Slashdot Mirror


A Coal-Fired Power Plant In India Is Turning Carbon Dioxide Into Baking Soda (technologyreview.com)

schwit1 quotes a report from MIT Technology Review: In the southern Indian city of Tuticorin, locals are unlikely to suffer from a poorly risen cake. That's because a coal-fired thermal power station in the area captures carbon dioxide and turns it into baking soda. Carbon capture schemes are nothing new. Typically, they use a solvent, such as amine, to catch carbon dioxide and prevent it from escaping into the atmosphere. From there, the CO2 can either be stored away or used. But the Guardian reports that a system installed in the Tuticorin plant uses a new proprietary solvent developed by the company Carbon Clean Solutions. The solvent is reportedly just slightly more efficient than those used conventionally, requiring a little less energy and smaller apparatus to run. The collected CO2 is used to create baking soda, and it claims that as much as 66,000 tons of the gas could be captured at the plant each year. Its operators say that the marginal gain in efficiency is just enough to make it feasible to run the plant without a subsidy. In fact, it's claimed to be the first example of an unsubsidized industrial plant capturing CO2 for use. schwit1 notes: "A 'climate change' project that doesn't involve taxpayer dollars? Is that even allowed?"

6 of 197 comments (clear)

  1. So wait, where do they get the sodium? by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since it's sodium bicarbonate. I guess they could get it from sea water but then I'd wonder what happens to the left over chloride ions.

    --
    Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
  2. What was that last parting shot at the end for? by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For one thing, it's got nothing to do with climate change. This is kinda like why I oppose nuclear: it needs to be cheaper and more profitable to do the _right_ thing than the wrong thing or unregulated businesses will do the wrong thing. Every. Figgin. Time. If they didn't they'd be run out of business by the guy who did (and used the cost savings to under cut them).

    This is what we sometimes call a "Happy Accident". Like all such things I'm highly skeptical. Anyone want to shoot holes in it? e.g. what other industrial run offs might they have that they're not mentioning...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  3. 66000 tons of CO2 would produce 126000 Tons NaHCO3 by wizzerking · · Score: 4, Interesting

    66000 tons is 59874192840 grams of CO2 Divide by the molecular weight of CO2 of 44g/mole or 1360777110 moles of CO2 per year If this process uses teh standard process of converting CO2 to NaHCO3 CO2 + 2 NaOH -> Na2CO3 + H20 Na2CO3 + CO2 + H2O -> 2NaHCO3 Then for every mole of CO2 converted there is also 1 mole of NaHCO3 which has a molecular weight of 88 grams per mole so Converting 66000 tons of CO2 to NaHCO3 will result in 1360777110 moles * 84 g/Mole = 114305277240 grams NaHCO3 or 126,000 tons per year According to http://www.madehow.com/Volume-... only 32000 tons were sold in 1990 a decrease from previous sales So the NaHCO3 produced from THIS ONE PLANT WOULD INCREASE THE WORLD NEED FOR SALES BY NEARLY 400% so yep we are going to be burying this NaHCO3 SOMEWHERE THERE IS NO MARKET AT THIS TIME

  4. That's nice by Namarrgon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Kudos for finding a new use for some of the excess CO2, but it's still only a tiny fraction of the plant's CO2 output.

    Given an estimated 13 million tonnes of CO2 emitted annually (based on the 14.9 million tonnes emitted by the 1200 MW Chandrapur plant), then capturing 66 kilotonnes still allows 99.5% of the CO2 to escape.

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  5. Let's look at how much they are using/making by justthinkit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    CO2
    44 g/mole

    Baking Soda
    NaHCO3
    84 g/mole

    NaOH
    40 g/mole

    The reaction is CO2 + NaOH => NaHCO3

    So 44 g CO2 + 40 g NaOH => 84 g NaHCO3

    So to capture 66,000 tons of CO2, you need 10/11*66,000 tons of NaOH (i.e. 60,000 tons) and you get 126,000 tons of soap.

    Lets say a family of four uses 1/4 pound of soap per month. This would make enough soap for 100,000,000
    people (each month/indefinitely).

    Bulk cost of NaOH is $125/ton, so the 60,000 tons of NaOH needed would cost $7,500,000.

    --
    I come here for the love
  6. Re:Sorry, I wasn't being clear by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Actually three former execs are being prosecuted over the Fukushima disaster. It has taken a long time to gather evidence and build a case, but hopefully there will eventually be jail time for those guys.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC