Slashdot Mirror


Governments Shut Down the Internet More Than 50 Times in 2016 (thewire.in)

An anonymous reader writes: Governments around the world shut down the internet more than 50 times in 2016 -- suppressing elections, slowing economies and limiting free speech. In the worst cases internet shutdowns have been associated with human rights violations, Deji Olukotun, senior global advocacy manager at digital rights organisation Access Now told IPS. "What we have found is that internet shutdowns go hand in hand with atrocities," said Olukotun. "In Ethiopia there's been consistent blocking this year of social media and internet." Dozens of people have died in protests in Ethiopia in 2016, "many of them during the kind of blackout where it's difficult to report on what's happening," he said. Several leaders used internet shutdowns to affect democratic processes, including elections. "In Uganda in February 2016 there was a shutdown of social media networks by President Museveni and that again happened in Gambia (in December) surrounding the election," Olukotun added. In other cases, three governments chose to shut down the internet because they thought that it would stop students from cheating on their exams, he said. "On the whole most governments want to expand internet access," said Olukotun. However governments do not seem to have taken into account the potential repercussions of the shutdowns, beyond the limits of free speech. According to an estimate, internet shutdowns resulted in a loss of $2.4 billion in 2015.

34 comments

  1. Re: What about crimes like email servers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed. These articles are to make us forget that Clinton should be in jail.

  2. That's Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So that's why... I thought it was my horrible ISP.

  3. Is it Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or the National Enquirer?

  4. Title inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's access to the Internet that was shut down.

    1. Re:Title inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the internet when nobody has access to it? Is this some kind of Koan?

    2. Re:Title inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the internet when nobody has access to it? Is this some kind of Koan?

      What's the point of this question? There was never a time when all 7 billion+ people had access to the internet revoked. Please note I said "revoked", so the millennia before the internet does not count.

  5. The whole internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or just a tiny portion?

    1. Re:The whole internet? by fbobraga · · Score: 1
  6. Its Roy and Moss's fault... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Darn you Roy and Moss for giving Jen the black box!

    1. Re:Its Roy and Moss's fault... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      But Stephen Hawking himself said it was ok. Who are we to argue with The Hawk?

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:Its Roy and Moss's fault... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The russians hacked his speech computer, silly man.

    3. Re:Its Roy and Moss's fault... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Stephen Hawking himself said it was ok. Who are we to argue with The Hawk?

      The russians hacked his speech computer, silly man.

    4. Re: Its Roy and Moss's fault... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The russians hacked his speech computer, silly man.

      Or did you not know this?

  7. What if your ISP is unstable... by NeoMorphy · · Score: 1

    I haven't had a stable connection for more than two weeks. If it was stable enough that a disruption would indicate a possible covert operation I could script for that, but I would get a false alert every week. I'm pretty sure my cable company isn't the only one that sucks for stability and problem determination, ....Comcast

    Does this mean that third world countries have a more dependable internet service than we do?

    1. Re:What if your ISP is unstable... by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 0

      I knew there'd be some self-centered person in the US who'd figure out some way to spin this to make it about America.

    2. Re:What if your ISP is unstable... by drew_kime · · Score: 2

      I knew there'd be some self-centered person in the US who'd figure out some way to spin this to make it about America.

      How about this?

      Republican lawmakers have proposed fining Congressional representatives who stream live video or post photos from the House floor, in an apparent attempt to stop a repeat of last year’s Democratic live-streamed sit-in protest.

      Now can we talk about how this applies to America, too?

      --
      Nope, no sig
    3. Re:What if your ISP is unstable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Now can we talk about how this applies to America, too?"
      No. How does this equate to the government shutting down total access to the Internet? A bunch of worthless politicians staging publicity stunts to make it appear they are actually doing something useful. Bush, Obama, Trump, and all the other Presidents before them come in a very distant second place to Congress when it comes to wrecking the country. Senators and Representatives are the ones responsible for the problems we face today. If there was a shred of honor amongst all the members in the legislative branch they would resign and apologize for their pitiful and sometimes criminal efforts to run the country into the ground. Every single complaint laid at Bush's feet should instead be laid at the feet of the legislative branch. They had the power to stop every single deployment of US troops by simply refusing to release the funds needed. America is failing because of citizens who do nothing but complain about everything. The least these morons could do is study the checks and balances that each branch operates under. At least with that knowledge they can start complaining at those actually responsible for the problem. The hysterics aimed at Trump only serves to show how fucking stupid the professional protestors and their equally clueless disciples are. If you have to complain about something at least complain about the right people.

