Slashdot Mirror


China Says It Will Shut Down Ivory Trade By End of 2017 (go.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from ABC News: China says it plans to shut down its ivory trade by the end of 2017 in a move designed to curb the mass slaughter of African elephants. The Chinese government will end the processing and selling of ivory and ivory products by the end of March as it phases out the legal trade, according to a statement released on Friday. China had previously announced it planned to shut down the commercial trade, which conservationists described as significant because China's vast, increasingly affluent consumer market drives much of the elephant poaching across Africa. China, which has supported an ivory-carving industry as part of its cultural heritage, said carvers will be encouraged to change their activities and work, for example, in the restoration of artifacts for museums. More efforts will be made to stop the illegal trade, the statement said. China has allowed trade in ivory acquired before a 1989 ban on the ivory trade by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, which seeks to regulate the multi-billion-dollar trade in wild animals and plants. The number of Africa's savannah elephants dropped by about 30 percent from 2007 to 2014, to 352,000, because of poaching, according to a study published this year. Forest elephants, which are more difficult to count, are also under severe threat.

67 comments

  1. this is not news for nerds, stuff that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    this is not news for nerds, stuff that matters

    1. Re:this is not news for nerds, stuff that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Elephant lives matter!

    2. Re:this is not news for nerds, stuff that matters by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well it might matter to science nerds like biologists that may wish to study large African land mammals.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    3. Re:this is not news for nerds, stuff that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It might also matter to eco-nerds, who appreciate a complex biosphere in general.

    4. Re:this is not news for nerds, stuff that matters by secretsquirel · · Score: 1

      Also to people, of whom nerds are a subclass.

    5. Re:this is not news for nerds, stuff that matters by itsenrique · · Score: 2

      So extinctions don't matter?

    6. Re:this is not news for nerds, stuff that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously have never read the description of searching for an elephant as performed by programmers of different languages. Maybe it still exists someplace online (25+ years ago it was 'new').
      Slashdot often goes down the Global Warming rabbithole, and elephants, like polar bears, are part of our ecosystem we (humans) are supposed to be looking after.
      So next Global Warming article, please hold to your position: "this is not news for nerds, stuff that matters".
      Wildlife is more important than some bits floating around in a clever pattern. If all computer tech vanished, life would go on. But if we destroy all life, no amount of tech will "save" us.

  2. What a coincidence. by Patent+Lover · · Score: 0

    This will, of course, closely coincide with the extinction of African elephants and rhinos. No more stiff dicks or cured cancers in China after 2017.

    1. Re:What a coincidence. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This will, of course, closely coincide with the extinction of African elephants and rhinos.

      No more stiff dicks or cured cancers in China after 2017.

      What? You think the Chinese fucking CARE?

    2. Re:What a coincidence. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like those American hunters who have gone over and lured animals out of the park so they can legally kill them ?

    3. Re:What a coincidence. by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 4, Informative

      What? You think the Chinese fucking CARE?

      This is from a 2013 Time article (emphasis added):

      In a 2007 survey, the IFAW [International Fund for Animal Welfare] discovered that 70% of Chinese polled did not know that ivory came from dead elephants. This led to the organization's first ad campaign- a simple poster explaining the actual origins of ivory. A campaign evaluation earlier this year found that the ad, promoted by the world's largest outdoor advertising company JC Decaux, had been seen by 75% by China's urban population, and heavily impacted their view on ivory. Among people classified as "high risk"- that is, those likeliest to buy ivory- the proportion who would actually do so after seeing the ad was almost slashed by half.

    4. Re:What a coincidence. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      70% of Chinese polled did not know that ivory came from dead elephants.

      Does it have to? Why not cut the tusks off live elephants? That would remove the incentive to poach them.

    5. Re:What a coincidence. by mutantSushi · · Score: 1

      Which raises the point, if they were not even aware of it's origins from elephants to begin with, why can't the product be replaced with alternate sources of carving suitable bone etc? If they didn't know of the difference, why would they care about it's replacement?

    6. Re:What a coincidence. by Lotana · · Score: 1

      Indeed.

      Even if it works perfectly, it is too late. Particularly for the rhinos. I do hope they focus on shark fins before the great whites start entering endangered levels.

    7. Re:What a coincidence. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      Does it have to? Why not cut the tusks off live elephants? That would remove the incentive to poach them.

      They've actually done this - cut off rhino horns as well, for the same reason. But there are a couple problems...

