly enjoyed chatting with you. But I am (thankfully) employed and I owe my employer eight hours of work today, so I will allow you to have the last word. Best wishes for a happy and safe Christmas.

      SCM

    18. Re:Trump! Trump! by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      I'm happy that you've learned how to cut and paste definitions. This represents a real breakthrough for you! And I'm sure your employer will allow you to package fewer garbage bags and enjoy a little "you time" on the computer. It is, after all, the holiday season.

      Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  5. Of course, so they can copy the technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'll have their own "internally developed" electric cars out within 5 years and then our companies will be forced out of the market.

    1. Re:Of course, so they can copy the technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have already had their own electric cars for years.

    2. Re:Of course, so they can copy the technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So while we're still perfecting the technology, they've already had it for years? Why aren't these well vetted Chinese electric cars for sale in America?

    3. Re:Of course, so they can copy the technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God knows they sell everything else here.

  6. I thought protectionism doesn't work by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

    Well, China is using protectionism quite successfully to employ their people and give an advantage to their country. I thought it didn't work! Now they're "relaxing" the law. Of course, there are no specifics, and Chinese laws are notorious for being interpreted on the spot by local officials. Five cities have five different ways of implementing the exact same law.

    I guess it's just weird for me, as an American, to see a national government helping its people. Even if it's with a non-working idea like protectionism. I'm just used to, for example, being told by our First Lady that she had never been proud of our country, and she has lost all hope in our country. I just assume without thinking that every government in the world is like this. It's a shock to the system to see a government like China's appear to actually make moves to benefit their own people.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:I thought protectionism doesn't work by JeffAtl · · Score: 3, Informative

      Protectionism works just fine - the 90 million chinese workers employed in industry as a testament to that.

      Free trade only raises the standard of living of all parties if everyone is playing by the same rules - asymmetrical trade relationships don't work.

    2. Re:I thought protectionism doesn't work by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      Protectionism works just fine if you have a large enough domestic market.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    3. Re: I thought protectionism doesn't work by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      If you look carefully, they are targeting only 1 company with this:Tesla.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:I thought protectionism doesn't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Economic theory says you are wrong. The USA will maximize it's GDP by having no trade barriers on countries with trade barriers.

    5. Re:I thought protectionism doesn't work by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      China doesn't have that much protectionism in trade. You'll just be hard-pressed to undercut them on price.

    6. Re:I thought protectionism doesn't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. All this crap e.g. regarding steel dumping is nonsense. Or at least it's not equal to the 266% tariff dumping penalty that the US placed. If China was discounting their prices up to 266%, the government would have gone bankrupt long time ago.

      China is being somewhat screwed over by the fact that they don't have "market economy" status yet. Therefore when the West e.g. calculating whether China is dumping or not, other nations can simply use any third world country's steel manufacturing prices to compare to China to see if they are dumping. The US decided to use countries like India and some island nations which don't even have heavy industries as comparables. That's just ridiculous.

    7. Re:I thought protectionism doesn't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USA has far more trade barriers than any other Western country.

    8. Re:I thought protectionism doesn't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you assume trade to be spherical and friction-less... It turns out that assuming people have perfect information and always act in their own best interest is a pretty bad axiom upon which to base an entire field of study. The best way to gain negotiating advantage is to lie. When the Chinese say they will relax the restriction they are lying, as soon as a company has made an investment too large to walk away from they'll change the rules, heads you give us your IP, tails you give us your factory, thanks for playing suckers. Letting people literally steal from you isn't a good way of maximizing GPD.

    9. Re:I thought protectionism doesn't work by JeffAtl · · Score: 1

      How can you say that? China has implemented tarriffs on US made luxury cars and SUVs and even been ruled against by the WTO.

  7. They want tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if the official technology transfers aren't required, no doubt there will be Chinese spies from the government or the private sector to steal technology. And just look at all the partnership cars manufactured in China. They are complete crap. I understand getting your feet in the emerging market but not at the expense of damaging the reputation of your brand.

    But I do admire China in that they are one of the few countries who can ban non-electric cars overnight and get away with it.

  8. Cars that spy on you by davidwr · · Score: 1

    How soon before China infects the firmware without Tesla even being aware of it?

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  9. Exactly. China's strategy is IP theft. Period. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously. When are companies going to learn.

    This should be a non-starter. Has no one learned from the lessons of Boeing and countless others?

  10. Tesla Open Sourced their Patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like a homegrown auto manufacturer should start there.

    1. Re:Tesla Open Sourced their Patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla's patents are worthless.

    2. Re: Tesla Open Sourced their Patents by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      China has over 20 EV car makers and not a one worth a damn.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  11. Free Trump cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump promises tax relief for companies that stay in USA.
    And now Tesla whom is ramping up its production in its Megafactory suddenly want to maybe build a factory in China?

