Slashdot Mirror


Automatic Brakes Stopped Berlin Truck During Christmas Market Attack (dw.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Deutsche Welle: The truck that plowed into a Berlin Christmas market, killing 12, came to a halt due an automatic braking system, according to German media reports on Wednesday. The automatic braking system potentially saved the lives of many more people in the recent terrorist attack. An investigation by newspaper "Suddeutsche Zeitung" and broadcasters "NDR" and "WDR" found the Scania R 450 semi-trailer stopped after between 70 and 80 meters (250 feet). The system was reportedly engaged after sensing a collision. Previous reports speculated that the truck had driven erratically and stopped due to the heroic actions of the truck's Polish driver, who lay fatally wounded in the cabin. In 2012 the European Union adopted regulations requiring all new trucks exceeding 3,500 kilograms be fitted with advanced emergency braking systems. The systems initially alert drivers and then take evasive action. The regulation was adopted to reduce the number of rear end collisions by trucks.

8 of 164 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Double edged sword by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Fortunately you have to be kind of an idiot to want to murder people like this anyway.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  2. Re:SubjectIsSubject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Handling Muslim refugees is simple: have Muslim countries handle it. Why would a Christian country accept Muslims? It doesn't make sense. Christians are the mortal enemies of Muslims (it says so in the Koran)? Why won't the Muslim countries take all the refugees? It is their people.

    Quran (5:51) - "O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people."

    And DON'T say that is "out of context". This is the Koran. Direct quote.

  3. Re:what, wait a second by Sique · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After you already hit something? What would you win by not hitting the brakes? People rear ending you still have their airbags and seatbelts and crumple zones, which will protect them from the worst. People in front of you don't. So breaking and getting some 40 ton heap of steel into stillstand as soon as possible once it is out of control (and because it hit something, there is enough proof to call it out of control) is in any case better than let it run to save the people driving to close behind it a few bucks by keeping their cars undamaged.

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  4. Re:Double edged sword by goose-incarnated · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How would you stop such autonomous cargo truck with no driver to shoot at?

    Fortunately you have to be kind of an idiot to want to murder people like this anyway.

    That fact doesn't lessen the threat; the world is filled with idiots, after all.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  5. Re:Double edged sword by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sure, but if you strive to make the world idiot-proof it sucks for everyone.

    We shouldn't react to events like this by compounding the loss of life with a loss of rights, loss of dignity and loss of humanity. Most Germans can still remember what that was like.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  6. You gave Trump's plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Any asylum seeker found guilty of committing a violent crime should be booted immediately.

    Funny, Trump suggested this for illegal immigrants, instead of refugees, and he was called a racist for saying it. I see people decided you are insightful for saying something very similar, just a different country with different people. The difference is Trump was talking about those illegally in the country, instead of approved to be there.

    I'm not sure why this is an acceptable view to have now, where it was completely irrational and crazy just a month ago. Perhaps people should keep this in mind when trying to figure out how he won the election.

    1. Re:You gave Trump's plan by 91degrees · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Was that before or after he called all Mexicans criminals

      He didn't.

      But hey, fake news is only fake when we disagree with it, right.

    2. Re:You gave Trump's plan by 91degrees · · Score: 1, Insightful

      He may well be a bigot. But the line is taken very much out of context.

      What Trump is saying is that a lot of the people arriving here aren't the hard working immigrants after a better life that many on the left want us to believe. Some of them are actually criminals. A disproportionate amount of them are.

      Now, he may well be wrong. I don't know if he is or not. But nobody gives a shit about the actual point he's making because it's so much easier to quote just that one line and dismiss him as a bigot.

      But Trump's supporters know what he's saying. They realise that the people who say "look see!!! See! SEEE!!!!! He's a BIGOT!!!!" completely failed to understand this simple point, despite their fancy college education. So not only are they failing to address the point. They're discrediting themselves so they're no longer taken seriously when they do have a point to make.

      And people wonder how Trump won.