      - It's a rather expensive thing to do per-animal, both in terms of time, money and manpower. It's hard to keep ahead of the poachers, who have a much simpler task to plan for.
      - It has a deleterious impact on the ability of the animals to defend themselves.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    8. Re:What a coincidence. by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

      Whoosh.

    9. Re:What a coincidence. by s.petry · · Score: 1

      While written with snarky vitriol, your point has merit. The problem is mostly that the populace in China is uneducated and extremely poor, meaning belief in magic and magical cures is still rampant. An educated society is dangerous, so don't look for this to change any time soon.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    10. Re:What a coincidence. by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

      You didn't mention that they have to stalk the rhino to sight it - that can take days. When it turns out the horn is cut off, they shoot it so they don't waste the time of stalking it again.

      So cutting off the horn to save the rhino is a stupid waste of money.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    11. Re:What a coincidence. by Dorianny · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While written with snarky vitriol, your point has merit. The problem is mostly that the populace in China is uneducated and extremely poor, meaning belief in magic and magical cures is still rampant. An educated society is dangerous, so don't look for this to change any time soon.

      The uneducated and extremely poor receive adulterated concoctions containing little if any of the very expensive raw materials they claim to have. The trade in black market materials for traditional medicine didn't explode because China got poorer but because it got wealthier. Westerner's spend Billions a year in "alternative medicine," like supplements which at best are doing little and at worst are actually harming. The Chinese are not that different in trying to cling to hope when the Medical Community offers little

    12. Re:What a coincidence. by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      Boners. When anybody starts rambling about 'Chinese medicine' remind them that Rhino Horn, various animal organs, etc. are not 'aphrodisiacs.' They are boner pills for aging Chinese losers.

    13. Re:What a coincidence. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      When it turns out the horn is cut off, they shoot it so they don't waste the time of stalking it again.

      If you cut off the horns of all the rhinos, then they won't stalk them in the first place.

    14. Re:What a coincidence. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese know damn well that ivory comes from elephant tusks. The Chinese words for ivory literally mean "elephant tooth." The only excuse they could possibly have is if they thought that the tusks were taken from elephants that died of natural causes (disease, old age, or natural predators) or if they thought that the tusks were shed like baby teeth or some other hard-to-believe idea.

      Buyers of ivory and rhinoceros horn are fully aware of how those materials are acquired and they specifically reject artificial substitutes.

    15. Re:What a coincidence. by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 2

      Yes they will, because there will still be a stub of horn left. You can't completely remove all of the horns without killing it.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    16. Re: What a coincidence. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Ivory carvings is an art form with more than a thousand year history.

      It is priced as an art and a status symbol way more than being medicine.

      It's used to treat some either rather rare stuff like as an anti convulsant (which would not really create a big market) or common but insignificant stuff like mouth ulcers (which would be crazy to pay the price for good ivory).

      It's the left over materials from carvings and Low quality ivory that is ground up as medicine.

  3. That's the wrong move. Build a market for ivory by SensitiveMale · · Score: 0

    You want to keep the elephants alive? Keep the poachers out?

    Commercialize ivory. Make it a private market. Have companies make money selling ivory. Make those companies defend and protect their elephants.

  4. Thank you Yao Ming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For raising awareness on this important problem with your television commercials on elephants and shark fin soup (both funded by WildAid).
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/ex-rocket-yao-ming-aims-to-save-africas-elephants--with-china-campaign/2014/09/03/87ebbe2a-d3e1-4283-964e-8d87dea397d6_story.html?utm_term=.84e3a9405c5f

  5. Re:That's the wrong move. Build a market for ivory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A couple years after that there wouldn't be a wild elephant left but only farmed/preserved ones. Something like that might work better in countries with stronger laws and less poverty, I cannot see it working well in Africa.

  6. Re:That's the wrong move. Build a market for ivory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are far too rational for /. Maybe one day this site will be broad-minded enough to entertain all ideas.

  7. Summary execution for possession of ivory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the only way we'll at least stem the tide of slaughter. Once people know they'll be dragged out into the street and shot in the head by merely having ivory in their possession the number of people willing to sell, and thus buy from poachers, will drop dramatically.
    Also make wildlife preserves a shoot-first-ask-questions-later zone. Any human in a preserve not wearing a bright orange vest and gps locator is fair game for anybody; wildlife officers, hunters, tribesmen, bored civilians with guns mounted to drones...anybody.

    The only way to protect these species is to eradicate the human vermin who pray on them.