    I bet in a few months/weeks/days that Trump will claim that he has saved jobs from going to China and he created those jobs that Tesla would create anyway.

  12. It's a Trap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a Trap!

    Run away!

    Just ask
    * high-speed rail makers
    * cablecar makers
    * networking equipment makers
    * Qualcom

    Run away!

  13. Hopefully musk not stupid by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    where ever he builds will be sell out. No sense allowing China to wipe them out.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  14. Well by buss_error · · Score: 1

    Would this be the same intelligence folks that told us during the cold war that the USSR had better and more thermonuclear bombs than the US did?

    --
    Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
    1. Re: Well by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      And those Intel ppl were correct.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re: Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They had more and better rockets too.

    3. Re: Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more rockets, but not better by any strech. They did not have the accuracy of Americas.

  15. Re: Partner and Share = Give up by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Musk has given up IP/patents pertaining to EVs. He is not giving up manufacturing IP, which is what he is loaded with.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  16. Wrong by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    The pollution is from electricity plants since they run 85-88% coal ( and not 75 like one part of gov claims ). EVs are actually going to make things worse on pollution, but allow them to massively oil imports.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coal power plants are more efficient than smaller ICEs. The move to EVs also makes it possible to move pollution sources out of the cities. Energy production can be much farther out than other manufacturing.

      But the main benefit with switching to EV is that you break the hen/egg situation you have with ICEs and coal where you don't think that switching coal to renewable is that beneficial since you still have ICEs and you don't think that switching ICEs to EV is that beneficial since the electricity still is produced from fossils.

      There is something in the American mindset that makes people averse to anything that doesn't give immediate benefits.
      Switching to EVs is an investment that doesn't have an immediate benefit, but it is a vital part in a two step process to make transportation more sustainable.

    2. Re:Wrong by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      coal plants ARE more efficient. However, China does not turn on the pollution controls on their plants (it would cost them 5% of the energy). ALL of The coal plants are built close to cities to minimize the energy losses. The gov does not care about the citizens. As such, by China switching to EVs, things are going to get WORSE, NOT BETTER.

      Now, as to America, we currently buy the majority of EVs made in the west. We buy more than Europe. In addition, when Model 3 hits the market, the majority will go to America, as will the majority of MY. Both are highly sought after around the world, and it will be America buying 1/2 of these or more.
      And I have to say that I love our 2013 tesla model S. I was just in it upgrading the lights to those by abstract ocean. And yes, I am American.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  17. Tesla IP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tesla's said it won't enforce its patents so Chinese EV can already use Tesla technology, but I'm sure Tesla has a lot of manufacturing know how that the Chinese would like to understand. Anyway, Elon Musk said that he would be a manufacturing facility in China and Europe.

  18. Regarding your economic theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America has been more or less following "economic theory" for decades now. The current state of the country is a result of that policy. The people elected Trump because the status quo was not working. The people have rejected you and your economic theory, the message is: shove it up your ass.

  19. Musk isn't stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'll manufacture non-critical components and assemble the cars in China while producing all the cutting edge components somewhere else

  20. Still trust CHINA? by johnsonlam · · Score: 1

    I wonder if anyone still trust CHINA. Lots of evidence shows CHINA government have the worse reputation in every category, protectionism is one of the small obstacle ahead, real businessmen will know CHINA government can interpret the law according to their direction, you're loser no matter how strong you're (e.g. Apple, New Balance). Apple losing the court case in China, being accused "copy" a China firm's mobile phone, it's so absurd and really tell you how ridiculous the China law.

    --
    Hong Kong - International Joke Center (after 1997-06-30)
  21. Re: Partner and Share = Give up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, Musk just chooses to build Teslas badly and inefficiently because he likes that better...

  22. You partner with us, we steal your technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please come to China and partner with us...until we steal your technology and kick you out of country...

  23. Tesla, learn a lesson first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My personal opinion:
    Tesla could learn the very hard lesson learned by Intel, Boeing, Craftsman and many others: in China there is no such thing as Intellectual Property. That part of "rule of law" has irrelevant enforcement in either China or India. If you move there, it will take a year, possibly two, and then a local company will "surprisingly invent" your exact product. The thousands or tens of thousands of man-hours of research or engineering will be undercut in the Chinese and global market by lower quality copy-cat products being sold at 1/7 the price.

    Mr. Musk, if you value your IP - if you have done great and amazing technical things, and you don't want it walking out your door and into your competitors production facility, then you might want to think twice, and think twice again, before establishing manufacturing there. Do your homework.

  24. Go read up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About China and Kawasaki Heavy Industries high speed train technology transfer and global export agreement.

  25. Re: Partner and Share = Give up by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    and yet, tesla is the top rated car going according to CR.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.