Slashdot Mirror


Zuckerberg Could Run Facebook While Serving in Government Forever (techcrunch.com)

Reader randomErr writes: Closer look at SEC documents reveal that Zuckerberg only needs to own enough Facebook stock or have the board's approval to be allowed to serve in the government. This comes hours after, Facebook co-founder said his 2017 personal challenge is to meet and listen to people in all 50 states, hinting that he may have intentions of getting into politics. Without the limit, Zuckerberg has the opportunity to be appointed or elected to a more significant office and have as much time as he wants to make an impact, rather than just dipping in potentially as a cabinet member whose terms typically last less than two years. Of course, getting elected would require the faith of the people which has been shaken by the fake news scandal. Some would surely view a role in government as a selfish push for power despite Zuckerberg's massive philanthropy initiatives. Certain government offices might have historically required him to give up control of Facebook, but Donald Trump is currently redefining how much ownership of business one can have as President

16 of 181 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Zuck 2020! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    He will keep us safe from news

  2. Who approved this posting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Resign.

  3. ... and why not? by twebb72 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Zuckerberg is already at the top of the fake news feed

  4. Just another facebook slashvertisement by damn_registrars · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It had been a while since slashdot reminded us to worship Zuckerberg. I can't say I was missing the call to prayer or anything, but I had noticed its absence.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Just another facebook slashvertisement by sunking2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And yet they didn't post the story about how he admitted that being an Atheist was just a phase. That would have made peoples heads explode.

    2. Re:Just another facebook slashvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In the USA, one must profess a love of religion to be elected. Perhaps this is why he's renouncing his atheism.

  5. Forever? by rossdee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is he an immortal? A vampire? a Howard?

  6. Let me interpret this for you by chispito · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not about Zuckerberg being appointed to or running for political office. The justification for this news story is the jab at the end about "fake news," lest we forget for a moment that we are all smart people and nobody we know voted for Donald Trump, therefore there must be foul play.

    --
    The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  7. Re:Why? by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He's a college dropout who became a billionaire. I thought Red State America loved that? Or do you also have to be a racist?

    You just tell them what they want to hear and they'll vote for you, whether you make any attempt at being sincere or not. When they are reminded of your past opposite positions, just deny that ever happened and make some half-assed attempt to play to their fears about something else. In short, lie. Seems to work pretty reliably these days. And you don't have to be a racist, but you absolutely shouldn't denounce racists either, because every white vote counts, even the evil ones.

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  8. Re:wow, great by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yet another person I will be very happy to vote against.

    Therein lies the problem with modern American politics. Far too often we are stuck voting for the lesser of two evils, casting our ballots against someone rather than for anyone we truly believe will represent our best interests. I don't have an easy solution, but the problem is clear, and our system is screwed.

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  9. Re:wow, great by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 4, Funny

    Of course you vote for a lizard. You wouldn't want the wrong lizard to get in, would you?

  10. Re:wow, great by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My new hypothesis is that democracy isn't focused on getting a good leader, its purpose is to make it easy to get rid of a bad leader without a bloody revolution. That is the main benefit of democracy.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  11. Re:Zuck 2020! by bondsbw · · Score: 3, Informative

    Certain government offices might have historically required him to give up control of Facebook, but Donald Trump is currently redefining how much ownership of business one can have as President

    False.

    I don't recall any laws being changed in this regard. Trump is only pushing boundaries that were never really there. If you dislike it, get your Congressional leaders to pass a law against it.

    --
    All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
  12. Re:Why? by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think a lot of folks who voted Trump and a Republican Congress are about to find that out with Obamacare, as it becomes clearer with each press conference that the Republicans have no actual plan, and are more than likely simply going to tinker with the ACA, and that the "great repeal" is going to be little more than a rebranding, with some funding changes, and probably defunding of Planned Parenthood and a means for Catholic and Evangelical employers to squeak out of having to pay for the birth control.

    The block grant plan will be the most fun to watch, because it's going to mean an even greater health care disparity between the poorer (and more often Red states) and the wealthier (more often) Blue states. But overall, the likes of Paul Ryan are making it as clear as they dare that there isn't going to be an overnight repeal of Obamacare, which means the transition is going to be multi-year, and longer than the life of the current Congress. It makes me wonder if the Republicans will simply use the whole thing as a delaying tactic, make the changes I suggest above, rename it and then try to use it as a feather in their own cap.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  13. Re:Why? by lgw · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think a lot of folks who voted Trump and a Republican Congress are about to find that out with Obamacare, as it becomes clearer with each press conference that the Republicans have no actual plan, and are more than likely simply going to tinker with the ACA, and that the "great repeal" is going to be little more than a rebranding,

    That's certainly what we're afraid of. But there are some hints the GOP is finding it's long-lost balls, and waking up to the fact that, since a big jump in exchange insurance rates played into last election, a big drop in rates would save their asses in the next.

    Otherwise: fuck the GOP. I don't know a single conservative who actually likes the GOP, it's merely the barely lesser evil. The pendulum swing that brought us Trump has just begun, and unless the GOP is nimble, it won't survive as a party to the end of it all. And if the Dems aren't scared by the level of support Bernie got, they should wake up - that wave is still rising, too.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  14. Trust him? by myid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here's a quote from Mark Zuckerberg:

    Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard
    Zuck: Just ask
    Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS
    [Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one?
    Zuck: People just submitted it.
    Zuck: I don't know why.
    Zuck: They "trust me"
    Zuck: Dumb fucks