  8. Re:That's the wrong move. Build a market for ivory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They already did that before. That's why they almost went extinct and ivory trade had to be banned in the first place.
     
    Defending and protecting elephants is not good for the bottom line.

  9. I will by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll shut down smoking. Next year.

  10. China says it will be on Mars in 2020. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't give a gong about your 5-10-15 or 20 year plan. We'll see. China and Bezos are smoking the good shit...

    1. Re:China says it will be on Mars in 2020. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      Except this is a statement regarding the immediate future - by the end of next year (2017). It's a little different situation than a 5-10-15 year plan.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  11. Re:That's the wrong move. Build a market for ivory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or, make a commercial market for poachers.

    Sell the rights to hunters, charge them $50,000 a head to be able to track hunt and kill a poacher.
    There will be more than enough psychopaths out there willing to pay.

    With that kind of income money will be spent on high tech tracking equipment to find the poachers, and then hunting parties can be flown in the remove the problem

  12. Re:That's the wrong move. Build a market for ivory by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

    Commercialize ivory. Make it a private market. Have companies make money selling ivory.

    A better solution would be to use genetic engineering to create fake ivory in factories, and use that to flood the market and push down prices.

  13. Re:That's the wrong move. Build a market for ivory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're a fucking idiot. If only you had some valuable bone structure or something worth driving to extinction...

    "Unfettered capitalism is a cure-all! Ask anyone on Breitbart, regulation never helped anyone ever! Elephants are a commodity, the market will correct it!"

  14. Doubtful by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if farming elephants was practical they'd be doing it already. Ivory has been valuable for hundreds of years. What makes it profitable is that the elephant you kill was raised and fed in the wild. You didn't have to pay to feed it for 20-30 years while you waited for it's tusks to grow.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Doubtful by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      if farming elephants was practical they'd be doing it already.

      There is an elephant farm in Thailand, but those are the wrong kind of elephant. Asian elephants are much easier to tame and handle than African elephants, and also produce much less ivory.

    2. Re:Doubtful by xvan · · Score: 1

      But there is a market for elephant leather, ie on Mexican exotic boots.

  15. Re:That's the wrong move. Build a market for ivory by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 0

    I cannot see it working well in Africa.

    It doesn't have to work in Africa. China can raise their own elephants. There are elephants in Yunnan, and a few millennia ago, they used to migrate as far north as the Yellow River Valley. The only problem is that Asiatic elephants have small tusks. But maybe they could import African elephants to Yunnan. The climate is not that different.

    Even better would be to clone mammoths, and raise them in Siberia. The have enormous tusks, and there is plenty of unused tundra where they can graze. Also, mammoths have different DNA, so the tusks could be verified as non-elephant to prevent trafficking of poached ivory.

  16. Re: That's the wrong move. Build a market for ivor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There are already any number of synthetic substitutes for Ivory.

    Dove, Dial, Irish Spring...

  17. Step ahead of US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US has long ago banned importation of ivory but those made it to the country before the ban are legal. You can legally buy ivory in the US and government can't stop you.

  18. Re:That's the wrong move. Build a market for ivory by mutantSushi · · Score: 2

    Perhaps you didn't read the article? Chinese has had a legal market. They also have been largest market. The countries that made it illegal have become smallest part of ivory trade. But hey, elephants, or your ideological fixations, tough choice I know.

  19. Easy to do by fustakrakich · · Score: 0

    Just convince people that elephants are soft and mushy

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  20. They burn good ivroy by aberglas · · Score: 1

    There are actually large collections of ivory in several southern African countries. And they burned a whole lot recently.

    If that ivory were sold, it would raise a lot of cash for looking after elephants. It would also reduce prices for ivory, and make poaching less attractive. Perhaps more importantly, it would make elephants of some value, which could compensate people for the damage they do to crops etc.

    1. Re:They burn good ivroy by aberglas · · Score: 1

      To be clear, most of the stocked ivory is legal. Elephants die naturally. Or are culled when the numbers get excessive.

  21. Trying to make amyl nitrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It keeps degrading. I'm getting sharp fumes (nitric oxide?) and low yields. Anyone out there help?

    1. Re:Trying to make amyl nitrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What method are you using?

  22. from now on only "scientific" ivory trafficking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just like how the japanese only do "scientific" whaling

  23. Re:That's the wrong move. Build a market for ivory by SirSlud · · Score: 1

    It was a private market. What part of "phases out the legal trade" is complicated?

