Slashdot Mirror


Lucasfilm Creates A 4K Ultra-HD Restoration of the Original 'Star Wars' (4k.com)

An anonymous reader quotes 4K.com: When the first ever of the Star Wars films, "A New Hope" turns 40 in 2017, millions of dedicated fans of the immensely popular franchise might get a very unique treat in the form of a limited theater screening in beautifully restored form with theatrical 4K resolution of the first movie released in the series. According to recent comments made by Rogue One director Gareth Edwards, a 4K restoration of Star Wars Episode IV "A New Hope" does indeed exist and now the only real question is whether or not the cleaned up and sharpened version of the movie will be hitting the big screen once again.
White it's release status is unknown, the ultra-high definition footage is said to be spectacular. In the interview, Edwards says "You can't watch it without getting carried away... It just turns you into a child."

4 of 304 comments (clear)

  1. The title is wrong. 4K != UHD by Misagon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Theatrical 4K is not the same as Ultra-HD, often marketed as "4K UHD". Seriously, don't muddle these up! The linked article did not, it even had "Theatrical 4K" explicitly, being a link to an explanation of the differences.

    The cinema standard 4K is 4096*2160, not quite 16:9 aspect ratio. However, movies can be of any aspect ratio that would fill either the width or the height. With Star Wars being in 2.35:1 aspect ratio, that becomes 4096*1743. Pixels are square and there is no overscan.

    Ultra-HD, the TV and BluRay standard is 3840*2160 pixels. Some HDTV's do have overscan, not showing the entire picture, by the way.

    Cinema 4K also uses the DCI-P3 colour space and theatrical projectors are capable of the entire range of this colour space.
    Regular Ultra-HD is not that good. Ultra-HD with HDR uses a larger colour space than DCI-P3 but mainstream LCD panels at the moment are not capable of displaying that properly even if they can handle the input signal.

    --
    "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
  2. Re: The Cantina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    Han didn't shoot first.

    Here's the order of operations:

    Han shoots Greedo.

    Greedo never fires, because Han shot him, and Greedo is dead.

  3. Re:Keep it original... by irving47 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just in case you (or anyone else reading this) doesn't know, there is a very very convincing, and solid theory that JarJar was in fact THE Phantom Menace alluded to in the title. Check youtube for jarjar sith theory and check them out. I'm not saying I'm 100% convinced, but I need a better reason to disbelieve than just the fanboy hate of GL thinking, "aww, no, he's not clever enough to do that."

    --
    I had a sucky sig.
  4. Re:Keep it original... by meerling · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not only did Han shoot first, Greedo didn't even get a shot off, he just died like the scumbag that he was. Don't forget that Greedo had just told Han that he's basically going to take him out back and blow his head off.