Slashdot Mirror


Family Sues Apple For Not Making Thing It Patented (nymag.com)

An anonymous reader writes: A lawsuit filed against Apple last week argues that, by not actually making a product that it patented, the company is partly responsible for an automobile accident. According to Jalopnik, James and Bethany Modisette are suing the tech company after a car crash two years ago that killed one of their daughters and injured the rest of the family. The driver of the car who hit them had been using Apple's FaceTime video chat at the time. The patent in question was first applied for in 2008, and describes "a lock-out mechanism to prevent operation of one or more functions of handheld computing devices by drivers when operating vehicles," such as texting or video chatting. The complaint cites Apple's "failure to design, manufacture, and sell the Apple iPhone 6 Plus with the patented, safer, alternative design technology" -- in other words, lack of the program's inclusion -- as a "substantial factor" in the crash.

2 of 455 comments (clear)

  1. Re:This is fucking awesome by mark-t · · Score: 4, Funny

    Also, its not it's

    How deliciously ironic.

  2. Re: Applying tort to patents by AndrewMontana · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes, they should already know, but that's *common sense*. You cannot expect a person to have common sense in a court of law, which is rather barbaric.