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  24. Because they are emptying Africa's elephants... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Zimbabwe sells wildlife to China secretly"
    http://www.iol.co.za/news/afri...
    I am out of words to describe this travesty. May China be judged, soon.

  25. Re:That's the wrong move. Build a market for ivory by AvitarX · · Score: 1

    Thay makes the assumption that it's worth (economically) raising/protecting the elephants for their tusks.

    It may or may not be, but it's definitely cheaper to just kill wild ones, cheaper enough that there are poachers and not farmers right now.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  26. It was not posters it was Yao Ming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    As someone who lived in China, those posters did jack shit to raise awareness, it was beloved basketball star Yao Ming on TV telling people about the problem that finally raised awareness.

  27. That means only one thing... by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    the payoffs will have to be MUCH bigger!

  28. Don't Forget New York by Kagato · · Score: 1

    There are some very large Ivory markets in NYC. There's a lot of fake paperwork that says it's old pre-ban or Mammoth ivory. There was a bust back in September of millions of dollars of illegal ivory. It's really only the surface.

  29. Re:That's the wrong move. Build a market for ivory by retroworks · · Score: 1

    One thing Mao still gets credit for is wiping out the heroin and opium trade, in record time. The Red Army backed Communist Party took heroin users and their families and executed them publicly in the streets. Using was made a capital offense in all cases, no ifs ands or buts. I wouldn't trade democracy and social nuance for the efficacy of totalitarianism, but if China isn't democratizing anytime soon then to hell with the ivory buyers, post haste. Extinction is forever, and our generation will probably be remembered for hundreds of years for that one thing if we don't get a handle on it. http://www.revcom.us/a/china/o...

    --
    Gently reply
  30. Re:That's the wrong move. Build a market for ivory by itsenrique · · Score: 2

    But at the end of the day it has to be cheaper than stalking and killing a forest elephant, and those don't have to be raised or housed.

  31. Re:That's the wrong move. Build a market for ivory by thegarbz · · Score: 2

    Make those companies defend and protect their elephants.

    And where do you think these elephants come from? Farm them now and maybe in 15-20 years you have a single suitable harvest which can produce a grand total of 2 tusks per animal. Then what?

    These aren't chickens. They don't grow in a few months and then start crapping out endless products while rapidly multiplying. The reason that these animals are hunted rather than farmed is dictated by the economics of the trade in the first place.

  32. Re:That's the wrong move. Build a market for ivory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe there is no misunderstanding of the current and near future situation. I believe the poster you address was suggesting that instead of a limited private market highly dependent on illegal poaching there could instead be a market open to more countries that was legal on the supply side as well. Instead of a twisted ban on a valuable substance the efforts could be directed to what the actual problem is...the killing of elephants. Elephants die at a natural rate. The elephant numbers under the current ban system are declining due to poaching. A legal though regulated market would allow for a maximization of elephant populations with herd management. It would be an international effort but would promise both maximized elephant health and prosperity along with maximizing ivory availability.

  33. Re:That's the wrong move. Build a market for ivory by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

    Does it need to be cheaper than mass graves for elephant poachers? Because I bet we could round up a decent-sized hunting crew. And a few volunteers with shovels.

  34. by 2018 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ohh, poaching ivory is bad, we've decided. Therefore, we've decided not to allow it to be sold.

    But there's no hurry, we won't stop it for another year or so, allowing anyone who wants to buy it to stock up in the next year, and then they'll have an item that is no longer available.

  35. Not a farm by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    it says so right in the wikipedia article. It's a health-recovery and reproduction-management "farm". It's basically a wild life preserve being called a farm. They put the elephants back into the wild when they're done.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  36. Re:That's the wrong move. Build a market for ivory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    John Hume has a rhino farm like that. The governments won't let him sell the horn.

  37. Grow it ourselves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about synthetic? Can we make it?
    3D print it?

  38. Same declaration as last year!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China is getting sloppy on making a new year resolution!

  39. Re:That's the wrong move. Build a market for ivory by itsenrique · · Score: 1

    I understand the sentiment, but really, the insanely high price means new goons would pop up instantly to fill the power vacuum. You have to lower demand and protect the existing wild animals as much as is financially feasible. Keep in mind, in Africa, a lot of these animals actually live on private land, and private landowners (often running a managed hunting area) are basically at war with poachers 24/7/365. In other words, they already kind of do raise ivory, but poachers will brave their life (easy "profession" to die in) because the potential rewards are staggering. The money seems big even by US$ standards, now imagine that x 100-1000 purchasing power in their local economies.