  8. In Trump's America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of shutting down the internet, he'll just tweet that it should be the protesters who should get a job!

    Like him.

  9. I didn't notice the 50 times the internet was shut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe it wasn't actually shut down???

  10. That's not how the internet works by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Governments around the world shut down the internet more than 50 times in 2016

    No, no they didn't...

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:That's not how the internet works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know what precisely they did? Forced every ISP to stop forwarding connections maybe?

    2. Re:That's not how the internet works by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Governments around the world shut down the internet more than 50 times in 2016

      No, no they didn't...

      People in countries where the government shut down the internet disagree. Okay many of these were run of the mill single site censorship, but I do remember the odd case where an entire country was taken offline for a day or two.

    3. Re:That's not how the internet works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Internet crosses nation boundaries. Disabling it in one region is not by any stretch of the imagination "shutting down the Internet".

    4. Re:That's not how the internet works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Denying some people access to the internet is not the same as shutting down the internet.

    5. Re:That's not how the internet works by sad_ · · Score: 1

      Denying some people access to the internet is not the same as shutting down the internet.

      that's just word play, and totaly besides the point. how many times have you heard people say - the internet is down.
      ofcourse we know that it's not true, but if you can't access it anymore it might as well be.

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  11. A Sony VAIO running Windows and a Blackberry... by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    ... on the picture of TFA: the person in the photo is doing it wrong!

  12. No by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    That's much worse than shutting down the internet...much, much worse.

    The block after the people are used to it (and, thus, dependent of it somehow) is a very bad to free speech and information flow: no, there's very few things "much, much worse" than it, if any - this kind of thing undercovers very serious violations os human rights!

  13. Move it!! by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

    It's time for you sharp people out there to figure out a backup plan for this nonsense, and move information another way!!

  14. Re:What about crimes like email servers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ivan, the election is over. Go home. We have no more rubles for you. I told Brenski and Mitya last week stop coming here, the job is gone now, but you come in to my internet cafe each day for 16 hours and posting Hillary e-mails Hillary Benghazi Hillary Hillary on reddit. Worse, you going home to Novgorod hellhole and post the same thing on Slashdot!! We aren't even paying you for this!!

  15. Financial impact seems oddly modest by sjbe · · Score: 1

    According to an estimate, internet shutdowns resulted in a loss of $2.4 billion in 2015.

    Is that all? That's roughly 1% of Apple's annual revenue for perspective. Basically they're saying that you could achieve the same financial impact by Apple going on a long weekend. I realize $2.4 billion is a large number and certainly enough to be consequential to those affected but in the grand scheme of things it's just not as much of an impact as one might think. Obviously it's a hard number to pin down with any precision but I kind of would have expected a larger number.

  16. Trump Doesn't Use The Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Google Uses Trump!

  17. Democrats want to censor the net in the USA by knorthern+knight · · Score: 2

    They're pissed off because their near-monopoly of the lib-left newspapers, CNN (Clinton News Network), MSNBC (Most Socialist Network on Basic Cable), etc was easily bypassed. That's what cost Hillary the election.

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-j...

    > Three years before Matt Drudge changed the world and how news would be
    > consumed, President Bill Clinton's White House feared that the Internet was allowing
    > average citizens, especially conservatives, to bypass legacy gatekeepers and
    > access information that had previously been denied to them by the mainstream press.

    http://www.freerepublic.com/fo...
    3 years later, it happened. One of the "legacy gatekeepers", Newsweek was considering doing a story breaking the Clinton-Lewinski scandal. But management killed the story. Instead a lowly store clerk with a modem broke the story... you've heard of Matt Drudge http://www.drudgereport.com/ Hillary clinton's reaction was to whine about the lack of "gatekeepers".

    http://dailycaller.com/2016/08...
    What would've happened if Hillary had won?
    > Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton's campaign has sent out a fundraising
    > email arguing the website Breitbart News has no "right to exist,"
    > and suggests that if elected, the website will be shut down entirely.

    --

    I'm not repeating myself
    I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
    1. Re:Democrats want to censor the net in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go burn a cross